政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/131165
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113393/144380 (79%)
Visitors : 51235499      Online Users : 899
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/131165


    Title: 嘉義縣農地交易價格之形成因素－生產力、都市壓力與農地政策
    The Determining Factors of Farmland Prices in Chiayi County: Soil Productivity, Urban Pressure and Farmland Policies
    Authors: 林冠穎
    Lin, Kuan-Ying
    Contributors: 林子欽
    林士淵
    Lin, Tzu-Chin
    Lin, Shih-Yuan
    林冠穎
    Lin, Kuan-Ying
    Keywords: 農地價格
    農地政策
    特徵價格理論
    空間迴歸模型
    Farmland Prices
    Farmland Policy
    Hedonic Price Theory
    Spatial Regression Model
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-08-03 18:08:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 農地為農業的生產要素之一，亦為農民的主要資產，近年來隨著農地用途的轉變，影響農地價格的因素逐漸從農業生產因素轉為非農業因素，農地的價格開始與其生產價值脫鈎。除此之外，農地政策的發布與實施影響農地利用的方向，回顧過去台灣關於農地價格影響因素之研究，鮮少著墨關於農地政策方面的相關變數。因此本研究將影響農地價格因素的相關變數分為三類：農地生產力因素、都市壓力因素、農地政策因素，其中農地政策因素包含農地重劃政策、興建農舍最小面積限制、農地種電政策三項，藉此探討農地生產條件與非農業的都市壓力因素對嘉義縣農地交易價格的影響程度，並觀察農地政策是否確實會對農地交易價格產生影響。
    本研究以內政部不動產實價登錄系統中，2013年1月至2019年2月的嘉義縣農地買賣交易資料作為實證樣本，透過特徵價格理論建構多元線性迴歸模型進行分析，再利用空間迴歸模型中的空間落遲模型，修正未考量空間相依現象時所存在的估計偏誤，並觀察空間上的鄰域因素對價格的影響。根據迴歸分析結果，本研究整理出以下三點結論：一、農地生產條件對農地價格的影響甚小。二、農地面積為影響農地價格的主要因素，但並非為農地生產力因素所致。三、農地政策在特定情況下會對農地價格產生影響。
    Farmland is one of the main factors of agricultural production and the main asset of the farmers. In recent years, the factors that influence farmland price has transformed from agricultural production factors to non-agricultural factors, thus causing farmland price to be disconnected with the value of agricultural production. The implementation of farmland policies affects the agricultural land uses. However, only a small number of previous research emphasized the influence of farmland policies. Thus, this research classifies the factors that affect farmland price into three groups that include soil productivity, urban pressure, and farmland policies. In the context of these factors, we are able to respectively discuss how soil productivity and the urban pressure affect the farmland price, and also find out if farmland policies actually affect farmland price.
    This research employs data from the platform of registered sales price of real estate, which was operated by the Ministry of The Interior, and analyzes the farmland sales during the time period between January 2013 to February 2019. Data of sales price is examined through several multiple linear regressions based on hedonic price theory. In addition, the potential estimation biases caused by spatial dependence were corrected using a spatial lag model to take account of the spatial effects of neighboring farmland prices.
    The regression analysis has reached three conclusions. First, soil productivity is not a significant factor of farmland prices; secondly, land size is an influential factor of farmland price but not because of its soil productivity; third, farmland policies can substantially affect farmland price under certain conditions.
    Reference: 中文參考文獻
    1.行政院主計總處，2013，以農業普查探討全球化下我國農業生產力。
    2.吳功顯，2007，農地價格之組成及其影響因素之探討，華岡農科學報，20，1-30。
    3.李泳龍、葉光毅，1999，地價形成的理論回顧與探討，長榮學報，3(1)，101-116。
    4.杜宇璇、宋豐荃、曾禹瑄、葛仲寧、陳奉瑤，2013，台灣特徵價格模型之回顧分析，土地問題研究季刊，12(2)：44-57。
    5.林國慶，1993，臺灣農地價格之分析，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究報告(編號：NSC82-0301-H-002-015)。
    6.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994a，臺灣三大都會區農地價格之動態分析，臺灣土地金融季刊，31(2)，1-49。
    7.林國慶、趙蕙萍，1994b，農地區位地價之研究－雲林縣崙背鄉，土地經濟年刊，5，73-104。
    8.唐晨欣，2016，氣候變遷下永續農地調適策略規劃，農政與農情，第285期。
    9.張基湛，1996，臺灣農地價格變動之研究，臺灣銀行季刊，37(4)，305-343。
    10.張學聖、陳姿伶、陳柏君，2013，台灣農地轉用與農地交易空間關聯性之研究，建築與規劃學報，14(2/3)，167-182。
    11.許瑞明，2002，我國加入世界貿易組織(WTO)後農地重劃工作之探討(一)，現代地政，258，6-9。
    12.陳文雄、廖子菁、葉家瑜，2013，分析 「超高壓輸電線路」對土地價格之影響，農業經濟叢刊，18(2)，121-165。
    13.陳明燦，1998，農地價格、選擇價值與農地政策不同類型農業區之實證研究，中興大學法商學院法商學報，34，209-234。
    14.陳冠睿，2017，影響農地價格與價值比率之因素—以宜蘭縣與雲林縣為例，國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
    15.陳建宏、戴錦周，2000，日本戰後農地價格變動因素之分析－資訊元分析法的應用，農業經濟叢刊，6(1)，115-141。
    16.陳恆鈞、詹茗荏，2013，臺灣農地政策變遷之探討：關鍵時刻觀點，政治學報，55，53-84。
    17.陳碧琳，2000，全球化趨勢對環境的衝擊—以台灣農地資本化為例，環境與藝術學刊，1，123-137。
    18.曾菁敏，2008，空間外部性、交易成本與市地重劃對住宅土地價格影響之研究－台南市的實證分析，住宅學報，17(1)，23-50。
    19.黃威翔，2008，農地轉用壓力下之農地價格－以宜蘭縣為個案，國立台北大學不動產與城鄉環境學系碩士學位論文。
    20.黃炳文，2006，農地興建農舍的課題與調整方向，農業世界，278，93-97。
    21.溫福星，2013，社會科學研究中使用迴歸分析的五個重要觀念，管理學報，30(2)，169-190。
    22.葉美容，2012，以混合多評準決策探討臺灣農地價格之影響因素，逢甲大學土地管理所碩士學位論文。
    23.廖安定，2008，台灣農地改革政策的回顧與展望，農政與農情，第193期。
    24.趙蕙萍，1992，臺灣農地價格之研究，國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
    25.劉哲良、吳珮瑛、陳翰輝，2016，不同類型土壤及地下水污染場址外溢效果之評估－那種場址對房產價值減損最大？，農業與經濟，56，1-40。
    26.蔣榮華，2017，宜蘭縣農地價格分析，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
    27.賴美君，2018，再生能源政策對台南市農地價格的影響－種太陽能板如果種出好地價，國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士學位論文。
    28.賴進貴、葉高華、王韋力，2004，土地利用變遷與空間相依性之探討－以臺北盆地聚落變遷為例，臺灣地理資訊學刊，1，29-40。

    英文參考文獻
    1.Alston, J. M., 1986, An Analysis of Growth of U.S. Farmland Prices, 1963-1982, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 1-9.
    2.Bird, P., 2007, Landownership and Settlement Change in South-West Cheshire from 1750 to 2000, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
    3.Bastian, C. T., McLeod, D. M., Germino, M. J., Reiners, W. A., and Blasko, B. J., 2002, Environmental Amenities and Agricultural Land Values: A Hedonic Model Using Geographic Information Systems Data, Ecological Economics, 40(3), 337-349.
    4.Chang, H. H. and Lin, T. C., 2015, Does The Minimum Lot Size Program Affect Farmland Values? Empirical Evidence Using Administrative Data And Regression Discontinuity Design In Taiwan, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(3), 785-801.
    5.Chang, H. H., and Lin, T. C., 2015, Does the Minimum Lot Size Program Affect Farmland Values? Empirical Evidence Using Administrative Data and Regression Discontinuity Design in Taiwan, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(3), 785-801.
    6.Chen, Y. H., Lee, C. L., Chen, G. R., Wang, C. H., and Chen, Y. H. (2018). Factors Causing Farmland Price-Value Distortion and Their Implications for Peri-Urban Growth Management. Sustainability, 10(8), 2701.
    7.Chicoine, D. L., 1981, Farmland Values at the Urban Fringe: An Analysis of Sale Prices, Land Economics, 57(3), 353-362.
    8.Cliff, A., and Ord, J. K., 1973, Spatial Autocorrelation, London: Pion.
    9.David M. Henneberry, and Richard L. Barrows, 1990, Capitalization of Exclusive Agricultural Zoning into Farmland Price, Land Economics, 66(3), 249-258.
    10.Elad, R. L., Clifton, I. D., and Epperson, J. E.,1994, Hedonic Estimation Applied to the Farmland Market in Georgia, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26(02), 351-366.
    11.Follain, J. R., and Malpezzi, S., 1980, Dissecting Housing Value and Rent: Estimates of Hedonic Indexes for Thirty-nine Large SMSAs (Vol. 249, No. 17), Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
    12.Gleditsch, K., and Ward, M. D., 2008, Spatial regression models (Vol. 155), Sage Publications Inc..
    13.Gujarati, D. N., 2003, Basic Econometrics, 4th Edition, India: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
    14.Heintzelman, Martin D., and Carrie M. Tuttle., 2012, Values in the Wind: A Hedonic Analysis of Wind Power Facilities, Land Economics, 88 (3), 571–88.
    15.Huang, H., Miller, G. Y., Sherrick, B. J., and Gomez, M. I., 2006, Factors Influencing Illinois Farmland Value, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(2), 458-470.
    16.Iacobucci, D., Schneider, M. J., Popovich, D. L., and Bakamitsos, G. A., 2016, Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity, Behavior research methods, 48(4), 1308-1317.
    17.Isakson, H., 2004, Analysis of the Effects of Large Lot Zoning, Journal of Real Estate Research, 26(4), 397-416.
    18.Isgin, T., and Forster, D. L., 2006, A Hedonic Price Analysis of Farmland Option Premiums Under Urban Influences, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d`agroeconomie, 54(3), 327-340.
    19.Kuchler, F., and Tegene, A., 1993, Asset Fixity and the Distribution of Rents from Agricultural Policies, Land Economics, 69(4), 428-438.
    20.Lin, Tzu-Chin and Evans, Alan W., 2000, The Relationship Between the Price of Land and Size of Plot When Plots Are Small, Land Economics, 76(3), 386-394.
    21.Livanis, G., Moss, C. B., Breneman, V. E., and Nehring, R. F., 2006, Urban Sprawl and Farmland Prices, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88(4), 915-929.
    22.Moss, C. B., 1997, Returns, Interest Rates, and Inflation: How They Explain Changes in Agricultural land Values, American Agricultural Economics, 79(5), 1311-1318.
    23.Nickerson, C., Morehart, M., Kuethe, T., Beckman, J., Ifft, J., and Williams, R., 2012, Trends in U.S. Farmland Values and Ownership, USDA Economic Information Bulletin, 92.
    24.Ricardo, D., 1817, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, London: J. Murray.
    25.Rosen, S., 1974, Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34-55.
    26.Schlenker, W., W.M. Hanemann, and A.C. Fisher, 2006, The Impact of Global Warming on U.S. Agriculture: An Econometric Analysis of Optimal Growing Conditions, Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(1), 113–125.
    27.Sirmans, S., Macpherson, D., and Zietz, E., 2005, The composition of hedonic pricing models, Journal of Real Estate Literature, 13(1), 1-44.
    28.Stewart, P. A. and Libby, L. w., 1998, Determinants of Farm Land Value: The Case of DeKalb County, Illinois, Review of Agricultural Economics, 20(1), 80-95.
    29.Tobler, W. R., 1970, A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region, Economic Geography, 46(supplement: Proceedings), 234-240.
    30.Tsoodle, L. J., Golden, B. B., and Featherstone, A. M., 2006, Factors Influencing Kansas Agricultural Farm Land Values, Land Economics, 82(1), 124-139.
    31.Van der Horst, Dan, 2007, NIMBY or Not? Ex¬ploring the Relevance of Location and the Pol¬itics of Voiced Opinions in Renewable Energy Siting Controversies, Energy Policy, 35(5), 2705–14.
    32.Von Thünen, J.H., 1826, Der Isolierte Staaat in Beziehung auf Landtschaft und Nationalokonomie, Hamburg. (English translation by C.M. Wartenburg, von Thünen’s Isolated State, Pergamon Press, Oxford.)
    33.Vyn, R. J., and McCullough, R. M., 2014, The Effects of Wind Turbines on Property Values in Ontario: Does Public Perception Match Empirical Evidence?, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(3), 365-392.
    34.Wang, H., 2018, The Spatial Structure of Farmland Values: A Semiparametric Approach, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 47(3), 568-591.
    35.Warren, Charles R., Carolyn Lumsden, Simone O’Dowd, and Richard V. Birnie, 2005, ‘Green on Green’: Public Perceptions of Wind Power in Scotland and Ireland, Journal of Environ¬mental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–75.
    36.Weerahewa, J., Meilke, K. D., Vyn, R. J., and Haq, Z., 2008, The Determinants of Farmland Values in Canada, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    37.Weersink, A., S. Clark, C.G. Turvey, and R. Sarker. 1999, The Effect of Agricultural Policy on Farmland Values, Land Economics, 75(3), 425–439.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政學系
    107257007
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107257007
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000883
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Land Economics] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700701.pdf3443KbAdobe PDF2166View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback