Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131213
|
| Title: | 公務機關雇傭條件差異下的激勵問題－公務人員與聘僱人員的比較分析
A comparative analysis on motivational issues of the civil servant and the employee in government : the employment conditions as a moderator |
| Authors: | 葉依婷
Yeh, Yi-Ting |
| Contributors: | 陳敦源
葉依婷
Yeh, Yi-Ting |
| Keywords: | 聘僱人員
激勵
組織正義
工作滿意度
公共服務動機
Employee
Motivation
Organization justice
Job satisfaction
Public service motivation |
| Date: | 2020 |
| Issue Date: | 2020-08-03 18:18:18 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 我國政府自1969年即開始運用聘僱人力作為公務人員以外的補充人力，聘僱人員原本是為承擔短期性、計畫性等業務，以一年一簽的方式進用，但時至今日，聘僱人員多有於機關中久任的情形，且承擔的工作也與當時制度設計的目的不同，該等人力的運用目的及管理法制逐漸成為社會各界關注的議題。
為提供聘僱人員管理制度的參考，本研究以公務人員及聘僱人員的相關權益進行比較分析，探討組織正義是否能作為聘僱人員的激勵因素，並藉此提升他們的工作滿意度，又公共服務動機是否能在組織正義及工作滿意度間扮演一個負向調節的角色。
本研究發現組織正義確實能成為聘僱人員的激勵因素，並對工作滿意度產生正面影響，惟公共服務動機無法在二者之間發揮負向調節的功能，又前開因素的交互作用結果，不會受到身分差異（即是公務人員還是聘僱人員）的影響。
基於上開發現，本研究提出針對不同等級聘僱人員調整報償設計、納入績效評比及獎罰分明概念、合理配置業務及人力、使人員業務負擔符合職責程度要求、強化知能訓練及增加公務行政訓練等建議，期望透過提升聘僱人員的組織正義感受，增加其工作滿意度，並因此提升工作意願，進而提高政府的效率及效能。
Since 1969, Taiwan has been supplement the civil servant by recruiting the employee who is originally intended for short-term, project-based business on an annual contract, but somehow working in the government in long-term and undertaking work deviating from the purpose of the employment system, hence making the management and the purpose of the employment system gradually become an issue.
In order to provide a reference for the employment system, this study compares and analyzes the rights and interests relevant to the civil servant and the employee to examine whether organizational justice can be a motivating factor for employees and thus enhance their job satisfaction, and whether public service motivation (PSM) can be a negative role in regulating organizational justice and job satisfaction.
This study found that organizational justice is indeed a motivating factor for employees and affects job satisfaction positively. However, PSM does not function as a negative regulator between the two, and the interactions of the preceding factors are not affected by status differences (i.e. whether be a civil servant or an employee).
Based on the above findings, in order to enhance the employees` sense of organizational justice and their job satisfaction, this study proposes to adjusting the compensation design for different levels of employees, incorporating the concepts of performance appraisal, reward and punishment, rationalizing the allocation of business and manpower, assigning the business burden in accord with the level of responsibility, strengthening knowledge and competency training, and increasing official business training and thus to increase their working willingness, thereby increasing the efficiency and effectiveness of the government. |
| Reference: | 壹、 中文部分：
王佩雯（2003）。政府部門聘僱人員裁減措施之研究-以國家公園解說員為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
王南琳（2003）。薪資公正、升遷公正與心理契約違背之關係探討-以醫師為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
甘添貴（2010）。新修正刑法公務員的概念，載於甘添貴、靳宗立、吳耀宗、程明修、白忠志、高銘暄、李希慧、劉仁文、鄭善印、柯耀程、張明偉等著，刑法公務員概念的比較研究（1-13頁）。台北：台灣刑事法學會。
白景文（1997）。工作價值觀、領導型態與工作滿意度之相關性研究-以研華集團為例。台灣師範大學工業科技教育學系研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
李弘祺 (1982）。科舉─隋唐至明清的考試制度。載於鄭欽仁(編)，中國文化新論－制度篇：立國的宏規（292-293頁）。台北：聯經出版社。
李茂能（2012）。變項中心化與多元共線性的玄機。測驗統計年刊，20，25-52。
李欣怡（2015）。組織公平、領導型態、工作滿意度及組織公民行為之探討-以內政部移民署員工為例。內政部移民署自行研究報告，未出版。
邱麗蓉（2003）。組織公平與組織公民行為關係之研究-以苗栗縣國民小學為例。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。
吳裕民（2010）。激勵理論相關研究學術報告。玄奘大學公共事務管理學系碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
吳明隆 (2011)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計（第三版）。台北：易習圖書。
吳宗憲（2012）。台南市政府文官公共服務動機與工作滿意、工作努力意願之實證研究－以個人/組織配適度作為調節變項。公共行政學報，43，91-126。
林庭光（2004）。政府約聘僱人員工作滿意與工作績效之相關研究-以經濟部標準檢驗局為例。義守大學管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
高永光（2004）。政府彈性用人制度之探討。國家政策論壇，93(春)，30-38。
高珪慧（2007）。心理契約、領導風格對於典型聘僱人員與非典型聘僱人員工作態度之影響。國立高雄第一科技大學企業與管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
徐承毅、李文雄、許志賢（2007）。人事人員個人背景對工作滿意度之研究-以T公司為例。通識研究集刊，11，217-250。
徐建中（2011）。激勵因素、工作壓力、工作滿意與離職傾向關係之研究-以國軍招募工作者為例。中國文化大學商學院國際企業管理學系企業實務管理數位學習碩士在職專班碩士論文，未出版，台北。
陳安瀅（2003）。政治知覺對組織負面影響的干擾因素-以工作滿足為例。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
陳志展（2013）。人力資源管理制度一致性對組織正義、員工心理契約違反與組織公民行為之影響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
陳敦源、李仲斌、張鎧如（2013）。公部門陞遷制度之實證研究：以正義觀點為核心的檢視。考試院委託研究，未出版。
陳敦源、吳舜文、陳揚中、王光旭（2019）。從工作要求資源模式檢視公共衛生護理人員職業倦怠因素：以公共服務動機為調節變數。台灣公共衛生雜誌，38（5），478-497。
陳重安、許成委（2016）。公共服務動機：回顧、反思與未來方向。公共行政學報，51，69-96。
黃鈴雯、廖主民、楊証惠(2013)。運動員公平知覺量表中文化與修訂-以組織公平為基礎。中華體育學會體育學報，46（4），407-427。
楊世瑩 (2011)。SPSS統計分析實務。台北：旗標出版股份有限公司。
鄒英英（2008）。地方行政機關人力運用彈性化之研究-以宜蘭縣政府及所屬機關為例。國立東華大學公共行政研究所碩士論文，未出版，花蓮。
蔡述倫（2010）。從管理者觀點探討我國政府約聘雇人員制度：以臺北市政府為例。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文，未出版，台北。
蕭煥鏘（1997）。人事行政人員工作滿足之調查分析。人事管理月刊，34(11)， 34-49。
鍾燕宜（1986）。我國工作滿足研究的整合分析。東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中。
謝向婷（2017）。公部門職業選擇：以公共服務動機做為調節變項。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程論文，未出版，台北。
蘇偉業（2010）。從地方政府運用約聘僱人員之調查剖析我國契約公務人力之改革。文官制度季刊，2(2)，77-109。
蘇偉業（2010）。台灣政府機關人力進用彈性化改革之實證研究：以契約人力制度為例。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫，未出版。
蘇偉業（2012）。政務、常務及契約用人三元體系下政府彈性用人之研究。考試院委託研究，未出版。
全國法規資料庫。http://law.moj.gov.tw/
全國人事法規釋例資料檢索系統。https://weblaw.exam.gov.tw/
考試院全球資訊網。http://www.exam.gov.tw/welcome.html
銓敘部全球資訊網。http://www.mocs.gov.tw
國家教育學院雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網。http://terms.naer.edu.tw/
貳、 英文部分：
Adams, J. S. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(5), 422–436
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational Behavior & Human Performance, 4(2), 142–175
Alderfer, C.P. (1972). Existence, relatedness, and growth: human needs in organizational settings. New York: Free Press.
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Andrews, M. C., Baker, T. L., & Hunt, T. G. (2008). The interactive effects of centralization on the relationship between justice and satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 15(2), 135–144.
Brayfield, A. H., & Rothe, H. F. (1951). An index of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 35(5), 307-311.
Bies, R.J., & Moag, J.F. (1986), Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R.J., Sheppard, B.H. & Bazerman, M.H. (Eds.), Research on Negotiations in Organizations (Vol.1, pp.43-55), Greenwich, CT：JAI Press.
Baron, J.N. & Kreps, D.M. (1999). Strategic Human Resources: Frameworks for General Managers. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Brewer, G. A., & Selden, S. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), 413–440.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83(2), 85–113.
Crewson, P. E. (1997). Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 7(4), 499-518.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-400.
Carpenter, J., Doverspike, D., & Miguel, R. F. (2012). Public service motivation as a predictor of attraction to the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 509-523.
Clerkin, R. M., & Coggburn, J. D. (2012). The dimensions of public service motivation and sector work preferences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32(3), 209-235.
Citation. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice?. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3),137-149
Folger. R. (1984). Perceived injustice, referent cognitions, and the concept of comparison level. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 14(2), 88–108.
Folger. R. (1993). Reactions to mistreatment at work. In K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social Psychology in Organizations: Advances in Theory and Research.(pp. 161-183). Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentive hall.
Folger. R. & J. Greenberg (1985). Procedural justice: An interpretative analysis of personnel system. In G.R. Ferris & K. M. Rowland(Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management(Vol.3,pp. 141-183). Greenwich, CT:JAI.
Frey, B. S., & R. Jegen. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589-611.
Gilliland, S. W. (1994). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 691–701
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: Random Harper.
Houston, D. J. (2006). “Walking the walk” of public service motivation: Public employees and charitable gifts of time, blood, and money. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 67-86.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Kalleberg, A. (1977). Work values and job rewards: a theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42 (1), 124-143.
Kelman, Mark (1987). A Guide to Critical Legal Studies. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press,
Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2002). Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5),916-928 ·
Kumar, K., Bakhshi, A., & Rani, E. (2009). Linking the Big Five personality domains to Organizational citizenship behavior. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(2), 73.
Lewis, G. B., & Frank, S. A. (2002). Who wants to work for the government? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 395-404.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. (1953). The Achievement Motive.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational fairness and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855
Moynihan, D. P. (2010). A workforce of cynics? the effects of contemporary reforms on public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 13(1), 24-34.
Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556.
Naff, K.C. , & Crum, J. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?
Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5-16.
Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Illinois:Dorsey Press.
Perry, J. L., & Wise, L. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.
Rainey, H. G. (1982). Reward preferences among public and private managers: In search of the service ethic. American Review ofPublic Administration, 16(4), 288-302.
Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825–836.
Robbins, S. P., Decenzo, D. A., & Coulter, M. (2011). Fundamental of management (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Smith, P. C., Kendall, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job satisfaction indicators and their correlates. American Behavioral Scientist, 18(3), 333–368.
Steijn, B. (2008). Person-Environment Fit and Public Service Motivation. International Public. Management Journal, 11(1), 13–27.
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Bros.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: John Wiley.
Vandenabeele, W., a. Hondeghem, and t. Steen. (2004). The civil service as an employer of choice in Belgium: How work orientations influence the attractiveness of public employment. Review of Public PersonnelAdministration. 24(4), 319–333.
Vandenabeele, W. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM-performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), 11–34.
Wernimont, P. F. (1972). A systems view of job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(2), 173–176. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
102921041 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102921041 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202001024 |
| Appears in Collections: | [行政管理碩士學程(MEPA)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 104101.pdf | | 5824Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
