政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133650
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51056765      線上人數 : 947
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133650


    題名: 論保險經紀人之義務—受託義務與我國保險法修正之再檢討
    A Study on Insurance Broker’s Duty: A Reexamination of Fiduciary Duty and Recent Amendments of Taiwan Insurance Law
    作者: 陳俊元
    Chen, Chun-Yuan
    貢獻者: 風管系
    關鍵詞: 保險經紀人;受託義務;注意義務;忠誠義務;或有佣金;信託;居間;利益衝突;特殊關係;揭露
    insurance broker;fiduciary duty;duty of care;duty of loyalty;contingent commission;trust;brokerage;interest conflict;special relation;disclosure
    日期: 2020-06
    上傳時間: 2021-01-21 09:44:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文之目的，在於以我國近年關於保險經紀人義務之修正與爭議為中心，就英美法制與我國進行比較分析，並提出立法建議。我國 2015 年修正保險法，揭示保險經紀人之忠實義務 ; 注意義務與相關義務。但此一修正是否妥當，仍有疑義。本文先釐清受託義務之內涵，再針對保險經紀與其他事務 ; 代收保費 ; 佣金與其他利益之揭露之三個議題，逐一探討是否成立受託義務，並分析相關規範是否妥適，再進一步重新建構我國保險經紀人之義務體系。本文認為一般之保險經紀事務並不足以構成受託關係，僅在特殊情況時方會成立。保險法第 163 條之忠實義務應限縮於利益衝突之避免且不等於受託義務。又保險經紀人代收保險費並不構成意定信託或信賴關係。如為強化對保險費或相關債權之保護，可考慮修法準用信託法關於信託財產相關之規定。再者，主動書面報告義務與佣金揭露義務，則應適度修正並增訂法律效果。就收受或有佣金或其他利益而言，亦不足以成立受託義務。本文認為保險經紀人仍可收取利益但應有揭露義務，如有違反應負賠償責任。但如保險經紀人可舉證符合一般交易慣例，則可不負賠償責任。就結論而言，本文發現英美法就保險經紀人義務認定甚為謹慎，實值得似有強化保險經紀人義務趨勢之我國注意。
    This paper aims to comparatively analyze the duty of insurance broker in Anglo-American law and Taiwanese law, with the focus on recent modifications and controversies in Taiwan, and then proposes draft amendment for Taiwan insurance law. Taiwan modified insurance law in 2015 to declare insurance broker’s duty of loyalty, the duty of care, and relevant duties. But such modification is still subject to suspicion. The analysis firstly explores the content of fiduciary duty, and then examines three critical issues, including insurance brokerage business, transferring of premium, as well as disclosure of commission and other benefits, and finally reorganizes the duty system of insurance broker. This paper argues that except for special circumstances the regular insurance brokerage is not sufficient to establish fiduciary relation. The duty of loyalty of Article 163 should be constrained to avoid conflict of interests, and is not equivalent to fiduciary duty. Also, transferring of premium by insurance broker does not create express trust or fiduciary relation. For the purpose of enhancing the protection of premium and relevant obligation, Taiwan may consider to modify insurance law to apply mutatis mutandis to the rules concerning trust property in trust law. The duty of providing a written analysis report as well as expressly advising the standard of remuneration shall be modified and remedies shall be added. For receiving contingent commission and other benefits, they are not sufficient to establish fiduciary duty, either. This study argues that an insurance broker may receive that benefit but have the duty to disclose it. Violation of this duty will generate liability of damage. However, an insurance broker can prove receiving that benefit is in accordance with general business custom to overrule that liability. In conclusion, this study finds that Anglo-American law is cautious with establishing duties of insurance broker, and this experience shall be considered for Taiwan, which seems to aggravate the duty of insurance broker.
    關聯: 臺大法學論叢, 49:2, 559-634
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[風險管理與保險學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2210檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋