政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/132536
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50925529      Online Users : 957
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132536


    Title: 朱子倫理學是理由內在論嗎？
    Is Zhu Xi`s Ethics a case of Internalism of Reasons?
    Authors: 梁奮程
    Leung, Fan-Ching
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 朱子 ; 理由 ; 內在論 ; 外在論 
    Zhu Xi ; reasons ; internalism ; externalism
    Date: 2020-07
    Issue Date: 2020-11-12 16:01:01 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文從理由論的角度切入探問朱子倫理學究竟是理由內在論還是外在論。文章首先釐清內在論與外在論的正確意涵，而其中威廉斯的「內在理由理論」與王陽明的「知行合一」說代表著內在論的兩種典型。本文據此主張對朱子倫理學的內在論詮釋並不成立，並接著以牟宗三判定朱子學中的「性理」是「只存有而不活動」為線索，進一步轉換到理由論的脈絡中，從而得出「性理」只是行動的證成理由而非驅動力之源，就此確定朱子倫理學是一種理由外在論，並將之與麥克道爾式外在論作一對比，經此我們更能了解朱子式外在論因為其「格物致知」程序比麥克道爾式外在論更為精緻，從而突顯出朱子倫理學的實踐意涵。
    This paper explores whether Zhu Xi`s Ethics, viewed from the perspective of theories of reasons, is a case of internalism or externalism of reason. The meaning of internalism and externalism is first clarified. I identify Bernard Williams` Internal Reason Theory and Wang Yangming`s Doctrines of the Unity of Moral Knowledge and Action as two paradigms of internalism. Based on the standard of these two paradigms, I argue that Zhu Xi`s ethics is not a case of internalism. In this paper, I also apply the result of Mou Zongsan`s analysis, namely that the xingli (Nature-Reason) of Zhu`s philosophy is ＂merely an ontological Being without activity＂, onto the context of theories of reason and argue that xingli is a ground of the justification of action rather than a motivational force. Thus, Zhu Xi`s ethics represents a version of externalism. Finally, in comparison with John McDowell`s externalism, Zhu Xi`s procedure of ＂Investigating Things and Extending Knowledge＂ proves to be more sophisticated in so far as it is a theory of moral practice.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 44, 119-175
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202007_(44).0003 
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202007_(44).0003 
    Appears in Collections:[NCCU Philosophical Journal] Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    10.pdf1567KbAdobe PDF2303View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback