政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/133456
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51220794      線上人數 : 871
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133456


    題名: 科技賦能：新加坡樟宜機場以資訊科技創造服務新能力
    Enabling Technology: Information Technology Enabled Service Capabilities in Singapore Changi Airport
    作者: 黃品傑
    Huang, Pin-Chieh
    貢獻者: 蕭瑞麟
    Hsiao, Ruey-Lin
    黃品傑
    Huang, Pin-Chieh
    關鍵詞: 服務設計
    科技賦能
    組織轉型
    組織作為
    服務創新
    Service design
    Technology enablement
    Organizational transformation
    Organizing practices
    Service innovation
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2021-01-04 11:30:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 數位轉型似乎就等同以科技將流程自動化進而促成組織轉型，科技賦能的議題更顯重要。 常見作法是以科技賦予服務功能，或是轉換組織性能。目前研究鮮少討論分析科技所內 嵌的作為及所可能賦予組織的新能力。有鑑於此，本研究分析樟宜機場來探索科技賦能。 樟宜機場連續獲得 Skytrax 八年評鑑服務第一名，其服務設計不單是收集旅客痛點，更 蘊含科技賦能的嶄新做法，為旅客帶來愉悅的體驗，展現數位轉型的過程，更成為各機 場的標竿。本研究將分析樟宜機場的服務創新，理解導入科技背後所縝密規劃的組織作 為，以科技令組織獲得新能力。觀念上，本研究指出，科技變革需與服務設計並行，關 鍵在以服務思維注入科技應用，使得組織轉換其作為，且獲取新能力。實務上，本文點 出，數位轉型不應限於功能，更要反思何以由功能產品過渡到服務場景，以科技去育成 組織的特定能力，促成領域價值的整合，隨之轉變商業運行邏輯。最終，數位轉型的關 鍵是在於科技是否在服務思維的引導下，賦予組織新的能量，去承擔與時俱增的挑戰。
    Digital transformation merely includes process automation so as to facilitate organizational transformation. In this context, technology enablement becomes an important issue. Current practices attempt to employ technology to enable service functions or transform organizational characteristics. Present research seldomly examines mode of organizing embedded in technology and how it enables new capabilities for organizations. For this reason, this research analyzes the case of Changi Airport to explore the issue of technology enablement. Skytrax has awarded Changi Airport of Service Excellence for eight consecutive years. Changi’s service design deals not only with passengers’ painpoints, but also new ways of technology enablement that creates pleasant experience for passengers. It demonstrates effective digital transformation process and becomes a service benchmark for many airports. This study investigates Changi Airport’s service innovation in order to understand the intricate formation of organizing practices behind technology implementation, which enables new capabilities within organizations. Conceptually, this research indicates that technology enabled change need to be integrated with service design. The key is to imbue service thinking into technology application so as to transfer its ways of organizing while acquiring new capabilities. Practically, this thesis points out, digital transformation should not be limited to technical functions. It should transit from product functions to service scenarios, deploy technology to nurture organization specific capabilities, facilitate domain value integration, and subsequently transform the operating logic of a business. Eventually, effective digital transformation should be guided by service lens, thereby strengthening organizational capabilities so as to shoulder expanding challenges.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻：
    朱彩馨、李慶芳、許致嘉，2014，「知易行難:以施行理論觀點探索數位學習導入失敗」，中山管理評論，第 4 期，第 22 卷，857-900 頁。
    李麗華、賴昶予，2019，「以精實物聯網平台架構實現中小企業達成工業 4.0-以製造生產流程為例」，《資訊管理學報》，第 2 期，第 26 卷，209-239 頁。
    林芬慧、曾智義、郭峰淵，2006，「資訊科技啟動組織變革的歷程模式研究」，《資訊管理學報》，第 1 期，第 13 卷，1-26 頁。
    陳信宏，2011，「科技採用的吸收困難:組織實務對制度環境的依存性」，《資訊管理學報》，第 1 期，第 18 卷，105-131 頁。
    陳家祥、鄒鴻泰，2008，「資訊科技採納對新產品開發成功之影響」，《資訊管理學報》第一期，第 15 卷，1-28 頁。
    葉耕榕、王鈿、李承翰，2014，「醫療資訊科技服務品質模型:由醫事人員觀點出發」，《資訊管理學報》，第 2 期，第 21 卷，139-160 頁。 蕭瑞麟，2008，《科技福爾摩斯:科技優勢永遠源自創新》，台北:麥格羅希爾國際出版公司。
    蕭瑞麟，2020，(第五版)《不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北:五南學術 原創專書系列。
    蕭瑞麟、侯勝宗、歐素華，2011，「演化科技意會—衛星派遣科技的人性軌跡」，《資訊 管理學報》，第 4 期，第 18 卷，1-28 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、廖啟旭、陳蕙芬，2011，「越淮為枳:從實務觀點分析跨情境資訊科技移轉」， 《資訊管理學報》，第 2 期，第 18 卷， 131-160 頁。
    蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2011，「市集脈絡:由組織例規分析資訊科技的創新來源」， 《中山管理評論》，第 2 期，第 19 卷， 461-493 頁。

    英文文獻：
    Al-Mashari, M., & Al-Mudimigh, A. 2003. ERP implementation: lessons from a case study. Information Technology & People, 16(1): 21-33.
    Baskerville, R., & Smithson, S. 1995. Information technology and new organizational forms: Choosing chaos over panaceas. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2): 66-73.
    Bettencourt, L. A., Lusch, R. F., & Vargo, S. L. 2014. A service lens on value creation: Marketing role in achieving strategic advantage. California Management Review, 57(1): 44-66.
    Bharadwaj, A. S. 2000. A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1): 169-196.
    Bloomfield, B. P., & Hayes, N. 2009. Power and Organizational Transformation through Technology: Hybrids of Electronic Government. Organization Studies, 30(5): 461-487.
    Chandler, J. W., Palvia, P. C., Thompson, J. D., & Zeltmann, S. M. 1996. The Orion Project: Staged Business Process Reengineering at FedEx. Communications of the ACM, 39(2): 99-107.
    Chatfield, A. T., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. 1997. The Impact of IOS-Enabled Business Process Change on Business Outcomes: Transformation of the Value Chain of Japan Airlines. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1): 13-40.
    Chen, H., Prabuddha, D., & Hu, J. 2015. IT-enabled broadcasting in social media: An empirical study of artists` activities and music sales. Information Systems Research, 26(3): 513-531.
    Chesbrough, H. W. 2006. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
    Crowston C., a. M. M. D. 2004. Infromation technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13: 5-28.
    Delmestri, G., & Greenwood, R. 2016. How Cinderella became a queen. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 507-550.
    Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. 1994. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
    Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. 2001. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 685-716.
    Eisenhardt, K. 1989. Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3): 543-576.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 2007. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25-32.
    Feldman, M. S. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11(6): 611-629.
    Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., & Madsen, T. L. 2012. Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure. Journal of Management Studies: no-no.
    Galliers, R. D., & Baets, W. 1998. Information Technology and Organisztional Transformation: The Holy Grail of IT? In R. D. Galliers, & W. Baets (Eds.), Information Technology and Organizational Transformation: Innovation for the 21st Century Organisation: 1-18. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
    Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. 1993. Appealing work: an Investigation of how ethnographic texts convince. Organization Science, 4: 595–616.
    Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, N. 1993. Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1): 4-16.
    Jelassi, T. 1993. Gaining business from information technology: The case of Otis Elevator. European Management Journal, 11(1): 62-73.
    Jiang, J., & Cameron, A.-F. 2020. IT-enabled self-monitoring for chronic disease self- management: An interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly, 44(1): 451-508.
    Lee, J. Y. H., Panteli, N., Bülow, A. M., & Hsu, C. 2018. Email adaptation for conflict handling: A case study of cross‐border inter‐organisational partnership in East Asia. Information Systems Journal, 28(2): 318-339.
    Leonardi, P. M. 2007. Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organization Science, 18(5): 813-831.
    Lucas Jr, H. C., Agarwal, R., Clemons, E. K., El Sawy, O. A., & Weber, B. 2013. Impactful research ontransformational information technology: An opportunity to inform new audiences. MIS Quarterly, 37(2): 371-382.
    Luftman, J. N., Lewis, P. R., & Oldach, S. H. 1993. Transforming the enterprise: The alignment of business and information technology strategies. IBM System Journal, 32(1): 198-221.
    Markus, M. L., & Benjamin, R. I. 1997. The magic bullet theory in IT-enabled transformation. Sloan Management Review, 38(2): 55-68.
    Mikalef, P., & Pateli, A. 2017. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70: 1-16.
    Möller, K., Rajala, R., & Westerlund, M. 2008. Service innovation myopia? A new recipe for client-provider value creation. California Management Review, 50(3): 31-48.
    Monteiro, E., & Parmiggiani, E. 2019. Synthetic knowing: The politics of the Internet of Things. MIS Quarterly, 43(1): 167-184.
    Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. 1993. From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4): 65-77.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 1996. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1): 63–93.
    Orlikowski, W. J. 2002. Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3): 249-273.
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Gash, D. C. 1994. Technology frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 12(2): 174- 207.
    Orlikowski, W. J., & Hofman, D. 1997. An improvisational model for change management: The case of groupware technologies. Sloan Management Review, Winter: 11-21.
    Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. 2008. Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1): 83-96.
    Pettigrew, A. M. 1979. On studying organisational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 570-581.
    Pettigrew, A. M. 1990. Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1(3): 267-292.
    Powell, P. 1993. Causality in the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2(4): 320-334.
    Rai, A., Arikan, I., Pye, J., & Tiwana, A. 2015. Fit and misfit of plural sourcing strategies abd IT-enabled process integration capabilities: Consequnces of firm performance in the US electric utility industry. MIS Quarterly, 39(4): 865-885.
    Rai, A., & Tang, X. 2014. Information Technology-Enabled Business Models: A Conceptual Framework and a Coevolution Perspective for Future Research. Information Systems Research, 25(1): 1-14.
    Ransbotham, S., Fichman, R. G., Gopal, R., & Gupta, A. 2016. Ubiquitous IT and digital vulnerabilities. Information Systems Research, 27(4): 834-847.
    Robey, D., & Sahay, S. 1996. Transforming Work through Information Technology: A Comparative Case Study of Geographic Information Systems in County Government. Information Systems Research, 7(1): 93-101.
    Setia, P., Venkatesh, V., & Joglekar, S. 2013. Leveraging digital tecnologies: How information quality leads to localized capabilities and customer service performance. MIS Quarterly, 37(2): 565-A564.
    Soh, C., & Sia, S. 2004. An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package: Organization misalignment. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(4): 375-397.
    Srivastava, S. C., & Shainesh, G. 2015. Bridging the service divide throuh digitally enabled service innovation: Evidence from Indian healthcare service providers. MIS Quarterly, 39(1): 245-A219.
    Suddaby, R. 2006. What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 633-642.
    Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C. 1997. The organizing vision in information systems innovation. Organization Science, 8(5): 458-474.
    Tan, F., Pan, S. L., & Zuo, M. 2019. Realizing platform operational agility through information technology-enabled capabilities: A resource‐interdependence perspective. Information Systems Journal, 29(3): 582-608.
    Venkatraman, N. 1994. IT-enabled business transformation: From automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review, 35(2): 73-87.
    Willcocks, L., & Smith, G. 1995. IT-enabled business process reengineering: Organizational and human resource dimensions. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 4(3): 279- 301.
    Yin, R. K. 1981. The Case Study Crisis: Some Answers. Administrative Science Quarterly, ??(?): 58-65.
    Yin, R. K. 1994. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Zuboff, S. 1985. Automate/Informate: The Two Faces of Intelligent Technology. Organizational Dynamics, 14(2): 5-19.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    107364127
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107364127
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001804
    顯示於類別:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    412701.pdf155534KbAdobe PDF290檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋