政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133821
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113311/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50927175      線上人數 : 919
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133821


    題名: 論保險代位與自願給付──評最高法院106年度台上字第411號等判決
    Insurance Subrogation and Voluntary Payment: A Comment on Taiwan Supreme Court Civil Judgment 106 Tai Shang Tzu No. 411
    作者: 陳俊元
    Chen, Chun-Yuan
    貢獻者: 風管系
    關鍵詞: 衡平;公共政策;保險代位;自願理賠;誠實且合理;責任保險;和解;損害填補原則;強制規定;法定債權移轉
    equity;public policy;insurance subrogation;voluntary payment;honest and reasonable;liability;settlement;principle of indemnity;mandatory mule;legal assignment
    日期: 2020-06
    上傳時間: 2021-01-28
    摘要: 保險代位為保險法中之重要原則，一般認為保險代位之成立以保險人應負理賠責任為要件。如保險人不須負理賠責任而仍為給付，則屬於自願給付而保險人則無保險代位權。但理賠與自願給付應如何認定，我國法尚欠缺具體標準。最高法院 106 年度台上字第 411 號等判決即涉及此一爭議，前歷審見解未盡相同，而更需要進一步之研究。本文認為可參考英美法之誠實合理原則，如保險人之給付出於善意與合理之確信，即屬於保險理賠。且英美法採取實質標準，保險理賠之認定並不以完全符合契約為必要。就本案而言，保險人已盡相當調查，且給付金額與應理賠之額度相同，可認為具善意與合理性，故應為保險理賠而保險代位仍可能成立。但解除保險契約之約定，實際上將根本規避保險代位，故應違反強制規定而為無效。
    As an important principle in insurance law, the insurer’s liability under an insurance contract is generally regarded as the prerequisite to subrogation. If the insurer’s payment is voluntary and not based on contract, then insurer will have no right to subrogation. However, Taiwan has no specific rule for voluntary payment. The Taiwan Supreme Court Civil Judgment 106 Tai Shang Tzu No. 411 and other relevant cases have reached different conclusions regarding this issue; thus, it demands further research. This paper suggests that Taiwan may consider the honest and reasonable rule in common law. If an insurer’s payment is based on good faith and a reasonable belief, then it is a decent payment, not voluntary. Moreover, common law employs a substantial rule, under which an insurance contract does not dictate the form of the insurer’s payments. If the insurer has done its due diligence and the resultant payment is the same as the amount of liability under contract. In such case, the payment is deemed honest and reasonable and thus constitutes a decent payment. Consequently, subrogation is still possible. However, a settlement that rescinds the insurance contract will substantially and fundamentally exclude subrogation, which is a violation of the mandatory rule and should be void.
    關聯: 中原財經法學, 44, 59-117
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    200.pdf1761KbAdobe PDF2206檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋