政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131244

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131244

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51247217 線上人數 : 882

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/131244

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131244

題名:	「臺灣文壇上閃亮的恆星」琦君的創造力生命故事：以系統演化觀點分析 The Creative Life Story of Chi-Chun: An Evolutionary Systems Approach
作者:	張菁育 Chang, Ching-Yu
貢獻者:	詹志禹 Chan, Chih-Yu 張菁育 Chang, Ching-Yu
關鍵詞:	創造力琦君生命故事心理傳記系統演化觀點 Creativity Chi-Chun life story psychobiography evolutionary systems approach
日期:	2020
上傳時間:	2020-08-03 18:23:03 (UTC+8)
摘要:	創造力人才的育成，長期以來為各國教育發展的重點議題之一。在制定培養各領域創造力人才的政策與方法上，可透過研究該領域之知名創造性人物，來獲得啟發。本研究係一創造力人才心理傳記研究，以文學家琦君（1917-2006）為研究主體，搜羅關於琦君一生的材料，包含琦君作品、訪談、他人回憶與報導等，鋪陳出琦君的生命故事，再以Csikszentmihalyi和Gruber的兩種創造力系統演化觀予以分析。研究結果顯示，琦君的創造力之形成來自於當時文化、文學場域，與自己知識、情感和目的間的相互作用：在五四運動與東西文化論戰的時空脈絡下，琦君從文學領域獲得新文學與白話文知識；隨國民政府遷臺後，在當時特殊的政治社會氛圍下，琦君將文學興趣與人生經驗整合成內在價值觀，發展出生命的主題與目的感，不論遭遇何種困難與挫折，她都擁有強烈的意志力與復原力。琦君將思鄉的情感昇華成懷鄉的文學，並透過長期調整目的、知識與情感的動態過程，創造出一系列獨特而溫柔敦厚的作品（變異）；琦君以正向情感碰觸當時臺灣社會許多讀者的鄉愁，使她的作品在良師益友推薦的機緣下嶄露頭角，隨即受到編輯與讀者的歡迎（選擇），並逐步發展成為懷鄉文學的典範之一，因而成為文學領域文化遺產的一環（保存）。　　本研究建議，對於文學人才的培育，教育者可引導學生觀察體會有情世界並探索生命的主題與目的感；有意創作者，則宜發展內在動機、主動選擇並養成良好的寫作習慣；環境的機緣有待創作者把握，但只有準備充分者能夠掌握。 This study is a psychobiography of the famous writer Chi-Chun (1917-2006), primarily aiming to explore and describe the creativity development of Chi-Chun with specific reference to her life story through the use of Csikszentmihalyi and Gruber’s evolving systems of creativity theory. In this single case psychobiographical research design, the theory chosen was systematically used to reinterpret and reconstruct Chi-Chun’s life into an enlightening psychological narrative. Additionally, the collected data were organized and integrated in a conceptual matrix which further guided the analysis, presentation and discussion of the findings. 　　The findings of this study showed that Chi-Chun’s creativity is constructed through interactions among the culture, the literary field, her knowledge, affect and purpose: In the time and space of the May Fourth Movement and the Eastern and Western Cultural Debates, Chi-Chun obtained the knowledge of new literature and vernacular from the literary domain. In the special political and social atmosphere after the Republic of China’s retreat to Taiwan, Chi-Chun integrated literary interests and life experience into inherent values, and then developed the theme of life and the sense of purpose. No matter what difficulties and setbacks she encountered, Chi-Chun had a strong willpower and resilience. Chi-Chun sublimated her nostalgia into nostalgic literature, and created a series of unique gentle, honest and sincere works (variation) through long-term adjustment of the dynamic process of purpose, knowledge and affect; Chi-Chun touched the audience in Taiwan at that time with her positive affect so much that has made her works emerge with the opportunity recommended by mentors and friends. Chi-Chun’s works then were immediately welcomed by editors and audience(selection), and thus gradually developed into one of the paradigms of nostalgic literature, thus becoming a part of cultural heritage in the literary domain (retention). 　　The suggestions of the study for the cultivation of literary talent were as follows: Educators should guide students to observe the sentient world and explore the theme of life and the sense of purpose; Interested creators should build intrinsic motivation, actively choose and develop good writing habits; Environmental opportunities need to be grasped by creators, but only those who are fully prepared can master it.
參考文獻:	參考文獻中文資料丁興祥、賴誠斌（2001a）。心理傳記學的開展與應用：典範與方法。應用心理研　　究，12，77-106。丁興祥、賴誠斌（2001b）。沈從文的文學創作歷程初探－其個人適壓功能與其創　　作之關係。輔仁學誌，27，75-108。丁興祥等(譯)（2002）。生命史與心理傳記（原作者：Runyan, W. M.）。臺北　　：遠流出版社。（原著出版年：1982）丁興祥、邱惟真(2005)。當代台灣傑出企業家的創業發展研究：一種傳記資料分　　析。教育資料集刊，30，299-322。古繼堂（2003）。簡明台灣文學史。臺北：人間出版社。白少帆等著（1987）。現代臺灣文學史。中國遼寧：遼寧大學出版社。宇文正（2006）。永遠的童話：琦君傳。臺北：三民出版社。吳玲瑤（民國87年6月12日）。永懷赤子心。中央日報，第22版。林秀娟（2009）。林懷民之創作生命故事—創作之流‧源遠流長(未出版之碩士論　　文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。林淇瀁（2001）。書寫與拼圖──台灣文學傳播現象研究。臺北：麥田出版社。林秀蘭（民國91年4月1日）。尋找一段散落的記憶──琦君的法庭書記官歲　　月。中國時報，第39版。胡適（1934年1月1日）。逼上梁山。東方雜誌，第三十一卷一期。胡適（1917年1月1日）。文學改良芻議。新青年，第二卷五號。胡適（1998）。胡適文集（二）‧談新詩。中國北京：人民文學出版社。徐柏蓉（2008）。建構新的生命認同即是創意─馬偕的創意生命故事(未出版之碩　　士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。陳昭儀（2003）。創意人物研究之回顧與探析。資優教育季刊，87，27-40。陳昭儀（2005）。傑出作家創作歷程之探析。特殊教育研究學刊，29，295-312。陳御蓓（2004）。看孤鴻明滅：張愛玲生命創造之展現(未出版之碩士論文)。輔仁　　大學，新北市。陳獨秀（1917年2月1日）。文學革命論。新青年，第二卷六號。陳序經（1934）。中國文化的出路。臺北：商務印書館。陳芳明（2011）。台灣新文學史。臺北：聯經出版社。陳芳明（2001年5月號）。反共文學的形成及其發展。聯合文學，第199期，頁　　150。夏志清（民國80年11月10日）。母女連心忍痛楚琦君回憶錄評賞-下。中央日　　報，第9版。孫陵（1976）。文藝工作者的當前任務──展開戰鬥，反擊敵人。中國新文學史。　　臺北：長歌出版社。埃斯卡皮（1990）。文學社會學（葉淑燕譯）。臺北：遠流出版社。陶德．羅斯（2019）。黑馬思維（林力敏譯）。臺北：先覺出版社。張素貞（1984年3月號）。五十年代小說管窺。文訊，第九期，頁84。章方松（2004）。琦君的文學世界。臺北：三民書局。琦君（1969）。紅紗燈。臺北：三民書局。琦君（1975）。三更有夢書當枕。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1980）。琴心。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1980）。錢塘江畔。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1980）。琦君自選集。臺北:爾雅出版社。琦君（1984）。水是故鄉甜。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1985）。此處有仙桃。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1986）。玻璃筆。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1988）。青燈有味似兒時。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1988）。留予他年說夢痕。臺北：洪範書店。琦君（1991）。母心‧佛心。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1991）。一襲青衫萬縷情。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1992）。媽媽銀行。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1993）。千里懷人月在峰。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1994）。與我同車。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1995）。萬水千山師友情。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（1996）。煙愁。臺北：爾雅出版社。琦君（1998）。永是有情人。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（2002）。夢中的餅乾屋。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（2002）。母心似天空。臺北：九歌出版社。琦君（2008）。桂花雨。臺北：爾雅出版社。黃重添（1992）。故園在他們夢裡重現。台灣長篇小說論。臺北：稻禾出版社。趙士尊(2005)。當我這樣唱：生命故事觀點看張雨生音樂創作的心路歷程(未出版　　之碩士論文)。輔仁大學，新北市。廖玉蕙（民國90年11月9日）。在彩色與黑白的網點之後---到紐澤西，訪琦君- 　　上。自由時報，第39版。詹志禹（2003）。課程創新與教師的自我創化──系統演化的觀點。教育資料集　　刊，28，145-173。詹志禹（2004）。台灣發明家的內在動機、思考取向及環境機會：演化論的觀點。　　教育與心理研究，27（4），775-806。詹志禹（2018）。從西方觀點看東方的莎士比亞。2018 年台灣教育研究學會　　(TERA)暨全球華人創造力學會(GACC)國際學術研討會，國立中山大學。隱地（主編）（1980）。琦君的世界。臺北：爾雅出版社。聯副三十年文學大系編委會（1982）。史料卷‧風雲三十年。臺北：聯合報社。西文資料 Albert, R. S. (1969). Genius: Present-day status of the concept and its implications for the 　　study of creativity and giftedness. American Psychologist, 24, 743-752. Bickhard, M. H., Campbell, D. T. (2003). Variations in variation and selection: The 　　ubiquity of the variation-and-selective-retention ratchet in emergent organizational 　　complexity. Foundations of Science, 8(3), 215-282. Bloom, B. (1985). Talent development in young people. New York: Ballantine. Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in 　　other knowledge processes. The Psychological Review, 67, 380-400. Campbell, D. T. (1974). Evolutionary epistemology. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), The 　　philosophy of karl popper (pp.413-463). La Salle: Open Court. Chan, C. J. (2001). An evolutionary approach to general problem-solving process. Paper 　　presentented in the Interactivist Summer Institute, Bethlehem, PA, U.S.A. Claude-Hélène Mayer & David Maree. (2018). The Magical Life and Creative Works of 　　Paulo Coelho: A Psychobiographical Investigation. Indo-Pacific Journal of 　　Phenomenology, 18:1, 1-16 Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. 　　In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (p325-339). New York: Cambridge 　　University Press. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: 　　Harper & Row. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and 　　invention. New York: Harper Collins Publishers. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of　　　creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 313-338). United 　　Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Wolfe, R. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to 　　creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In K. A. 　　Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International 　　Handbook of Giftedness and Talents (pp. 81-93). New York: Pergamon. Cziko, G. A. (1998). From blind to creative: In defense of Donald Campbell’s selectionist 　　theory of human creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32, 192-209. Dawkins, Richard. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York City: Oxford University Press. Elms. A. (1994). Uncovering lives: The uneasy alliance of biography and psychology. 　　New York: Oxford University Press. Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate 　　practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 　　363–406. Fouché Fouche, Paul J.P. & Holtz, Tania & Walker, Stephen. (2014). Roald Dahl: A 　　Psychobiography. 21st IACAPAP Congress- International Association For Child 　　And Adolescent Psychiatry And Alied Professions. Durban, South Africa. Freud, Sigmund (2010). The interpretation of dreams. Strachey, James. New York: Basic 　　Books A Member of the Perseus Books Group. Friedlander, S. (1978). History and psychoanalysis. New York: Holmes & Meier. Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds. NY: Basic Books. Gardner, H. (1997). Extraordinary minds: Portraits of exceptional individuals and an 　　examination of our extraordinariness. New York: Basic Books. Glad, B. (1973). Contribution of psychobiography. In J. Knutson(Ed.), Handbook of 　　political psychology. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Gruber, H. E. (1981a). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity (2nd 　　ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1974.) Gruber, H. E. (1981b). On the relation between ‘aha experiences’ and the construction of 　　ideas. History of Science, 19, 41-59. Gruber, H. E. (1984). The emergence of a sense of purpose: A cognitive case study of 　　young Darwin. In M. L. Commons, F. A. Richards, & C. Armon (Eds.), Beyond 　　formal operations: Late adolescent and adult cognitive development (pp. 3-27). New 　　York: Praeger. Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity 　　Research Journal, 1, 27-51. Gruber, H. E. & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: The evo1ving- 　　systems approach to creative thinking. In R. J. Stemberg (Eds.). The nature of 　　creativity (pp. 240-273). New York: Cambridge University Press. Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. B. (1999). The case study method and evolving systems 　　approach for understanding unique creative people at work. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), 　　Handbook of Creativity. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Kőváry, Z. (2016). Psychobiographical research and personality psychological 　　background of creativity: The case of Friedrich Nietzsche. In G. B. Moneta & J. 　　Rogaten (Eds.), Psychology research progress. Psychology of creativity: Cognitive, 　　emotional, and social processes (p. 169–195). Nova Science Publishers. Krumboltz, J. D. (2009). The Happenstance Learning Theory. Journal of Career 　　Assessment, 17(2), 135–154. Lipshitz, R., & Strauss, O. (1997). Coping with uncertainty: A naturalistic decision- 　　making analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69(2), 　　149–163. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. 　　Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. McAdams, D. P. & Ochberg, R. L. (Eds.) (1988). Psychobiography and life narratives. 　　Durham and London: Duke University Press. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results. 　　Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm Pierre Bourdieu. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. 　　Cambridge: Polity Press. Piirto, J. (1992). Understanding those who create. Dayton: Ohio Psychology Press. Policastro, E., & Gardner, H. (1999). From case studies to robust generalizations: An 　　approach to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Handbook of creativity. 　　Cambridge University Press. Pope, R. (2005). Creativity: Theory, history, practice. London: Routledge. Pryor, R. G. L., & Bright, J. E. H. (2007). Applying chaos theory to careers: Attraction 　　and attractors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(3), 375–400. Radnitzky, G. & Bartley III, W. W. (Eds.) (1987). Evolutionary epistemology, rationality, 　　and the sociology of knowledge. La Salle, I. L.: Open Court. Raina, M. K. (1997). "Most dear to all the muses" — Mapping Tagore`s networks of enterprise: A study in creative complexity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 153- 173. Rothenberg, A. (1997). Creativity, mental health, and alcoholism. Creativity Research 　　Journal, 3(3), 179-201. Runyan, W. M. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography: Explorations in theory and 　　method. New York: Oxford University Press. Runyan, W. M. (1988). Progress in psychobiography. In McAdams, D. P. & Ochberg, R. 　　L. (Eds.), Psychobiography and life narratives. Durham and London: Duke 　　University Press. 295-326. Runyan, W. M. (1990). Individual lives and the structure of personality psychology. In 　　Rabin, A. I., Zucker, R. A., Emmons, R. A. & Frank, S.(Eds.), Studying persons 　　and lives. New York: Springer. Simonton, D. K. (1976). Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate 　　approach to the Cox data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 218- 　　226. Simonton, D. K. (1977). Creative productivity, age, and stress: A biographical time-series 　　analysis of 10 classical composers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 　　35, 791-804. Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard 　　University Press. Simonton, D. K. (1990). Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content 　　analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 251-264. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and 　　paradigm. In Sternberg, R. J.（Ed.）. Handbook of Creativity (pp.3-15). NY: 　　Cambridge. Vaillant, George E.. Triumphs of Experience: The Men of the Harvard Grant Study. 　　Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2012. Van De Ven, A.H. and Poole, M.S. (1995) Explaining development and change in 　　organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 510-540. Walberg, H. J., & Stariha, W. E. (1992). Productive human capital: Learning, creativity, 　　and eminence. Creativity Research Journal, 5(4), 323–340. Wallace, D. B. (1991). The genesis and microgenesis of sudden insight in the Creation of 　　Literature. Creativity Research Journal, 4(1), 41-50.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學教育學系 106152007
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106152007
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000817
顯示於類別:	[教育學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

沒有與此文件相關的檔案.

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋