Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131914
|
| Title: | 服務隨創：以在地資源的價值轉換回應制約
Service Bricolage: Conversion of Local Resources in Responding to Constraints |
| Authors: | 繆宜真
Miao, Yi-Jen |
| Contributors: | 蕭瑞麟
繆宜真
Miao, Yi-Jen |
| Keywords: | 服務創新
隨創
資源拼湊
資源建構
資源轉換
Service innovation
bricolage
resource making-do
resource construction
resource conversion |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-09-02 13:10:52 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 服務創新過程中遇到制約要如何回應，挑戰著每一位設計者。目前文獻雖然談到以隨創的手法來活化資源，卻亟需探索資源轉換的方式。隨創作法中，物質性資源以拼湊為核心，文化性資源以社會建構來施力去轉化對資源的印象。這兩種隨創模式都提供激活資源的方式，然而當前實務卻對在地資源的應用比較陌生。特別是，設計者如何能由在地資源找到解除制約的構思，進而轉換資源的價值，形成解決方案。本研究以星野集團的OMO都會型旅館為研究對象，分析星野如何運用在地資源來回應劣勢條件，理解在地資源的取用與轉化，至形成解決方案的作法。學理上，本研究對隨創文獻的貢獻著重於資源轉換的手法，點出改變資源的性質何以能轉變資源的價值。實務上，本研究將省思目前服務創新以及地方創生的迷思，並提出資源轉換導向的新作法。透過星野的隨創方式，可體會到服務隨創的精神不僅是資源的拼湊與建構，更是思維上的轉變與啟蒙。當我們能用積極的視角看待貌似劣質的資源，便可隨手拈來皆是創新。
How may we respond to constraints in the process of developing new services, is a challenge that confronts every designers. Although current literature indicates the use of bricolage to activate resources, we know relatively little about how resources may be converted. In exercingin bricolage, the material thesis proposes to make-do with resource, whereas the cultural thesis applies social construction to transform the impression of resources.Both models suggest ways to mobilize resources. Nonetheless, contemporary practices still are not entirely familiar with the use of local resources. Particularly, designers may face obstacles to resolve constraints through local resources and convert their value before forming solutions. This study examines the case of Hoshino’s OMO metropolitan hotels and analyzes how it reacts to unfavorable conditions by leveraging and converting local resources.A theoretical insight points out that the transformation of resources’ value depends largely on the conversion of resources’ quality. Practically, this research speaks to service innovation and urban rejuvenation, highlights those myths underlying current practices. This case study inspires us to reflect that the essence of bricolage lies not solely in the making-do and construction of resources. Rather, it is more of an enlightenment of how we perceive our staus quo. When we could positively reframe seemingly unpleasant resources, innovation would come in handy ubiquitously. |
| Reference: | 中文文獻
李宜曄、林詠能，2008，「 十三行博物館導覽服務滿意度與重遊意願研究」，《博物館學季刊》，第1期，第22卷，93-105頁。
李沿儒、楊瑜馨，2014，「連結消費者新生活型態：王品集團商業生態系統個案研究」，《產業管理評論》，第一期，第7卷，17-37頁。
彭康麟、洪碧怡、林明珠，2011，「逆境生存、創新思維─以節慶活動行銷幼教產業」，《產業管理評論》，第1期，第5卷，35-47頁。
湯桂禎，2018，《美麗的制約：星野旅館集團如何以服務創新化劣勢為優勢》，碩士論文，政治大學商學院經營管理碩士學程台商組。
蕭瑞麟，2017，《不用數字的研究：質性研究的思辨脈絡》，台北：五南學術原創專書系列。
蕭瑞麟，2019，《服務隨創：少力設計的邏輯思維》，台北：五南書局學術專書。
蕭瑞麟、徐嘉黛，2020，「境隨心轉：服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換」，《組織與管理》，即將發表。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬，2017，「逆勢拼湊：化資源制約為創新來源」，《中山管理評論》，第1期，第25卷，219-268頁。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳煥宏，2019，「負負得正：相依性如何促成負資源轉換」，《組織與管理》，第12卷，第1期，第127-171頁。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬，2014，「劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為」，《中山管理評論》，第2期，第22卷，323-367頁。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、蘇筠，2017，「逆強論：隨創式的資源建構過程」，《台大管理論叢》，第4期，第27卷，43-74頁。
英文文獻
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. 1998. Out on a limb: The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1): 23-57.
Baker, T. 2007. Resources in play: Bricolage in the toy store(y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5): 694-711.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. 2003. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, 32(2): 255-276.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. 2005. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3): 329-366.
Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1): 99-120.
Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. 2011. Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handles surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2): 239-261.
Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. 2008. Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3): 66-94.
Desa, G. 2012. Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36(4): 727-751.
Desa, G., & Basu, S. 2013. Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1): 26-49.
Edelman, D. C., & Singer, M. 2015. Competing on customer journeys. Harvard Business Review, 93(11): 88-87.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. 2003. Bricolage versus breakthrough: Distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2): 277–300.
Gulati, R., & Kletter, D. 2005. Shrinking core, expanding periphery: The relational architecture of high performance organizations. California Management Review, 47(3): 77-104.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. 1993. Strategy as stretch and leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2): 75-84.
Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. 2016. Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6): 69-96.
Levi-Strauss, C. 1968. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. 2001. Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 545.
Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. 2015. Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1): 155-176.
Maklan, S., Antonetti, P., & Whitty, S. 2017. A better way to manage customer experience: Lessons from the Royal Bank of Scotland. California Management Review, 59(2): 92-115.
Normann, R., & Ramirez, R. 1993. From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 71(4): 65-77.
Norton, D. W., & Pine II, B. J. 2013. Using the customer journey to road test and refine the business model. Strategy & Leadership, 41(2): 12-17.
Penrose, E. T. 1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. 2014. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2): 211-230.
Shane, S. 2000. Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4): 448-469.
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571-610.
Tidd, J., & Hull, F. M. 2006. Managing service innovation: The need for selectivity rather than ‘best practice’. New Technology, Work & Employment, 21(2): 139-161.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. A rsource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2): 171-180.
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 70-105. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
106364121 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106364121 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001643 |
| Appears in Collections: | [科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 412101.pdf | | 33793Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 88 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
