Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131265
|
| Title: | 領導者與部屬交換關係（LMX）理論主題文獻之知識基礎與研究前沿
The Intellectual Bases and Research Fronts of Leader–member Exchange(LMX) Theory |
| Authors: | 張于玲
Chang, Yu-Ling |
| Contributors: | 吳政達
Wu, Cheng-Ta
張于玲
Chang, Yu-Ling |
| Keywords: | 領導者與部屬交換關係理論
引文分析
共被引分析
書目耦合分析
知識基礎
研究前沿
leader–member exchange theory
citation analysis
co-citacion analysis
bibliographic coupling analysis
intellectual bases
research fronts |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 18:26:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 近年來的領導研究愈來愈強調關係領導的重要，因此領導者與部屬交換關係理論（Leader–member Exchange Theory）逐漸受到研究者的重視，相關研究與文獻也大量出現。本研究將Web of Science與Scopus資料庫中LMX理論的相關文獻進行梳理，並利用引文分析、共被引分析與中心性分析建構起LMX理論的知識基礎，最後再利用書目耦合分析探測出LMX理論最新的研究前沿。研究結果在知識基礎的部分為（一）高發文量的作者，其被引量不一定是最高的（二）LMX理論文獻最常被收錄於《領導力季刊》（三）LMX理論的主要研究國家為美國（四）LMX理論文獻在2010年代後急遽增加（五）LMX理論發展至今被引頻次最高的文獻為《奠基於關係的領導方法：25年來 LMX領導理論的發展：應用多層次、多領域的觀點》（六）LMX理論中最重要的作者為Graen, G（七）LMX理論中最重要的期刊為《應用心理學期刊》（八）LMX理論中最重要的文獻為《奠基於關係的領導方法：25年來 LMX領導理論的發展：應用多層次、多領域的觀點》（九）LMX理論在理論擴張期之文獻彼此間共同的參考文獻量偏低（十）《領導者與部屬交換關係與績效：後設分析回顧》與最多文獻主題相關聯；在研究前沿的部分為（一）高品質的LMX對於組織或員工創新能力有正面的影響（二）LMX的提升有助於員工做出自我決定（三）LMX的建立過程及其質量高低對組織所產生的影響（四）LMX理論與模型的檢驗與評論（五）高品質的LMX能提升組織或員工的正向行為。綜而言之，LMX理論的相關研究應多參酌高被引作者、期刊與文獻的資料，以及各國的文獻，使研究結果能因地制宜，更能促進LMX理論的多元發展。
In recent years, leadership studies have given increasing emphasis to the importance of relational leadership. Therefore, the Leader-member Exchange Theory has gradually received the attention of researchers. Relevant researches and literatures have also emerged in large quantities. In this study, the relevant literatures of the LMX Theory in the Web of Science and Scopus database were sorted out. Citation analysis, co-citation analysis, and centrality analysis were adopted to construct the knowledge basis of the LMX theory. Finally, through bibliographic coupling analysis to detect the latest research fronts of the LMX theory. The research results in the knowledge basis part include: (1) Authors with high volumes of articles published do not necessarily have the highest citation; (2) Literatures on the LMX theory are most often included in “The Leadership Quarterly”; (3) The United States is the main country engaged in LMX theory research; (4) Literatures on the LMX theory increased drastically after 2010; (5) Since the development of the LMX theory, the literature with the highest citation frequency is “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective”; (6) The most important author of the LMX theory is Graen, G; (7) The most important journal in the LMX theory is the “Journal of Applied Psychology”; (8) The most important literature is “Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective”; (9) Literatures on the LMX theory in the theory expansion period have relatively lower common reference literatures; and (10) “Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta-Analytic Review” is related to most literature themes. In the research frontier part: (1) High-quality LMX has a positive impact on the innovation capacity of organizations or employees; (2) The enhancement of LMX aids employees in making decisions; (3) The impacts of the LMX establishment process and its quality and quantity level on organizations; (4) The inspection and commentary of the LMX theory and model; (5) High-quality LMX can enhance the positive behaviors of organizations or employees. All in all, LMX theory related researches should refer to data of authors, journals, and literatures with high citations, and literatures from different countries. This way, research results can be adapted to local conditions, thereby promoting the diversified development of the LMX theory. |
| Reference: | 中文部份
王立學、冷伏海（2010）。簡論研究前沿及其文獻計量識別方法。情報理論與實踐，33（3），54-58。
李杰（2018）。R科學計量資料視覺化。北京：首都經濟貿易大學出版社。
周文傑、張彤彤、高沖（2018）。共詞分析預測研究前沿的表面效度研究：基於自然語言處理。高校圖書館工作，38(2)，17-21。
邱均平（2007）。信息計量學。武漢: 武漢大學出版。
侯海燕（2006）。基于知識圖譜的科學計量學進展研究（未出版之博士論文）。大連理工大學科學學與科技管理研究所，大連市。
張郁蔚（2009）。以直接引用、書目耦合及共同作者探討圖書資訊學跨學科之變遷（博士論文）。取自華藝線上圖書館系統。（系統編號U0001-0708200914520700）doi:10.6342/NTU.2009.00503
張嘉彬（2011）。以書目耦合及共被引探討不同引用區間之研究前沿：以OLED領域為例（博士論文）。取自華藝線上圖書館系統。（系統編號U0001-1708201116091600）doi:10.6342/NTU.2011.01943
張嘉彬（2016）。從研究方法角度探討研究前沿。大學圖書館，20（1），88-112。
陳世榮（2017）。社會網絡分析方法：UCINET的應用。高雄市：巨流圖書股份有限公司。
陳悅、陳超美、胡志剛、王賢文（2016）。引文空間分析原理與應用：CitesSpace實用指南。北京：科學出版社。
陳曉靜、周劍平、劉永恆（2016）。領導-成員交換的理論階段、維度劃分和機制分析。商業經濟研究，(22)，97-99。
曾文紀（2014）。探討組織氣候、LMX領導型態對組織承諾的影響:以人力資源管理機制為調節變項（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，台南市。
黃福、侯海燕、任佩麗、胡志剛（2018）。基於共被引與文獻耦合的研究前沿探測方法遴選。情報雜誌，37（12），14-35。
楊曉、師萍、安立仁（2013）。領導-成員交換理論述評與研究展望——多層次的視角。未來與展望，8，44-49。
榮泰生（2013）。UCINET在社會網絡分析(SNA) 之應用。台北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
羅潔伶、曾建勳（2014）。領導者-部屬交換關係對員工幸福感之影響。經營管理論叢特刊，31-43。
英文部份
Ali Chughtai, A. (2016). Can ethical leaders enhance their followers’ creativity?. Leadership, 12(2), 230-249.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C.(2019, November 26). A brief introduction to bibliometrix [Web blog message]. Retrieved from http://htmlpreview.github.io/?https://github.com/massimoaria/bibliometrix/master/vignettes/bibliometrix-vignette.html
Boies, K., & Howell, J. M. (2006). Leader–member exchange in teams: An examination of the interaction between relationship differentiation and mean LMX in explaining team-level outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(3), 246-257.
Callon, M., Courtial, J.-P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis. Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235. doi:10.1177/053901883022002003
Cashman, J., Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1976). Organizational understructure and leadership: A longitudinal investigation of the managerial role-making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15(2), 278-296.
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377.
Chen, C., & Morris, S. (2003, October). Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus pathfinder networks. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No. 03TH8714) (pp. 67-74). IEEE.
Chen, X. P., He, W., & Weng, L. C. (2018). What is wrong with treating followers differently? The basis of leader–member exchange differentiation matters. Journal of Management, 44(3), 946-971.
CONCERT (2019). Web of Science. Retrieved from https://concert.stpi.narl.org.tw/database/31
Culnan, M. J. (1986). The intellectual development of management information systems, 1972–1982: A co-citation analysis. Management Science, 32(2), 156-172.
Dansereau Jr, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13(1), 46-78.
Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618-634.
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange: Integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715-1759.
Elsevier (2019). Scopus. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/zh-tw/solutions/scopus
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
Fujita, K., Kajikawa, Y., Mori, J., & Sakata, I. (2012). Detecting research fronts using different types of combinational citation. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ichiro_Sakata2/publication/267857211_Detecting_Research_Fronts_Using_Different_Types_of_Combinational_Citation/links/546d39c40cf2193b94c58089/Detecting-Research-Fronts-Using-Different-Types-of-Combinational-Citation.pdf
Gardner, W. L., Karam, E. P., Tribble, L. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (2019). The missing link? Implications of internal, external, and relational attribution combinations for leader–member exchange, relationship work, self‐work, and conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(5), 554-569.
Garfield, E. (2005). Identifying core literature through citation analysis and visualization. Technology, 56(6), 636-657.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(6), 827.
Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
Graves, L. M., & Luciano, M. M. (2013). Self-determination at work: Understanding the role of leader-member exchange. Motivation and Emotion, 37(3), 518-536.
Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86(3), 705-725.
Han, Y., Sears, G., & Zhang, H. (2018). Revisiting the “give and take” in LMX: Exploring equity sensitivity as a moderator of the influence of LMX on affiliative and change-oriented OCB. Personnel Review, 47(2), 555-571.
Harris, T. B., Li, N., & Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX`s influence on OCB and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 314-328.
He, Q. (1999). Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends, 48(1), 133.
Henderson, D. J., Liden, R. C., Glibkowski, B. C., & Chaudhry, A. (2009). LMX differentiation: A multilevel review and examination of its antecedents and outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(4), 517-534.
Herdman, A. O., Yang, J., & Arthur, J. B. (2017). How does leader-member exchange disparity affect teamwork behavior and effectiveness in work groups? The moderating role of leader-leader exchange. Journal of Management, 43(5), 1498-1523.
Horner, M. (1997). Leadership theory: past, present and future. Team Performance Management, 3(4), 270-287.
Jiang, Z., Le, H., & Gollan, P. J. (2018). Cultural intelligence and voice behavior among migrant workers: the mediating role of leader–member exchange. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(5), 1082-1112.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Khasseh, A. A., Soheili, F., Moghaddam, H. S., & Chelak, A. M. (2017). Intellectual structure of knowledge in iMetrics: A co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 53(3), 705-720.
Lee, J. Y. (2015). Identifying the research fronts in Korean library and information science by document co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106.
Li, A. N., & Liao, H. (2014). How do leader–member exchange quality and differentiation affect performance in teams? An integrated multilevel dual process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 847.
Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 451-465.
Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43-72.
Liu, J. S., Lu, L. Y., & Lu, W. M. (2016). Research fronts in data envelopment analysis. Omega, 58(C), 33-45.
Liu, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, W., & Dunford, M. (2015). Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 103(1), 135-158. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1517-y
Lorinkova, N., & Perry, S. J. (2019). Examining Curvilinear Effects of the Leader Perspective of LMX (SLMX) on Safety Enforcement. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2019(1), 14873. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.2019.14873abstract
Martin, R., Epitropaki, O., Geoff, T. & Topakas, A. (2010). A review of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) research: Future prospects and directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 25, 35-88.
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 67-121.
Morris, S. A., Yen, G., Wu, Z., & Asnake, B. (2003). Time line visualization of research fronts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 413-422. doi: 10.1002/asi.10227
Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M. B., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 14-33.
Ng, T. W. (2017). Transformational leadership and performance outcomes: Analyses of multiple mediation pathways. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(3), 385-417.
Persson, O. (1994). The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(1), 31-38.
Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J. W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, 5, 9-24.
Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 510-515.
Qu, R., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2017). Leader–member exchange and follower creativity: The moderating roles of leader and follower expectations for creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28(4), 603-626.
Schat, A. C. H., Frone, M. R., & Kelloway, E. K. (2006). Prevalence of workplace aggression in the U.S. workforce: Findings from a national study. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schiebel, E. (2012). Visualization of research fronts and knowledge bases by three-dimensional areal densities of bibliographically coupled publications and co-citations. Scientometrics, 91(2), 557-566. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0626-8
Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. C. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement, and data-analytic practices. The Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 63-113.
Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box? Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 62-93.
Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571-580.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799-813.
Stuber, F., Seifried-Dübon, T., Rieger, M. A., Zipfel, S., Gündel, H., & Junne, F. (2019). Investigating the Role of Stress-Preventive Leadership in the Workplace Hospital: The Cross-Sectional Determination of Relational Quality by Transformational Leadership. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 622-622.
Sun, L. Y., Chow, I. H. S., Chiu, R. K., & Pan, W. (2013). Outcome favorability in the link between leader–member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: Procedural fairness climate matters. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(1), 215-226.
Takeda, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2009). Optics: A bibliometric approach to detect emerging research domains and intellectual bases. Scientometrics, 78(3), 543-558. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-2012-5
Thiel, C. E., Hardy III, J. H., Peterson, D. R., Welsh, D. T., & Bonner, J. M. (2018). Too many sheep in the flock? Span of control attenuates the influence of ethical leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(12), 1324.
Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the Social Processes of Leadership and Organizing. In P. Werhane & M. Painter-Morland (Eds.), Leadership, Gender, and Organization (pp. 75-108). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163-171.
Zhang, J., & Guan, J. (2017). Scientific relatedness and intellectual base: A citation analysis of un-cited and highly-cited papers in the solar energy field. Scientometrics, 110(1), 141-162. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2155-3. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
107171010 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107171010 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000905 |
| Appears in Collections: | [教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101001.pdf | | 3257Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
