政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131719

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131719

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50978535 線上人數 : 921

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 國家發展研究所 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/131719

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131719

題名:	從經貿外交角度探討臺灣與斯洛伐克的雙邊關係（1993-2003年） A Study of Taiwan-Slovakia Relations (1993-2003) from the Perspective of Economic Diplomacy
作者:	雷悅 Eunika, Rejtova
貢獻者:	魏玫娟 Wei, Mei-Chuan 雷悅 Rejtova Eunika
關鍵詞:	斯洛伐克台灣中歐實質關係經貿外交代表處 Slovakia Taiwan Central Europe substantial relations economic diplomacy representative offices
日期:	2020
上傳時間:	2020-09-02 12:32:25 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本文旨在從經貿外交的角度探討臺灣在斯洛伐克設立代表處之前的兩國關係，特別著重於討論斯洛伐克作為中歐最後一個與臺灣建立實質關係國家的原因為何。由於斯洛伐克與中國的官方關係，以及斯洛伐克對「一個中國」政策的堅持，與臺灣建立任何關係都僅止於非正式層面。臺灣採取所謂「非正式外交」方式與中國的盟友建立實質關係，而經貿外交則是臺灣於1990年代與中歐和東歐採取的非正式外交手段之一。為確認臺灣辦事處延遲設立之因，本文的分析框架為先評估1990年代臺灣經貿外交對斯洛伐克的影響程度，然後探討是否因此導致雙方之間出現「不對稱互賴性關係」。本研究結果顯示，儘管臺灣自1990年代以來持續努力與所有中歐國家建立關係，但其與斯洛伐克的經貿外交似乎直到2000年代初才因為該國的國內政治變化而出現成效。據此，本研究認為斯洛伐克國內政治為臺灣代表處延遲設立的主要因素；1990年代斯洛伐克政府的兩個領導者對經濟發展採取不同的方針：Meciar的「經濟服務政治」和Dzurinda 的「政治服務經濟」，不同了方針因此決定了該國的外交政策、經濟改革及其對臺灣經貿外交的立場。本論文從經貿外交角度出發，以臺灣代表處延遲設立為例探討1993-2003臺灣與斯洛伐克外交關係所進行之研究的結果顯示，國內政治為影響臺灣經貿外交成效的重要因素，但在國際現實條件下，透過加強經貿關係仍為臺灣與他國建立實質性關係的重要雙邊關係模式。 This thesis seeks to provide an account of the relations between Taiwan and Slovakia before the opening of the representative offices with a special emphasis on the reasons that made Slovakia being one of the last countries in Central Europe to institutionalize its substantial relations with Taiwan. Given Slovakia‟s official relations with China and the „one China‟ policy to which Slovakia adheres, any relations with Taiwan are possible exclusively on the informal level. Taiwan establishes this kind of relationship with China‟s diplomatic allies through the so-called „informal‟ diplomacy. One tool of the informal diplomacy that had been adopted by Taiwan on Central and Eastern Europe in the 1990s is the economic diplomacy. In order to identify the reasons behind the delay of the opening of the mutual offices, the analytical framework of the thesis aimed first to evaluate the degree of influence of Taiwan‟s economic diplomacy on Slovakia in the 1990s and then find out whether this resulted in an asymmetrical dependent relationship with Slovakia. The research revealed that although Taiwan had made efforts since the 1990s to establish relationship with all Central European countries, its economic diplomacy with Slovakia did not appear to be effective primarily due to the country`s domestic politics until the time of early 2000s. The domestic politics were thus identified as the most influential factor for explaining the delay of the opening of the representative offices. The different approaches of the two administrations that led Slovakia in the 1990s – „economy serving politics‟ under Mečiar‟s government and „politics serving economy‟ under Dzurinda‟s administration - determined the country‟s foreign policy, economic reforms and its attitude towards Taiwan‟s economic diplomacy. This thesis suggests a model of the bilateral relations that could help to understand the possible patterns of Taiwan‟s substantial relations with other countries built through the economic diplomacy.
參考文獻:	Books Alexander, C. R. (2014). China and Taiwan in Central America: Engaging Foreign Public in Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Baine, N. and Wookock, S. (2003). The New Economic Diplomacy: Decision-Making and Negotiation in International Economic Relations (Global Finance). Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Baldwin, D. A. (1985). Economic Statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Berridge, G., James A., Lloyd L. (2012). The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA. Elster, J., Offe, C. and Preuss, U. K. (1998). Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fürst, R. Bakesova, I. and Hermanova, Z. (2004). Hisory of Taiwan (Dějiny Taiwanu). Prague: Nakladatelstvi Lidove noviny. Fürst, R. (2010), The Czech-China Relations after 1989. Prague: Karolinum. Gao Lang (1994). Zhonghua Mingguo waijiao guanxi zhi yanban, 1972-1992 [An Evolution of Foreign Relations of the Republic of China, 1972-1992]. Taipei: Wunan Tushu Chuban. Goldman, M. F. (1999). Slovakia since Independence: A Struggle for Democracy. London: Praeger Publishers. Holsti, K.J. (1995). International Politics: a Framework for Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown. Linz, J. and Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Nye, J. S. Jr. (2005). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs. Rawnsley, G. D. (2010). Taiwan`s Informal Diplomacy and Propaganda. London: Macmillan Press LTD. Rosenberg, S. Emily (1999). Financial Missionaries to the World, The Politics and Culture of Dollar Diplomacy. London: Harvard University Press. Tubilewicz, C. (2007). Taiwan and Post-Communist Europe: Shopping for Allies. New York: Routledge. van Vranken Hickey, D. (2007). Foreign Policy Making in Taiwan: From Principle to Pragmatism. London and New York: Routledge. Wang, Y. S. (1990). Foreign Policy of the Republic of China on Taiwan: An Unorthodox Approach. New York: Praeger. Wong, T. (1999). The Political Economy of Taiwan`s Foreign Policy. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies. Journal articles Arel-Bundock, V. and Atkinson, J. and Potter, R. A. (2015). The Limits of Foreign Aid Diplomacy: How Bureaucratic Design Shapes Aid Distribution. Retrieved January, 2019 from <https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12191 >. Batora, J. (2005). Public diplomacy in small and medium-sized states: Norway and Canada. Netherlands Institute of International Relations` Clingendael`. Retrieved January, 2019 from <https://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/Clingendael_20050300_cli_paper_dip_issue97.pdf> Blanchard, F. and Ripsman, N. M. (2008). A Political Theory of Economic Statecraft, Foreign Policy Analysis, vol. 4, no. 4, 2008, pp. 374-398. Retrieved January 2019, from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229889891_A_Political_Theory_of_Economic_Statecraft>. Bowen, G. (2009). (PDF) Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Retrieved April, 2019 from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240807798_Document_Analysis_as_a_Qualitative_Research_Method>. Brooks, R. (2002). Sanctions and Regime Type: What Works, and When? Security Studies 11(4), 1-50. Caporaso, James A. (1978). Dependence, Dependency, and Power in the Global System: a Structural and Behavioral Analysis, International Organization, 32, 1–2, Winter–Spring, 13–43. Daborowski, T. (2009). Slovakia’s Economic Success and the Global Crisis in Centre for Eastern Studies, Issue 19. Retrieved November, 2019 from <https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/96500/commentary_19.pdf>. Dickey, L. (2018). Taiwan`s Small-power Diplomacy. The interpreter. Retrieved January, 2019 from <https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/taiwans-small-power-diplomacy>. Duleba, A. (1997). Democratic Consolidation and the Conflict over Slovak International Alignement in Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation and the Struggle over the Rules of the Game, Bratislava: Slovak Political Science Association and Friedrich Ebert Foundation, 209-230. Duleba, A. and Lukac, P. and Wlachovsky, M. (1998). ‘Zahraničná politika Slovenskej republiky východiská, stav a perspektívy’ [Foreign politics of the Slovak Republic: Background, Status and Perspectives]. Retrieved Sept, 2019 from <http://www.sfpa.sk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/1998_Duleba_Lukac_Wlachovsky.pdf>. Fürst, R. and Pleschova, G. (2010). Czech and Slovak Relations with China: Contenders for China`s Favour. Europe-Asia Studies. Glasgow: University of Glasgow, 1363-1381. Retrieved October, 2018 from <http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09668136.2010.504387>. Goldstein, S. M. (2008). Soft Power as a Foreign Policy Tool for Taiwan. In Tsang, S. (Eds.), Taiwan and the International Community. Bern: International Academic Publishers. Gregušová, G. (2003). Slovak-Chinese Relations. Report on the State of Society, Bratislava: Institute for Public Issues, 303-306. Gregušová, G. (2005). Relations of Visegrad Four Countries with China. Czech Journal of International Relations 1-2005. Prague: Institute of International Relations. Retrieved November, 2019 from <https://mv.iir.cz/article/view/152>. Javorcik B. S., B. Kaminski, (2004). The "EU Factor" and Slovakia`s Globalization: The Role of Foreign Direct Investment. Retrieved September, 2019 from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242514642_The_EU_Factor_and_Slovakia`s_Globalization_The_Role_of_Foreign_Direct_Investment>. Labuschagne, A. (2003). Qualitative research: Airy fairy or fundamental? The Qualitative Report, 8 (1), Article 7. Retrieved April, 2019 from <https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol8/iss1/7/>. Larus, E. F. (2006). Taiwan`s quest for international recognition. Issues & Studies, 42(2), 23-52. Lee, D. and Hocking, B. (2010). Economic Diplomacy. In Robert A. Denemark (Eds.), The International Studies Encyclopedia, Vol. II, 1216-1227. Wiley Blackwell. Lektzian, D. and Souva, M. (2007). An Institutional Theory of Sanction Onset and Success. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(6), 848-71. Marcincin A., Beblavy, M. (2000).Economic Policy in Slovakia 1990-1999. Retrieved August, 2019 from <https://www.academia.edu/6258072/Economic_policy_in_Slovakia_1990-1999>. Mengin, F. (1998). The Foreign Policy of the ROC on Taiwan since 1971: An Overview. The Republic of China on Taiwan in International Politics. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang D. Retrieved May 4, 2019 from <https://www.peterlang.com/view/title/23365>. Okano-Heijmans, M. (2011). Conceptualizing Economic Diplomacy: The Crossroads of International Relations, Economics, IPE and Diplomatic Studies. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, January 2011. Retrieved on January, 2019 from <https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233659639_Conceptualizing_Economic_DiplomacyThe_Crossroads_of_International_Relations_Economics_IPE_and_Diplomatic_Studies>. Okano-Heijimans M., Wit S., van der Putten F. P., (2015). Cross-Strait Relations and Diplomacy in East Asia: Towards Greater EU-Taiwan cooperation? Retrieved October 2019 from <https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/2015%20%20Towards%20Greater%20EU-Taiwan%20Economic%20C%20ooperation%20-%20Clingendael%20Report%20(FINAL).pdf>. Pleschová, G. (2013). The Slovak and Hungarian Partnerships with China: High Hopes that Did Not Come True. China`s Comeback in Former Eastern Europe: No Longer Comrades, Not yet Strategic Partners. Prague: Institute of International Relations, 45-49. Pridam, G. (2001). Uneasy Democratisations – Pariah Regimes, Political Conditionality and Reborn Transitions in Central and Eastern Europe. Democratisation, vol. 8, 2001, no. 4, 65–94. Rejtová, E. (2019). Slovak-Taiwanese Relations under the One China Policy, Studia Orientalia Slovaca, vol. 1, 2019, ISSN 1336-3786, Saner, R. and Yiu, L. (2003). International Economic Diplomacy: Mutations in Postmodern Times. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 84 (1). The Hague: Clingendael (Netherlands Institute of International Relations). Retrieved January, 2019 from <http://www.businessdiplomats.com/images/articles/files/Postmodern_diplomacy.pdf. Straková, A. (2017) Taiwan’s Cultural Diplomacy Practice: The Case in Slovakia (Master thesis, School of Culture Resources, Taipei National University of the Arts). Su, Hungdah (2010). The EU’s Taiwan Policy in a New Context. Issues & Studies 46 (1), 1-53. Szczudlik –Tatar J. (2013). The Unexploited Potential of Poland’s Cooperation with Taiwan. Retrieved January, 2019 from <https://www.pism.pl/files/?id_plik=14455>. Szomolányi, S. (2003). Slovakia: From a Difficult Case of Transition to a Consolidated Central European Democracy. Retrieved, September 2019 from <http://src-h.slav.hokudai.ac.jp/sympo/03september/pdf/S_Szomolanyi.pdf>. Taylor, I. (2002). Taiwan`s Foreign Policy and Africa: The limitations of dollar diplomacy. Journal of Contemporary China, 11:30, 125-140, DOI: 10.1080/10670560120091174 Tubilewicz, C. (1999). Comrades No More: Sino-Central European Relations after the Cold War, Problems of Post-Communism, 46, 2, March/April 1999, pp. 3–14. Tubilewicz, C. (2000). Promising Eldorado: Taiwan`s diplomatic offensive in East Central Europe, 1989-1999. East Asia, 18(1), 34-60. Tubilewicz, C. (2001) Taiwan`s Balkan option: A new chapter in Republic of China ‘dollar diplomacy’, Diplomacy & Statecraft, 12:1, 161-184, DOI: 10.1080/09592290108406194 Tubilewicz, C. (2005).The Scrooge Effect: Taiwan’s Economic Diplomacy Toward Central Europe, 1988-2005.Issues & Studies, 41(4), 209-249. Tubilewicz, C. (2004). Breaking the ice: The origins of Taiwan`s economic diplomacy towards the Soviet Union and its European allies. Europe Asia Studies, 56(6), 891-906. van Bergeijk, P. A.G. and Moons, S. (2009). Economic Diplomacy and Economic Security. New Frontiers for Economic Diplomacy, 37-54. Retrieved January, 2019 from <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1436584>. Winkler, S. (2007). EU-Taiwan Relations in the WTO: The Question of International Status. Retrieved September 2019 from <https://www.ies.be/files/070417%20Sigrid%20Winkler%20EU-Taiwan.pdf>. Woo, B. and Verdier, D. (2013). Sanctions, Rewards and Regime Types. Unpub. Retrieved May, 2019 from: <https://polisci.osu.edu/sites/polisci.osu.edu/files/Sanctions%2C%20rewards%20and%20regime%20type.pdf>. Government and Organizations’ documents Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2003). Slovakia. Retrieved October 2019 from <https://www.btiproject.org/fileadmin/files/BTI/Downloads/Reports/2003/pdf/BTI_2003_Slovakia.pdf>. The Basis for One China, de Facto and de Jure. Retrieved September, 2018 from <http://en.people.cn/features/taiwanpaper/taiwanb.html>. Directorate General of Customs, Ministry of Finance, ROC. Statistics Database Query: Yearly Comparison of ROC Imports and Exports by Continent (Area), Visegrad 4. Retrieved August, 2019 from <https://portal.sw.nat.gov.tw/APGA/GA30E;APGAJSESSIONID=nT9Dp4NST0b41NbfSvy0zJ0RV4q51gmPwnJt9bvmm9dQPpQGf0Xk!-626283149>. European Commission (1997), Agenda 2000 - Commission Opinion on Slovakia’s Application for Membership of the European Union. Retrieved September, 2019 from <https://www.esiweb.org/pdf/slovakia_EC%20Opinion%20on%20SK%201997_en.pdf>. European Parliament (2000). Briefing No 13 Slovakia and the enlargement of the European Union. Retrieved November, 2019 from <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/briefings/13a3_en.htm>. Freedomhouse (2003). Reports, Czech Republic. Retrieved August, 2019 from <https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2003/czech-republic>. Government Office of the Slovak Republic (2001) Report on the Preparedness of the Slovak Republic for the EU Membership. Retrieved November, 2019 from <https://rokovania.gov.sk › download>. Institute for Policy Studies (2016). What Europe Can Teach Us bout Trump. Retrieved October, 2019 from <https://ips-dc.org/europe-can-teach-us-trump/>. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2003). 我國設立駐斯洛伐克代表處記者會紀要 . Obtained during Interview in August, 2019. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of China (Taiwan) (2003). The ROC signed the “Replenishment Agreement for the EBRD-Taipei China Technical Cooperation Fund” and... Retrieved September, 2018 from <https://www.mofa.gov.tw/en/News_Content.aspx?n=539A9A50A5F8AF9E&sms=37B41539382B84BA&s=AF58130F6D2F7430>. MOFA Slovakia, Economic Information about Territory, Taiwan (2016). Retrieved September, 2018 from <https://www.mzv.sk/documents/1479306/1481362/Ekonomick%C3%A9+inform%C3%A1cie+o+terit%C3%B3riu/882cb16c-422c-4f92-ac86-6fd3513ddb64>. National Bank of Slovakia, NBS (1995). Annual Report 1995. Retrieved August, 2019 from < https://www.nbs.sk/sk/publikacie/vyrocna-sprava/vs-1995-kapitoly>. Office of the President, Republic of China (Taiwan) (20015). President Ma meets delegation led by Slovakian Member of European Parliament Eduard Kukan. Retrieved November, 2019 from <https://english.president.gov.tw/NEWS/4744>. Taiwan Affairs Office and the Information Office of the State Council. The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue. Retrieved July, 2019 from <https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/world/asia/022200china-taiwan-text.html> Taiwan`s Foreign Aid Policy White Paper (2010). Retrieved September, 2018 from <https://www.mofa.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/2173/80233/%E5%A4%96%E4%BA%A4%E9%83%A8%E6%8F%B4%E5%A4%96%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%99%BD%E7%9A%AE%E6%9B%B8%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%EF%BC%88PDF%EF%BC%89.PDF> Taipei Represenative Office in Hungary, <http://tro.hu/en/tajvanrol/>. The Official Website of Republic of China: Economy. Retrieved September, 2018 from <https://www.taiwan.gov.tw/content_7.php>. The Treaty of Lisbon (2009). Retrieved November 2019 from <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=legissum%3Aai0033>. Media reports The Diplomat (2016). International Civil Aviation Organization Shuts out Taiwan. Retrieved September, 2019 from <https://thediplomat.com/2016/09/international-civil-aviation-organization-shuts-out-taiwan/>. Focus Taiwan, (2018). EU supports Taiwan`s participation in WHO. Retrieved September, 2019 from <http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aipl/201805010010.aspx>. Taiwan Today (1992). Testing Free-Market Waters. Retrieved September, 2018 from <https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=8,29,32,45&post=13094>. Taiwan Today (2011). Paying tribute to Vaclav Havel. Retrieved October, 2018 from <https://taiwantoday.tw/news.php?unit=2,23,45&post=2126>. The Slovak Spectator (2019). Is Slovakia a Mafia State? Retrieved October, 2019 from <https://spectator.sme.sk/c/22138003/is-slovakia-a-mafia-state.html#privatisation> Trend (1998). V obchode s Taiwanom je Slovensko nadalej pasivne, [Slovakia continues to be passive in Trade with Taiwan]. Retrieved March, 2019 from <https://www.etrend.sk/trend-archiv/rok-/cislo-Okt%C3%B3ber/v-obchode-s-taiwanom-je-slovensko-nadalej-vysoko-pasivne.html>.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學國家發展研究所 105261022
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105261022
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202001274
顯示於類別:	[國家發展研究所] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
102201.pdf		1894Kb	Adobe PDF2	129	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋