English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51145597      Online Users : 869
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/134431
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134431


    Title: 政府持股對企業CSR資訊揭露程度之影響—兼論機構投資人持股之交互作用
    The impact of government ownership to companies’ CSR disclosure–Interaction effect of institutional investors
    Authors: 張晏瑜
    Chang, Yen-Yu
    Contributors: 王文英
    張晏瑜
    Chang, Yen-Yu
    Keywords: CSR揭露程度
    政府持股
    機構投資人
    交互作用
    CSR disclosure
    Government ownership
    Institutional investors
    Interaction effect
    Date: 2021
    Issue Date: 2021-04-01 11:21:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 政府為企業揭露CSR資訊之重要利害關係人之一,惟當政府身兼企業所有權人身份,對企業CSR資訊揭露有何影響,尚乏相關研究。本研究目的主要係探討政府與外部機構投資人持股對企業CSR揭露程度之影響,並進一步檢視國內、外機構投資人持股比例在政府持股比例和上市櫃公司CSR揭露程度間是否存在正向或負向干擾。謹將本研究結論列示如下:
    一、樣本企業CSR經濟類別揭露狀況較佳,其餘類別揭露較不理想。
    二、政府持股比例越高,樣本企業CSR揭露程度越高。
    三、在揭露數量方面,國內、外機構投資人持股比例越高,樣本企業CSR整體及環境類別揭露程度越高。
    四、在揭露品質方面,國內、外機構投資人持股比例越高,樣本企業CSR資訊揭露程度越高,惟兩者造成影響之層面不盡相同。
    五、國外機構投資人持股比例在政府持股比例和樣本企業CSR資訊揭露程度間存在正向干擾。
    As one of the stakeholders, government plays an important role to companies’ CSR disclosure. However, few studies show the influence of government ownership on this issue. This study aims to analyze the impact of government and institutional investors ownership to companies’ CSR disclosure, furthermore, measuring the interaction effect of institutional investors ownership on the relationship between government ownership and the companies’ CSR disclosure. The conclusions of this study are as following:
    1.On average, the companies disclose more information in economic category than others.
    2.Government ownership was found positively related to companies’ CSR disclosure.
    3.Domestic and foreign institutional investors ownership was found positively related to the quantity of companies` CSR disclosure, especially in the environmental category.
    4.Domestic and foreign institutional investors ownership was found positively related to the quality of companies’ CSR disclosure, while the impact level are not quite similar.
    5.Foreign institutional investors ownership was found to have a positive interaction effect on the relationship between government ownership and companies’ CSR disclosure.
    Reference: 中文文獻
    全球永續性報告協會,2014,GRI G4永續性報告指南:報告原則與標準揭露,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、張仁杰與楊于縈譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    全球永續性報告協會,2016,GRI G4-準則條文對照表,社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會編譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    全球永續性報告協會,2017a,GRI 準則:報告原則與標準揭露,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、巫宜株、陳譽文、翁儷嘉、宋彥霆譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    全球永續性報告協會,2017b,GRI 準則詞彙表 2016:實施手冊,吳文雅、莫冬立、張凱評、陳科里、巫宜株、陳譽文、翁儷嘉、宋彥霆譯,台北:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。
    封昌宏,2018,公司盡企業社會責任的法律爭議,月旦會計網,第11期(11月):1-2。
    徐耀浤,2006,企業責任與投資環境:政府的功能與角色,應用倫理研究通訊,第40期(11月):18-32。
    陳雅萍與梁榮輝,2003,我國公股管理與公司治理之研究,華人經濟研究,第2期(9月):17-27。
    葉保強,2007,企業社會責任的發展與國家角色,應用倫理研究通訊,第41期(2月):35-47。
    詹鎮榮、趙偉傑、王井與張立瑾,2018,公股事業監督法制之檢討及革新,科技部補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
    劉紹樑、葉秋英、許正華、曾更瑩、江蘋與林雁琳,2003,已民營化事業(政府持股在二十%—四十九%)公股在公司治理中應扮演角色之探討,行政院經濟建設委員會專題研究報告。

    英文文獻
    Abbott, W.F., and R.J. Monsen. 1979. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. The Academy of Management Journal 22(3): 501-515.
    Akoglu, H. 2018. User`s guide to correlation coefficients. Turkish Journal of Emergency Medicine 18(3):91-93.
    Almquist, Y.B., S. Kvart, and L. Brännström. 2019. A practical guide to quantitative methods with SPSS. https://su.figshare.com/.
    Ballester, M., and C. Pilar. 2015. Investor reactions to socially responsible investment. Management Decision 53(3):571-604.
    Bartkus, B. R., S.A. Morris, and B. Seifert. 2002. Governance and corporate philanthropy: Restraining robin hood? Business and Society 41(3):319-344.
    Benesty, J., J. Chen, Y. Huang, and I. Cohen. 2009. Springer Topics in Signal Processing, Vol 2. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
    Beretta, S., and S. Bozzolan. 2004. A framework for the analysis of firm risk communication. The International Journal of Accounting 39(3): 265-288.
    Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review 4(4): 497-505.
    Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons 34(4): 39-48.
    Cespa, G., and G. Cestone. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Managerial Entrenchment. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy16(3):741-771.
    Chan, M.C., J. Watson, and D. Woodliff. 2013. Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics 125(1): 59-73.
    Chauvey, J.N., S. Giordano-Spring, C.H. Cho, and D.M. Patten. 2015. The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosure: Evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics 130(4):789-830.
    Cho, C.H., G. Michelon, D.M. Patten, and R.W. Roberts. 2015. CSR disclosure: The more things change ? Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 28(1):14-35.
    Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and F.P. Vasvari. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 33(4-5): 303-327.
    Cochran, P.L., and R.A. Wood. 1984. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of Management Journal 27(1):42-56.
    Cong, Y., and M. Freedman. 2011. Corporate governance and environmental performance and disclosures. Advances in Accounting 27 (2): 223-232.
    Cooke, T. E. 1992. The impact of size, stock market listing and industry type on disclosure in the annual reports of Japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research 22(87): 229-237.
    Cox, P., S. Brammer, and A. Millington. 2004. An empirical examination of institutional investor preferences for corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics 52(1):27-43.
    Dam, L., and B. Scholtens. 2013. Ownership concentration and CSR policy of European multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics 118(1):117-126.
    Davis, J. H. 1973. Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review 80(2):97-125.
    Dhaliwal, D.S., S. Radhakrishnan, A. Tsang, and Y.G. Yang. 2012. Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review 87(3):723-759.
    Drucker, P.F. 1984. A new look at corporate social responsibility. McKinsey Quarterly 2(4):17-28.
    Fox, T., H. Ward, and B. Howard. 2002. Public sector roles in strengthening corporate social responsibility: A baseline study(English). Washington, DC: World Bank.
    Freeman, R.E. 1984. A stakeholder approach to strategic management. Working Paper, University of Virginia.
    Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September13.
    Gamerschlag, R., K. Moller, and F. Verbeeten. 2011. Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical. Review of Managerial Science 5(2-3):233-262.
    Garde-Sanchez, R., M.V. López-Pérez, and A.M. López-Hernández. 2018. Current trends in research on social responsibility in state-owned enterprises: A review of the literature from 2000 to 2017. Sustainability 10(7):2403.
    Gjølberg, M. 2009. Measuring the immeasurable?: Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management 25(1):10-22.
    Graves, S.B., and S.A. Waddock. 1994. Institutional owners and corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Journal 37(4):1034-1046.
    Gul, F. A., and S. Leung. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23 (5): 351-379.
    Haniffa, R., and T.E. Cooke. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 24(5): 391-430.
    Harjoto, M.A., and J. Salas. 2017. Strategic and institutional sustainability: Corporate social responsibility, brand value, and Interbrand listing. Journal of Product and Brand Management 26(6): 545-558.
    Hu, Y.Y., Y. Zhu, J. Tucker, and Y. Hu. 2018. Ownership influence and CSR disclosure in China. Journal of Accounting Research 31(1):8-21.
    Jensen, M.C. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Working Paper, Harvard Business School.
    Kansal, M., M. Joshi, and G. Singh Batra. 2014. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from India. Advances in Accounting 30(1): 217-229.
    Keim, G. 1978. Managerial behavior and the social responsibilities debate: Goals versus constraints. Academy of Management Journal 21(1): 57-68.
    Khan, A., M. B. Muttakin, and J. Siddiqui. 2013. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2): 207-223.
    Kraemer, H. C., and C. M. Blasey. 2004. Centring in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 13(3):141-151.
    Krippendorff, K. 1980. Validity in Content Analysis. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
    Laufer, W.S. 2003. Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics 43(3):253-261.
    Lee, K. and J. Kim. 2009. Current status of CSR in the realm of supply management: The case of the Korean electronics industry. Supply Chain Management 14(2): 138-148.
    Li, T., and A. Belal. 2018. Authoritarian state, global expansion and corporate social responsibility reporting: The narrative of a Chinese state-owned enterprise. Accounting Forum 42(2):199-217.
    López-Iturriaga, F.J., and O. López-de-Foronda. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and reference shareholders: An analysis of European multinational firms. Transnational Corporations Review 3(3):17-33.
    Marquis, C., and C. Qian. 2014. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science 25(1):127-148.
    McWilliams, A., and D. Siegel. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review 26(1):117-127.
    Moneva, J.M., J.M. Rivera-Lirio, and M.J. Mun ̃oz-Torres. 2007. The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems 107(1):84-102.
    Moser, D.V., and P.R. Martin. 2012. A broader perspective on corporate social responsibility. Research in Accounting 87(3):797-806.
    Nakamura, E. 2013. The impact of shareholders’ types on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from Japanese firms. Journal of Global Responsibility 4(1): 113-130.
    Neubaum, D.O., and S.A. Zahra. 2006. Institutional ownership and corporate social performance. Journal of Management 32(1):108-131.
    Oh, W.Y., Y.K. Chang, and A. Martynov. 2011. The effect of ownership structure on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 104(2): 283-297.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(OECD). 2018. Ownership and governance of state-owned enterprises: A compendium of national practices. http://www.oecd.org/.
    Orlitzky, M., F.L. Schmidt, and S.L. Rynes. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies 24(3): 403-441.
    Preston, L.E., and D.P. O’Bannon. 1997. The corporate social-financial performance relationship. Business and Society 36(4):419-429.
    Roberts, R.W. 1992. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(6): 595-612.
    Roper, J., and J.R. Barker. 2011. Forum introduction: State-owned enterprises, corporate social responsibility, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly 25(4): 690-692.
    Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52(2): 737-783.
    Toms, J.S. 2002. Firm resources, quality signals and the determinants of corporate environmental reputation: Some UK evidence. British Accounting Review 34(3): 257-282.
    Ullmann, A. 1985. Data in search of a theory a critical examination of the relationship among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance. Academy of Management Review 10(3): 540- 577.
    Waddock, S.A., and S.B. Graves. 1997. The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4):303-319.
    Winter, J. C. F., S. D. Gosling, and J. Potter. 2016. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data. Psychological Methods 21(3):273-290.
    Wiseman, J. 1982. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting, Organizations and Society 7(1):53-63.
    Wolniak, R., and P. Habek. 2016. Assessing the quality of corporate social responsibility reports: The case of reporting practices in selected European Union member states. Quality & Quantity 50(1): 399-420.
    Young, S., and M. Marais. 2012. A multi‐level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance: An International Review 20(5): 432-450.

    參考網站
    公開資訊觀測站:http://mops.twse.com.tw/mops/web/t146sb05
    公務人員退休撫卹基金管理委員會:https://www.fund.gov.tw/Default.aspx
    全球永續性報告協會:https://www.globalreporting.org
    金融監督管理委員會:https://www.fsc.gov.tw/ch/index.jsp
    勞動部勞動基金運用局:https://www.blf.gov.tw/
    臺灣證券交易所:https://www.twse.com.tw/zh/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    106353012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106353012
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100386
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback