政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134454

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134454

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51125696 Online Users : 924

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Education > Department of Education > Theses > Item 140.119/134454

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134454

Title:	聽力元認知策略教學對元認知意識和聽力理解影響之後設分析 Meta-analysis of the influence of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension
Authors:	楊燦 Yang, Can
Contributors:	吳政達郭昭佑 Wu, Cheng-Ta Kuo, Chao-Yu 楊燦 Yang, Can
Keywords:	聽力元認知教學策略元認知元認知意識聽力理解後設分析 metacognitive strategy instruction metacognitive metacognitive awareness listening comprehension meta-analysis
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-04-01 11:26:47 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	近年來，元認知成為心理學研究的熱點之一，並在深刻地影響著第二語言教育領域。聽力元認知策略教學的研究文獻日益增添，並展現出了不同的研究結果。為了整合這些相關的研究成果和發現，本研究主要瞭解不同背景的學生在元認知策略教學的指導下是否在元認知意識和聽力理解方面有差異為目的，借由探討，分析變項，希望厘清各個變項之間的關係。本研究對SCOPUS, WOS 以及EBSCO三個資料庫進行了全面的搜索。最終納入了30個研究樣本進行分析，並探究了5個調節變項。研究結果發現，聽力元認知策略教學對學生元認知意識和聽力理解有顯著影響。聽力元認知策略教學對元意識水準影響合併後的總效果量為0.476，屬於中等效果量；對元認知意識五大因素的整體分析結果顯示，元認知策略教學對學生的計畫與評估意識，問題解決意識和定向注意意識有顯著影響。對聽力理解影響的總體效果為0.952，屬於高強度效果。影響其有效性的變數包括教學環境，學生的語言熟練程度以及介入時間的長短。聽力元認知策略教學對第二語言聽力意識的影響可能是複雜的，雖然存在理論聯繫，但元認知策略教學對元認知意識發展的影響仍不確定，還需要進一步的研究。最後，本研究對未來聽力元認知策略教學提供了研究建議。 Metacognition has become one of the hot topics in psychology and has exerted a profound influence on the field of second language education in recent years. The research literature of Metacognitive strategy instruction (MSI) is increasing and different research results are presented. In order to integrate these relevant research results and findings, this study aims to explore whether students with different backgrounds have differences in metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension under the guidance of MSI in listening by discussing and analyzing the variations. Hoping to clarify the relationships among various variables. The SCOPUS, WOS and EBSCO databases were searched in the study. 30 research samples were included for analysis, and 5 moderator variables were explored. The results show that the MSI has a significant effect on students` metacognitive awareness and listening comprehension. The combined effect of MSI on metacognitive level was 0.476, which was a medium effect. Meanwhile, the results also showed MSI has a significant impact on learners` awareness of planning and evaluation, problem solving and directed attention. The overall effect on listening comprehension was 0.952, which was a high-intensity effect. Variables that affect its effectiveness include the teaching environment, students` language proficiency, and the length of the intervention. The influence of MSI on the listening awareness of the second language may be complex. Although there are theoretical connections, the influence of MSI on the development of metacognitive awareness is still uncertain and needs further research. In the conclusion, the study provides suggestions for the future study of MSI.
Reference:	林資荃（2014）。統合分析(Meta-analysis)簡介。RegMed，48，6-17。李茂能（2015）。傳統整合分析理論與實務：ESS & EXCEL。台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。文秋芳、王立非（2004）。影響外語學習策略系統運行的各種因素評述。外語與外語教學，9，28-32。王丹、翟俊霞、牟振雲、宗紅俠、趙曉東、王學義、顧平（2009）。Meta分析中的異質性及其處理方法。中國循證醫學雜誌，9(10)，1115-1118。謝進昌（2010）。國內教育學門系統性文獻評閱策略及後設分析發展現況與建議。教育研究學報，4(2)，133-156。https://doi.org/10.7029/JES.201010.0133 Anderson, N. J. (2002). The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest. Arnold, J. (2000). Seeing through listening comprehension exam anxiety. TESOL quarterly, 34(4), 777-786. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587791 * Al-Jahwari, M., Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., Al-Barwani, T., & Abdulraheim, A. (2019). The Effect of Metacognitive Listening Strategy Instruction on Omani Grade 11 EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension and their Metacognitive Listening Awareness. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(9),256-275. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.9.14 Bernhardt, S. (1997). Self-efficacy and second language learning. The NCLRC Language Resource, 1(5). Borenstein, M. (2005). Software for publication bias. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments, 193-220. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/0470870168 Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1088-1101. Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. ISRN Education, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/734085 Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149-161. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10904018.2013.861303 Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons. Bozorgian, H., & Padiav, B. (2015). The Role of Metacognitive Instruction through Pedagogical Cycle on Metacognitive Awareness of EFL Learners: Gender Difference Focus. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 2(2), 99-117. Bozorgian, H., & Alamdari, E. F. (2018). Multimedia listening comprehension: Metacognitive instruction or metacognitive instruction through dialogic interaction. ReCALL: The Journal of EUROCALL, 30(1), 131. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0958344016000240 Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember; a problem of metacognition. Advances in instructional psychology, 1. Carr, M., Kurtz, B. E., Schneider, W., Turner, L. A., & Borkowski, J. G. (1989). Strategy acquisition and transfer among American and German children: Environmental influences on metacognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.25.5.765 Cao, Z., & Lin, Y. (2020). A Study on Metacognitive Strategy Use in Listening Comprehension by Vocational College Students. English Language Teaching, 13(4), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n4p127 Chamot, A. U., & O`malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587323 Chen, C. C., & Tseng, D. S. (2017). “I give up and stop listening”: Fostering metacognitive listening strategy awareness in the English classrooms in Taiwan. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 4(11). https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.411.3268 Cho, Y. A. (2017). Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in L2 Listening Development for EFL College Students. 영어영문학연구, 43(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.21559/aellk.2017.43.3.009 Coskun, A. (2010). The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Training on the Listening Performance of Beginner Students. Online Submission, 4(1), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.902315 Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155 Cochran, W. G. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001666 Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809103446 Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT journal, 65(4), 408-416. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq073 Davis, J., Mengersen, K., Bennett, S., & Mazerolle, L. (2014). Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 511. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-511 Dousti, H., & Abolfathiasl, H. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy Training on EFL learners’ listening sub-skills performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 2(4), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.827 Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). Trim and fill: a simple funnel‐plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta‐analysis. Biometrics, 56(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen. Fiani, A., Suherdi, D., & Musthofa, B. (2019). The Impact of Metacognitive Instruction on EFL Students’ Listening Comprehension and Metacognitive Awareness in Lubuk Linggau. In UNNES International Conference on English Language Teaching, Literature, and Translation (ELTLT 2018). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/eltlt-18.2019.28 Fathi, J., & Hamidizadeh, R. (2019). The Contribution of Listening Strategy Instruction to Improving Second Language Listening Comprehension: A Case of Iranian EFL Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1222a Fahim, M., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2014). Maximizing learners’ metacognitive awareness in listening through metacognitive instruction: An empirical study. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 3(3), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2014.762 Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence. https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v6i3.8537 Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34(10), 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 Gavaghan, D. J., Moore, R. A., & McQuay, H. J. (2000). An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain, 85(3), 415-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00302-4 Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003 Goh, C. (1997). Metacognitive awareness and second language listeners. ELT journal, 51(4), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.4.361 Goh, C. C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners` listening comprehension problems. System, 28(1), 55-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3 Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT journal, 60(3), 222-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002 Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC journal, 39(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184 Goh, C. C. M. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. English language teaching materials: Theory and practice, 179-206. Goh, C. C., & Hu, G. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language awareness, 23(3), 255-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.769558 Graham, S. (2003). Learner strategies and advanced level listening comprehension. Language Learning Journal, 28(1), 64-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730385200221 Graham, S., & Santos, D. (2015). Strategies for second language listening: Current scenarios and improved pedagogy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.010 Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower‐intermediate learners of French. Language learning, 58(4), 747-783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00478.x Garfield, E., Malin, M. V., & Small, H. (1983). Citation data as science indicators. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL quarterly, 29(2), 261-297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625 Hasan, A. S. (2000). Learners` perceptions of listening comprehension problems. Language Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666595 Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13(1), 75-78. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164953 Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (2014). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic press. Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis. Statistics in medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186 Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Bmj, 327(7414), 557-560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 Higgins, M. D., Green, R. J., & Leeson, M. S. (2011). Optical wireless for intravehicle communications: A channel viability analysis. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 61(1), 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2011.2176764 Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?. Psychological methods, 11(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193 Jerotijević-Tišma, D. (2016). Improving listening comprehension skills relying on metacognitive strategies-focus on vocabulary and specific l2 instruction. Zbornik Instituta za pedagoska istrazivanja, 48(2), 301-320. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1602301J Khonamri, F., & Ahmadi, F. (2015). THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY TRAINING AND RAISING EFL LEARNERS’METACOGNITIVE KNOWLEDGE ON LISTENING PERFORMANCE. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v5i1.827 Kintsch, W., & Walter Kintsch, C. B. E. M. A. F. R. S. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00090-9 Kiany, G. R., & Shiramiry, E. (2002). The Effect of Frequent Dictation on the Listening Comprehension Ability of Elementary EFL Learners. TESL Canada Journal, 20(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v20i1.938 Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. SAGE publications, Inc. Lye, S. E. & Goh, L. H. (2017). Embedded and Direct Metacognitive Strategy Instruction and its Effects on the Metacognitive Awareness of Tertiary Level Malaysian ESL Listeners. Language & Translation, 5(4), 172-180. Maftoon, P., & Fakhri Alamdari, E. (2020). Exploring the effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on metacognitive awareness and listening performance through a process-based approach. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1250632 Marshakova, I. V. (1973). Bibliographic coupling system based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya, Ser, 2(6), 3-8. Mendelsohn, D. J., & Rubin, J. (1995). A guide for the teaching of second language listening. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press. Mohammadian, A., Khoshsima, H., & Dehghani, N. (2016). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on Iranian intermediate EFL learners‟ metacognitive awareness in listening. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 305-318. https://doi.org/10.24200/mjll.vol7iss1pp8-17 Morley, J. (1984). Listening and Language Learning in ESL: Developing Self-Study Activities for Listening Comprehension Practice. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, No. 59. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich International, Orlando, FL 32887. Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. A guide for the teaching of second language listening, 132-150. Nosratinia, M., Ghavidel, S., & Zaker, A. (2015). Teaching Metacognitive Strategies through Anderson’s Model: Does It Affect EFL Learners’ Listening Comprehension?. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(6), 1233-1243. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0506.16 Osada, N. (2001). What Strategy Do Less Proficient Learners Employ in Listening Comprehension?: A Reappraisal of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 73-90. Oz, H. (2016). The importance of personality traits in students’ perceptions of metacognitive awareness. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 655-667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.090 Ozeki, N. (2000). Listening strategy instruction for female EFL college students in Japan. O`Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner‐Manzanares, G. L. O. R. I. A., Russo, R. P., & Küpper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL quarterly, 19(3), 557-584. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586278 O`Malley, J. M., O`Malley, M. J., Chamot, A. U., & O`Malley, J. M. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/415153 Osada, N. (2001). What Strategy Do Less Proficient Learners Employ in Listening Comprehension?: A Reappraisal of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Processing. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 73-90. Pei, T., & Suwanthep, J. (2019). Effects of web-based metacognitive listening on Chinese university EFL learners` listening comprehension and metacognitive awareness. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 480-492. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20246 Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, 1, 15-51. Price, D. D. S. (1976). A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. Journal of the American society for Information science, 27(5), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270505 Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2013). The impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ listening comprehension and oral language proficiency. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 32(2), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.22099/JTLS.2013.1555 Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 162-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.902315 Rahimirad, M., & Moini, M. R. (2015). The challenges of listening to academic lectures for EAP learners and the impact of metacognition on academic lecture listening comprehension. Sage Open, 5(2), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015590609 Rasouli, M., Mollakhan, K., & Karbalaei, A. (2013). The effect of metacognitive listening strategy training on listening comprehension in Iranian EFL context. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2(1), 115. Richards, J. C., & Richards, J. C. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667152.002 Rost, M. (2002). Listening tasks and language acquisition. In JALT 2002 at Shizuoka Conference Proceedings. Retrieved September, 25 , 2012. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Effect sizes: Pearson`s correlation, its display via the BESD, and alternative indices. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.10.1086 Rost, M. (2005). L2 Listening. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 527-552. Routledge. Rost, M. (2013). Teaching and researching: Listening. Routledge. Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological bulletin, 86(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638 Rosenthal, R. (1986). Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Science Research Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, 1984, 148 pp. Educational Researcher, 15(8), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015008018 Schulze, R. (2004). Meta-analysis: A comparison of approaches. Hogrefe Publishing. Selamat, S., & Sidhu, G. K. (2013). Enhancing listening comprehension: The role of metacognitive strategy instruction (MetSI). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 421-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.111 Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2 Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719050100006X Sastry, M. M., & Joy, A. S. (2018). The Impact of Metacognitive Listening Instruction on the Performance of Engineering Undergraduate Students in IELTS. language, 2, 2. Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000263 Taguchi, K. (2017). Metacognitive listening strategy instruction for EFL learners. The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences, Toyo University, 19, 63-83. Taheri, P., & Hedayat Zade, M. (2018). The Contribution of Metacognitive Strategies to EFL Learners` Listening Comprehension Task Types. Teaching English Language, 12(2), 169-198. https://doi.org/10.22132/TEL.2018.82864 Tabeei, S., Tabrizi, A. R., & Ahmadi, G. (2013). The effect of metacognitive strategies instruction on listening comprehension of Iranian EFL learners: Focusing on gender. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 13-29. *Tanewong, S. (2019). Metacognitive pedagogical sequence for less-proficient Thai EFL listeners: A comparative investigation. RELC Journal, 50(1), 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218754942 Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension?. Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01246.x Veenman, M. V., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and learning, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0 Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232 Vandergrift, L. (2004). 1. Listening to learn or learning to listen?. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017 Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language learning, 56(3), 431-462. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language teaching, 40(3), 191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004338 Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language learning, 60(2), 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2012.10.004 Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language learning, 53(3), 463-496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00232 Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency?. The modern language journal, 90(1), 6-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00381.x Wampler, K. S. (1982). Bringing the review of literature into the age of quantification: Meta-analysis as a strategy for integrating research findings in family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1009-1023. https://doi.org/10.2307/351460 Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning1. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515 Yang, C. (2009). A Study of Metacognitive Strategies Employed by English Listeners in an EFL Setting. International Education Studies, 2(4), 134-1139. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n4p134 Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18, 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813505395 Zarrabi, F. (2016). The Impact of Listening Strategy Training on the Meta-Cognitive Listening Strategies Awareness of Different Learner Types. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 154-165. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n5p154 Zoler, A. C. (2010). Effects of Listening Strategies Instruction on Listening Comprehension, Oral Proficiency, and Metacognition on Second Language Learners.
Description:	博士國立政治大學教育學系 107152517
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152517
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100407
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Education] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
251701.pdf		2307Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback