政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134430

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/134430

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51579549 Online Users : 1035

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Communication > Department of Journalism > Theses > Item 140.119/134430

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134430

Title:	蘋果日報工會創建歷程之紀錄與分析 Documenting and Analyzing the Formation of Apple Daily Union
Authors:	黃于庭 Huang, Yu-Ting
Contributors:	馮建三 Feng, Chien-San 黃于庭 Huang, Yu-Ting
Keywords:	蘋果日報媒體工會編輯室公約新聞自主勞動條件勞動意識 Apple Daily News Media Trade Union Editorial Autonomy Collective Agreement Labor Conditions Labor Consciousness
Date:	2014
Issue Date:	2021-04-01 11:20:54 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在瞭解歸納《蘋果日報》工會的創建過程，其在短時間創建、成功與資方簽訂了《編輯室公約》的影響因素大部份為時間及環境脈絡促成，其脈絡可分析如下：首先，新聞媒體傳出「旺旺中時媒體集團」即將併購壹傳媒，「旺中集團」旗下媒體立場鮮明，使得《蘋果日報》社內新聞工作者產生新聞自主權消失的危機感。其次，《蘋果日報》內新聞工作者，普遍對「蘋果精神」的認同，不願讓「蘋果精神」消失。此外，《蘋果日報》社內普遍對於主席黎智英感到信任甚至崇拜，壹傳媒併購案的爆發，造成社內員工的情緒激動，產生被背叛感。上述因素影響下，造成了《蘋果日報》社內新聞工作者組成工會的強烈動機。《蘋果日報》幹部利用社群媒體平台宣傳，也對於工會的組成、運動的動員、喚起公民的關注有很大幫助，《蘋果日報》工會的組成，前期的抗爭，得到許多關注與協助。由於「編輯室公約」的成功簽訂與壹傳媒交易案發展脈絡有關，「編輯室公約」簽訂後，編採自主程度並未改善太多，主因在於受限於妥協後的條款的工會力量不足以落實「編輯室公約」。《蘋果日報》編輯部門和印刷部門工作者勞動條件的需求和感受大不相同，印刷部門對於勞動條件的需求主要為基本勞工權益及福利，但編輯部們的新聞工作者主要訴求為擁有新聞自主權。尤其在現今報社積極發展即時新聞的趨勢下，工作量大增、工作壓力增加、報社卻大幅裁員，勞動條件大幅下降。雖然蘋果日報社內新聞工作者普遍肯定及支持蘋果日報工會爭取勞動權益及新聞自主，蘋果工會也提升了員工的勞動意識，但仍不足以清楚意識到積極致力於勞方增權對於自身勞動條件、新聞自主權的影響。《蘋果日報》工會短程目標為推動簽訂「團體協約」，藉此提升社內員工的勞動條件，並維持一定的工會會員人數，提高對資方協商的實力。 This research aims at understanding and analyzing the formation of Apple Daily Union. The formation of Apple Daily Union, and its further success in signing “Editorial Autonomy Agreement” with the management in a very short time was influenced by its chronological context, which can be analyzed as follows: first, the merge and acquisition of Apple Daily News by Want Want China Times Media Group created a sense of crisis that the journalists and editors will lose editorial autonomy after the acquisition. Secondly, workers in Apple Daily recognized there is something unique about Apple Daily as a press, and they also deeply identified with the spirit of this brand, which is ‘the spirit of Apple Daily,’ and not willing to see the spirit disappear. Lastly, the President of Apple Daily, Jimmy Chee-Ying Li, is a trustworthy, heroic icon to his employees. The employees became emotional after learning that Apple Daily was sold; they felt betrayed by President Lai. The aforementioned factors resulted in a strong motivation for the workers of Apple Daily to form the Apple Daily Union to fight for editorial autonomy and labor conditions. With the utilization of social media to promote the Union, the formation process, the aggregation of participants, and the early stage protest events, was aware of and greatly assisted by members, non-members and the general public. The editorial autonomy in the organization did not improve very much after signing the agreement, mainly because the power of Union was limited. The power of the Union was limited since they compromised on several causes. The labor condition of the editorial sections and printing sections are quite different. While workers in printing sections tend to demand on basic labors’ rights, workers in editorial section tends to demand on more editorial autonomy. News workers of Apple Daily approved and supported the achievement and value of the Apple Daily Union. Also, there is improvement on the workers’ labor consciousness; however, it is still not strong enough to motivate the workers actively participate in the movement to improve labor conditions. The Apple Daily Union is moving forward on advocacy of “Collective Bargaining Agreement” to achieve their goal of improving labor conditions, maintaining the number of members, and gaining their capability to bargain with the management.
Reference:	一、中文部份：朱若蘭（2002）。《台灣報業記者勞工意識的建構與轉變（1984~2002 年）》，國立政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。李宇美譯（2011）。《鄉民都來了：無組織的組織力量》。台北：貓頭鷹。（原書：Shirky, C. [2008]. Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. New York: Penguin Books.）。李靜怡譯（2014）。《勞工自主企業：創造經濟民主，挽救崩壞的資本主義與政治民主》。台北：麥田。（原書：Wolff, R. [2012] Democracy at Work: A Cure for Capitalism.Chicago: Haymarket Books.）李耀泰（2008）。〈長篇書評—擺盪在國家、市場與社會之間：歐美工會的內涵、變異及發展〉，《政治科學季評》，17: 1-12。林佳和（2012）。〈社會正義的基礎不當勞動行為裁決機制的前世今生〉，《搞工會》，台灣勞工陣線協會。林淳華（1996）。〈新聞記者工作自主權和決策參與權之研究〉，《新聞學研究》，52: 49-68。林富美（2002）。〈台灣媒體工會意識與集體行動之初探〉，《新聞學研究》，73: 63-94。林富美（2006）。《台灣新聞工作者與藝人：解析市場經濟下的文化勞動》。台北：秀威資訊科技股份有限公司。林富美（2007）。〈新聞工作者的浪漫與哀愁〉。《第八屆財團法人張思恒文教基金會》學術獎助。林麗雲（2013）。〈英國媒體併購管制中的公共利益－「新聞集團」併購「天空衛視」〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，3(2): 87-112。邱林川（2013）。《信息時代的世界工廠：新工人階級的網絡社會》。桂林：廣西師範大學出版社。洪貞玲（2013）。〈媒體集中之管制及個案－美國經驗〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，3(2): 113 - 139。張烽益（2012）。〈工會的哀與愁臺灣如何搞工會〉，《搞工會》，台灣勞工陣線協會。張錦華（2013）。〈無獨有偶？比較美國2003年反鬆綁運動和我國2012年反壟斷運動的異同〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，3(2): 27-63。陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南出版社。陳炳宏（2010）。〈媒體集團化與其內容多元之關聯性研究〉，《新聞學研究》，104: 1-30。陳娟、展江等譯（2012）。《比較媒介體制》。北京：中國人民大學。（原書：Hallin, D. C. & Mancini, P. [2004]. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.）傅明雅（2005）。《TVBS電視台員工勞動過程之分析》。新竹：交通大學社會與文化研究所碩士論文。游蓓茹（2013）。《台灣媒體記者駐點中國的工作控制與因應》。台北：政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。舒嘉興（2002）。《布爾迪厄新聞場域理論》，台北：桂冠。馮建三（2001）。〈台灣媒體工作者階級意識之初探 (1988-1997：以三家工會刊物為例 )〉，《邁向 21 世紀的台灣民族與國家論文集》，台北：吳三連台灣史料基金會。馮建三（2002）。〈台灣媒體改革運動八十年：1921-2002〉，《世紀中國》。74:119-126。管中祥、魏玓（2001）。〈「傳播學生鬥陣」與媒體運動－社會、媒體與「傳播學生鬥陣」〉，《當代》。162: 46-57。劉昌德（2008）。〈大媒體、小記者：報禁解除後的新聞媒體勞動條件與工作者組織〉，《新聞學研究》。劉蕙苓（2010）。〈置入性行銷對電視新聞專業自主的影響：一個自動態觀點的探索〉，《中華傳播學會年會論文》。劉靜怡（2009）。〈台灣民主轉型的「人權保障」未竟志業—「言論自由」和「集會遊行自由」往何處去〉，《我國民主季刊》。6(3)：1-46。潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。台北：心理。鄭百雅譯（2013）。《大媒體的金權遊戲》。台北：漫遊者。（原書：Hall, J. & Bettig, R [2012]. Big Media, Big Money: Coltural Texts and Political Economics. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield.）蕭肇君（2006）。《論媒體勞動：閱聽人、記者與記者後備軍》。台北：政治大學碩士論文。賴若函（2010）。《奮不顧身下的勞動哀愁：新聞工作者職災類型、成因、組織與法制》。台北：政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。魏玓（2009）。〈公民社會、知識份子與國家－關於台灣媒體改革運動的幾點反思〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》。74: 317-330。羅文輝、劉蕙苓（2006）。〈置入性行銷對新聞記者的影響〉，《新聞學研究》，89：81-125。羅世宏（2013）。〈媒體壟斷如何防制？媒體多元如何維護？邁向一個複合式的管制取徑〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，3(2):1-25。黃光雄等譯（2001）。質性教育研究：理論與方法。台北：揚智。（原書：Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. [1982]. Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Ally and Bacon.）顧佳、陳正芬、周佳欣譯（2013）。《誰控制了總開關？》。台北：行人。（原書：Wu, T. [2010]. The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.）二、英文部份： Freeman, R. & Medoff, J. (1984). What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books. Freeman, R. (2005). From the Webbs to the Web: The Contribution of the Internet to Reviving Union Fortunes, in Susan Fernie and DavidMetcalf (eds), Trade Unions: Resurgence or Demise? London : Routledge. Gallagher, M. (1982). Negotiations of control in media organizations and occupations, in M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran and J. Woollacott (eds), Culture, Society and Media. London: Routeledge. Guback, T. H. (1997). The Communication Industries in The American Economy. New York: Routledge. Hackett, R. (2000). Taking Back the Media: Notes on the Potential for a Communicative Democracy Movement, Studies in Political Economy. 63: 61–86. Hyman, R. (1971). Marxism and the Sociology of Trade Unionism. London: Pluto Press. ── (1979). ‘The politics of workplace trade unionism: recent tendencies and some problems for theory.’ Capital and Class, 8: 54–67. ── (1995). ‘Industrial relations in Europe: theory and practice. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 1: 17–46. ── (2001). Understanding European Trade Unionism: Between Market, Class & Society. London: Sage. Kelly, J. (1988) Trade Unions and Socialist Politics. London: Verso. McChesney, R, W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy, Communication: A Sociological Portrait of American Journalists and Their Work. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Murdock, G. (1982) Large Corporations and the Control of the Communications Industries, in M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran and J. Woollacott (eds), Culture, Society and the Media. London: Routledge. Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學新聞學系 97451026
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097451026
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202100414
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Journalism] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
102601.pdf		4271Kb	Adobe PDF2	278	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback