English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50997681      Online Users : 814
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/132531


    Title: On Two Recent Arguments against Intellectualism
    論最近兩個反對智性主義的論證
    Authors: 李國揚
    Lee, Kok Yong
    Contributors: 政治大學哲學學報
    Keywords: Intellectualism ; Epistemic Pragmatism ; Pragmatic Encroachment ; Pragmatic Penetration ; Interest-Relative Invariantism ; the Nature of Knowledge 
    智性主義 ; 知性實用主義 ; 實用入侵主義 ; 實用穿透主義 ; 利益相對不變主義 ; 知識的本質
    Date: 2020-01
    Issue Date: 2020-11-12 15:59:15 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Several authors have recently argued against intellectualism, the view that one`s epistemic position with respect to p depends exclusively on one`s truth-relevant factors with respect to p. In this paper, I first examine two prominent arguments for the anti-intellectualist position and find both of them wanting. More precisely, I argue that these arguments, by themselves, are underdetermined between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism. I then manifest the intuitive plausibility of intellectualism by examining the ordinary conversational pattern of challenging a claim.
    根據智性主義(intellectualism),影響S對p的認知地位(epistemic position)的因素,只能是與p是否為真相關的因素(truth-relevant factor)。近年來,有不少的哲學家對智性主義提出強而有力的反對論證。本文將探討其中兩個重要的反對論證。筆者主張,這兩個論證其實並沒有辦法證明,非智性主義比智性主義更合理。並且,通過檢視日常語言中,挑戰一個宣稱(challenging a claim)的語言資料(linguistic data),筆者將說明智性主義是非常符合一般人的直覺的。
    Relation: 政治大學哲學學報, 43, 35-67
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0002
    DOI: 10.30393/TNCUP.202001_(43).0002
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學哲學學報 THCI Core] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5.pdf541KbAdobe PDF2283View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback