Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131759
|
| Title: | 農村地區韌性實踐之研究-以台中市霧峰區為例 |
| Authors: | 楊孟儒
Yang, Meng-Ju |
| Contributors: | 顏愛靜
Yen, Ai-Ching
楊孟儒
Yang, Meng-Ju |
| Keywords: | 農村韌性
繁榮
創新
農會
領導人
Rural resilience
Prosperity
Innovation
Farmers’ Association
Leadership |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-09-02 12:40:26 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究以霧峰區農會於二零一四年開始推動友善耕作之發展歷程為例，檢視農場和農村地區如何應對客觀環境變化帶來的衝擊，並透過五大韌性提升策略作為強化其組織能力的依據，以減少對於霧峰區農會的依賴，進而發揮自主性得以永續經營，又農村地區繁榮也是韌性的展現，故探討農村的農會、農民如何藉由韌性策略以謀求整體繁榮的進程、所生影響及未來展望。
根據Amit Ashkenazy(2018)等人提出提升韌性與繁榮促進策略對霧峰區的在地實踐狀況進行分析，研究結果顯示除五個韌性提升策略外應重視在地人才的能力培育，方能促進地方發展，再者，發現韌性提升後確能增進農村的繁榮和福祉，如認識當地傳統與能力和有效利用資源策略說明，應重視在地特色與傳統並將其大力推廣；尋找新方法使農村居民收入來源多樣化與創新的土地利用和管理實踐認為，應以創新的模式創造多元的收入；利用技術創新和成本效益是以發掘創新的雜草管理模式以期降低生產成本；增加不同社會群體之間的凝聚力與良好治理的城鄉關係則是透過與在地組織及大學合作藉以增強彼此的交流；利用政府對農民與農村地區的協助，維持可能會消失的公共財是以藉由霧峰區農會設立的契作制度維護農村地景文化景觀；而在地人才的培育是為農村培養農產業人才，方能增進地方發展。
現行之友善耕作發展有賴霧峰區農會從旁協助，該運行模式易受農會領導人更迭而變化，因此，本研究建議為使霧峰區友善耕作精神永續長存，尤須建置在地領導人培育計畫，建構促進農產業發展能力及兼顧社區發展需求以利地方繁榮。而在友善環境的基礎上如何將友善耕作農友們的韌性精神昇華為繁榮在地的傳統精神，是下個階段的目標，此精神係傳達友善耕作需透過不斷嘗試及改善，包括產量及品質的提升。
This study aimed to investigate the developmental process of the Wu-feng District Farmers’ Association in promoting friendly farming starting from 2014 as an example, surveyed how farms and rural areas have responded to the changes in the environment, and used five resilience improvement strategies to strengthen their organizational capabilities. The basis is to reduce famers’ dependence on the Wu-feng District Farmers’ Association, and then exert their autonomy to achieve sustainable operation. Moreover, the prosperity of rural areas is also a manifestation of resilience. Therefore, we will discuss how Wu-feng District Farmers’ Association and farmers use resilience strategies to achieve overall prosperity, impact and future prospects.
According to the strategies proposed by Amit Ashkenazy et al.(2018) to promote resilience and prosperity, the local practice in Wu-feng District is analyzed. The results show that in addition to the five resilience enhancement strategies, attention should be paid to the cultivation of local talents in order to promote local development. It is found that the increase in resilience can indeed enhance the prosperity and well-being of rural areas. For example, valuing traditions and local capacities and efficient resource use reveals that local characteristics and traditions should be emphasized and promoted. Promoting economic diversification and innovative land use and management practices is believed that innovative models should be used to create diversified income. Utilizing technological innovation and cost efficiency is to explore innovative weed management models to reduce production costs. Increasing cohesion between different social groups within the region and outside and well managed rural-urban relationships is through cooperation with local organizations and universities to enhance mutual exchanges. Optimising the use of public support to farmers and rural areas to maintain public goods that may disappear is maintained by the contract system established by the Wu-feng District Farmers’ Association the rural landscape and cultural landscape. The cultivation of local talents is to cultivate talents in the agricultural industry for the rural areas, so as to promote local development.
The current development of friendly farming relies on the assistance of the Wu-feng District Farmers’ Association. This mode of operation is subject to changes in the leadership of the Farmers’ Association. This study suggests that in order to sustain the development of the friendly farming spirit in Wu-feng District, local leaders must be established. Cultivating plans and strengthening the ability to promote the development of agricultural industry and taking into account the needs of community development to benefit local prosperity. On the basis of a friendly environment, how to sublime the resilient spirit of friendly farming farmers into the traditional spirit of prosperity is the goal of the next stage. This spirit conveys that friendly farming requires continuous experimentation and improvement, including yield and quality improvement. |
| Reference: | 一、中文參考文獻
王俊豪，2008，「歐盟共同農業政策歷次改革方案之比較」，〈主要國家農業政策法規與經濟動態資訊之蒐集與研究〉，行政院農業委員會。
余祈暐，2014，「全球香米市場與科技發展現況」，『農業生技產業季刊』，第39期，頁1-13。
李承嘉，廖麗敏，陳怡婷，王玉真，藍逸之，2009，「多功能農業體制下的農地功能與使用方案選擇」，『台灣土地研究』，第十二卷 2期 頁135-162。
邱紫菱，2019，「台中市霧峰區區域空間的歷史變遷」，台南大學文化與自然資源學系台灣文化碩士班碩士論文。
張勝彥總編，2010，「續修臺中縣志土地誌」，臺中：臺中縣政府。
黃仲杰，2016，「推動友善環境農業」，『農政與農情』，294期。
黃智彥，張文龍，李蕙玲，賴明信，2011，「以社會網絡分析驗證稻米產業的創新擴散」，『東吳經紀商學學報』，第73期 頁67-108。
董時叡，2007，「有機之談:有機農業的非技術面思考」，臺中。
臺中市農林漁牧統計年報，2019，臺中：臺中市政府。
臺中市霧峰區農業發展概況統計分析，2018，臺中：臺中市霧峰區公所。
劉凱翔，2007，有機農業法規及政策之研究，國立台灣大學農藝學系碩士論文。
鄭瑞明等，2009，「新修霧峰鄉志」，臺中：霧峰鄉公所。
韓寶珠，2004，「歐盟共同農業政策改革與啟示」，『農政與農情』，143期。
顏愛靜，2013，「土地資源概論」，臺北:五南出版社。
顏愛靜、陳胤安、吳宜庭，2016，「有機農業多功能性之探究：以宜蘭縣三星鄉行健村為例」，『台灣土地研究』，第十九卷 1期 頁69-103。
二、外文參考文獻
Amit Ashkenazy,Tzruya Calvão Chebach,Karlheinz Knickel, Sarah Peter,Boaz Horowitz, Rivka Offenbach, 2018, Operationalising resilience in farms and rural regions e Findings from fourteen case studies, Journal of Rural Studies, 59,.211-221.
Berkes, F., Folke, C., 1998, Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability.Link. Soc. Ecol. Syst. Manag. Pract. Soc. Mech. Build. Resil.1, 13-20.
Chambers, R., 1997, Editorial: responsible well-being-a personal agenda for development. World Dev. 25, 1743-1754.
Cloke, P., Goodwin, M., Milbourne,P.,Thomas, C.,1995, Deprivation, poverty and marginalization in rural lifestyles in England and Wales. J. Rural Stud.11 (4), 351-365.
Curry, N., 2010, Differentiating trust in rural decision-making, drawing on an English case study. Sociol. Rural. 50 (2), 121-138.
Darnhofer, I. Lamine, C., Knickel, K , 2013, Conceptual Framework for RETHINK,29.
Dayton-Johnson, J., 2001, Social Cohesion and Economic Prosperity. James Lorimer& Company, 152.
De los Ríos, I., García, C., Herrera, A.T., Rivera, M., 2015, Innovation and Social Learning in Organic Vegetable Production in the Region of Murcia, Camposeven, Spain. RETHINK Case Study Report. GESPLAN e Technical University of Madrid, Technical College of Agriculture, Madrid, Spain.
Easterly, W., Ritzen, J., Woolcock, M., 2006, Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Econ. Polit. 18 (2), 103-120.
Folke, C., Carpenter, S.R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., Rockstrom, J., 2010, Resilience Thinking:Integrating Resilience,Adaptability and Transformability.Ecology and Society 15(4): 20-28.
Giray, F.H., Bal , T., Boyar, S., Sayın, B., 2015, Resilience and Competitiveness of SmallRuminant Farms in Isparta (Turkey). RETHINK Case Study Report. Suleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Agriculture (SDUZF), West Mediterranean Agricultural Research Centre (BATEM), Turkey.
Holling, C.S., 1973, Resilience and stability of ecological systems.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 1-23.
Holling,C.S., 1973,Resilience and stability of ecological systems.Annu.Rev.Ecol. Syst., 1-23.
IFOAM, 2013, Principles of Organic Agriculture Preamble, International Federal of Organic Agriculture Movement (IFOAM). http://www.ifoam.bio/sites/default/files/ poa_english_web.pdf
IFOAM,2013,Principles of Organic Agriclture,http://infohub.ifoam.bio/en/what-organic/principles-organic-agriculture
K. Knickel, M. Redman, I. Darnhofer, A. Ashkenazy, T. Calv~ao Chebach, S. S umane, T. Tisenkopfs, R. Zemeckis, V. Atkociuniene, M. Rivera, A. Strauss, L.S. Kristensen, S. Schiller, M.E. Koopmans, E. Rogge, 2018, Between aspirations and reality: Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient, sustainable and equitable, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 197-210.
Kasser, T., et al., 2007, Some costs of american corporate capitalism: a psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychol. Inq. 1-22.
Kees de Roest, Paolo Ferrari, Karlheinz Knickel, 2018, Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 222-231.
Maria Rivera, Karlheinz Knickel, Ignacio de los Rios, Amit Ashkenazy, David Qvist Pears, Tzruya Chebach, Sandra Sūmane, 2018, Rethinking the connections between agricultural change and rural prosperity: A discussion of insights derived from case studies in seven countries, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 242-251.
Marlinde E. Koopmans, Elke Rogge, Evy Mettepenningen, Karlheinz Knickel, Sandra Šūmane, 2018, The role of multi-actor governance in aligning farm modernization and sustainable rural development, Journal of Rural Studies, 59, 252-262.
McIntosh, A., Stayner, R., Carrington, K., Rolley, F., Scott, J., Sorensen, T., 2008, Resilience in Rural Communities Literature Review. University of New England -Centre for Applied Research in Social Science.
Paull, J., 2011, Attending the First Organic Agriculture Course: Rudolf Steiner’s Agriculture Course at Koberwitz, 1924, European Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), pp. 64-70.
Pears, D., Kristensen, L.S., Primdahl, J., 2015, Landscape Strategy Making and Agriculture (Denmark). RETHINK Case Study Report. Copenhagen University, Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and Planning, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Rivera, A. Strauss, L.S. Kristensen, S. Schiller, M.E. Koopmans, E. Rogge, 2018, Between aspirations and reality: Making farming, food systems and rural areas more resilient,sustainable and equitable,Journal of Rural Studies,59, 197-210.
Shucksmith, M., Rønningen, K., 2011, The Uplands after neo liberalism? The role of the small farm in rural sustainability. J. Rural Stud. 27, 275-287.
Šūmane,S. , 2010, Rural innovation: formation of new development practices. The case of biological agriculture. PhD dissertation. Riga: University of Latvia.
Vilma Atkočiūnienė, Romualdas Zemeckis, Alvydas Aleksandravičius, 2015, Public Policy Impact on Prosperity and Resilience of Farms and Agricultural Companies: Lithuanian Case Study. Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2015, 1-7.
Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., Kinzig, A., 2004, Resilience, adaptability and transformability in socialeecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 9 (2) , 5.
三、網路查詢
內政部戶政司，2020，https://reurl.cc/20jGMX，2020/5/1查詢。
水保局，2018，霧峰稻田設棲架成功吸引黑翅鳶停駐創造友善耕作環境。https://reurl.cc/d0yjAk，2020/5/1查詢。
台中觀光旅遊網，2020，https://reurl.cc/GVjpN3，2020/4/30查詢。
林献元，2019，台中霧峰農會發表黑翅鳶米暨友善耕作市集，指傳媒。https://reurl.cc/odL8zM，2020/8/17查詢。
顏愛靜，2019，誰踐踏農地 偷走農村幸福？，聯合新聞網。https://reurl.cc/kdyjWK，2019/11/25查詢。
霧峰區公所網頁，2019， https://reurl.cc/MvjxmK，2019/11/25查詢。
霧峰區農會網頁，2019，https://reurl.cc/Y1qrrX，2019/11/25查詢。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
地政學系
107257009 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257009 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001475 |
| Appears in Collections: | [地政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 700901.pdf | | 3842Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
