政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133575
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51034151      Online Users : 925
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133575


    Title: 心臟死後器官捐贈的刑法思考
    Criminal Issues on the Organ Donation after Death of Heart
    Authors: 李聖傑
    Lee, Sheng-chieh
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 人體器官移植條例;心臟死;無心跳器捐;器官捐贈
    Human Organ Transplant Act;heart death;non-heart-beating donation;organ donation
    Date: 2018-03
    Issue Date: 2021-01-18 15:26:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 人類生命終期之認定，分別有脈搏停止說 ; 呼吸停止說 ; 綜合判斷說 ; 腦死說等不同主張。近期雖有最高法院將腦死判定準則納為考量，惟多數實務仍係以心臟與呼吸皆永久停止，且瞳孔對光反應停止及放大等徵兆綜合判斷之。衛生福利部日前邀集各界專家召開會議，達成心臟死後器官捐贈的共識。本文認為，病人是否曾簽署器官捐贈同意書，不應對生命價值的絕對保護產生動搖，而應聚焦於開放無心跳器官捐贈之條件是否會脫離生命法益的保護涵攝。此外，應注意如以親屬同意撤除維生醫療，實行同意之親屬與受器官捐贈親屬為同一人時，可能產生的相關倫理爭議。
    There are many opinions used to certify the human death like stopped pulse, stopped breath, synthetic judgment and dead brain. Even though supreme court had taken dead brain as the criterion of human death recently, stopped heart and breath with a synthetic judgment that pupils had no reaction to light and even had corectasis are still accepted in legal practice generally. Inviting many scholars in different fields, Ministry of Health and Welfare held a committee to reach a consensus of non-heart-beating donation. The following would be the thesis in this article: the absolute protection of life shall not be effected, whether the patient signed any consent of organ donation. By contrast, it shall be concentrated that whether the legalization of non-heart-beating donation would be excluded from the protected range of life as a legal interest (rechtsgut). Furthermore, an ethical issue shall be noticed that the family member who consents to remove medical care and to donate the organ is the receiver at the same time.
    Relation: 月旦醫事法報告, No.17, pp.139-148
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.3966/241553062018030017012
    DOI: 10.3966/241553062018030017012
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Law] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    26.pdf2271KbAdobe PDF2177View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback