政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131456
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113392/144379 (79%)
造访人次 : 51210520      在线人数 : 876
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/131456


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131456


    题名: 消費者選擇確定或機率折扣之研究
    The Research on Consumers` Choice of Regular or Probabilistic Price Discounts
    作者: 蔡佩純
    Tsai, Pei-Chun
    贡献者: 樓永堅
    Lou, Yung-Chien
    蔡佩純
    Tsai, Pei-Chun
    关键词: 選擇
    選擇性折扣
    機率性折扣
    確定性折扣
    滿意度
    參考點
    結果評價
    展望理論
    價值函數
    價格折扣
    Choice
    Selective price discounts
    Probabilistic price discounts
    Regular price discounts
    Satisfaction
    Reference point
    Outcome evaluation
    Prospect Theory
    Value function
    Price discounts
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-09-02 11:38:57 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 回顧過往價格促銷文獻，多篇研究證實機率性折扣確實改善了以往確定性折扣所帶來的負面影響，例如內部參考價格下降、消費者再購行為下降等 (Davis, Inman, and McAlister,1992; Giadagin and Little, 1983; Kalwani and Yim, 1992)。然以往價格促銷研究並未單獨將「折扣選擇性」納入探討，但在決策領域，學者已證實人們天性喜歡「主動」選擇大過於「被動」接受，也更樂於承擔主動選擇的結果 (Schwartz, 2004; Scott, 1976; Winer, 1986)。另一方面，多篇國外文獻探討機率性促銷因帶有不確定性、娛樂性的遊戲性質，深受消費者喜愛之際，卻鮮少追蹤消費者參與機率性折扣後，是否會因為輸贏下得到不同折扣結果而影響結果評價，進而改變對商品內部參考價格的變化；最後，當消費者面對不同潛在利得損失的選擇性折扣，影響消費者選擇確定性或機率性折扣的心理機制為何，亦是本研究所關注的重點。
    本研究透過三個實驗依序探討折扣選擇性對消費者影響為何、而消費者在機率性折扣下，輸贏得到不同折扣結果的後續影響以及影響消費者選擇確定性或機率性折扣的心理機制。研究一證實消費者在「選擇性」折扣下 (即確定性折扣搭配機率性折扣)的活動參與意願與結果滿意度均優於以往提供單一價格折扣，如機率性折扣或確定性折扣；其次，研究二則證實消費者參與機率性折扣，無論輸贏得到不同折扣結果，在大利得小損失的機率性折扣下，消費者結果評價最佳；而當消費者在利得損失相等的折扣時，在輸的情況得到較差結果時，消費者的內部參考價格向上提升的變化最大。最後，研究三則發現消費者在選擇性折扣下，不同利得損失程度、是否包含原價購買的折扣設計，影響消費者選擇確定性或機率性折扣，其中，當選擇性折扣為利得損失相等、以及包含原價購買結果的設計下，消費者為迴避原價購買的潛在結果，更確定選擇確定性折扣，此系列研究成功從行為決策理論豐富價格促銷領域的研究，針對學術與實務面提出具體性建議。
    Promotional campaign is one of the tools for companies to attract customers to try new products and stimulate sales for meeting performance targets in the short run. In the past, coupons and cash discounts have been the most tempting ones to consumers. Recalling previous literature on price promotion, several studies have confirmed that probabilistic price discounts are better than regular price discounts in terms of negative impact on the decline in the internal reference prices and repurchase behavior. (Davis, Inman, and McAlister, 1992; Giadagin and Little, 1983; Kalwani and Yim, 1992).
    Scholars studying price discounts have confirmed that probabilistic price discounts are better than regular price discounts in terms of negative impact on the decline in the internal reference prices and repurchase behavior. In retrospect, most literature related to price discounts studies has investigated the impact of regular price discounts and probabilistic price discounts on consumer behavior, such as reference price, purchase intention, repurchase behavior, etc., but rarely discussed about "choices". Though, in the stream of decision-making research, scholars have confirmed that people like to "make” their choices more than passively "be given", and are more willing to take the responsibility for the results from their own decisions. Furthermore, the literature on probabilistic discounts in the past has focused more on why people prefer probabilistic discounts, but it does not pay attention to the fact that after people participate in probabilistic promotions, they may produce different evaluations due to different discount results and affect the change of internal reference price of the product. Finally, what are the psychological mechanisms that affect people’s choice of certainty or probabilistic discounts when facing selective discounts with different gains and losses?
    This research explores how consumers respond to the selective price discounts and their subsequent psychological mechanisms through three studies. Study 1 explore consumers` purchasing behavior when facing “selective” price discounts and single price discounts; in other words, consumers feel more willing and satisfied with outcomes when they were in Selective Price Discounts to choose between a probabilistic price discounts (PPD) and a regular price discounts (RPD), compared to when they have no choices but only take the discount, being PPD or SPD.
    Secondly, Study 2 verifies consumers feel more satisfied with their outcomes such as satisfaction, regret, or decision-making quality, no matter win or lose. Additionally, when consumers in the PPD with Gain and Lose even group, they increase their internal reference price after they obtained the inferior outcomes.
    Lastly, Study 3 investigate that when consumers face different selective price discounts (PPD with different discount levels), the key factor(s) to influence their preference by value functions, especially facing the selective discount with Gain and Lose are even, and the inferior outcome includes the original price, consumers are more likely to choose the regular discounts in order to avoid the potential result of the original price purchase.
    This research successfully bridge the literature gap between price promotion and decision behavior, further to provide academic and practical suggestions for those who are interested in promotional tools design.
    參考文獻: 一、中文文獻
    1.馬慶玲 (2010). 調節焦點影響廣告效果之研究. 政治大學心理學研究所學位論文, 1-138.
    2.張重昭與謝千之(2000).產品資訊, 參考價格與知覺品質對消費者行為之影響. 企業管理學報,(47), 161-190.
    3.張愛華,陳仁惠與張馨云(2006) 主題廣告, 促銷活動與品牌層級之綜效研究. 管理與系統, 13(1), 15-46.
    4.劉信賢與邱玉葉(2012). 增量,升級或折扣? 促銷框架對成本配置及相對偏好的影響. 臺大管理論叢, 23(1), 269-296.
    5.劉美琪(1995) 促銷管理-理論與實務, 臺北: 正中書局.
    6.顏乃欣(2010) 情緒對決策歷程的影響.人文與社會科學簡訊，11卷4期

    二、政府/民間資料
    經濟部，便利商店營業額屢創新高，產業經濟統計簡訊《309》，資料連結：https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/dos/bulletin/Bulletin.aspx?kind=9andhtml=1andmenu_id=18808andbull_id=5108
    公平交易委員會，有關辦理「106年連鎖式便利商店經營概況調查案」新聞稿，2018-09-05發佈，資料連結：https://www.ftc.gov.tw/internet/main/doc/docDetail.aspx?uid=126anddocid=15589

     
    三、英文文獻

    Ailawadi, K. L., Gedenk, K., Langer, T., Ma, Y., & Neslin, S. A. (2014). Consumer response to uncertain promotions: An empirical analysis of conditional rebates. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(1), 94-106.
    Ailawadi, K. L., Neslin, S. A., & Gedenk, K. (2001). Pursuing the value-conscious consumer: store brands versus national brand promotions. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 71-89.
    Alavi, S., Bornemann, T., & Wieseke, J. (2015). Gambled price discounts: a remedy to the negative side effects of regular price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 79(2), 62-78.
    Averill, James R. (1973), "Personal Control over Aversive Stimuli and Its Relationship to Stress", Psychological Bulletin, 80(4), 286-303.
    Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644-656.
    Baron, J., & Hershey, J. C. (1988). Outcome bias in decision evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 (4), 569.
    Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory of risk evaluation. Econometrica, 22, 23-36.
    Bettman, J. R., Luce, M. F., & Payne, J. W. (1998). Constructive consumer choice processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (3), 187-217.
    Biswas, A., & Blair, E. A. (1991). Contextual effects of reference prices in retail advertisements. Journal of Marketing, 55 (3), 1-12.
    Bitta, A. J., Monroe, K. B., & McGinnis, J. M. (1981). Consumer perceptions of comparative price advertisements. Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (4), 416-427.
    Blattberg, R. C., Briesch, R., & Fox, E. J. (1995). How promotions work. Marketing Science, 14(3_supplement), G122-G132.
    Blattberg, R. C., Getz, G., & Thomas, J. S. (2001). Managing Customer Acquisition. Direct Marketing, 64(6), 41-54.
    Boles, T. L., & Messick, D. M. (1995). A reverse outcome bias: The influence of multiple reference points on the evaluation of outcomes and decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61 (3), 262-275.
    Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers` assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4), 375-384.
    Botti, McGill & Iyengar (2003),"Preference For Control and Its Effect on the Evaluation of Consumption Experiences", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 30, eds. Punam Anand Keller and Dennis W. Rook, Valdosta, GA : Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 127-128.
    Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. S. (2003). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent well-being. Unpublished manuscript.
    Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2006). When choosing is not deciding: The effect of perceived responsibility on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 33 (2), 211-219.
    Botti, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). “The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37 (4), 1065–78.
    Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press
    Brendl, C. M., Higgins, E. T., & Lemm, K. M. (1995). Sensitivity to varying gains and losses: The role of self-discrepancies and event framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69 (6), 1028.
    Briesch, R. A., Chintagunta, P. K., & Matzkin, R. L. (2002). Semiparametric estimation of brand choice behavior. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97 (460), 973-982.
    Broniarczyk, S. M., & Alba, J. W. (1994). The importance of the brand in brand extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31 (2), 214-228.
    Bucklin, R. E., & Gupta, S. (1992). Brand choice, purchase incidence, and segmentation: An integrated modeling approach. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (2), 201. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/235233504?accountid=10067
    Buil, I., De Chernatony, L., & Martínez, E. (2013). Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 115-122.
    Campbell, L., & Diamond, W. D. (1990). Framing and sales promotions: The characteristics of a ″good deal ″. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 7 (4), 25-31.
    Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64 (4), 65-81.
    Chandran, S., & Morwitz, V. G. (2006). The price of “free”-dom: Consumer sensitivity to promotions with negative contextual influences. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(3), 384-392.
    Chen, S. F. S., Monroe, K. B., & Lou, Y. C. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers` perceptions and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74 (3), 353-372.
    Chernev, A. (2004). Goal–attribute compatibility in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14 (1-2), 141-150.
    Chiambaretto, P., & Dumez, H. (2012). The role of bundling in firms` marketing strategies: A synthesis. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 27 (2), 91-105.
    Choi, S., & Kim, M. (2007), “The effectiveness of scratch and save promotions: the moderating roles of prices consciousness and expected savings”, Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 469-80.
    Crowe, E., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Regulatory focus and strategic inclinations: Promotion and prevention in decision-making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69 (2), 117-132.
    Darke, P. R., & Chung, C. M. (2005). Effects of pricing and promotion on consumer perceptions: it depends on how you frame it. Journal of Retailing, 81 (1), 35-47.
    Davis, S., Inman, J., & McAlister, L. (1992) Promotion has a negative effect on brand evaluations – or does it? Additional disconfirming evidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 29, 143– 148.
    deCharms, Richard (1968). Personal Causation, New York, NY: Academic Press.
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53 (6), 1024.
    Dekimpe, M. G., Hanssens, D. M., & Silva-Risso, J. M. (1998). Long-run effects of price promotions in scanner markets. Journal of Econometrics, 89(1-2), 269-291.
    DelVecchio, D., Krishnan, H. S., & Smith, D. C. (2007). Cents or percent? The effects of promotion framing on price expectations and choice. Journal of Marketing, 71 (3), 158-170.
    Dhar, R., & Simonson, I. (1999). Making complementary choices in consumption episodes: Highlighting versus balancing. Journal of Marketing Research, 36 (1), 29-44.
    Dhar, S. K., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., & Soman, D. (1995).Brand promotions as a lottery. Marketing Letters, 6 (3), 221-233.
    Dhar, S. K., Gonzalez-Vallejo, C., & Soman, D. (1999). Modeling the effects of advertised price claims: Tensile versus precise claims? Marketing Science, 18 (2), 154–177.
    Diamond, W. D., & Campbell, L. (1989). The framing of sales promotions: effects on reference price change. ACR North American Advances.
    Diamond, William D., & Abhijit Sanyal (1990), “The Effect of Framing on the Choice of Supermarket Coupons,” in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, ed. Marvin E. Goldberg, Gerald Gorn & Richard W. Pollay, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 488–93
    Dickson, P. R. (1982). Person-situation: Segmentation`s missing link. Journal of Marketing, 46 (4), 56-64.
    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28 (3), 307-319.
    Dodson, J. A., Tybout, A. M., & Sternthal, B. (1978). Impact of deals and deal retraction on brand switching. Journal of Marketing Research, 15(1), 72-81.
    Dommermuth, W. P. (1989). Promotion: Analysis. Creativity, and Strategy, Boston, MA: PWS-Kent.
    Ehrenberg, A. S., & Charlton, P. (1973). An analysis of simulated brand choice. Journal of Advertising Research.
    Fazio, R. H., Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42 (3), 404.
    Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of applied Psychology, 73 (3), 421.
    Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford university press.
    Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectations, risk perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. Journal of Services Marketing, 13 (1), 59-72.
    Gedenk, K., & Neslin, S. A. (1999). The role of retail promotion in determining future brand loyalty: Its effect on purchase event feedback. Journal of Retailing, 75(4), 433-459.
    Genesove, D., & Mayer, C. (2001). Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (4), 1233-1260.
    Gneezy, U., List, J. A., & Wu, G. (2006). The uncertainty effect: When a risky prospect is valued less than its worst possible outcome. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121 (4), 1283-1309.
    Goldsmith, K., & Amir, O. (2010). Can uncertainty improve promotions? Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (6), 1070-1077.
    Grewal, D., Marmorstein, H., & Sharma, A. (1996). Communicating price information through semantic cues: the moderating effects of situation and discount size. Journal of Consumer Research, 23 (2), 148-155.
    Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value & behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46-59.
    Guadagni, P. M., & Little, J. D. (1983). A logit model of brand choice calibrated on scanner data. Marketing science, 2 (3), 203-238.
    Gupta, S., & Cooper, L. G. (1992). The discounting of discounts and promotion thresholds. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 401-411.
    Hardesty, D. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2003). Consumer evaluations of different promotion types and price presentations: the moderating role of promotional benefit level. Journal of retailing, 79 (1), 17-25.
    Haws, K. L., Dholakia, U. M., & Bearden, W. O. (2010). An assessment of chronic regulatory focus measures. Journal of Marketing Research, 47 (5), 967-982.
    Heath, C., Larrick, R. P., & Wu, G. (1999). Goals as reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 38 (1), 79-109.
    Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper and Row: New York
    Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52 (12), 1280.
    Higgins, E. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (3), 177-191.
    Higgins, E. T., & King, G. A. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. InN. Cantor and JF Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, Cognition & Social Interaction (pp. 69-121).
    Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31 (1), 3-23.
    Hirschman, Elizabeth C., & Morris B. Holbrook (1982), “Hedonic consumption, emerging concepts, methods and propositions,” Journal of Marketing, 46 (summer), 92-101.
    Hock, S. J., Bagchi, R., & Anderson, T. M. (2020). Promotional Games Increase Consumer Conversion Rates and Spending. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 79-99.
    Holbrook, M. B., & Corfman, K. P. (1983). Quality and other types of value in the consumption experience: Phaedrus rides again. In Jacoby & Olson (Eds.), Perceived quality (pp. 31-57). Lexington.
    Hoyer, W. D., & Brown, S. P. (1990). Effects of brand awareness on choice for a common, repeat-purchase product. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 141-148.
    Huppertz, J. W., Arenson, S. J., & Evans, R. H. (1978). An application of equity theory to buyer-seller exchange situations. Journal of Marketing Research, 15 (2), 250-260.
    Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2000). Distinguishing gains from nonlosses and losses from nongains: A regulatory focus perspective on hedonic intensity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36 (3), 252-274.
    Inman, J. J., & McAlister, L. (1993). A retailer promotion policy model considering promotion signal sensitivity. Marketing Science, 12(4), 339-356.
    Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 995.
    Jacobson, R., & Obermiller, C. (1990). The formation of expected future price: A reference price for forward-looking consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (4), 420-432.
    Jacoby, J., Olson, J. C., & Haddock, R. A. (1971). Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of perceived quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55 (6), 570.
    Janiszewski, C., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1999). A range theory account of price perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (4), 353-368.
    Jarnebrant, P., Toubia, O., & Johnson, E. (2009). The silver lining effect: Formal analysis and experiments. Management Science, 55 (11), 1832-1841.
    Jedidi, K., Mela, C. F., & Gupta, S. (1999). Managing advertising and promotion for long-run profitability. Marketing science, 18(1), 1-22.
    Johnson, M. D., Ilies, R., & Boles, T. L. (2012). Alternative reference points and outcome evaluation: The influence of affect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97 (1), 33.
    Jones, J. M., & Zufryden, F. S. (1981). Relating deal purchases and consumer characteristics to repeat purchase probability. Journal of the Market Research Society.
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7, 409-411
    Kalwani, M. U., & Yim, C. K. (1992). Consumer price and promotion expectations: An experimental study. Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (1), 90-100.
    Kalyanaram, G., & Winter, R. S. (1995). Price sensitivity and television advertising exposures: Some empirical findings. Marketing Science, 11 (4), 359-371.
    Klein, N. H., & Oglethorpe, J. E. (1987). Cognitive reference points in consumer decision making. Association of Consumer Research North American Advances.
    Koop, G. J., & Johnson, J. G. (2011). Response dynamics: A new window on the decision process. Judgment and Decision Making, 6 (8).
    Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2007). Reference-dependent risk attitudes. American Economic Review, 97 (4), 1047-1073.
    Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management: The millennium edition. Marketing Management, 23 (6), 188-193.
    Kuntner, T., & Teichert, T. (2016). The scope of price promotion research: An informetric study. Journal of Business Research, 69 (8), 2687-2696.
    Kwon, K. N., Schumann, D. W., & Fairhurst, A. (2010). Consideration of an expected future deal in assessing the value of a present deal: Forward-looking bargain shopping. Journal of Business Research, 63 (1), 84-90.
    Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 (2), 311.
    Langer, E. J., & Rodin, J. (1976). The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: A field experiment in an institutional setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (2), 191.
    Laran, J., & Tsiros, M. (2013). An investigation of the effectiveness of uncertainty in marketing promotions involving free gifts. Journal of Marketing, 77 (2), 112-123.
    Lee, A. Y., Aaker, J. L. & Gardner, W. L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: the role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78 (6), 1122.
    Lichtenstein, D. R., & Bearden, W. O. (1989). Contextual influences on perceptions of merchant-supplied reference prices. Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), 55-66.
    Lichtenstein, D. R., & Burton, S. (1989). The relationship between perceived and objective price-quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (4), 429-443.
    Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing coupon proneness from value consciousness: An acquisition-transaction utility theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54 (3), 54-67.
    Lichtenstein, D. R., Ridgway, N. M., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1993). Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior: a field study. Journal of Marketing Research, 30 (2), 234-245.
    Marketing Science Institute (1998). Research priorities 1998−2000. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
    Mayhew, G. E., & Winer, R. S. (1992). An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (1), 62-70.
    Mazar, N., Shampanier, K., & Ariely, D. (2016). When retailing and Las Vegas meet: Probabilistic free price promotions. Management Science, 63 (1), 250-266.
    Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005). Reference price research: Review and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69 (4), 84-102.
    Mela, C. F., Gupta, S., & Lehmann, D. R. (1997). The long-term impact of promotion and advertising on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (2), 248-261.
    Midgley, D. F. (1983). Patterns of interpersonal information seeking for the purchase of a symbolic product. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 74-83.
    Miller, K. E., & Ginter, J. L. (1979). An investigation of situational variation in brand choice behavior and attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 16 (1), 111-123.
    Mobley, M. F., Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1988). An investigation of individual responses to tensile price claims. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 273-279.
    Monroe Kent B. (1990), Pricing: Making Profitable Decisons, 2d ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Monroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10 (1), 70-80.
    Monroe, K. B., & Chapman, J. D. (1987). Framing effects on buyers` subjective product evaluations. Association for Consumer Research North American Advances.
    Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), 46-59.
    Narasimhan, C. (1984). A price discrimination theory of coupons. Marketing Science, 3(2), 128-147.
    Niedrich, R. W., Sharma, S., & Wedell, D. H. (2001). Reference price and price perceptions: A comparison of alternative models. Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 339-354.
    Novemsky, N., & Dhar, R. (2005). Goal fulfillment and goal targets in sequential choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 32 (3), 396-404.
    Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? The Journal of Finance, 53 (5), 1775-1798.
    Oliver, Richard L (1993), "A conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction: compatible goals, different concepts," in Advances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice, Vol. 2, Teresa A. Swartz, David E. Bowen, and Stephen W. Brown, eds. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
    Olson, J. C. (1978). Inferential belief formation in the cue utilization process. Association for Consumer Research North American Advances.
    Ouschan, L., Boldero, J. M., Kashima, Y., Wakimoto, R., & Kashima, E. S. (2007). Regulatory focus strategies scale: A measure of individual differences in the endorsement of regulatory strategies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10 (4), 243-257.
    Parducci, A., & Fabre, J. M. (1995). Contextual effects in judgment and choice. In Contributions to Decision Making: I, ed. J. P. Caverni et al., Amsterdam: North-Holland, 97-109.
    Pauwels, K., Hanssens, D. M., & Siddarth, S. (2002). The long-term effects of price promotions on category incidence, brand choice, and purchase quantity. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(4), 421-439.
    Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J.(1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press.
    Raghubir, P., Inman, J. J., & Grande, H. (2004). The three faces of consumer promotions. California Management Review, 46(4), 23-42
    Saini, R., Rao, R. S., & Monga, A. (2010). Is that deal worth my time? The interactive effect of relative and referent thinking on willingness to seek a bargain. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 34-48.
    Schwartz, B. (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. New York: Ecco.
    Scott, C. A. (1976). The effects of trial and incentives on repeat purchase behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 13(3), 263-269.
    Sett, R. K. (2014). A product and a price bundle in an efficient choice set: how do choice framing and goal orientation influence preferences? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22(3), 285-298.
    Sherif, C. W. (1963). Social categorization as a function of latitude of acceptance and series range. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(2), 148.
    Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170.
    Shoemaker, R. W., & Shoaf, F. R. (1977). Repeat rates of deal purchases. Journal of advertising research, 17 (2), 47-53.
    Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000). Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 28(1), 150-167.
    Sinha, I. & Smith, M. F. (2000). Consumers` perceptions of promotional framing of price. Psychology and Marketing, 17 (3), 257-275.
    Smith, M. F., & Sinha, I. (2000). The impact of price and extra product promotions on store preference. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 28 (2), 83-92.
    Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 (10), 1660.
    Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1980). Category accessibility and social perception: Some implications for the study of person memory and interpersonal judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38 (6), 841.
    Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological bulletin, 103 (2), 193.
    Thaler, R. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing science, 4 (3), 199-214.
    Tsiros, M. (1998). Effect of regret on post-choice valuation: The case of more than two alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76 (1), 48-69.
    Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211 (4481), 453-458.
    Urbany, J. E., & Dickson, P. R. (1990). Prospect theory and pricing decisions. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19 (1), 69-80.
    Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., & Weilbaker, D. C. (1988). The effect of plausible and exaggerated reference prices on consumer perceptions and price search. Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), 95-110.
    Villanueva, J., Yoo, S., & Hanssens, D. M. (2008). The impact of marketing-induced versus word-of-mouth customer acquisition on customer equity growth. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(1), 48-59.
    Volkmann, J. (1951). Scales of judgment and their implications for social psychology.
    Wang, X., Sun, L., & Keh, H. T. (2013). Consumer responses to variety in product bundles: The moderating role of evaluation mode. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30 (4), 335-342.
    Winer, R. S. (1986). A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (2), 250-256.
    Woods, A. Walter (1960), Psychological dimensions of consumer decision, Journal of Marketing, 24 (4), 15-19
    Yadav, M. S., & Seiders, K. (1998). Is the price right? Understanding contingent processing in reference price formation. Journal of Retailing, 74 (3), 311-329.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 2-22.
    Zeithaml, V.A., & Bitner, M.J. (2000), Services Marketing, McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA
    Zeithaml, Valerie A., Leonard L. B., & A. Parasuraman (1996). "The Behavioral Consequences of Service Quality," Journal of Marketing, 60 (4), 31-46
    Zhou, R., & Pham, M. T. (2004). Promotion and prevention across mental accounts: When financial products dictate consumers and investment goals. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 125-135.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    100355505
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100355505
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001640
    显示于类别:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    550501.pdf6482KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈