政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134875
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51133195      線上人數 : 894
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134875


    題名: 企業租稅負擔與工作機會成長
    Business Tax Burden and Employment Growth
    作者: 曾立中
    Tzeng, Li-Chung
    貢獻者: 何怡澄
    郭振雄
    曾立中
    Tzeng, Li-Chung
    關鍵詞: 租稅負擔
    工作機會成長率
    勞動密集度
    現金持有
    Tax burden
    Employment growth rate
    Labor-intensive
    Cash holding
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2021-05-03 10:31:38 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本篇研究問題為企業租稅負擔與工作機會成長兩者之間的關聯性。期望藉由研究租稅負擔與工作成長的關聯程度，以預測當政府對企業減稅時，是否能夠創造出更多就業機會。透過理論的分析與實證的檢驗，本文得以評斷，減稅作為一種政策工具，其有效性為何。

    在理論基礎上，藉由哈柏格兩要素兩部門一般均衡模型可以得知，當勞動與資本呈現互補關係，且政府課徵資本要素稅時，減稅可創造更多就業機會。另一方面，如若企業屬勞力密集型態產業，就業機會提升的幅度更大。另參照相關實證研究成果，本文亦將企業的現金持有比率以及給定的工作機會成長率納入考量，檢視減稅的效果，是否在現金持有較少的企業及給定工作機會成長率較高的企業上更明顯。

    實證分析部分，本文選用租稅規避指標以量測企業租稅負擔程度。並且採用最小平方法模型、分量迴歸模型以及邏輯斯迴歸模型等三種方法以估計租稅負擔程度與工作機會成長間的關聯性。結果顯示，當企業租稅負擔下降時，其工作機會成長率確實上升。而上升的程度在以下三者情況下會更高，分別是現金持有比率偏高時、勞動密集程度偏高時以及給定工作機會成長率偏高時。除了現金持有比率外，其他研究結果皆與現有之理論實證文獻相符。現金持有比率部分，有待後續更嚴謹之理論建構與實證分析加以解釋。

    另一方面，本文也跳脫過去的研究框架，除了成長率外，另以機率的方式呈現租稅負擔對勞動投入的影響。根據邏輯斯迴歸模型的結果，企業租稅負擔下降時，其開闢新工作的機率也會上升。因此不論使用成長率或是機率作為衡量標準，租稅負擔對於勞動投入皆具有正面影響。
    The thesis is dealing with the relationship between business tax burden and employment growth. By discussing the topic, we can predict whether companies create more jobs when they encounter tax breaks. The combination of theory and empirical data helps us to examine the effectiveness of tax reduction as a policy to promote employment growth.

    According to the general equilibrium analysis, taken by A.C Harberger, tax breaks can create more employment opportunities under the circumstance that labor and capital are complementary factors and the government only taxes on capital owners. Moreover, factor allocation plays an important role. The more labor-intensive a corporate is, the more jobs it can provide during the tax break period. Besides, present empirical results let us know that the given rate of cash holding and employment growth are also moderating variables which we should take into account.

    When it comes to data analysis, this article chose tax avoidance as a way to measure business tax burden. With ordinary least square model, quantile regression model, and logistic regression model, we can estimate the relation between tax burden and employment growth. The result reveals a positive correlation among these two variables. Given the high rate of cash holding, labor-intensive, and employment growth, the positive correlation tends to be even stronger. Expect for cash holding, all research outcomes are consistent with the present literature. Future theoretical construction and positive analysis should be taken seriously to explore the role of cash holding in this topic.

    Unlike present literature, this article applies probability as an additional way to measure the influence of tax burden. Based on the result of logistic regression model, the probability of creating new jobs will rise when the business tax burden declines. Therefore, no matter what measurement we apply, tax burden and labor input have a positive correlation.
    參考文獻: 工商時報，2019，盤點川普稅改周年的成效，檢索於2020年12月12日，https://view.ctee.com.tw/economic/8721.html。
    全國法規資料庫，nd，中小企業增僱員工薪資費用加成減除辦法，檢索於2020年12月5日，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0140014。
    陳聽安與陳國樑，2018，川普2017稅改之透視與剖析，財稅研究，47(5)，1-24。
    張豐淦、江育維與梁芮綺，2020，《稅務篇》美國稅改重點解析，檢索於2021年2月1日，https://www2.deloitte.com/tw/tc/pages/tax/articles/2018-outlook-internationaltax.html。
    Anderson, S. & Pizzigati, S..2017. Corporate tax cuts boost CEO pay, not jobs. https://inequality.org/research/report-corporate-tax-cuts
    boost-ceo-pay-not-jobs/. Accessed DEC.10,2020.
    Auerbach, Alan J..1979.“Wealth maximization and the cost of capital.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 93:433–446.
    Bartik, T.J..1992.“The Effects of State and Local Taxes on
    Economic Development: A Review of Recent Research.”
    Economic Development Quarterly 6(1):102–110.
    Bradford, David F..1981.“The incidence and allocation effects of a tax on corporate distributions.”Journal of Public Economics 15:1–22.
    Desai,M.,& Dharmapala,D..2009.“Corporate tax avoidance and firm value.”Review of Economics and Statistics 91:537-546.
    Dyreng,S.,Hanlon,M.& Maydew,E..2008.“Long-run corporate tax avoidance.” The Accounting Review 83:61-82.
    Feldstein, Martin S..1970.“Corporate taxation and dividend behavior.” Review of Economic Studies 37:57–72.
    Frank,M.,Lynch,L.& Rego,S..2009.“Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting.” The Accounting Review 84:467-496.
    Hanlan,M.,& Heitzman .2010.“A review of tax research.”Journal of Accounting and Economics 50:127-178.
    Harberger, Arnold C..1962.“The incidence of the corporation income tax.” Journal of Political Economy 70:215–240.
    Joint Committee on Taxation.2017.Macroeconomic analysis of the cofference agreement for H.R.1,The“ Tax cuts and Jobs act”.Washington DC.Joint Committee on Taxation.
    Koenker,R.& Basset,G.Jr..1978.“Regression Quantiles.”Ecometrica 46(1):33-50.
    Kouparitsas,M.,Prihardini,D.& Beames,A..2016.“Analysis of the long term effects of a company tax cut.”Working Paper, Australian Government.
    Leigh, A..2018.“Do firms that pay less company tax create more jobs?”Economic Analysis and Policy 59:25-28.
    Ljungqvist, A. & Smolyansky, M..2016. To Cut or Not to Cut? On the Impact of Corporate Taxes on Employment and Income. http://dx.doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2016.006. Accessed NOV.20,2020.
    Martin,J..2020.“Dividend Taxes, Employment, and Firm Productivity.”Working Paper, Otto Beisheim School of Management.
    Martinez,A.& Silva,R..2019.“Do Brazilian Publicly Traded Companies That Pay Less Tax Create More Jobs?”Revista Catarinense da Ciência Contábil 19:1-15.
    Mills,L..1998.“Book-tax differences and Internal Revenue Service adjustments.”Journal of Accounting Research 36(2):343-356.
    Romer,C.& D.Romer..2010.“The Macroeconomic Effects of
    Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks.”American Economic Review 100(3):763–801.
    Shuai,X.& Chmura, C..2013.“The Effect of State Corporate Income Tax Rate Cuts on Job Creation.”Business Economics 48(3):183-193.
    Wilson,R..2009.“An examination of corporate tax shelter participants.”The Accounting Review 84:969-999.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    107255031
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107255031
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100421
    顯示於類別:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    503101.pdf2257KbAdobe PDF20檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋