政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131298

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131298

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51049052 線上人數 : 920

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 學校行政碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/131298

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131298

題名:	中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力指標建構研究 The Construction of Indicators for High School Teachers’ Teaching Competence in Media Literacy Education
作者:	藍涵馨 Lan, Han-Hsin
貢獻者:	郭昭佑陳揚學藍涵馨 Lan, Han-Hsin
關鍵詞:	媒體素養教育教學能力概念構圖 Media literacy education teaching competence Concept mapping
日期:	2020
上傳時間:	2020-08-03 18:32:28 (UTC+8)
摘要:	本研究目的在建構中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力指標，除提升教學現場效能、未來師資培育之外，亦提供具結構化的評鑑參考。研究流程的第一階段，以文獻探討析論出中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力的20項指標。第二階段，以專家問卷進行指標修改調整，建立我國中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力評鑑指標。第三階段，採用概念構圖問卷和集群分析整合媒體教育、資訊教育、教育行政三領域代表對指標的重要性評估，以及指標分群。最後一階段，以多元尺度法求取各構面的指標和權重，完成我國中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力指標體系。根據研究結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下：一、本研究建構之中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力指標，包含三個主構面、五個次構面和20項指標。二、中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力，三大主構面中，重要性依序排列為「社會參與」、「自主行動」、「溝通互動」。三、中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力，五個次構面中，重要性依序排列為「媒體資安」、「數位公民」、「使用媒體」、「理解媒體」、「創建媒體」。四、中學教師媒體素養教育之教學能力，重要性最高的前三項指標為「教師能教導學生合法運用媒體的行為」、「教師能教導學生具備資安意識，在利用媒體傳播訊息時，保護個人資料及隱私」、「教師能教導學生具備媒體互動的倫理規範」。 The objective of this study is to establish indicators of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers. The indicators can not only contribute to classroom teaching effectiveness and future teacher training but also serve as a foundation for structural assessment. In the first stage of this study, a literature review was conducted to obtain 20 indicators of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers. In the second stage, the indicators were modified and adjusted through an expert questionnaire to establish the domestic indicators of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers. In the third stage, a concept mapping questionnaire and cluster analysis were utilized to integrate the assessment of the importance of these indicators by representatives from three domains, including media education, information education, and education administration, and then cluster the indicators. In the final stage, multidimensional scaling was applied to determine the indicators and their respective weights in each dimension and complete a domestic system of indicators of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers. The main findings of this research are summarized as follows: 1.In this study, 20 indicators, 3 dimensions, and 5 subdimensions of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers were established. 2.In order of importance, the three dimensions of teaching competence in media literacy education are “social participation”, “autonomous action”, and “communication and interaction”. 3.Among the five subdimensions of teaching competence in media literacy education, “media information security” is most important, followed by “digital citizenship”, “media access”, “media comprehension”, and “media creation”. 4.The top three indicators of teaching competence in media literacy education for high school teachers are “being able to teach students to have lawful media use behavior”, “being able to nurture the awareness of information security in students and teach them how to protect their personal data and privacy while using media to exchange information”, and “being able to teach students to abide by the ethical norms of media interaction”.
參考文獻:	中文部分中華資訊素養協會（2013年4月9日）。莫斯科宣言，媒體與資訊素養 (Moscow Declaration on Media and Information Literacy)，取自http://www.cila.org.tw/?p=2152 天下雜誌（2018年11月1日）數位素養待加強，僅2%英國學童能分辨真假新聞。取自https://flipedu.parenting.com.tw/article/5036 王文科、王智弘 (2014)。教育研究法。臺北：五南。台灣媒體觀察教育基金會 (2019)。簡介。取自http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/about/history 余民寧 (1997)。有意義的學習－概念構圖之研究。臺北市：商鼎。吳政達、郭昭佑 (1997)。概念構圖法在國民小學教科書評鑑標準建構之應用。教育與心理研究，20(2)，217-242。林子斌（譯）(2006)。媒體教育：素養、學習與現代文化（原作者：Buckingham, D.）。臺北：巨流。林雍智 (2015)。未出版之碩士論文。台灣媒體素養教育政策2008-2014分析研究。臺灣師範大學，台北。金車文教基金會 (2019)。簡介。取自https://kingcar.org.tw/intro 財團法人卓越新聞獎基金會 (2019)。我們需要瞭解媒體。媒體就是環境、就是文化。擷取自https://www.feja.org.tw/29882 教育部 (2002)。媒體素養教育政策白皮書。教育部，台北。教育部 (2008)。「國民中小學媒體素養推廣計畫」服務計劃書。教育部，台北。教育部 (2014)。中小學數位輔助學科閱讀計畫。教育部，台北。教育部 (2015)。媒體識讀教師種子培育計畫。教育部，台北。教育部 (2018)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要科技領域。教育部，台北。教育部 (2019)。中小學媒體素養教育推廣計畫。教育部，台北。陳瑞南 (2014)。警察人員媒體素養能力之研究-以六都為例（未出版之博士論文）。中央警察大學，桃園。陳炳宏 (2019)。108課綱「科技資訊與媒體素養」係瞎米？談如何落實媒體素養教育。取自http://pxc24.blogspot.com/2019/01/108.html 須文蔚 (2018)。解決媒體亂象重新學習看媒體。取自http://faculty.ndhu.edu.tw/~poem/paper/49.html 富邦文教基金會 (2019)。簡介。取自http://www.fubonedu.org.tw/content/info/aboutus.aspx 黃哲斌（2019年1月20日）。你今天也「未看先推」了嗎？從網路亂象看108課綱真正需要的科技素養。取自https://opinion.cw.com.tw/blog/profile/51/article/8608 曾春榮 (2014)。台灣與德國中學生媒體素養之比較研究—以福營國中與Unterrieden中學為例（未出版之博士論文）。國立台北教育大學，台北。駐法國代表處教育組（2019）。打擊假新聞由教育著手。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，163。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=163&content_no=7399 駐波士頓辦事處教育組（2017）。史丹福大學研究發現，年輕學子不辨資訊真假。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，116。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=116&content_no=5987 駐洛杉磯辦事處教育組（2018）。美國州政府刻正強化公民教育。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，155。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=155&content_no=7217 駐美國代表處教育組（2017）。美國教師經由媒體素養課程，教育學生辨識充斥網路的假新聞。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，120。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=120&content_no=6113 駐英國代表處教育組（2019）。英國對於兒童及青少年面對假新聞之教育因應策略。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，163。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=163&content_no=7400 駐奧地利代表處教育組（2013）。奧地利2013青年政策白皮書（下）。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，26。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/paper_view.php?edm_no=26&content_no=1520 駐歐盟兼駐比利時代表處教育組（2018）。迎接數位化時代，歐盟運用新科技開創教育新領域。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，143。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=143&content_no=6909 駐澳大利亞代表處文化組（2012）。學校應與社區合作為21世紀學習者做準備。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，15。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=15&content_no=912 駐澳大利亞代表處教育組（2019）。澳洲中小學從媒體藝術課程中，培養學生媒體素養。國家教育研究院國際教育訊息電子報，163。取自https://fepaper.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=163&content_no=7396 盧安邦 (2018)。網絡公共領域的意見擴大與深化─探索當代弱公共領域的運作邏輯（未出版之博士論文）。國立政治大學，台北。簡瑋成 (2019)。各國培育學生媒體素養之策略。國家教育研究院電子報，188期。取自https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/upfiles/edm_188_3319_pdf_0.pdf 外文部分 Akib, E., & Muhsin, M. A. (2019). Assessment of Teaching In 21 ST Century. Journal of Physics, 1179:012065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1179/1/012065 Bialic, M., Martin, J., Mayo, M., & Trilling, B. (2016). Evolving Assessments for 21st Century Education. https://curriculumredesign.org/wp-content/uploads/Evolving-Assessments-for-the-21st-Century-Report-Feb-15-Final-by-CCR-ARC.pdf Canada’s Centre for Digital and Media Literacy. (2019). Media Literacy Fundamentals Retrieved Jul 1, 2019 from https://mediasmarts.ca/digital-media-literacy/general-information/digital-media-literacy-fundamentals/media-literacy-fundamentals Christ, W. G., & Potter, W. J. (1998). Media literacy, media education, and the academy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02733.x Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962 Domine, V. (2011). Building 21st-Century Teachers: An Intentional Pedagogy of Media Literacy Education. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569457 Felini, D. (2014). Quality Media Literacy Education: A Tool for Teachers and Teacher Educators of Italian Elementary Schools. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 6(1), 28–43. Fry, S., & Seely, S. (2011). Enhancing Preservice Elementary Teachers` 21st-Century Information and Media Literacy Skills. Action in Teacher Education, 33(2), 206–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2011.569468 Grafe, S., & Breiter, A. (2014). Modeling and Measuring Pedagogical Media Competencies of Pre-Service Teachers (M³K). In C. Kuhn, T. Miriam, & O. Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia (Eds.), Current International State and Future Perspectives on Competence Assessment in Higher Education (pp. 76–80). Grizzle, A. (2011). Media & Information Literacy: The UNESCO Perspective In School 2.0. A global perspective. . The Journal of Media Literacy, 57(1-2). Hobbs, R. (2004). A review of school-based initiatives in media literacy education. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(1), 42-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204267250 Hobbs, R. (2010). Digital and Media Literacy: A Plan of Action. https://knightfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Digital_and_Media_Literacy_A_Plan_of_Action.pdf Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2009). The Past, Present, and Future of Media Literacy Education. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 1–11. Kantrowitz, A. (2019). The Man Who Built The Retweet: “We Handed A Loaded Weapon To 4-Year-Olds”. Retrieved Jul 23, 2019 from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/alexkantrowitz/how-the-retweet-ruined-the-internet Lambert, J., & Cuper, P. (2008). Multimedia Technologies and Familiar Spaces: 21st-Century Teaching for 21st-Century Learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(3), 264–276. Lewis, P. (2017). Our minds can be hijacked: the tech insiders who fear a smartphone dystopia. Retrieved Oct 6, 2017 from www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/oct/05/smartphone-addiction-silicon-valley-dystopia Livingstone, S. (2004). Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies. The Communication Review, 7(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714420490280152 Lockie, S. (2001). SIA in review: setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(4), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154601781766952 Martin, A. G., & Tyner, K. (2012). Media Education, Media Literacy and Digital Competence. Comunicar, 19(38), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.3916/C38-2012-02-03 Masterman, L. (1997). A rationale for media education. . In R. Kubey (Ed.), Media literacy in the information age (pp. 15–68). Transaction. Potter, W. J. (2010). The State of Media Literacy. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(4), 675-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2011.521462 Simons, M., Meeus, W., & T’Sas, J. (2017). Measuring Media Literacy for Media Education: Development of a Questionnaire for Teachers` Competencies. Education’s Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2017-9-1-7 Stein, L., & Prewett, A. (2009). Media Literacy Education in the Social Studies: Teacher Perceptions and Curricular Challenges. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(1), 31–148. Tiede, J., & Grafe, S. (2016). Media Pedagogy in German and US Teacher Education. Comunicar, 24(49), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.3916/C49-2016-02 Tiede, J., Grafe, S., & Hobbs, R. (2015). Pedagogical Media Competencies of Preservice Teachers in Germany and the United States: A Comparative Analysis of Theory and Practice. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(4), 533−545. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2015.1068083 Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). An Introduction to Concept Mapping for Planning and Evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(89)90016-5 Trochim, W. M. K., & Linton, R. (1986). Conceptualization for Planning and Evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 9(4), 289-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(86)90044-3 UNESCO. (2008, Jun 16-18, 2008). Teacher Training Curricula for Media and information Literacy Report of the International Expert Group Meeting, http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/teacher_training_curricula_mil_meeting_june_2008_report_en.pdf Widihastuti. (2015). Model Penilalian untuk Pembelajaran Abad 21 (Sebuah kajian untuk mempersiapkan SDM kritis dan kreatif). Prosiding Pendidikan Teknik Boga Busana, 10(1). https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/ptbb/article/view/31893/13560 Zhang, H., Zhu, C., & Sang, G. Y. (2014). Teachers` stages of concern for media literacy education and the integration of MLE in Chinese primary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9321-1
描述:	碩士國立政治大學學校行政碩士在職專班 106911019
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106911019
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000847
顯示於類別:	[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
101901.pdf		1991Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋