政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131346
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113313/144292 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50946659      線上人數 : 1012
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131346


    題名: 台灣公部門與私部門如何實踐永續發展目標
    How Taiwan’s Public and Private Sectors Implement Sustainable Development Goals
    作者: 游宜珍
    Yu, Yi-Chen
    貢獻者: 林月雲
    Lin, Yeh-Yun
    游宜珍
    Yu, Yi-Chen
    關鍵詞: 永續發展目標SDGs
    國際援助
    企業社會責任
    制度理論
    日期: 2020
    上傳時間: 2020-08-03 18:42:02 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 聯合國在2015年通過《2030年永續發展議程》，包含17項「永續發展目標」(Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs)，以「沒有人是局外人」(No One Leave Behind)為精神，致力在2030年前，結合政府、企業、民間機構等力量，終結貧窮、保護地球，達到人類擁有和平與繁榮的生活藍圖(UN，2015)。在第17項目標裡的子目標，提及財務融資方面，已開發國家可充分藉由政府開發協助（Official development assistance，ODA）計畫，私部門則透過外國直接投資（Foreign direct investments ，FDI）的方式進行努力。近一步討論各方利害關係人如何參與其中，一起達到這個願景，是全球迫切的下一步行動。

    本研究聚焦於台灣的公部門財團法人國際合作發展基金會（簡稱：國合會）（ICDF, International Cooperation and Development Fund）與私部門國泰金融控股股份有限公司（簡稱：國泰金控）（Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.），以公開資料與半結構式的訪談，了解雙方的永續歷史脈絡，透過制度理論與路徑依賴為分析工具，了解兩者實踐永續發展目標SDGs的動機、實踐方法、與對組織的影響與意義為何。

    綜合發現，組織內部對永續的正面態度促使兩者積極參與這次永續發展目標SDGs倡議，實踐過程中，在公司高層的政策會議中，永續發展目標SDGs作為討論組織未來發展的參考框架，讓永續發展目標SDGs融入組織的政策制定脈絡裡。最後，從兩個組織的實踐過程中，本研究發現永續發展目標SDGs成為一個良好的溝通工具，能夠降低個體間對永續認知的落差與組織溝通的障礙，促進組織對內與對外的永續發展討論。
    “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) was adopted at the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit in New York in September 2015. UN pledge that no one will be left behind and commit to dedicating to ending poverty, protecting the planet, and accelerating peace and prosperity before 2030. Governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals will contribute to achieving these goals (UN, 2015). In Goal 17, referring to finance target, developed countries can implement fully their official development assistance (ODA) commitments, and the private sector through foreign direct investment (FDI). How stakeholders engage in this vision is a crucial next step in the world.

    This research focuses on Taiwan’s public sector, International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF) and the private sector Cathay Financial Holdings Co., Ltd.. The information accessed from secondary data and semi-structured interviews to understand the sustainable history of both parties and analyzed the motives, methods, and impact of implementation SDGs with institutional theory and path dependence.

    To summarize the analysis and discussion of this study, the internal positive attitude is a significant factor to induce organization to adopt SDGs implementation. In the process of practice, SDGs are used as the reference framework to discuss the future strategy in the company`s top executives meeting. Finally, this study found that the SDGs have become a good communication tool, which can reduce the gap between individuals` perceptions of sustainability and organizational communication barriers, and promote organizational internal and external discussions on sustainability.
    參考文獻: 中文文獻：
    1. 台灣B lab官網http://blab.tw/
    2. 林建煌（2019）。管理學概論（五版）。華泰文化事業公司。
    3. 黃良志，黃家齊，溫金豐，廖文志&韓志翔（2017）。人力資源管理理論與實務（四版）。華泰文化事業公司
    4. CSRone（2019）。GRI執行長：企業永續將成為主流顯學。取自https://ubrand.udn.com/ubrand/story/12117/3713038
    5. 李秀玲（2010）。淺談「上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則」及相關配套機制推動情形。證券暨期貨月刊，第28卷第5期。
    6. 台灣證券交易所（2004）。上市上櫃公司訂定道德行為準則參考範例。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
    7. 台灣證券交易所（2010）。上市上櫃公司企業社會責任實務守則。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
    8. 台灣證券交易所（2014）。上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法」。取自https://cgc.twse.com.tw/lawTWSE/listCh
    9. 陳雅慧（2012）。國泰金控一半台灣人是客戶。天下雜誌。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5041287
    10. 國泰世華商業銀行介紹。取自https://www.cathaybk.com.tw/cathaybk/about/about/intro/history/
    11. 楊雅智（2015）。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊，第33卷第1期。
    12. KPMG（2018）。《企業因應全球永續發展目標(SDGs)分析報告》。取自https://home.kpmg/tw/zh/home/insights/2018/02/how-to-report-on-the-sdgs.html
    13. CSRone（2020）。《2020臺灣暨亞太永續報告現況與趨勢》。取自https://csrone.com/reports/3650
    14. 劉世慶（2020）。17項SDGs的永續發展目標，最多台灣企業選的3項是？，取自https://csr.cw.com.tw/article/41407
    15. 中華民國外交部（2017）。環保署長李應元赴紐約出席永續發展國際研討會發布我國首部「國家自願檢視報告」。第157號新聞稿
    16. 新北市政府（2019）。《2019新北市地方自願檢視報告》。新北市政府秘書處
    17. 黃正忠（2007）。全球企業永續性報告現況。證券櫃檯，96年8月號。
    18. 李宜卿（2010）。公民參與的機會與挑戰—台灣審議民主制度化之研究。doi:10.6342/NTU.2010.03403
    19. 國發所（2019）。國發所師生參訪國合會總部，瞭解我國國際開發援助。取自https://www.nccu.edu.tw/p/405-1000-6793,c87.php?Lang=zh-tw
    20. 中華民國外交部（2009）。援外政策白皮書。
    21. 魏慧（2012）。世界五百強企業的生命周期及其決定因素。
    22. 經濟部中小企業處（2012）。2012中小企業白皮書。
    23. 劉純佑譯（2016）。企業存活率恐怖真相。哈佛商業評論。
    24. 貝婉莉（2017）。國際福利服務發展拓點歷程之探究－台灣明月社會福利機構於東南亞拓點案例分析。
    25. 經貿事務司（2007）。台灣援外工作與國際合作。外交部通訊。第27卷第1期。
    26. 傅中（2018）。1895-1985台灣歷史知多少？。金剛出版事業有限公司。
    27. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2015）。第一屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
    28. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2016）。第二屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
    29. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2017）。第三屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
    30. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2018）。第四屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
    31. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2019）。第五屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明
    32. 證券櫃檯買賣中心（2020）。第六屆公司治理評鑑系統評鑑結果暨評鑑程序說明

    英文文獻：
    1. Sheldon, Oliver (1923). The Philosophy of Management. London ： Kenneth Thompson.
    2. Bowen, H.R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. Retrieved April 5, 2020, from https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=4y0vAAAAMAAJ
    3. Yang, L., & Guo, Z. (2014). Evolution of CSR Concept in the West and China. International Review of Management and Business Research, 3(2), 819.
    4. Latapí Agudelo, M.A., Jóhannsdóttir, L. & Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int J Corporate Soc Responsibility 4, 1 Retrieved : https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
    5. Carroll, A. B. (2008). A history of corporate social responsibility: Concepts and practices. The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility, 19-46. Retrieved :http://satellinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/AHistoryofCSRConceptsPractices.Oxford.2008.pdf
    6. Bhaduri, S. N., & Selarka, E. (2016). Corporate social responsibility around the world—An overview of theoretical framework, and evolution. In Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility of Indian companies. Springer, Singapore. Retrieved : https://reurl.cc/j7R8dp
    7. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California management review, 2(3), 70-76. Retrieved : https://search.proquest.com/docview/206291990?pq-origsite=gscholar
    8. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The growing concern over business responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61. Retrieved : https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/GrowingConcern.pdf
    9. Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.morididattica.it/files/Friedman%201970%20b7.pdf
    10. D.J. Vogel. (2005). Is there a market for virtue? The business case for corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 47, 19-45. Retrieved April 11 , 2020, from http://www.untag-smd.ac.id/files/Perpustakaan_Digital_1/CORPORATE%20SOCIAL%20RESPONSIBILITY%20The_Market_for_Virtue_The_Potential_and_Limits_of_Corporate_Socia.pdf
    11. Waterhouse, B. C. (2017). The personal, the political and the profitable: Business and protest culture, 1960s-1980s. Financial History, Spring, 2017, 14–17.
    12. Stephanie Vierra. (2019). Green Building Standards And Certification Systems. Vierra Design & Education Services, LLC Retrieved : https://www.wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and-certification-systems
    13. Jones, T. M. (1980). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review, 22(3), 59-67. doi:10.2307/41164877
    14. Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Academy of management Journal, 27(1), 42-56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/255956?seq=14#metadata_info_tab_contents
    15. Archie B. Carroll. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: The Centerpiece of Competing and Complementary Frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 87-96
    16. John Elkington. (2018). 25 Years Ago I Coined the Phrase “Triple Bottom Line.” Here’s Why It’s Time to Rethink It. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved : https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrase-triple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving-up-on-it
    17. Corporate Register. https://www.corporateregister.com/
    18. United Nations Global Compact. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/
    19. N. Craig Smith. (2000). Changes in corporate practices in response to public interest advocacy and actions: the role of consumer boycotts and socially responsible corporate social responsibility. London Business School. Retrieved: https://www.london.edu/faculty-and-research/academic-research/c/changes-in-corporate-practices-in-response-to-public-interest-advoc-ff1e3ab7328d44d9b5fbc19e6170c9f7
    20. William C. Frederick. (1994). From CSR1 TO CSR2: the maturing of business-and-society thought. Business and Society. Retrieved: https://www.williamcfrederick.com/articles/FromCSRtoCSR.pdf
    21. Werther Jr, W. B., & Chandler, D. (2005). Strategic corporate social responsibility as global brand insurance. Business Horizons, 48(4), 317-324. Retrieved: http://hajarian.com/brand/1-s2.0-s000768130400134x-main.pdf
    22. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. Retrieved : https://www.comfama.com/contenidos/servicios/Gerenciasocial/html/Cursos/Columbia/Lecturas/Strategy-Society.pdf
    23. Kramer, M. R., & Porter, M. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard business review. Retrieved: http://www.coherence360.com/praxis/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Michael_Porter_Creating_Shared_Value.pdf
    24. Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR Web site reporting. Business & Society, 44, 415-441.
    25. Peters, B. G. (1999). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. London: Pinter Press.
    26. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American political science review, 78(3), 734-749. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1961840?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
    27. Paul J. DiMaggio and Walter W. Powell. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational American Sociological Review, Vol. 48, No. 2 ,147-160 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2095101
    28. Lammers, J. C., & Garcia, M. A. (2017). Institutional theory approaches. The international encyclopedia of organizational communication, 1-10. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314712184_Institutional_Theory_Approaches
    29. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x
    30. O’Connor, A., & Shumate, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility communication: An economic industry and institutional level of analysis of corporate social responsibility communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318909358747
    31. Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 472-500. DOI: 10.2307/2393735
    32. Beddewela, E., & Fairbrass, J. (2016). Seeking legitimacy through CSR: Institutional pressures and corporate responses of multinationals in Sri Lanka. Journal of business ethics, 136(3), 503-522. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-014-2478-z
    33. Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
    34. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of management Review, 33(2), 404-424. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2008.31193458
    35. the GRI’s history. https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/gri-history/Pages/GRI`s%20history.aspx
    36. Marga Hoek. (2018). The Trillion Dollar Shift.
    37. United Nations Development Programme. What are the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from: https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html
    38. Gavin E.R. Wilson. (2015) Billions to trillions: Financing the Global Goals. Retrieved from: https://blogs.worldbank.org/voices/billions-to-trillions-financing-the-global-goals
    39. The SDGs are a call to action for business and governments know it. Business call to action. Retrieved from: https://www.businesscalltoaction.org/news/sdgs-are-call-action-business-and-governments-know-it
    40. Business & Sustainable Development Commission. (2017). Better Business Better World: The Report of the Business & Sustainable Development Commission, Retrieved from: http://report.businesscommission.org/uploads/BetterBiz-BetterWorld_170215_012417.pdf
    41. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
    42. Europe commission. Corporate Social Responsibility & Responsible Business Conduct. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/sustainability/corporate-social-responsibility_es?2nd-language=en
    43. UNIDO. What is CSR? Retrieved from: https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr
    44. Fehling, M., Nelson, B. D., & Venkatapuram, S. (2013). Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review. Global public health, 8(10), 1109-1122. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3877943/
    45. Millennium Development Goals Report 2015, New York. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/mdg-report-2015.html
    46. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
    47. United Nations. (2000). United Nations Millennium Declaration. https://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/millennium_summit.shtml
    48. Lucci, P. (2012), Post-2015 MDGs: What Role for Business?, Overseas Development Institute, London. https://www.odi.org/publications/6645-post-2015-millennium-development-goals-what-role-business
    49. Lozano, R. (2008). Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of cleaner production, 16(17), 1838-1846. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652608000401?casa_token=IMx6k36zLIwAAAAA:l-_cVHPSnx8J0BhrWMp_IaaQaW7qJduGLkoq0mg2J4qFAw7qHPOXm3CBiY5axh5umGZXjYbphSTB
    50. BCtA & GRI. (2016). MEASURING IMPACT : How Business Accelerates the Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from : https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/Meassuring%20Impact_BCtA_GRI.pdf
    51. North, D. C. (1993). The new institutional economics and development. Economic History.
    52. Office of the Historian, Foreign Service Institute. Marshall Plan. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/marshall-plan
    53. Mahoney, J. (2001). Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in comparative international development, 36(1), 111-141. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02687587
    54. Unilever Annual Report and Accounts 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.unilever.com/Images/unilever-annual-report-and-accounts-2018_tcm244-534881_en.pdf
    55. Channell, Curmi, Whitton & Fordham. (2018). UN Sustainable Development Goals Pathways to Success-A Systematic Framework for Aligning Investments. Retrieved from: https://www.citivelocity.com/citigps/un-sustainable-development-goals/
    56. Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Reporting: A Practical Guide. (2018). Retrieved from: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/GRI_UNGC_Reporting-on-SDGs_Practical_Guide.pdf
    57. European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
    107363022
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363022
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202001010
    顯示於類別:[企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    302201.pdf2458KbAdobe PDF269檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋