English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50919344      Online Users : 835
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132532


    Title: 道教重玄學與佛教中觀學間的對比與交談：以成玄英與吉藏之方法論為例
    Contrast and Communication between Daoist Chongxuanxue and Buddhist Madhyamaka: Cheng Xuanying and Jizang`s Methodologies as a Case Study
    Authors: 洪嘉琳
    Hong, C. Lynne
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: 重玄學 ; 中觀學 ; 對比哲學 ; 成玄英 ; 吉藏 ; 沈清松 
    Chongxuanxue (the Study of Twofold Mystery) ; Madhyamaka ; The Philosophy of Contrast ; Cheng Xuanying ; Jizang ; Vincent Shen
    Date: 2020-01
    Issue Date: 2020-11-12 15:59:29 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 學界公認重玄學之思維方法，不僅承襲了老莊之道家傳統，更深刻地受到佛教中觀學所發展的四句論法之影響；至於影響來源，或以為為印度之龍樹，或以為為中國之吉藏。本文旨在以重玄學之大家－成玄英－之重玄方法為例，借助沈清松之對比哲學，考察成玄英如何融攝佛教中觀學之語言乃至思維模式，與對方進行交談與溝通，以檢視此交談能否豐富道教義學上的內涵。本文首先對比吉藏與龍樹《中論》的四句論法，以明其於佛教中觀學內部的發展；其次以成玄英著作中的重玄方法為主，對比其與《老子》、《莊子》、向郭注中涉及雙遣雙非之處，以期辨明重玄方法對於道家傳統之繼承或創新。最後根據以上二節所得，對比吉藏的四句論法與成玄英的重玄方法，並以重玄學為主，考察其與佛學之間的交談。
    Chongxuanxue, The Study of Twofold Mystery, is a philosophical current within religious Daoism which ingeniously integrates the reasoning methodologies of the Daoist and Buddhist traditions, or more specifically for the latter, Buddhist Madhyamika catuṣkoṭi(ka). Inspired by the philosophy of contrast devised by Vincent Shen, this paper aims at investigating how Cheng Xuanying, the most representative Chongxuan thinker, communicates with Jizang, a Chinese Buddhist scholar who further developed catuṣkoṭi(ka), on the subject of reasoning methodology. In this paper, I first determine the way in which Jizang appropriated and developed Nāgārjuna`s catuṣkoṭi(ka). Second, I trace the influence in Cheng Xuanying`s work by comparing his Chongxuan methodology with the methodology of negation found in the Zhuangzi and its Xiang-Guo commentary. Finally, having established the positions of Jizang and Cheng Xuanying within their own respective traditions, I put into contrast their reasoning methodologies, with a particular emphasis on how Cheng responds to Jizang`s critique of Daoism.
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 43, 69-115
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0003
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0003
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    6.pdf1575KbAdobe PDF2362View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback