English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50998311      Online Users : 886
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133612


    Title: 影響老舊建物補強修繕關鍵因子之評估研究
    A Study on the Key Factors Affecting the Reinforcement of Old Buildings
    Authors: 林左裕
    Lin, Calvin T. Y.
    林怡利
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 老屋健檢;補強修繕;整建維護;層級程序分析法;租稅增額融資
    Building Structural Inspection;Reinforcement and Repair;Reconditioning and Maintenance;Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP);Tax Increment Financing(TIF)
    Date: 2020-03
    Issue Date: 2021-01-19 11:34:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 台灣建築物屋齡瀕臨「高齡化」之數量日益增加,而直接或間接影響此揭老舊建物損害因子除了地震等天然災害外,尚包括建築物自然老化及人為破壞等因素,進而影響居住者身體健康 ; 居家安全以及經濟發展等問題。本研究目的係針對老舊建築物若欲繼續提供居住服務,同時維持良好機能 ; 結構安全 ; 建築美觀,以及採用環保材料進行修繕補強等問題研究其關鍵因素,並運用層級程序分析法(AHP)得到各指標之相對權重。研究發現:(1)結構性能對老舊建物補強修繕之影響最為關鍵;(2)預算財源籌措不易難以達成共識,獎勵補助及減稅措施將成為刺激民眾申請補強修繕之誘因。老舊建物除了透過都市更新或重建,還可以透過整建維護延長使用期限與強度,然後者為民眾接受度不如前兩者,即使政府訂定相關規則補助獎勵,得到的效果仍不顯著。本研究結論除了指出影響整建維護的關鍵因素,並針對各個面向提出相關政策建議,期望提供政府及業界一落實整建維護的具體可行方案。
    The number of "aging" buildings in Taiwan is growing. In addition to the natural disasters, e.g., earthquakes, other factors that may undermine building structure include natural aging and man-made damage. The aging buildings may raise problems of residents’ health, living safety and economic development. The purpose of this study focuses on the key factors to keep the essential dwelling functions of an old building working while ensuring its structural safety, architectural aesthetics, and environmental protection at the same time. The relative weights of each evaluation indicators will be decided through using the method of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). This study reaches the following conclusions: 1. "Structural performance" is the most important factor deemed by experts evaluating the necessity of revamping old buildings. The other key factors, ranked in order, include fire prevention, risk of falling objects, and budgetary resources. 2. The government can use incentive subsidies and tax reduction measures to encourage residents to apply for revamping old buildings. Through the conclusions of this study and policy recommendations, it is expected to provide feasible ways to implement the maintenance policy for the relevant industries, government, and academia.
    Relation: 建築學報, No.111, pp.35-54
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/101632122020030111003
    DOI: 10.3966/101632122020030111003
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    44.pdf933KbAdobe PDF2362View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback