政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133978
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51694830      線上人數 : 425
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133978


    題名: ACT親職量表與親職效能的關聯性與量表信效度研究
    Psychometric Properties of The ACT Scale and Its Relationship with Parental Efficacy
    作者: 鄧運合
    Teng, Yun-Ho
    貢獻者: 傅如馨
    鄧運合
    Teng, Yun-Ho
    關鍵詞: ACT親職教育方案
    家暴預防
    量表研究
    ACT program
    Domestic violence prevention
    Scale research
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2021-02-01 14:30:28 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 摘要
    本研究旨在檢驗由「ACT親職教育方案」所衍生的，親職功能量表的信效度，並以親職效能感作為效標變項，討論兩者關係。研究以1006位家中有3-8歲孩子的家長為研究對象，採問卷調查法，研究工具包含「ACT親職功能量表」與「親職效能量表」。並經描述性統計、迴歸分析、信度分析，探索性與驗證性因素分析等統計方法分析資料，研究分析結果如下：
    1. ACT親職功能量表修訂過程：
    經本研究分析，ACT親職功能量表經刪減部分題目後，在保留大部分題項的狀況下可以達到心理計量的標準，獨立成為測量親職功能的量表，也讓ACT方案的成效測量更有理論基礎與說服力，同時能夠作為進一步修改、使方案更加進步的依據。
    2. ACT親職分數與親職效能感：
    經本研究分析，ACT親職分數與親職效能感呈線性關係，同時關係達到顯著，兩者能夠相互預測，在ACT親職功能量表得分越高的家長，親職效能感也會越強，即當家長使用更少的負向管教時，對於自身的親職效能感會有更高的評價。
    本研究根據上述研究結果進行討論，並針對未來研究方向及實務現場提出建議。
    Abstract
    The main purpose of this study was to validate the scale use by the ACT parental program under Taiwanese cultural context. In addition, the study also aimed to test the relationship between parental function and parental efficacy as well.
    In this study, the participants were 1006 parents who have kids that aged 3-8 years. The data were collected by questionnaires, including “ACT parental function scale” and “Parental efficacy”. The data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, regression analysis, reliability analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    The findings were summarized as follows:
    1. Based on the data and the analysis, after dropping some of the item, the ACT parental function has established its validation under the Taiwanese context. Not only it can serve as the program’s testing tool, it can also be used as a dependent scale to examine parental function.
    2. The result of regression analysis suggested that ACT scale’s score had a significant positive relationship with parental efficacy.
    參考文獻: 余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式：SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：高等教育。
    余民寧、陳柏霖、湯雅芬（2012）。大學生心理資本量表編製及其相關因素之研究。教育研究與發展期刊, 8(4), 19-52.
    李敦仁、余民寧（2005）。社經地位，手足數目，家庭教育資源與教育成就結構關係模式之驗證：以 TEPS 資料庫資料為例。臺灣教育社會學研究, 5(2), 1-47.
    阮菲(2019)。多元時代的挑戰—安康平宅社區家長參與 ACT 親職教育方案之經驗。國立政治大學輔導與諮商碩士學位學程碩士論文。
    林詩韻（2009）。家庭中心實務感知與親職效能感之相關性探究：以臺北市接受早期療育服務之主要照顧者為例。臺灣大學社會工作學研究所學位論文。
    林項爵（2010）。父母教養型態，教師管教方式與國小高年級學生霸凌行為之相關探討。國立臺北教育大學教育學系教育創新與評鑑碩士班學位論文。
    周玉慧、吳齊殷（2001）。教養方式，親子互動與青少年行為：親子知覺的相對重要性。人文及社會科學集刊, 13(4), 439-476.
    吳瓊洳、蔡明昌（2015）。新住民母親親職效能感，配偶及公婆共親職與學齡子女生活適應關係之研究。嘉大教育研究學刊, (35), 1-34.
    洪秀梅（2007）。台南縣國小高年級學童父母管教方式，情緒覺察能力，自我概念對人際關係之影響。台南應用科技大學生活應用科學研究所學位論文, 1-165.
    楊賀凱（2009）。父母社經地位對父母管教價值與方式的影響—檢證 Kohn的理論在臺東國中生父母之適用性。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類。
    徐畢卿、羅文倬、龍佛衛（1999）。雙親教養態度量表中文版之信效度研究。護理研究, 7(5), 479-489.
    陳富美（2005）。親子在教養行為上的認知差異：預測子方教養知覺的因素探討。中華心理衛生學刊, 20(1), 1-30.
    陳楷仁、陳富美（2009）。父母知覺子女表現、子女親職回應行為與親職效能感之關係研究。「家庭生活教育方案跨文化經驗分享與對談」國際研討會。輔仁大學民生學院兒童與家庭學系。
    陳秀峯(2010)。台灣家庭暴力防治之現狀與未來－從被害人保護及加害人處遇角度觀察。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊, 6(1), 187-210。
    黃薏靜(2016)。ACT Raising Safe Kids 親職教育方案於臺灣家庭的應用--探討親職壓力與兒童行為問題的關聯與改善
    傅如馨（2017）含攝文化的兒少虐待預防與親職教育：以美國ACT Raising Safe Kids親職教育方案的文化調適為例。本土諮商心裡學學刊9(3), 1-24。
    劉百純、陳若琳（2010）。新手媽媽的配偶支持，親職效能與親職壓力之相關研究。幼兒教育, (297), 22-40.
    劉淑媛（2004）。父母教養方式與青少年行為困擾之調查與訪談研究。成功大學教育研究所學位論文。
    游美貴 (2014)。臺灣家庭暴力防治服務方案的實施與轉變之探討。臺大社會工作學刊, (29), 53-96。
    鍾芬芳、劉雪娥（2015）。初為人母者於產後坐月子期間之親子互動品質及親職能力知覺的變化趨勢。助產雜誌, (57), 27-38.
    譚子文、董旭英（2010）。自我概念與父母教養方式對臺灣都會區高中生偏差行為之影響。教育科學研究期刊, 55(3), 203-233.
    謝曼盈（2020）。中文阿拉巴馬親職問卷簡式版之信度與效度研究。輔導與諮商學報， 42(1)， 55-81。
    Altafim, E. R. P., McCoy, D. C., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2018). Relations between Parental practices, socioeconomic status, and child behavior in Brazil. Children and Youth Services Review, 89, 93-102.
    Altafim, E. R. P., Pedro, M. E. A., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2016). Effectiveness of ACT Raising Safe Kids Parental Program in a developing country. Children and youth services review, 70, 315-323.
    Anton, M. T., Jones, D. J., & Youngstrom, E. A. (2015). Socioeconomic status, Parental, and externalizing problems in African American single-mother homes: A person-oriented approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 29(3), 405.
    Ardelt, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2001). Effects of mothers` Parental efficacy beliefs and promotive Parental strategies on inner-city youth. Journal of Family issues, 22(8), 944-972.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological review, 84(2), 191.
    Baumrind, D. (1971). Current Patterns of Parental authority. Developmental psychology, 4(1p2), 1.
    Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
    Bloomfield, L., & Kendall, S. (2012). Parenting self-efficacy, parenting stress and child behaviour before and after a parenting programme. Primary health care research & development, 13(4), 364-372.
    Burkhart, K. M., Knox, M., & Brockmyer, J. (2013). Pilot evaluation of the ACT raising safe kids program on children’s bullying behavior. Journal of child and family studies, 22(7), 942-951.
    Brislin, R. W., & Freimanis, C. (2001). Back-translation. An Encyclopaedia of Translation: Chinese-English, English-Chinese, 22.
    Bryanton, J., Gagnon, A. J., Johnston, C., & Hatem, M. (2008). Predictors of women’s perceptions of the childbirth experience. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 37(1), 24-34.
    Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validation results in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 1(2), 99-103.
    Coleman, P. K., & Karraker, K. H. (2000). Parental self‐efficacy among mothers of school‐age children: Conceptualization, measurement, and correlates. Family Relations, 49(1), 13-24.
    Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 10(7), 1-9.
    Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of Parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of family psychology, 19(2), 294.
    Deater-Deckard, K., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (1996). Physical discipline among African American and European American mothers: Links to children`s externalizing behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32(6), 1065.
    de Montigny, F., & Lacharité, C. (2005). Perceived Parental efficacy: Concept analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 49(4), 387-396.
    Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural equation modeling, 8(3), 430-457.
    Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83.
    Glatz, T., & Buchanan, C. M. (2015). Change and predictors of change in Parental self-efficacy from early to middle adolescence. Developmental psychology, 51(10), 1367.
    Haslam, D. M., Parkenham, K. I., & Smith, A. (2006). Social support and postpartum depressive symptomatology: The mediating role of maternal self‐efficacy. Infant mental health journal, 27(3), 276-291.
    Hess, C., & Teti, D. Hussey-Gardner.(2004). Self-Efficacy and Parental of high-risk infants: The moderating role of parent knowledge of infant development. Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 423-437.
    Hoff, E., Laursen, B., Tardif, T., & Bornstein, M. (2002). Socioeconomic status and Parental. Handbook of Parental Volume 2: Biology and ecology of Parental, 8(2), 231-52.
    Howard, M. C. (2016). A review of exploratory factor analysis decisions and overview of current practices: What we are doing and how can we improve？. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 32(1), 51-62.
    Howe, T. R., Knox, M., Altafim, E. R. P., Linhares, M. B. M., Nishizawa, N., Fu, T. J., ... & Pereira, A. I. (2017). International child abuse prevention: insights from ACT Raising Safe Kids. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 22(4), 194-200.
    Izzo, C., Weiss, L., Shanahan, T., & Rodriguez-Brown, F. (2000). Parental self-efficacy and social support as predictors of Parental practices and children`s socioemotional adjustment in Mexican immigrant families. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 20(1-2), 197-213.
    Jones, T. L., & Prinz, R. J. (2005). Potential roles of Parental self-efficacy in parent and child adjustment: A review. Clinical psychology review, 25(3), 341-363.
    Jonyniene, J., Kern, R. M., & Gfroerer, K. P. (2015). Efficacy of Lithuanian Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) on parenting style and perception of child behavior. The Family Journal, 23(4), 392-406.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3), 187-200.
    Knox, M. S., Burkhart, K., & Hunter, K. E. (2011). ACT against violence parents raising safe kids program: Effects on maltreatment-related Parental behaviors and beliefs. Journal of Family Issues, 32(1), 55-74.
    Knox, M., & Burkhart, K. (2014). A multi-site study of the ACT Raising Safe Kids program: predictors of outcomes and attrition. Children and Youth Services Review, 39, 20-24.
    Knox, M., Burkhart, K., & Cromly, A. (2013). Supporting positive Parental in community health centers: The ACT Raising Safe Kids Program. Journal of Community Psychology, 41(4), 395-407.
    Knox, M., Burkhart, K., & Howe, T. (2011). Effects of the ACT Raising Safe Kids Parental program on children`s externalizing problems. Family Relations, 60(4), 491-503.
    Kohlhoff, J., & Barnett, B. (2013). Parental self-efficacy: Links with maternal depression, infant behaviour and adult attachment. Early human development, 89(4), 249-256.
    Leahy‐Warren, P., McCarthy, G., & Corcoran, P. (2012). First‐time mothers: social support, maternal Parental self‐efficacy and postnatal depression. Journal of clinical nursing, 21(3‐4), 388-397.
    Leijten, P., Raaijmakers, M. A., de Castro, B. O., & Matthys, W. (2013). Does socioeconomic status matter？ A meta-analysis on parent training effectiveness for disruptive child behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42(3), 384-392.
    Luster, T., & Kain, E. L. (1987). The relation between family context and perceptions of Parental efficacy. Early Child Development and Care, 29(3), 301-311.
    McDonald, S., Kehler, H., Bayrampour, H., Fraser-Lee, N., & Tough, S. (2016). Risk and protective factors in early child development: Results from the All Our Babies (AOB) pregnancy cohort. Research in developmental disabilities, 58, 20-30.
    McKee, L., Roland, E., Coffelt, N., Olson, A. L., Forehand, R., Massari, C., ... & Zens, M. S. (2007). Harsh discipline and child problem behaviors: The roles of positive Parental and gender. Journal of Family Violence, 22(4), 187-196.
    Mistry, R. S., Biesanz, J. C., Chien, N., Howes, C., & Benner, A. D. (2008). Socioeconomic status, parental investments, and the cognitive and behavioral outcomes of low-income children from immigrant and native households. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(2), 193-212.
    Norman, R. E., Byambaa, M., De, R., Butchart, A., Scott, J., & Vos, T. (2012). The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse, and neglect: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS medicine, 9(11), e1001349.
    Parker, G., Tupling, H., & Brown, L. B. (1979). A Parental bonding instrument. British journal of medical psychology, 52(1), 1-10.
    Pedro, M. E. A., Altafim, E. R. P., & Linhares, M. B. M. (2017). ACT Raising Safe Kids Program to promote positive maternal Parental practices in different socioeconomic contexts. Psychosocial Intervention, 26(2), 63-72.
    Perrone, D., Sullivan, C. J., Pratt, T. C., & Margaryan, S. (2004). Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: A test of a general theory of crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(3), 298-312.
    Porter, B., & Howe, T. (2008). Pilot evaluation of the “ACT Parents raising safe kids” violence prevention program. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 1(3), 193-206.
    Portwood, S. G., Lambert, R. G., Abrams, L. P., & Nelson, E. B. (2011). An evaluation of the adults and children together (ACT) against violence Parents raising safe kids program. The journal of primary prevention, 32(3-4), 147.
    Russa, M. B., Rodriguez, C. M., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Frustration influences impact of history and disciplinary attitudes on physical discipline decision making. Aggressive behavior, 40(1), 1-11.
    Sanders, M. R., & Woolley, M. L. (2005). The relationship between maternal self‐efficacy and Parental practices: Implications for Parents training. Child: care, health and development, 31(1), 65-73.
    Sevigny, P. R., & Loutzenhiser, L. (2010). Predictors of Parental self‐efficacy in mothers and fathers of toddlers. Child: care, health and development, 36(2), 179-189.
    Shim, S. Y., & Lim, S. A. (2019). Paternal self-efficacy, fathering, and children’s behavioral problems in Korea. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(3), 851-859.
    Shonkoff, J. P., Garner, A. S., Siegel, B. S., Dobbins, M. I., Earls, M. F., McGuinn, L., ... & Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care. (2012). The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics, 129(1), e232-e246.
    Shorey, S., Chan, S. W. C., Chong, Y. S., & He, H. G. (2014). Maternal Parental self‐efficacy in newborn care and social support needs in Singapore: a correlational study. Journal of clinical nursing, 23(15-16), 2272-2283.
    Shumow, L., & Lomax, R. (2002). Parental efficacy: Predictor of Parental behavior and adolescent outcomes. Parental: Science and practice, 2(2), 127-150.
    Sofronoff, K., & Farbotko, M. (2002). The effectiveness of Parents management training to increase self-efficacy in Parents of children with Asperger syndrome. Autism, 6(3), 271-286.
    Weymouth, L. A., & Howe, T. R. (2011). A multi-site evaluation of Parents raising safe kids violence prevention program. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1960-1967.
    Whittaker, K. A., & Cowley, S. (2012). A survey of parental self‐efficacy experiences: maximising potential through health visiting and universal parenting support. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21(21-22), 3276-3286.
    Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2001). Parental efficacy and delinquent behavior: Do control and support matter？. Criminology, 39(3), 677-706.
    Yaman, A., Mesman, J., Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2010). Perceived family stress, Parental efficacy, and child externalizing behaviors in second-generation immigrant mothers. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 45(4), 505-512.
    Yong, A. G., & Pearce, S. (2013). A beginner’s guide to factor analysis: Focusing on exploratory factor analysis. Tutorials in quantitative methods for psychology, 9(2), 79-94.
    Yu, D. S., Lee, D. T., & Woo, J. (2004). Issues and challenges of instrument translation. Western journal of nursing research, 26(3), 307-320.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    輔導與諮商碩士學位學程
    106172003
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106172003
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202100054
    顯示於類別:[輔導與諮商碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    200301.pdf1900KbAdobe PDF2872檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋