政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134449

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Master for Eminent Public Administrators > Theses > Item 140.119/134449

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134449

Title:	決策樹應用於國軍戰力防護之研究-以空軍防空飛彈部隊為例 Research on decision tree applied to Force Protection—air defense missile force as an example
Authors:	王鐙鶴 Wang, Zeng-Ho
Contributors:	白仁德 Pai, Jen-Te 王鐙鶴 Wang, Zeng-Ho
Keywords:	決策樹模糊德爾菲法層級分析法防空飛彈戰力防護 Decision tree Fuzzy Delphi Method Analytic Hierarchy Process Air defense missile Force Protection
Date:	2021
Issue Date:	2021-04-01 11:25:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	摘要我國目前有愛國者、天弓及鷹式飛彈等3種不同型態的中、高空防空飛彈部隊，各部隊具有不同的各項參數，加上各部隊所面臨的戰場環境及單位戰力不同，決策者在選擇行動時更需要以客觀的科學方式作出決策。本研究藉由文獻回顧獲得影響防空飛彈部隊戰力防護行動決策的因素，區分為防護對象、執行時間、我軍作戰能力及敵人作戰能力等4個構面，以模糊德爾菲法遴選出12項指標，分別是指揮所、重要設施、友軍地面防衛部隊、飛彈陣地、戰鬥前、自作戰開始至結束、裝備妥善狀況、我軍武器命中率、預備戰術位置數量、敵軍武器命中率、敵軍武器數量、敵軍武器破壞程度等，並以層級分析法衡量各指標的權重，藉由各防空飛彈部隊的模擬資料庫和共軍攻臺方式的模擬情境之建立，運用訓練集決策樹模型推論各情境中防空飛彈部隊的行動是否符合防空作戰及戰力保存的需求並進行分析。在分析戰力防護各項指標的過程中，發現敵人命中率指標是我方無法控制的變數，經過敏感度分析後發現飛彈部隊的裝備妥善率及指揮所數量對飛彈部隊戰力防護行動決策有很大的影響，因此若能針對獲得零件及飛彈相對較費時間的美系裝備提高戰備存量，將能提高飛彈部隊的戰場存活率。另外在指揮所數量的策略方面，若能將海、空軍指揮所平均設立於不同的地區，將有助於減少選擇防空作戰行動的防空飛彈部隊，提高其戰場存活率。 Abstract Currently, there are three different types of medium- and high-altitude air defense missile forces in Taiwan: Patriot, Tiangong, and HAWK missiles. Each unit has different parameters. In addition, each unit faces different battlefield environments and different unit combat capabilities. Decision makers need to make decisions in an objective and scientific way when choosing their defensive actions. This research uses a literature review to determine the factors that influence the decision-making of air defense missile forces’ combat effectiveness protection actions, and divides them into four dimensions: protection object, execution time, our combat capability, and enemy combat capability, in order to select and measure the total weight of each facet. The weights of 12 indicators are used to establish a database on each air defense missile force, simulate the situation of an army attacking Taiwan, and use the training set decision tree model to infer whether the actions of the air defense missile force in each situation meet the requirements of successful air defense operations and combat strength preservation. In the process of analyzing the various indicators of combat power protection, it was found that the enemy`s hit rate index was a variable regarding which we could not control. After conducting a sensitivity analysis, it was found that the missile force’s equipment adequacy rate and the number of command posts had a significant effect on the decision-making of the missile force’s combat power protection actions. As these factors exert a great impact, if we can increase the combat readiness inventory for the relatively time-consuming American equipment to obtain parts and missiles, it will increase the battlefield survival rate of the missile force. In addition, in terms of the strategy of the number of command posts, if the naval and air force command posts can be equally set up in different areas, it will help reduce the number of air defense missile units that choose air defense operations, and increase their survival rate on the battlefield.
Reference:	中文文獻中華民國108年國防報告書編篡委員會（2019）。中華民國108年國防報告書。台北: 國防部。王小璠（2005）。多準則決策分析。台中市: 滄海書局。王逸雲、郭晃男（2019）。中共軍機繞臺對我國謀略戰之運用與影響—以平、戰時為例。陸軍學術雙月刊，55（565），54-73。吳明隆，張毓仁（2017）。R軟體在決策樹的實際應用。台北市: 五南出版社。易思安（2018）。中共攻台大解密。臺北市: 遠流出版事業股份有限公司。孫旭、何樹才、孫快吉、黎曉明（2003）。世界軍武發展史．飛彈篇。新北市: 世茂出版社。袁梅宇（2015）。王者歸來 WEKA機器學習與大數據聖經。台北市: 佳魁資訊. 康思明（2018）。承認台灣主權、和平統一、維持現狀、或相互交鋒：評估習近平、川普、及蔡英文執政下台海關係之影響及未來趨勢。國立政治大學社會科學學院論文，未出版，台北。張保隆、陳瑋玲（2007）。企業策略與競爭分析。臺北市: 臺灣培生教育。郭舜詠（2014）。共軍新型軍管民用滾裝船隻運載能量研究。陸軍學術雙月刊，50（534），58-74。陳宗和（1992）。謀略戰。台北: 政戰學校。陳修逸、馬煥棟（2016）。我國潛艦國造構型探討─由國際現役潛艦分析。海軍軍官，35（4），10-27。楊仕樂（2003年）。攻擊-防禦理論、空權發展與台海穩定。全球政治評論，3，155-169。葉可蔚（1970）。海軍損害管制教範。臺北: 海軍總司令部。詹仁吉（2019）。淺談中共滾裝式貨輪發展與軍事運用。海軍學術雙月刊，53（5），105-117。詹浩名（2000）。Y2K國軍武裝報告書。台北市: 雲皓出版社。榮泰生（2018）。EXPERT CHOICE 在分析層級程序法(AHP)之應用。台北市: 五南出版社。鄧振源、曾國雄（1989）。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（上）。中國統計學報，27（6），5-22。鄧振源、曾國雄（1989）。層級分析法（AHP）的內涵特性與應用（下）。中國統計學報，27（7），1-20。蕭英煜（2013）。美軍作戰程序-執行（Execution）之初探。黃埔學報，65，175-184。謝台喜（2009）陸軍野戰防空與聯合防空關係之探討。陸軍步兵季刊，76-92。衛萬里、張文智（2005）。應用模糊德爾菲與分析網路程序法選擇最佳產品設計方案之研究。設計學報，10（3），59-80。英文文獻 Air Force Doctrine 3-10. (2011.7). Force Protection. U.S.: Doctrine Development and Education. Allied joint doctrine for Force Protection. (2015.4). Allied Joint publication-3.14. Nato Standardization office (NSO). AnderssonKent. (2018). On the Military Utility of Spectral Design in Signature Management: a Systems Approach. SWEDISH National Defence University. ANNEX 3-10 Force Protection. (2019.10). U.S.: Doctrine Development and Education. Army Support to Military Deception. (2019). Washington, DC: HEADQUARTERS, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY. ARMYDEPARTMENT OF THEHEADQUARTERS. (1984). COMBAT SKILLS of the SOLDIER. Washington, DC: JOHN A. WICKHAM, JR.(General, United States Army Chief of Staff). CaddellW.Joseph. (2004). DECEPTION 101―PRIMER ON DECEPTION. DOUGLAS C. LOVELACE, JR. .CassidyMRobert. ChurchillS.Winston. (2018). RNZAF Force Protection. RNZAF Air Power Development Centre. ConleyP.Hampton. (1988). A HISTORY OF CAMOUFLAGE, CONCEALMENT AND DECEPTION. Maxwell Alabama: AIR WAR COLLEGE. CreveldvanMartin. (1994). Air Power and Warfare. Alabama: Air University. DefenseStates Department of United. (1995). Joint Doctrine for Military Operations Other Than War. JOHN M. SHALIKASHVILI. DefenseStates Department of United. (2020). DOD Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. Independently Published. Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. (2016). WILLIAM E. GORTNEY. Eric K. Clemons、Jason A. Santamaria. (2002.4). Maneuver Warfare: Can Modern Military Strategy Lead You to Victory? Harvard Business Review. HEADQUARTERSOF THE ARMYDEPARTMENT. (2019). ADP 3-37 Protection. Washington, DC: MARK A. MILLEY General, United States Army. Judson Jen (2019.3). Homeland missile defense system takes out ICBM threat in historic salvo test. KoppCarloDr. (2006.2). Almaz S-300 – China`s “Offensive” Air Defense. international assessment and strategy center. LinoffS.Gordon. (2011). Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Relationship Management. John Wiley & Sons Inc. Medium Term Defense Program (FY 2019 - FY 2023). (2018.12). Japen. Military Deception. (2006). WALTER L. SHARP Lieutenant General, USA. MonroeD.James. (2012). DECEPTION: THEORY AND PRACTICE. NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL. The German Army’s Force Protection Philosophy. (2008.11). DOCTRINE, 61-65. ThomasL.Timothy. (2007.12). The Chinese Military`s STRATEGIC MIND-SET. Military Review, 47-55. WatkinsD.James. (1986.1). The Maritime Strategy. U.S. Naval Institute, 3-16. 網路資料火力發電概況（民109年6月）。臺灣電力公司網頁。取自https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=204 防空暨飛彈指揮部沿革史（民107年11月）。空軍司令部網頁。取自 https://air.mnd.gov.tw/TW/Unit/AirUnit_Detail.aspx?FID=6&CID=17&ID=38 空軍防空暨飛彈指揮部（民109年4月）。維基百科。取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%A9%BA%E8%BB%8D%E9%98%B2%E7%A9%BA%E6%9A%A8%E9%A3%9B%E5%BD%88%E6%8C%87%E6%8F%AE%E9%83%A8 教育部（民109年6月)。教育部語文成果網。取自https://language.moe.gov.tw/001/Upload/Files/site_content/M0001/respub/index.html 煉製事業部（民109年1月）。台灣中油股份有限公司網頁。取自 https://web.cpc.com.tw/division/rb/about.aspx 臺灣的水庫（民109年9月）。經濟部水利署水利規劃試驗所網頁。取自https://www.wrap.gov.tw/pro13.aspx?type=0101030000 Korea Ministry of National Defense. (2016). 2016 DEFENSE WHITE PAPER. Retired from https://www.mnd.go.kr/cop/pblictn/selectPublicationUser.do?siteId=mndEN&componentId=51&categoryId=0&publicationSeq=777&pageIndex=1&id=mndEN_031300000000 Korea Ministry of National Defense. (2018). 2018 DEFENSE WHITE PAPER. Retired from https://english.defensie.nl/downloads/policy-notes/2018/03/26/ defence-white-paper WeinbergM.David. (2019.10). Prepare for war, the right way. Retired from The Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security: http://jiss.org.il/en/weinberg-prepare-for-war-the-right-way/
Description:	碩士國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程 108921318
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921318
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100394
Appears in Collections:	[Master for Eminent Public Administrators] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
131801.pdf		5811Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...