政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131715
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50795908      在线人数 : 390
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131715


    题名: 巴黎氣候會議對環境風險溝通的影響：以台灣非營利組織的臉書專頁為例
    Social Media and the Communication of Environmental Risks: An Analysis of Environmental NGO’s Facebook Pages in Taiwan
    作者: 邱意岑
    Chiu, Yi-tsen
    贡献者: 施琮仁
    Shi, Tsung-Jen
    邱意岑
    Yi-tsen Chiu
    关键词: 氣候變遷
    氣候會議
    環境非營利組織
    臉書
    全球暖化
    社群媒體
    Climate change
    Climate Summit
    Environmental nonprofit organizations
    Facebook
    Global warming
    Social meida
    media representation
    social networking sites (SNSs)
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-09-02 12:31:11 (UTC+8)
    摘要: This study examined how social networking sites (SNS) are being used by environmental NGOs (ENGOs) based on the theoretical framework of media representation and issue attention cycles. The research refers to the characteristics of the posts, including the origin of information, themes, topics, and sources. This study also focuses on the media frames used, such as mobilizing information and public participation information, through content analysis of the Facebook homepages of 10 environmental NGOs (n=634). While the Paris Climate Conference (COP21) took place from 30 November to 11 December, we found different attention cycle patters for climate change issues before and after COP21. This study suggests that ENGOs narrative considerations regarding environmental issues did change different phases of development.
    ENGOs’ Facebook posts were also highly event-based and increased Facebook posts correspond to important events such as international conferences after COP21. Regarding the origin of information, ENGOs prefer to use their own Facebook posts. I also found that ENGOs posts were highly education-based, “climate change” and “environmental campaign and education” were the two frames that ENGOs consistently used to construct stories about environmental issues after COP21. Notably, the results indicate that ENGOs did provide location mobilizing information and identificational mobilizing information but lack of providing tactical mobilizing information and public participation information before and after COP21.
    This study examined how social networking sites (SNS) are being used by environmental NGOs (ENGOs) based on the theoretical framework of media representation and issue attention cycles. The research refers to the characteristics of the posts, including the origin of information, themes, topics, and sources. This study also focuses on the media frames used, such as mobilizing information and public participation information, through content analysis of the Facebook homepages of 10 environmental NGOs (n=634). While the Paris Climate Conference (COP21) took place from 30 November to 11 December, we found different attention cycle patters for climate change issues before and after COP21. This study suggests that ENGOs narrative considerations regarding environmental issues did change different phases of development.
    ENGOs’ Facebook posts were also highly event-based and increased Facebook posts correspond to important events such as international conferences after COP21. Regarding the origin of information, ENGOs prefer to use their own Facebook posts. I also found that ENGOs posts were highly education-based, “climate change” and “environmental campaign and education” were the two frames that ENGOs consistently used to construct stories about environmental issues after COP21. Notably, the results indicate that ENGOs did provide location mobilizing information and identificational mobilizing information but lack of providing tactical mobilizing information and public participation information before and after COP21.
    參考文獻: Arlt, D., Hoppe, I., & Wolling, J. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1-2), 45-63.
    Batts, S. A., Anthis, N. J., & Smith, T. C. (2008). Advancing science through conversations: Bridging the gap between blogs and the academy. PLoS Biology, 6(9), e240.
    Becker, A. B., Dalrymple, K. E., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., & Gunther, A. C. (2010). Getting citizens involved: How controversial policy debates stimulate issue participation during a political campaign. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 22(2), 181-203.
    Brulle, R. J. (2010). From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: Environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 82-98.
    Buys, L., Aird, R., van Megen, K., Miller, E., & Sommerfeld, J. (2012). Perceptions of climate change and trust in information providers in rural Australia. Public understanding of science, 23(2), 170-188.
    Carvalho, A. (2007). Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change. Public understanding of science, 16(2), 223-243.
    Carpenter, S. (2010). A study of content diversity in online citizen journalism and online newspaper articles. New Media & Society, 12(7), 1064–1084.
    Chen, Y.-N. (2011). “I” am the Source: A Study on the Writings of Bloggers Diagnosed with Cancer. Mass Communication Research(106), 99-134.
    Cozma, R. (2006). Source diversity increases credibility of risk stories. Newspaper Research Journal, 27(3), 8-21.
    De Laat, M. (2011, January). Bridging the knowledge gap: Using social network methodology for detecting, connecting and facilitating informal networked learning in organizations. In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
    Downs, A. (1972). Up and Down With Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle`The Public Interest (Summer): 38-50.
    Dozier, D. M., Grunig, L. A., & Grunig, J. E. (2013). Manager`s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management. Routledge.

    Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social media update 2014. Pew Research Center, 9.
    Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news. Public opinion, and US foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 5-29.
    Feezell, J. T. (2018). Agenda setting through social media: The importance of incidental news exposure and social filtering in the digital era. Political Research Quarterly, 71(2), 482-494.
    Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002). Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty. Public understanding of science, 11(4), 363-372.
    Ford, J. D., & King, D. (2015). Coverage and framing of climate change adaptation in the media: A review of influential North American newspapers during 1993–2013. Environmental Science & Policy, 48, 137-146.
    Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News. Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon.
    Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
    Gordon, J. C., Deines, T., & Havice, J. (2010). Global warming coverage in the media: Trends in a Mexico City newspaper. Science Communication, 32(2), 143-170.
    Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals` social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336.
    Haßler, J., Maurer, M., & Oschatz, C. (2014). Media Logic and Political Logic Online and Offline: The case of climate change communication. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 326-341.
    Hoffman, A. J. (2011). The culture and discourse of climate skepticism. Strategic Organization, 9(1), 77-84.
    Hoffman, L. H. (2006). Is Internet content different after all? A content analysis of mobilizing information in online and print newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 58-76.
    Houston, J. B., Pfefferbaum, B., & Rosenholtz, C. E. (2012). Disaster news: Framing and frame changing in coverage of major US natural disasters, 2000–2010. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(4), 606-623.
    Ho, S. S., Binder, A. R., Becker, A. B., Moy, P., Scheufele, D. A., Brossard, D., & Gunther, A. C. (2011). The role of perceptions of media bias in general and issue-specific political participation. Mass Communication and Society, 14(3), 343-374.
    Hsiao, W.-K. (2015, November 23th). Taiwan i chien liang pai wan shou chi tsu tou ai shang lien shu. Appledaily. Retrieved from http://www.appledaily.com.tw/realtimenews/article/new/20151123/738735/
    Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., . . . Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk analysis, 8(2), 177-187.
    Katz-Kimchi, M., & Manosevitch, I. (2015). Mobilizing Facebook Users against Facebook`s Energy Policy: The Case of Greenpeace Unfriend Coal Campaign. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 248-267.
    Kenix, L. J. (2008). Framing science: Climate change in the mainstream and alternative news of New Zealand. Political Science, 60(1), 117-132.
    Keller, T. R., Hase, V., Thaker, J., Mahl, D., & Schäfer, M. S. (2019). News Media Coverage of Climate Change in India 1997–2016: Using Automated Content Analysis to Assess Themes and Topics. Environmental Communication, 1-17.
    Kerbel, M. R., & Bloom, J. D. (2005). Blog for America and civic involvement. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 3-27.
    Kao, C.-Y. (2006). Investigating the rise of new energy media issues (2001-2005)─ the analysis of media release and innovators` opinions.
    Kim, D., Chun, H., Kwak, Y., & Nam, Y. (2014). The employment of dialogic principles in website, Facebook, and Twitter platforms of environmental nonprofit organizations. Social Science Computer Review, 0894439314525752.
    Kim, Y., Chen, H.-T., & De Zúñiga, H. G. (2013). Stumbling upon news on the Internet: Effects of incidental news exposure and relative entertainment use on political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2607-2614.
    Lee, C. J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public attitudes toward emerging technologies: Examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology. Science communication, 27(2), 240-267.
    Lee, M. (2015). New Media and Science Communication: An Analysis of Low Carbon Living Weblog. Communication & Society, 32, 59-90.
    Maurer, C., & Wiegmann, R. (2011, January). Effectiveness of advertising on social network sites: a case study on Facebook. In ENTER (pp. 485-498).
    Meraz, S. (2011). Using time series analysis to measure intermedia agenda-setting influence in traditional media and political blog networks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 176-194.
    McCombs, M. (2002, June). The agenda-setting role of the mass media in the shaping of public opinion. In Mass Media Economics 2002 Conference, London School of Economics: http://sticerd. lse. ac. uk/dps/extra/McCombs. pdf.
    Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States (Vol. 38): Elsevier.
    Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy: Cambridge University Press.
    Nerlich, B., Koteyko, N., & Brown, B. (2010). Theory and language of climate change communication. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(1), 97-110.
    Norgaard, K. M. (2006). “We Don`t Really Want to Know” Environmental Justice and Socially Organized Denial of Global Warming in Norway. Organization & Environment, 19(3), 347-370.
    O`Neill, S., & Boykoff, M. (2011). The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. Engaging the public with climate change: behaviour change and communication, 233-251.
    Price, V., David, C., Goldthorpe, B., Roth, M. M., & Cappella, J. N. (2006). Locating the issue public: The multi-dimensional nature of engagement with health care reform. Political Behavior, 28(1), 33-63.
    PSPRC. (2015). National Taiwan University Climae Change Survey Report 2015. Available from Risk Society and Policy Research Center. College of Social Sciences, NTU. Taiwan, Taipei., from RSPRC https://www.google.com.tw/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiD14TgpsvQAhWBkpQKHfQ6BE0QFgggMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Frsprc.ntu.edu.tw%2Fzh-TW%2Fcomponent%2Fphocadownload%2Fcategory%2F14-%2525E5%25258F%2525B0%2525E7%252581%2525A3%2525E9%2525A2%2525A8%2525E9%25259A%2525AA%2525E7%2525A4%2525BE%2525E6%25259C%252583%2525E8%2525AB%252596%2525E5%2525A3%252587%3Fdownload%3D40%3Aafter-cop21-abstract&usg=AFQjCNGxO1qO5_Q8BpBB05ppmyvPbOK1pg&sig2=zf6zkXUwkAokjccq-KOOFA
    Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E. W., Feldman, L., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Republicans and climate change: An audience analysis of predictors for belief and policy preferences. Available at SSRN 2026002.
    Rowan, H.-W. (2009). Ideological construction of climate change in Australian and New Zealand newspapers. Climate change and the media, 28-40.
    Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. (2012). Research blogs and the discussion of scholarly information. PloS one, 7(5), e35869.
    Schweitzer, J. (2013). Media Framing of Nuclear Energy in France Before and After Fukushima.
    Scheufele, D. A., & Shah, D. V. (2000). Personality strength and social capital: The role of dispositional and informational variables in the production of civic participation. Communication research, 27(2), 107-131.
    Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news (pp. 69-71). New York: Norton.
    Stoddart, M. C., Haluza-DeLay, R., & Tindall, D. B. (2016). Canadian news media coverage of climate change: Historical trajectories, dominant frames, and international comparisons. Society & natural resources, 29(2), 218-232.
    Szarka, J. (2013). From climate advocacy to public engagement: an exploration of the roles of environmental non-governmental organisations. Climate, 1(1), 12-27.
    Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness: How to predict news sharing based on article characteristics. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38-60.
    Trumbo, C. (1996). Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public understanding of science, 5(3), 269-283.
    Tsang, K.-J. (1998). News Sources & Constructin off News Reality-Perspectives on Organizational Culture and Media Framing. The Journal of Advertising Research(11), 69-116.
    Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life: Sage.
    Tobias R. KellerTobias_Keller, Valerie Hase, Jagadish Thaker, Daniela Mahl & Mike S. Schäfer (2019): News Media Coverage of Climate Change in India 1997–2016: Using Automated Content Analysis to Assess Themes and Topics, Environmental Communication, DOI:10.1080/17524032.2019.1643383
    Kenix, L. J. (2008). Framing science: Climate change in the mainstream and alternative news of New Zealand. Political Science, 60(1), 117-132.
    Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public relations review, 35(2), 102-106.
    Walejko, G., & Ksiazek, T. (2010). Blogging from the niches: The sourcing practices of science bloggers. Journalism Studies, 11(3), 412-427.
    Vishwanath, A. (2014). Habitual Facebook use and its impact on getting deceived on social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(1), 83-98.
    Vraga, E. K., Thorson, K., Kligler-Vilenchik, N., & Gee, E. (2015). How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 281-289.
    Yang, Y.-J., & Hsu, M.-L. (2010). Risk Society, Risk Information and Web Communication: A Case of the Global Warming Issue. Chinese Journal of Communication Research(18), 151-191.
    Yang, S. U., Kang, M., & Johnson, P. (2010). Effects of narratives, openness to dialogic communication, and credibility on engagement in crisis communication through organizational blogs. Communication research, 37(4), 473-497.
    Zamith, R., Pinto, J., & Villar, M. E. (2013). Constructing Climate Change in the Americas An Analysis of News Coverage in US and South American Newspapers. Science Communication, 35(3), 334-357.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際傳播英語碩士學位學程(IMICS)
    103461010
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103461010
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001676
    显示于类别:[國際傳播英語碩士學程] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    101001.pdf674KbAdobe PDF2106检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈