政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131437

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131437

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50829305 線上人數 : 768

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 外國語文學院 > 英國語文學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/131437

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131437

題名:	英語學習者於課堂外自主網衝之能動性: 學習者個人與他者之差異 EFL Learner Agency in Out-of-class Free Voluntary Surfing: Inter-and-intra Individual Variability
作者:	王費瑜 Wang, Fei-yu
貢獻者:	李思穎尤雪瑛 Sy-ying Lee Hsueh-ying Yu 王費瑜 Fei-yu Wang
關鍵詞:	課堂外線上學習自主網衝英語為外語的學習者之能動性複雜動態系統理論架構學習軌跡 Out-of-class Online Learning Free Voluntary Surfing EFL learner agency Complex Dynamic Systems Theory Trajectory
日期:	2020
上傳時間:	2020-09-02 11:33:38 (UTC+8)
摘要:	隨著現代科技日新月異，課堂外的網路學習儼然成為電腦輔助教學領域的重要流派。同時，學習者能動性的重要性近年已獲得第二語言習得研究者的關注，鑑於此兩新興學術範疇所存在的潛在關聯，這篇貫時性的質性研究旨在探究以英語為外語的學習者於課堂外自主網衝的能動性。此研究主要基於兩項前提：（一）語言學習者針對其學習目標為具有學習意圖、意志力和能力的施為者；（二）學習者之能動性並非靜態結果，而是該施為者與其環境互動的動態結果之呈現。此研究包含兩個目的：（一）深入探究個別學習者內部與外部影響其學習能動性的因素；（二）記載個別學習者進行課外自主網衝的學習軌跡，以檢視外語學習者個人與他者學習能動性之差異。有鑒於外語學習乃非線性之發展，本研究借用複雜動態系統理論架構來呈現課室外參與自主網衝的外語學習者之複雜樣貌。由於複雜動態系統理論架構著重於時間對語言學習所造成的重要影響，因此此質性研究亦關注學習者過往之學習經驗、當下的參與以及其努力參與課室外非正式之數位學習後所帶來的改變，以提供研究者對於其研究議題有更深入之理解。本研究運用情境分析作為分析工具，並採用多種資料來源以提高此質性研究之可信任度。分析結果所呈現的三個地圖源自於各式資料，包含問卷、半結構式訪談、臉書貼文和研究者的反思日誌。研究結果呈現外語學習者於課室外進行自主網衝時所遇到各層面的影響以及學習者能動性的學習軌跡。本研究顯示不同程度的外語學習者能動性源於個人之自我組織與和環境之共同適應之結果。此外，隨著兩位施為者於課室外的努力，個別學習軌跡呈現了兩位外語學習者（施為者）之初期學習狀況、參與和改變。本研究除了記載了個別外語學習者在其能動性中所展現的個體性與特殊性，個別學習軌亦突顯了包括動機中的興趣、後設認知中的省思、社群中能力較佳的學習者之支持、以及環境脈絡中如網路的支持等不同面向的賦能因素。除此之外，本研究發現學校功課和考試限縮了外語學習者於課室外進行自發性線上學習之能動性。此一發現可視為課堂內學習對於外語學習者於進行課室外自主線上學習之負面影響。透過複雜動態系統理論的濾鏡探討外語學習者於課室外的自主網衝之能動性，捕捉了課室外自主線上學習之複雜與多變。學習者之個別學習軌跡的呈現顯示課室外自主網衝能使英語學習更具意義、更具個別關聯、並且有更愉悅的學習經驗，尤其對於非英語系學生而言。 With the prevalence and convenience of modern technology, out-of-class online learning has become an important line of inquiry in the field of CALL. Also, the significance of learner agency has raised researchers` attention in the field of SLA. This longitudinal study was set to probe two EFL learners` learner agency in the practice of out-of-class Free Voluntary Surfing with the awareness of the potential link between the two burgeoning academic areas. The exploration of the overarching construct in the naturalistic learning outside the classroom is under the two premises. First of all, learners are agents who have intent, will, and capacity to achieve desired or intended learning goals. Second, learner agency is not a static construct but a dynamic interplay between the agent and the embedded context. Therefore, the purpose of this study is twofold: (a) it delves into the individual (i.e., internal) and contextual (i.e., external) factors impacting learner agency and (b) it documents the individual trajectory of out-of-class Free Voluntary Surfing to uncover their intra-and-inter variability in learner agency. Underpinning this qualitative inquiry by the non-linear thinking, the theoretical framework of Complexity Dynamic Systems Theory was borrowed to capture the complexity and dynamism behind the agentive learning behavior in out-of-class FVS. The holistic view deriving from the theoretical lens of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory has included the past-present-and-future perspective in this qualitative research. This historical-and-processual examination of EFL learner agency has taken the impact of the factor of time—the past learning experience, and present engagement, and changes after pouring the strenuous efforts in out-of-class informal digital learning—into consideration that provides the researcher a better understanding of the inquiry under examination. This study has adopted situational analysis for the exploration of research inquiries. Employing situational analysis as the analytical tool in this study, the three maps (relational map, social arenas map, and positional map) engendered from the multiple data sources, including questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, Facebook postings, and the researcher’s reflectional journals, uncover the influential factors and the trajectory of learner agency in the self-initiated and self-directed practice of out-of-class FVS. With the revelation of the two sub-systems of individual and contextual factors empowering or constraining the two participants’ agentive learning behaviors in out-of-class informal online learning, the findings showcase that the various levels of EFL learner agency have resulted from the individual learners’ self-organization of and co-adaptation to the emergent factors in the process. The emergence of the individual trajectories features the initial learning conditions, engagement, and changes along with the strenuous efforts the two agents pouring in the practice outside the language classroom. Further, while the study has documented the individuality and particularity of individual EFL learner agency, the qualitative inquiry has foregrounded the enablement of the different aspects—motivational, metacognitive, social, and contextual empowering language learners’ agentive behavior, including interest, reflection, the support from a more able member in the community, and the affordances of the Internet. On the other hand, with regard to the mutual influence of formal learning in out-of-class informal online learning, the study has captured the negative force of schoolwork and tests that constrain EFL learner agency in the self-initiated online learning outside the classroom. Situating EFL learner agency in out-of-class Free Voluntary Surfing in the theoretical lens of Complex Dynamic Systems Theory, the findings bring to fore the relational and emergent nature of the overarching construct in informal online learning outside the language classroom. The unveiling of the individual trajectory of learner agency further supports the potential of out-of-class Free Voluntary Surfing in making EFL learning more meaningful, relevant, and pleasant, particularly among non-English majors.
參考文獻:	Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual review of anthropology, 30(1), 109-137. Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2018). The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(4), 721-754. Antonie, A. (2015). Facebook for informal language learning: Perspectives from tertiary language students. The EuroCALL Review, 23, doi:10.4995/eurocall.2015.4665 Alm, A. (2015). “Facebook for Informal Language Learning: Perspectives from Tertiary Language Students.” The EUROCALL Review, 23 (2): 3–18. Archer, M. (1988). Culture and Agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Archer, M. (2000). Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S., & Archer, M. S. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency: Cambridge University Press. Archer, M. S., & Archer, M. S. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation: Cambridge University Press. Arnold, N. (2009). Online Extensive Reading for Advanced Foreign Language Learners: An Evaluation Study. Foreign Language Annals, 42(2), 340-366. Badri, M., Alnuaimi, A., Guang, Y., Al Rashedi, A., & Temsah, K. (2016). School children’s use of digital devices, social media and parental knowledge and involvement – the case of Abu Dhabi. Journal of Education Information Technology https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317642379_School_performance_social_networking_effects_and_learning_of_school_children_Evidence_of_reciprocal_relationships_in_Abu_Dhabi Bagga-Gupta, S. (2015). Performing and Accounting Language and Identity: Agency as actors-in-(inter)action-with-tools. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 17–36). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Bagga-Gupta, S. (2014). 7 Performing and Accounting Language and Identity: Agency as Actors-in-(inter)action-with-tools. In (pp. 113-132): Multilingual Matters. Bakewell, O. (2010). Some Reflections on Structure and Agency in Migration Theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1689-1708. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2010.489382 Bakewell, O. (2010). Some Reflections on Structure and Agency in Migration Theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1689-1708. doi:10.1080/1369183x.2010.489382 Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press. Ballance, O. J. (2012). Mobile language learning: more than just “the platform”. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 21-23. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman. Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175 Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122 Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2), 158-166. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 Barnard, L., Lan, W. Y., To, Y. M., Paton, V. O., & Lai, S. L. (2009). Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. The internet and higher education, 12(1), 1-6. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193-224. Beckman, K., Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2014). Understanding students` use and value of technology for learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(3), 346-367. Benson, P. (2001). Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Longman. Benson, P. (2011). “Language Learning and Teaching Beyond the Classroom: An Introduction to the Field.” In Beyond the Language Classroom (pp. 7–16), edited by P. Benson, and H. Reinders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Benson, P (2011). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Second edition. London: Longman. Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. In M. J. Luzón, M. N. Ruiz-Madrid, & M. L. Villanueva, Digital genres, new literacies, and autonomy in language learning (pp. 63-80). Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (2011). Beyond the language classroom. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Benson, P., & Voller, P. (2014). Introduction: autonomy and independence in language learning. In Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 1-12): Routledge. Bernacki, M. L., Aguilar, A. C., & Byrnes, J. P. (2011). Self-regulated learning and technology-enhanced learning environments: An opportunity-propensity analysis. In Fostering self-regulated learning through ICT (pp. 1-26). IGI Global. Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149. Blackwell, O. (2010). Some reflections on structure and agency in migration theory. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), 1689-1708. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 120–136. Blaschke, L. M. (2012). Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical Practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 56-71. Blin, F., & Jalkanen, J. (2014). Designing for language learning: agency and languaging in hybrid environments. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 8(1), 147-170. Block, D. (2015). Structure, agency, individualization and the critical realist challenge. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 17–36). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Block, D. (2014). 2 Structure, Agency, Individualization and the Critical Realist Challenge. In Theorizing and Analyzing Agency in Second Language Learning (pp. 17-36): Multilingual Matters. Block, D. (2003). The Social Turn in Second Language Acquisition. Georgetown University Press, 3240 Prospect Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Self-regulation: An introductory overview. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 1-9). Academic Press. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bown, J. (2009). Self-regulatory strategies and agency in self-instructed language learning: A situated view. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 570–583. doi:10.1111/j.1540- 4781.2009.00965.x Brown, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (Fourth Edi). London: White Palms: Pearson Education Inc. Bryant, A. (2002). “Re-grounding Grounded Theory”, The Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(1), pp. 25-42. Bryant, Antony (2003). A Constructive/ist Response to Glaser [25 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(1), Art. 15, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0301155. Burnard, P. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis Kathy Charmaz Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage Burns, E. (2004). Julian Baggini, Philosophy: Key Themes, (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), and Philosophy: Key Texts, (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002). Think, 2(6), 103-106. doi:10.1017/s1477175600002876 Burris, B. (1980). Book Review: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Insurgent Sociologist, 9(4), 89-91. doi:10.1177/089692058000900410 Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. London: Continuum. Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carter, B., & New, C. (2005). Making realism work: Realist social theory and. empirical research. Routledge. Castellano, J., Mynard, J., & Rubesch, T. (2011). Student technology use in a self-access center. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 12-27. Celik, S., Arkın, E., & Sabriler, D. (2012). EFL learners’ use of ICT for self-regulated learning. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8, 98–118. Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 741- 753. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. Cheney, A. W., & Terry, K. P. (2018). Immersive learning environments as complex dynamic systems. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 30(2), 277-289. Chie, M. (2018). Portraits of second language learners: An L2 learner agency perspective. Multilingual Matters. Chik, A. (2017). Learner Autonomy and Digital Practices. In Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 73-92): Palgrave Macmillan UK. Chik, A. (2014). Digital gaming and language learning: Autonomy and community. Language Learning & Technology, 18(2), 85-100. Chik, A. (2013). Naturalistic CALL and digital gaming. TESOL quarterly, 47(4), 834- 839. Cho, K.-S., Ahn, K.-O., & Krashen, S. (2005). The effects of narrow reading of authentic texts on interest and reading ability in English as a foreign language. Reading Improvement, 42(1), 58-65. Chun, D. M. (2016). The role of technology in SLA research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 98-115. Chun, D. M., Kern, R., & Smith, B. (2016). Technology in language use, language teaching, and language learning. Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 64–80. Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. S. (2018). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Interpretive Turn. Thousand Oaks, California : SAGE. Clarke, A. E., & C. Friese (2007). Grounded theorising using situational analysis. In A. Bryant and K. Charmaz.(eds), The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, London: SAGE. Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic interaction, 26(4), 553-576. Cole, J. (2015). “Foreign Language Learning in the Age of the Internet: A Comparison of Informal Acquirers and Traditional Classroom Learners in Central Brazil.” Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. University of Oxford. Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). “Comparing Autonomous and Class-Based Learners in Brazil: Evidence for the Presentday Advantages of Informal, out-of-Class Learning.” System, 61, 31–42. Coxhead, Y. W. N. B. A., & Bytheway, J. (2015). Learning vocabulary using two massive online resources: you will not blink. In Language learning beyond the classroom (pp. 81-90). Routledge. Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2004). Supporting self-regulation in student-centered web-based learning environments. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(1), 40–47. Darvin, R., & Norton, B. (2016). Investment and language learning in the 21st century. Langage et société(3), 19-38. de Bot, K. (2015). Rates of change: Timescales in second language development. Motivational dynamics in language learning, 29-37. Demouy, V., A. Jones, Q. Kan, A. Kukulska-Hulme, & A. Eardley. (2016). “Why and How Do Distance Learners Use Mobile Devices for Language Learning?” The EuroCALL Review, 24 (1), 10–24. den Outer, B., Handley, K., & Price, M. (2013). Situational analysis and mapping for. use in education research: a reflexive methodology?. Studies in Higher Education, 38(10), 1504-1521. Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and differences. Alan Bass, translator. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Deters, P., Gao, X., Miller, E. R., & Vitanova, G. (Eds.). (2015). Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches (Vol. 84). Multilingual Matters. Dewaele, J. (2009) Individual differences in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K. (eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (p.623-646). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing. Dey, I. (2004). ‘Grounded theory’, in C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium and D. Silverman (eds.), Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, pp. 80-93. Dornyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 Learning Experience, the Cinderella of the L2 Motivational Self System. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19-30. Dornyei, Z. (2014). Researching complex dynamic systems: ‘Retrodictive qualitative modelling’ in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80-91. Dörnyei, Z. (2009a). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 9–42. Dornyei, Z. (2009b). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. In N. C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman (Eds.), Language as a complex adaptive system (pp. 230-248). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (Vol. 36). Multilingual Matters. Ducate, L. C. & Lomicka, L. L. (2008). Adventures in the blogosphere: from blog readers to blog writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(1), 9-28. Duff, P. (2012a). “Identity, Agency and SLA.” In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by A. Mackey, and S. Gass, 410–426. London: Routledge. Duff, P. (2012b). Triangulation in qualitative second language research.Plenary talk presented at the Second Language Research Forum, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Duff, P., & Doherty, L. (2015). Examining agency in (second) language socialization research. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 54–72). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Dufva, P., & Aro, M. (2015). Dialogical view on language learners’ agency: Connecting intrapersonal with interpersonal. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 37–53). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Dufva, H. (2011). Language learners as socio-cognitive and embodied agent: Dialogical considerations. Language. Communication and Social Environment, 9, 6-24. Dupuy, B. C. (1999). Narrow listening: An alternative way to develop and enhance listening comprehension in students of French as a foreign language. System, 27(3), 351-361. Duran, C. S. (2015). Theorizing young language learner agency through the lens of multilingual repertoires: A sociocultural perspective. Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches, 73-90. Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. In. A. Duranti (ed.) A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, pp. 451-473. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Duranti, A. & Goodwin, C. (eds). (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press Dweck, C. S. 1999. Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Hove: Psychology Press. Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60(5), 549-586. Elman, J. (2003). Development: It`s about time. Developmental Science, 6(4), 430-433. Ely, R., Ainley, M., & Pearce, J. (2013). MORE THAN ENJOYMENT: Identifying. the Positive Affect Component of Interest That Supports Student Engagement and Achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal, 8(1). English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting Student Self-Regulated Learning in Problem- and Project-Based Learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 7(2). doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1339 Finch, A. (2010). Critical incidents and language learning: Sensitivity to initial conditions. System, 38(3), 422-431. Fosket, J. R. (2015). Situating knowledge. Situational analysis in practice. Mapping research with grounded theory, 195-215. Fukuda, A. (2017). The Japanese EFL Learners’ self-regulated language learning and proficiency. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 65-87. Funder, D. C. (2001). The really, really fundamental attribution error. Psychological Inquiry, 12 (1), 21–23. Gao, X. (2013). Reflexive and reflective thinking: a crucial link between agency and autonomy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 226-237. Gao, X. (2010). Strategic language learning: The roles of agency and context. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Gao, X. (2007). A tale of Blue Rain Café: A study on the online narrative construction about a community of English learners on the Chinese mainland. System, 35(2), 259-270. Gao, X., & Zhang, L. J. (2011). Joining forces for synergy: Agency and metacognition as interrelated theoretical perspectives on learner autonomy. Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning, 25-41. Gehlbach, H., Brown, S. W., Ioannou, A., Boyer, M. A., Hudson, N., Niv-Solomon, A., & Janik, L. (2008). Increasing interest in social studies: Social perspective taking and self-efficacy in stimulating simulations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 894-914. Giddens A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press Gilmore, A. (2016). Language learning in context: Complex dynamic systems and the role of mixed methods research. In The dynamic interplay between context and the language learner(pp. 194-224). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Gkonou, P. (2015). Agency, anxiety and activity: Understanding the classroom behaviour of EFL learners. Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning: Interdisciplinary approaches, 195-213. Glas, K. (2016). Opening up ‘spaces for manoeuvre’: English teacher perspectives on learner motivation. Research Papers in Education, 31(4), 442-461. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3-17. Godwin-Jones, R. (1999). Web course design and creation for language learning. CALICO Journal, 17 (1), 43-58. Goller, M. (2017). Human agency at work: An active approach towards expertise development: Springer. Golovatch, Y., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). Unwitting agents: the role of adult learners` attributions of success in shaping language-learning behaviour. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 13(2), 127-155. Gong, M., Xu, Y., & Yu, Y. (2004). An enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for web-based learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15(4), 365–374. Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of pragmatics, 32(10), 1489-1522. Gradman, H. L., & Hanania, E. (1991). Language learning background factors and ESL proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 39-51. Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 56-76. Guo, Z., Xiao, L., Van Toorn, C., Lai, Y., & Seo, C. (2016). Promoting online learners’continuance intention: An integrated flow framework. Information & Management, 53, 279-295. Guz, E., & Tetiurka, M. (2016). Positive emotions and learner engagement: insights. from an early FL classroom. In Positive psychology perspectives on foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 133-153): Springer. Hamilton, M. (2013). Autonomy and foreign language learning in a virtual learning environment. London: Bloomsbury Academic Publishing. Handford, M. (2016). The dynamic interplay between language and social context in the language classroom: Interpersonal turn taking for ELF learners. In The Dynamic Interplay between Context and the Language Learner (pp. 151-171). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the Most from Google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140-153. Heo, G. M., & Lee, R. (2013). Blogs and social network sites as activity systems: Exploring adult informal learning process through activity theory framework. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 133–145. Hew, K. F. (2015). Towards a model of engaging online students: Lessons from MOOCs and four policy documents. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(6), 425-431. Hill, J. H., & Irvine, J. T. (Eds.). (1993). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (No. 15). Cambridge University Press. Hiver, P., & Al‐Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Reexamining the role of vision in second Language motivation: A preregistered conceptual replication of You, Dörnyei, and Csizér (2016). Language Learning, 70(1), 48-102. Hiver, P., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2020). Motivation: It is a relational system (H. A.- H. a. P. Ali, D. MacIntyre Ed.). Blue Ridges Summit, PA, USA: Multilingual. Matters. Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2016). A dynamic ensemble for second language research: Putting complexity theory into practice. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 741-756. Hiver, P., & Whitehead, G. E. (2018). Sites of struggle: Classroom practice and the complex dynamic entanglement of language teacher agency and identity. System, 30, 1-11. Hiver, P., & Whitehead, G. E. (2018). Sites of struggle: Classroom practice and the complex dynamic entanglement of language teacher agency and identity. System, 79(1), 70-80. Hiver, P., Zhou, A., Tahmouresi, S., Sang, Y., & Papi, M. (2020). Why stories matter: Exploring learner engagement and metacognition through narratives of the L2 learning experience. System, 102260. Hiver, P. (2015). Attractor states: Multilingual Matters Holec, H. (1981). 1981: Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon. Holland, A. A. (2019). Effective principles of informal online learning design: A theory-building metasynthesis of qualitative research. Computers & Education, 128, 214-226. Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Epistemic beliefs, online search strategies, and behavioral patterns while exploring socioscientific issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (3), 471-480. Huang, J. (2011). ‘‘A Dynamic Account of Autonomy, Agency and Identity in (T) EFL Learning.’’ In Identity, Motivation and Autonomy in Language Learning (p.229-246), edited by G. Murray, X. Gao, and T. Lamb. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Huang, J. P., & Benson, P. (2013). Autonomy, agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 7-28. Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96. Hyland, F. (2004). Learning autonomously: contextualizing out-of-class English language learning. Language Awareness, 13(3), 180-202. Indah, R. N. (2017). Critical thinking, writing performance and topic familiarity of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 229-236. Irwin, C. G., Ball, L., Desbrow, B., & Leveritt, M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19, 69-83. Isbell, D. R. (2018). Online informal language learning: Insights from a Korean learning community. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 82-102. Jalkanen, J.,& Vaarala, H. (2013). Digital texts for learning Finnish: Shared resources and emerging practices. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 107-124. Järvelä, S., & Renninger, K. (2014). Designing for learning: Interest, motivation, and engagement. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Jarvis, H., & Achilleos, M. (2013). From Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) to Mobile Assisted Language use. TESL-EJ, 16 (4), 1–18. Jarvis, H., & Krashen, S.D. (2014). Is CALL Obsolete? Language Acquisition and Language Learning Revisited in a Digital age. TESL-EJ, 17 (4), 1–6. Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., Törmänen, T., Näykki, P., Malmberg, J., Kurki, K., Mykkanen, A. & Isohätälä, J. (2018). Capturing Motivation and Emotion Regulation during a Learning Process. Frontline Learning Research, 6(3), 85-104. Jensen, S. H. (2017). Gaming as an English language learning resource among young children in Denmark. Calico Journal, 34(1), 1-19. Huang, J. P., & Benson, P. (2013). Autonomy agency and identity in foreign and second language education. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 36(1), 7. Jones, A. (2015). “Social Media for Informal Minority Language Learning: Exploring Welsh Learners’ Practices.” Journal of Interactive Media in Education 7: 1–9. Jones, A. (2015). Mobile informal language learning: Exploring Welsh Learners’ practices. eLearning Papers, 45, 4–14. Joseph, J. E. (2006). Applied linguistics and the choices people make (or do they?). International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 16(2), 237-241. Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., Reid, I., & Watkins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environments: The role of. reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(1), 203-218. Kahn, P. E. (2014). Theorising student engagement in higher education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 1005–1018. Kalaja, P., Alanen, R., Palviainen, Å., & Dufva, H. (2011). From milk cartons to. English roommates: Context and agency in L2 learning beyond the classroom. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 47-58). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Karp I. (1986). Agency and social theory: a review of Anthony Giddens. Am. Ethnol. 13(1), 131–37. Katyal, K. R., & Evers, C. W. (2004). Teacher leadership and autonomous student learning: Adjusting to the new realities. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(4-5), 367-382. Kim, S. (2014). “Developing Autonomous Learning for Oral Proficiency Using Digital Storytelling.” Language Learning and Technology, 18 (2): 20–35. Kim, Y., Sohn, D. and Choi, S. M. (2011) Cultural difference in motivations for using social network sites: A comparative study of American and Korean college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1): 365–372. Kizilcec, R. F., Perez-Sanagustín, M., & Maldonado, J. J. (2017). Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 104, 18-33. Knight, J., Barbera, E., & Appel, C. (2017). A framework for learner agency in online spoken interaction tasks. ReCALL, 29(3), 276-293. Knight, J., & Barbera, E. (2018). Navigational acts and discourse: Fostering learner agency in computer-assisted language learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 16(1), 67-76, available online at www.ejel.org Kogler, H. H. (2012). Agency and the other: On the intersubjective roots of self-identity. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 47–64. Kop, R. (2011). The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.882 Kormos, J., & Csizér, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 275-299. Kozar, O., & Sweller, N. (2014). An exploratory study of demographics, goals and. expectations of private online language learners in Russia. System, 45, 3951. doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.04.005 Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. (1992). Interest, Learning and Development. The role of interest in learning and development (K. Renninger, Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. Ed.): Hillsdale: NJ: Erlbaum. Krashen, S. D. (2014). The composing process. Research Journal: Ecolint Institute of Teaching and Learning. International School of Geneva, 2, 20-30. Krashen, S. D. (2011). Free voluntary reading. ABC-CLIO. Krashen, S. (2005). The composing process and the academic composing process. IJFLT, 7. Krashen, S. D. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research: Insights from the research: ABC-CLIO. Krashen, S. D. (2001). Incubation: A neglected aspect of the composing process. ESL Journal, 4(2), 10-11. Krashen, S. D. (1996). The case for narrow listening. System, 24(1), 97-100. Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440 464. Krashen, S. D. (1988). Do we learn to read by reading? The relationship between free reading and reading ability. Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding, 29, 269-298. Krashen, S. D. (1984). Writing, research, theory, and applications: Pergamon. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford University Press. Krashen, S. D., & Lee, S.-y. (2004). Competence in foreign language writing: Progress and lacunae. Literacy Across Cultures, 12(2), 10-14. Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, C. M. (2007). Agency and bidirectionality in socialization: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. Handbook of socialization: Theory and research, 259-283. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2009). Will Mobile Learning Change Language Learning?. ReCALL, 21(2), 157–165. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2012). Smart Devices or People? A Mobile Learning Quandary. International Journal of Learning and Media, 4 (3-4), 73–77. Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media, 4(2), 7-18. Kuppens, A.H. (2010). Incidental foreign language acquisition from media exposure. Learning, Media and Technology, 35, 65–85. Kusyk, M., & Sockett, G. (2012). “From Informal Resource Usage to Incidental Language Acquisition: Language Uptake from Online Television Viewing in English.” ASp. la Revue du GERAS, 62, 45–65. Kusyk, M. (2017). The development of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 written production through informal participation in online activities. CALICO Journal, 34(1), 75–96. Kuure, L. (2011). Places for learning: Technology mediated language learning practices beyond the classroom. In P. Benson, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Beyond the language classroom (pp. 35-46). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Lafford, B. A. (2009). Toward an ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991). The modern language journal, 93, 673-696. Lafford, P. T., & Lafford, B. A. (1997). Learning language and culture with Internet technologies. In M. D. Bush & R. M. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 215-262). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company. Lai, C. (2017). Autonomous language learning with technology: Beyond the classroom: Bloomsbury Publishing. Lai, C. (2013). A framework of developing self-directed technology use for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 17(2), 100–122. Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers’ influence on learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82: 74–83. Lai, C. (2015). Perceiving and Traversing In-class and Out-of-class Learning: Accounts from Foreign Language Learners in Hong Kong. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9 (3), 265–284. Lai, C., & Gu, M. (2011). “Self-regulated Out-of-class Language Learning with Technology.” Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24 (4): 317–335. Lai, C., Hu, X., & Lyu, B. (2018). Understanding the nature of learners’ out-of-class language learning experience with technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1-2), 114-143. Lai, C., Shum, M., & Tian, Y. (2016). Enhancing learners’ self-directed use of technology for language learning: the effectiveness of an online training platform. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(1), 40-60. Lai, C., & Zheng, D. (2018). Self-directed use of mobile devices for language Learning beyond the classroom. ReCALL, 30(3), 299-318. Lai, C., Zhu, W., & Gong, G. (2015). Understanding the quality of out‐of‐class English learning. TESOL Quarterly, 49(2), 278-308. Lam, W. S. E. (2000). L2 literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 457-482. Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L) anguage (A) ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research, 141-158. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2019). On language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 61-79. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2018). Looking ahead: Future directions in, and future research into, second language acquisition. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 55– 72. Larsen–Freeman, D. (2012). Complex, dynamic systems: A new transdisciplinary theme for applied linguistics? Language Teaching, 45, 202–214. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 26, 141–165. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex Systems and Applied Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press. Laura M., A. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109-137. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.30.1.109 Lawson, M. A., & Masyn, K. E. (2015). Analyzing profiles, predictors, and consequences of student engagement dispositions. Journal of School Psychology, 53(1), 63-86. Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. Sage. Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81-97. Leander, K. M., Phillips, N. C., & Taylor, K. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329-394. Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Cheung, K. W. (2019). Learner perceptions versus. Technology usage: A study of adolescent English learners in Hong Kong secondary schools. Computers & Education, 133, 13-26. Lee, J. S. (2019). Quantity and diversity of informal digital learning of English. Language Learning & Technology, 23 (1), 114-126. Lee, J. S. (2019). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British journal of educational technology, 50(2), 767-778. Lee, J. S. (2017). Informal digital learning of English and second language vocabulary. outcomes: Can quantity conquer quality? British Journal of Educational Technology, doi:10.1111/bjet.12599. Lee, J. S., & Dressman, M. (2018). When IDLE hands make an English workshop: Informal digital learning of English and language proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 52(2), 435–445. Lee, L., & Markey, A. (2014). A study of learners’ perceptions of online intercultural exchange through Web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 26(3), 281-297. Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students` perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 905-914. Lee, S.-Y. (2015). Joining the ‘literacy club’: When reading meets blogging. ELT Journal, 69(4), 373-382. Lee, S.-Y. (2001). What makes it difficult to write: Theory, research, and implications:Crane Publishing Company. Leppanen, S., Pitkanen-Huhta, A., Piirainen-Marsh, A., Nikula, T., & Peuronen, S. (2009). Young people`s translocal new media uses: A multiperspective analysis of language choice and heteroglossia. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1080-1107. Levak, N., & Son, J-B. (2017). Facilitating second language learners’ listening comprehension with Second Life and Skype. ReCALL, 29(2), 200-218. Levy, M., & Steel, C. (2015). Language learner perspectives on the functionality and use of electronic language dictionaries. ReCALL, 27(2), 177-196. Liao, C. C., Chang, W. C., & Chan, T. W. (2018). The effects of participation, performance, and interest in a game‐based writing environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 211-222. Lin, C.H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2016). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20, 124–147. Lincoln Y, Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Enquiry. London, Sage. Lindgren, R., & McDaniel, R. (2012). Transforming online learning through narrative and student agency. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 344. Little, D. (2004). Constructing a theory of learner autonomy: some steps along the way. Future perspectives in foreign language education, 15-25. Little, D., & Dam, L. (1998). Learner autonomy: What and why? LANGUAGE TEACHER-KYOTO-JALT, 22, 7-8. Little, D., & Erickson, G. (2015). Learner identity, learner agency, and the assessment of language proficiency: Some reflections prompted by the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 120-139. Liu, C. C., Chen, W. C., Lin, H. M., & Huang, Y.Y. (2017). A remix-oriented approach to promoting student engagement in a long-term participatory learning program. Computers & Education, 110, 1-15. Liu, M., McKelroy, E., Kang, J., Harron, J., & Liu, S. (2016). Examining the use of Facebook and Twitter as an additional social space in a MOOC. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 14–26. Liu, Q., & Chao, C. C. (2018). CALL from an ecological perspective: How a teacher perceives affordance and fosters learner agency in a technology-mediated language classroom. ReCALL, 30(1), 68-87. Liu, S. H. J., Lan, Y. J., & Ho, C. Y. Y. (2014). Exploring the relationship between self-regulated vocabulary learning and web-based collaboration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 404-419. Luo, H., Yang, T-T., Xue, J., & Zuo, M. (2019). Impact of student agency on learning performance and learning experience in a flipped classroom. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 819-831. Lyrigkou, C. (2018). Not to be overlooked: agency in informal language contact. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16. Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: a report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre: Learning and Skills Research Centre. Marc Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. Marefat, F., & Barbari, F. (2009). The relationship between out-of-class language learning strategy use and reading comprehension ability. Porta Linguarum, 12, 91–106. Margaret S., A. (2002). Meta-reflexives. In (pp. 255-297): Cambridge University Press. Mason, B. (2004). Improving TOEFL Scores from Reading Alone. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2(1), 2-5. Masood, B., Ali, A., Asma, A. R., Guang, Y., & Khaled, T. (2016). School children’s use of digital devices, social media and parental knowledge and involvement – the case of Abu Dhabi. Education and Information Technologies, 22, 2645- 2664. doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9557-y McCarthey, S. J., López-Velásquez, A. M., García, G. E., Lin, S., & Guo, Y.-H. (2004). Understanding writing contexts for English language learners. Research in the Teaching of English, 351-394. McCombs, B. L. (1994). Strategies for assessing and enhancing motivation: Keys to promoting self-regulated learning and performance. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr., & M. Drillings (Eds.). Motivation, Theory and Research (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Eribaum Associates. McKinney, P., & Sen, B. (2016). The use of technology in group-work: A situational. analysis of students` reflective writing. Education for Information, 32(4), 375-396. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2010). Personalised and self regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1). Mercer, S. (2018). Psychology for language learning: Spare a thought for the teacher. Language Teaching, 51(4), 504-525. Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies. Mercer, S. (2011). Language learner self-concept: Complexity, continuity and change. System, 39 (3), 335–346. Mercer, S. (2011). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System, 39 (4), 427–436. Mercer, S. & Ryan, S. (2010). A mindset for EFL: Learners’ beliefs about the role of natural talent. ELT Journal, 64 (4), 436–444. Mick, C. (2015). Sociological approaches to second language learning and agency. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and. analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 91–112). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Min, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58(1), 73-115. Miller, E. R. (2014). The language of adult immigrants: Agency in the making. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Miller, E. R. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 348–365. Moghari, M. H., & Marandi, S. S. (2017). Triumph through texting: Restoring learners’ interest in grammar. ReCall, 29(3), 357-372. Moje, E. B., & Luke, A. (2009). Literacy and identity: Examining the metaphors in history and contemporary research. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(4), 415-437. Mompean, J. A., & Fouz -González, J. (2016). Twitter -based EFL Pronunciation Instruction. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 166-190. Mruck, K. (2007). Das Beispiel der Open-Access-Zeitschrift Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS). Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie, 55(6), 251-257. doi:10.3196/18642950085445190 Muñoz, C. (2012). The significance of intensive exposure as a turning point in learners’ histories. Intensive exposure experiences in second language learning, 141-160. Nelson, T. O., A. W. Kruglanski, and J. T. Jost. 1998. ‘‘Knowing Thyself and Others: Progress in Metacognitive Social Psychology.’’ In Metacognition: Cognitive and Social Dimensions, edited by V. Y. Yzerbyt, G. Lories, and B. Darnne, 69-79. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Newmann, F. M. (1986). Priorities for the future: Toward a common agenda. Social Education, 50(4), 240-250. Nike, A. (2009). Online Extensive Reading for Advanced Foreign Language Learners: An Evaluation Study. Foreign Language Annals, 42, 340-366. Nitta, R., & Baba, K. (2015). Self-regulation in the evolution of the ideal L2 self: A complex dynamic systems approach to the L2 motivational self system. Motivational dynamics in language learning, 367-396. Norris, C. (1984). Margins of Philosophy. By Jacques Derrida (Trans. Alan Bass). The University of Chicago Press. 1982. 330 pp. Romance Studies, 3(1), 43-54. doi:10.1179/026399085786621828 Norton, B. (2017). Learner investment and language teacher identity. Reflections on Language teacher identity research, 80-86. In Barkhuizen, G. (Ed.). Reflections on language teacher identity research. Taylor & Francis. Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation: Multilingual Matters. Norton, B. & Toohey, K. (2001). ‘Changing perspectives on good language learners. TESOL Quarterly, 35: 307–22. Nowak, A., Vallacher, R. and Zochowski, M. (2005) The emergence of personality: Dynamic foundations of individual variation. Developmental Review, 25, 351–385. Nunan, D., & David, N. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge University Press. Oradini, F. & Saunders, G. (2008). The use of social networking by students and staff in higher education. Paper presented at the iLearning Forum, Paris. http://www.eifel. org/publications/proceedings/ilf08/contributions/improving-quality-of-learning withtechnologies/ Oradini_Saunders.pdf Orhan, Y. (2018). An Investigation of Out-of-Class Language Activities of Tertiary-Level EFL Learners. Education Reform Journal, 3(1), 1-14. Overton, W. F. (2007). A Coherent Metatheory for Dynamic Systems. Human development, 50(2/3), 154-159. Paiva, V. L. M. O. (2011). Identity, motivation and autonomy in second language acquisition from the perspective of complex adaptive systems. In G. Murray, X. S. Gao & T. Lamb (Eds.), Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning (pp. 57-72). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Palfreyman, D. M. (2011). Family, friends, and learning beyond the classroom: Social networks and social capital in language learning. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 17-34): Springer. Palfreyman, D. M. (2011). Family, friends, and learning beyond the classroom: Social networks and social capital in language learning. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 17-34). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Palfreyman, D. & Smith, R.C., eds. (2003). Learner autonomy across cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Panigrahi, R. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14. Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 1-14. Park, J., Yang, J-S., & Hsieh, Y. C. (2014). University level second language readers’ online reading and comprehension strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 148-172. Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. Rambe, P., & Chikobvu, D. (2014). Using Reflexive Agency to Explore Students’ Access to Online Learning Resources in Resource Constrained Learning Environments. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (20), 1147-1157. Rappa, N. A., & Tang, K. S. (2017). Student agency: An analysis of students’ networked relations across the informal and formal learning domains. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 673-684. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257–267. Reinders, H. (2011). Materials development for learning beyond the classroom. In Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). Beyond the language classroom (pp. 175-189). Springer. Reinders, H., & White, C. (2011). Learner autonomy and new learning environments. Special issue of Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 1-3. Reinhardt, J. & Zander, V. (2011). Social networking in an intensive English program classroom: A language socialization perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 326-344. Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice. The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, 26(3-4), 361-395. Renninger, K. A. (1992). Individual interest and development: Implications for theory and practice (Vol. 26). Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2011). Revisiting the conceptualization, measurement, and generation of interest. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 168-184. Renninger, K. A., & Su, S. (2012). Interest and its development. Ricca, B. (2012). Beyond teaching methods: A complexity approach. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 9, 31-51. Richards, J.C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46, 5–22. Rife, S. C., Cate, K. L., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2016). Participant recruitment and data collection through Facebook: The role of personality factors. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(1), 69-83. Rodrigo, V. (2003). Narrow listening and audio-library: The transitional stage in the process of developing listening comprehension in a foreign language. Mextesol Journal, 27(1), 9-25. Rose, M., & Rose, M. A. (2009). Writer`s block: The cognitive dimension: SIU Press. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2004). Well done and well liked: online information literacy skills and learner impressions of the web as a resource for foreign language learning. ReCall, 16(1), 210-224. Rubio, F. D. (2014). Self-esteem and self-concept in foreign language learning. Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA, 4158. Ryan, S., & Irie, K. (2014). Imagined and possible selves: Stories we tell ourselves about ourselves. Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA, 109-126. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 Morphosyntactic Development in Text-Based Computer- Mediated Communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 5-27. doi:10.1076/0958-8221(200002)13:1;1-k;ft005 Salma, U. (2015). Problems and practical needs of writing skill in EFL context: An. analysis of Iranian students of Aligarh Muslim University. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 20(11), 74-76. Salomon, G. (1984). “Television is ‘Easy’ and Print is ‘Tough’: The Differential Investment of Mental Effort in Learning as a Function of Perceptions and Attribution.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 76 (4), 647–658. http://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-0663.76.4.647 Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96-120. Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge. Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2000). The lexical advantages of narrow reading for second language learners. Tesol Journal, 9(1), 4-9. Scholz, K. (2017). “Encouraging Free Play: Extramural Digital Game-Based Language Learning as a Complex Adaptive System.” CALICO Journal, 34 (1): 39–57. Schulze, M., & Scholz, K. (2016). CALL theory: Complex adaptive systems. In C. Caws & M.-J. Hamel (Eds.), Learner-computer interactions: New insights on. CALL theories and applications (pp. 65-87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Sealey, A., & Carter, B. (2004). Applied linguistics as social science. A&C Black. Sendag, S., Gedik, N., & Toker, S. (2018). Impact of repetitive listening, listening aid. and podcast length on EFL podcast listening. Computers & Education, 125, 273-283. Smith, F. (2012). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read: Routledge. Smith, F. (1985). Reading without nonsense: Teachers College Press. Smith, K., & Craig, H. (2013). Enhancing the autonomous use of CALL: A new curriculum model in EFL. CALICO Journal, 30(2), 252-278. Sockett, G. (2014). The Online Informal Learning of English. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Sockett, G. (2013). Understanding the online informal learning of English as a complex n dynamic system: An emic approach. ReCall, 25(1), 48-62. Sockett, G. (2012). From informal resource usage to incidental language acquisition: language uptake from online television viewing in English. Asp, 62, 45-65. Sockett, G., & Kusyk, M. (2015). Online informal learning of English: Frequency effects in the uptake of chunks of language from participation in web-based activities. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 153–177). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110378528-009 Sockett, G. & Toffoli, D. (2012). Beyond learner autonomy: A dynamic systems view of the informal learning of English in virtual online communities. ReCALL, 24(2), 138-151. Song, D., & Bonk, C. J. (2016). Motivational factors in self-directed informal learning from online learning resources. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1205838. Stanfield, P. W. (2015). Analyzing Learner Agency in Second Language Learning: A Place-based Approach. In P. Deters, X. Gao, E. R. Miller, & G. Vitanova, (Eds.), Theorizing and analyzing agency in second language learning (pp. 173–194). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Stevens, D. D., & Cooper, J. E. (2009). Journal keeping: How to use reflective writing. for effective learning, teaching, professional insight, and positive change. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing, LLC. Stickler, U., & Emke, M. (2011). Tandem learning in virtual spaces: Supporting non- formal and informal learning in adults. In Benson, P., & Reinders, H. (Eds.). Beyond the language classroom (pp. 146-160): Springer. Su, Y., Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Examining the relationship between English language learners’ online self-regulation and their self-efficacy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2018, 34(3), 105-121. Sumuer, E. (2018). Factors related to college students` self-directed learning with technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 29-43. Sun, J. C. Y., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational interest, computer self‐efficacy and self‐regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education. British journal of educational technology, 43(2), 191-204. Sundqvist, P. (2011). A possible path to progress: Out-of-school English language learners in Sweden. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 106-118). Palgrave Macmillan, London. Sundqvist, P. (2009). “Extramural English Matters: Out-of-school English and its Impact on Swedish Ninth-graders’ Oral Proficiency and Vocabulary.” Diss., Karlstad University, Karlstad. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/ get/diva2:275141/FULLTEXT03.pdf Sundqvist, P., & Wikström, P. (2015). “Out-of-school Digital Gameplay and In-school L2 English Vocabulary Outcomes.” System, 51, 65–76. Sundqvist, P., & Sylven, L. K. (2016). Extramural English in the teaching and learning: From theory and research to practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Swain, M. (2009). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second Language proﬁciency. Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky, 95. Sylvén, L. K., & Sundqvist, P. (2012). Gaming as extramural English L2 learning and L2 proficiency among young learners. ReCALL, 24(3), 302-321. Sztompka. P. (ed.) 1994. Agency and Structure: Reorienting Social Theory. International Studies in Global Change,Vol. 4. Langhorne, PA: Gordon Breach Tare, M., Golonka, E. M., Vatz, K., Bonilla, C. L., Crooks, C., & Strong, R. (2014). Effects of interactive chat versus independent writing on L2 learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18 (3), 208-227. Tejeda, M. J. (2007). Book Review: Clarke, A. E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Organizational Research Methods, 10(2), 390-392. doi:10.1177/1094428106290198 Teo, T. (2018). Students and Teachers’ Intention to Use Technology: Assessing Their Measurement Equivalence and Structural Invariance. Journal of Educational Computing. DOI 10.1007/s10639-016-9557-y Thomas, M., Reinders, H., & Warschauer, M. (Eds.). (2013). Contemporary computerassisted language learning. London/New York: Bloomsbury. Toffoli, D., & Sockett, D. (2010). “How Non-specialist Students of English Practice Informal Learning Using web 2.0 Tools.” ASp. la Revue du GERAS, (58), 125–144. Toohey, K., & Norton, B. (2003). Learner autonomy as agency in sociocultural settings. In D. Palfreyman & R. C. Smith (Eds.), Learner autonomy across cultures (pp. 58–72). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet self-efficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(5), 479–494. Tsai, I. C. (2012). Understanding social nature of an online community of practice for learning to teach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 271–285. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272. Tsai, C. W., Shen, P. D., & Fan, Y. T. (2013). Research trends in self‐regulated learning research in online learning environments: A review of studies published in selected journals from 2003 to 2012. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), E107-E110. Tsai, M. J., Hsu, C. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Investigation of high school students` online science information searching performance: The role of implicit and explicit strategies. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(2), 246-254. Tsai, M. J. & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students` Internet usage and self-efficacy: A reexamination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182-1192. Tsai M-J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010) Junior high school students’ internet usage and self-efficacy: a re-examination of the gender gap. Comput Educ, 54, 1182–1192. Tsai, Y.-L., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Digital game-based second-language vocabulary learning and conditions of research designs: A meta-analysis study. Computers & Education, 125, 345-357 Tseng, S. C., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2014). Students` self-regulated learning, online information evaluative standards and online academic searching strategies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), 106-121. Tu, Y. W., Shih, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2008). Eighth graders’ web searching strategies and outcomes: The role of task types, web experiences and epistemological beliefs. Computers and Education, 51(3), 1142–1153. Ushioda, E. (2015). Context and complex dynamic systems theory. In Z. Dornyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 47–54). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Ushioda, E. (2014). Motivational perspectives on the self in SLA: A developmental view. Multiple perspectives on the self in SLA, 127-141. Ushioda, E. (2011a). Language learning motivation, self and identity: Current theoretical perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 199–210. Ushioda, E. (2011b). Motivating learners to speak as themselves. Identity, motivation and autonomy in language learning, 11-24. Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. Bristol: UK: Multilingual Matters. Ushioda, E. (2007). Motivation, autonomy and sociocultural theory. In: Benson, P. (Ed.), Learner Autonomy: Teacher and Learner Perspectives. Authentik, Dublin, pp. 5-24. Ushioda, E., & Dörnyei, Z. (2011). Teaching and Researching: Motivation. Pearson Education. van Geert, P. (2011). The contribution of complex dynamic systems to development. Child Development Perspectives, 5, 273–278. van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). London: Equinox. van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology of langauge learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer. Vanderplank, R. (2016). Captioned Media in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing as Tools for Language Learning. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Verspoor, M. (2012). Symposium: Dynamic systems/Complexity theory as a new approach to second language development. Language Teaching, 45(4), 533- 534. Verspoor, M., de Bot, K., & Lowie, W. (Eds.). (2011). A dynamic approach to second language development. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Voller, P. (1997). Does the teacher have a role in autonomous learning?‟ In P. Benson. & P. Voller (eds). Autonomy and Independence in Language Learning (pp. 98-113). London: Longman. Waes, L. V., Weijen, D. V., & Leijten, M. (2014). Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process. Computers & Education, 73, 60-71. Wang, F. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2013). Let’s surf: How does free voluntary surfing make English learning comprehensible and compelling? Selected Paper from the 22nd International Symposium and Book Fair on English Teaching (CD-ROM, pp. 403-411). Taipei: Crane.,2013/11/14-2013/11/16 Wang, F. Y., & Lee, S. Y. (2015). Free voluntary surfing: An extensive reading curriculum supported by technology. In L. H. Das, S. Brand-Gruwel, J. Walhout & K. Kok (Eds.), (2015). The School Library Rocks: Proceedings of the 44th International Association of School Warschauer, M., (1996). Computer Assisted Language Learning: an Introduction. In: Fotos S., (ed). 1998. Multimedia language teaching (pp.3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In S. Fotos & C. Brown (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press. Wertsch, J. V., Tulviste, P., & Hagstrom, F. (1993). A sociocultural approach to agency. Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development, 23, 336-356. Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 39–59. Winters, F. I., Greene, J. A., & Costich, C. M. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429–444. Wong, L. L., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System, 39(2), 144-163. Wu, M. M.-f. (2012). Beliefs and Out-of-class language learning of Chinese-speaking ESL learners in Hong Kong. New Horizons in Education, 60(1), 35-52. Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Information commitments: Evaluative standards and information searching strategies in web-based learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 374-385. Xiao, J. (2012). Successful and unsuccessful distance language learners: An ‘affective’ perspective. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 27, 121–136. Xiao, J. (2014). Learner agency in language learning: the story of a distance learner of EFL in China. Distance Education, 35(1), 4–17. Yang, H., & Clarke, M. (2018). Spaces of agency within contextual constraints: a case study of teacher’s response to EFL reform in a Chinese university. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 187-201. Yashima, T., & Arano, K. (2015). Understanding EFL learners’ motivational dynamics: A three-level model from a dynamic systems and sociocultural perspective. Motivational dynamics in language learning, 285-314. Yin, R. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. You, C., & Chan, L. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self- guides. In Z. Dornyei, P. MacIntyre, & A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 397-418). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters. Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Self-Regulation. In Boekaerts, M., Zeidner, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 7 49-768): Elsevier. Zhang, J. (2013). Learner agency, motive, and self-regulated learning in an online ESL writing class. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 43(2), 57-81. Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., Yang, Y. F., & Tsai, C. C. (2016). The relationship between Chinese university students` conceptions of language learning and their online self-regulation. System, 57, 66-78. Zheng, C., Liang, J. C., Li, M., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). The relationship between English language learners’ motivation and online self-regulation: A structural equation modelling approach. System, 76, 144-157. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In Boekaerts, M., Zeidner, M., & Pintrich, P. R. (Eds.). Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329– 339. Zimmerman, B. J., & Cleary, T. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5, 45-69. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of. self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 1–30). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
描述:	博士國立政治大學英國語文學系 100551505
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100551505
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202001528
顯示於類別:	[英國語文學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
150501.pdf		11212Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋