Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131345
|
| Title: | 企業社會責任與財務績效之關聯性-以天下雜誌CSR天下企業公民為研究對象
The Relation Between Corporate Social Responsibility & Financial Performance: Evidence from Taiwan |
| Authors: | 陳志彥
Chen, Chih-Yen |
| Contributors: | 顏錫銘
Yen, Shi-Ming
陳志彥
Chen, Chih-Yen |
| Keywords: | 企業社會責任
財務績效
公司治理
企業承諾
社會參與
環境保護 |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 18:41:50 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究主要探討台灣企業之企業社會責任表現是否會對其財務績效產生影響。以2016年-2019年天下雜誌「天下公民企業Top50」作為得獎企業目標樣本，同時也從TEJ台灣經濟新報資料庫選取了台灣其他上市櫃企業以1:2得獎：未得獎之比例做為配對樣本，並以多元迴歸模型去探討企業社會責任與財務績效間的關聯性，研究結果發現，天下雜誌得獎企業在企業社會責任上的相對積極作為對其財務績效確實有顯著的正向助益。
本研究進一步探討了這些天下雜誌得獎企業中，在「四大構面」上的差異作為而得到的差異分數是否造成不同的財務績效表現，此四大構面包含「公司治理」、「企業承諾」、「社會參與」及「環境保護」，本研究以該四項評鑑分數對企業財務績效：每股盈餘進行多元迴歸，而研究結果顯示，「公司治理」及「企業承諾」可以對企業的財務績效帶來顯著且正向的影響，故完整的董事會結構、透明的資訊揭露和對消費者、供應鏈和其他利害關係人的承諾將有效地影響著企業財務表現。
This study examines whether Taiwanese companies` CSR performance has a relationship with their financial performance. The 2016-2019 World Common Wealth magazines "Citizen Enterprise Top 50" winning companies are used as the target sample. At the same time, other listed companies in Taiwan were selected from the TEJ Taiwan Economic Newspaper database to be the non-award-winning sample under the basis of 1:2 ratio that the number of non-award-winning is twice of winning samples, and using multiple regression models to explore the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance. And the results of the study found that the relative positive ambition of award-winning companies does have a significant positive effect on their financial performance.
This research further discusses whether the difference scores obtained by the "four major aspects" of World Common Wealth magazine award-winning companies result in different financial performance. These four major aspects include "corporate governance" and " "Corporate Commitment", "Social Participation" and "Environmental Protection". In this study, the four evaluation scores were used to perform multiple regressions on corporate financial performance: EPS. The research results show that "corporate governance" and "corporate commitment" have a significant and positive impact on the company`s financial performance, so a complete board structure, transparent information disclosure, and commitment to consumers, supply chains, and other stakeholders will effectively affect the company`s financial performance. |
| Reference: | Alexander, G.J. & R.A. Buchholz (1978). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stock Market Performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 21(3), 479-486.
Bragdon, J. & J. Marlin (1972). Is Pollution Profitable. Risk Management, 19, 9-18.
Brzenk（2018）. The Impact of the Global Economy on the S&P 500, S&P Dow Jones Indices, 4-6.
Calantone, R.J., S.T. Cavusgil & Y. Zhao (2002). Learning Orientation, Firm Innovation Capability, and Firm Performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515-524.
Carroll, A.B. (1991). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities. California Management Review, 2, 70-71.
Eilbirt, H. & R. Parket (1972). The corporate responsibility officer: A new position on the organization chart. Business Horizons, 15(6), 45-51.
Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits . The New York Times Magazine, 122-126.
Hall, P. & R. Rieck. (1998). The Effect of Postive Corporate Social Actions on Shareholder Wealth. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions, 11, 83-88.
Hauff, M. & A. Kleine (2009). Sustainability-Driven Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility: Application of the Integrative Sustainability Triangle. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 517-533.
Kaplan, R.S. & D.P. Norton (1996). Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership, 24(5), 18-24.
Levitt, T. (1958). The Dangers of Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 36, 41-50.
McGuire, J.W.（1963）. Factors affecting the growth of manufacturing firms: Prepared under the Small Business Administration management research grant program. Bureau of Business Research. 100-110.
McWilliams, A. & D. Siegel (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21(5), 603-609.
Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing Socially Responsible Stocks. Business and Society Review, 1, 71-75.
Peters, R.H. & M.R. Mullen (2009). Some evidence of the cumulative effects of corporate social responsibility on financial performance. Journal of Global Business Issues, 3(1), 1-14.
Vance, S. (1975). Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks? Managerial Review, 64, 18-24.
中文文獻
丁昶均(2018)。企業社會責任 ─ 公司治理、財務績效與政策。東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士論文，18-25。
王言，張佑廷，柯俊禎及張阜民(2017)。善盡企業社會責任對公司治理、獲利能力關係之探討。財金論文叢刊，27期，34-49。
朱梓齊(2012)。企業社會責任對高階主管薪酬與績效關聯性影響之探討。國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文，21-35。
李秀英，劉俊儒及楊筱翎(2011)。企業社會責任與公司績效之關聯性。東海管理評論，13卷1期，77-112。
沈中華及張元(2008)。企業社會責任行為可以改善財務績效嗎?─以英國FTSE 社會責任指數為例。經濟論文，36卷3期，339-385。
林文玲及傅鍾仁(2001)。企業社會責任之揭露對會計資訊價值攸關性－以台灣資訊電子業上市公司為例。商管科技季刊，12卷2期，209-229。
林佳欣(2019)。企業社會責任活動對企業長期財務指標的影響。國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，4-8。
莫冬立(2006)。追求典範：企業社會責任評等。證券櫃檯，141期，62-63。
曹壽民，金成隆及呂學典(2009)。股權結構與多角化。臺大管理論叢，22卷1期，165-198。
陳庭萱，何瑞鎮及林玉婷(2016)。企業社會責任對長短期股價的影響－以台灣銀行業為例，證券市場發展季刊，28卷4期，129-169。
黃瓊瑤，王癸元及張鳳真(2013)。企業社會責任事件宣告與股價異常報酬之研究。當代會計，14卷2期，175-204。
劉嘉惠（2001）。公司治理下股權結構與經營績效關係之研究－兼論美、日、韓公司治理。私立長榮大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
劉美纓，丁碧慧及朱奐聿(2014)。企業社會責任與公司治理、公司績效之關連性研究。科際整合管理研討會，2014第17屆，17-30。
葉旻其（2009）。公司治理機制對企業績效與董監薪酬之影響。國立政治大學會計系碩士論文。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)
107363019 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107363019 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000693 |
| Appears in Collections: | [企業管理研究所（MBA學位學程）] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 301901.pdf | | 2282Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 21 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
