English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50932553      Online Users : 984
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/133581


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133581


    Title: 刑事上訴第三審採「嚴格法律審兼採上訴許可制」的疑慮－以司法院草案為中心
    Concerns of Adopting “Strict Trial of Law With The Permission to Appeal” for Appealing to the Criminal Court of the Third Instance: Focusing on the Judicial Yuan`s Draft Bill
    Authors: 楊雲驊
    Yang, Yun-Hua
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 訴訟權;第三審上訴;歐洲人權法院;金字塔型訴訟結構;德國聯邦憲法法院
    The Right of Instituting Legal Proceedings;Appeal to the Court of the Third Instance;European Court of Human Rights;Pyramidal Structure of Legal Proceedings;German
    Date: 2018-01
    Issue Date: 2021-01-18 15:30:37 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在建立金字塔型之審級構造的框架下，司法院刑事訴訟制度之第三審設計為「嚴格法律審兼採上訴許可制」，但此一設計是否符合憲法訴訟權保障之核心內容？本文以國際人權公約出發，並介紹德國聯邦憲法法院 ; 歐洲人權法院以及我國司法院相關釋字對此問題之見解以及法律修正後，歸納「普通法院優先」 ; 「救濟途徑明確」 ; 「至少一次的普通上訴救濟途徑」以及「救濟需及時，避免訴訟遲延」等作為救濟制度之核心，在司法本身亦會造成基本權利侵害的前提下，指出司法院相關設計的違憲疑慮以及運作困難之處，並呼籲各界正視此一問題之嚴重性。
    Based on the framework of establishing the pyramidal stages of trials, the criminal court`s third instance designed by the Judicial Yuan adopted the system of “strict trial of law with the permission to appeal” and its consistency with the right of instituting legal proceedings protected under the Constitution is questionable. This article, starting from the International Bill of Human Rights and introduction of relevant interpretations and amendments by the German Constitutional Court, European Court of Human Rights, and Taiwan`s J.Y. Interpretation, concluded that “general court`s priority”, “remedial approach`s clarity”, “opportunity of at least one ordinary appeal” and “timely relief” serve as the corner stones of a remedial system. In addition, on the condition that justice itself may infringe people`s fundamental rights, this article pointed out the unconstitutional concern and operational difficulty involved in Judicial Yuan`s said design and called for public attention to this issue.
    Relation: 月旦法學雜誌, No.282, pp.5-23
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.3966/102559312018110282001
    DOI: 10.3966/102559312018110282001
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    32.pdf912KbAdobe PDF2189View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback