政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130999

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130999

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113451/144438 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51270131 線上人數 : 849

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 金融學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/130999

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130999

題名:	公司停止季度盈餘指導之探究 The analysis of firms that stop providing quarterly earnings guidance
作者:	徐婧雯 Xu, Jing-Wen
貢獻者:	林靖庭徐婧雯 Xu, Jing-Wen
關鍵詞:	盈餘指導機構投資者監督效果 Earning guidance Institutional investors Monitor effect
日期:	2020
上傳時間:	2020-08-03 17:39:58 (UTC+8)
摘要:	自20世紀初以來有許多投資人和金融機構呼籲公司放棄提供盈餘指導，原因主要是盈餘指導會導致盈餘管理進而誤導大眾，吸引到更多短期投資者和內幕交易。然而，仍有許多公司提供盈餘指導，理由是盈餘指導可以降低信息不對稱，降低股價波動度，使分析師有更充足的資訊分析公司。本研究以美國上市公司爲例，探究公司停止季度盈餘指導的原因。本研究發現，機構投資者持股比例低的公司，更有可能放棄季度盈餘指導，體現出機構對公司的監督作用，進而使公司持續披露盈餘指導資訊。本文進一步探究持股機構之異質性，公司之集中機構投資人中，有長期、獨立投資機構持股之公司傾向持續提供季度盈餘指導，有短期或灰色投資者持股之公司傾向停止提供季度盈餘指導。指導停止者具有以下特徵，如公司的報酬較差、有會計損失的季度較多、股價波動度大、分析師數量少和公司規模小。因此機構投資者持股小、公司業績差、預測難度大是公司放棄盈餘指導的主要因素。 Since the early 20th century, many investors and financial institutions have called on companies to abandon earnings guidance. The main reason is that earnings guidance will lead to earnings management, furthering misleads investors, attracting more short-term investors and causing insider trading. From the supporting point of view, earnings guidance can reduce information asymmetry, reduce stock price volatility and enable analysts to know more about the company and better to analyze. This study uses US listed companies as a sample to explore the factors that companies stop quarterly earnings guidance. We found that companies with low institutional shareholding proportion are more likely to give up quarterly earnings guidance, which reflects the supervision role of the institution over the company and enables the company to continuously disclose earnings guidance information. We further explore the heterogeneity of institutional shareholders. Among the concentrated institutional investors of companies, companies with long-term, independent institutions are more likely to maintain quarterly earnings guidance, and companies with short-term or grey institutions are more likely to stop quarterly earnings guidance. The guidance stoppers have the characteristics of poor buy-and-hold return, more quarterly accounting losses, high volatility of stock price, few analysts and small company size. Therefore, small institutional ownership, poor performance and difficult forecast are the main reasons for companies to abandon earnings guidance.
參考文獻:	Brochet, Francois, and David Kiron.,2011. “Google and Earnings Guidance.”, Harvard Business School. Bushee, Brian J., and Christopher F. Noe. 2000. “Corporate Disclosure Practices, Institutional Investors, and Stock Return Volatility.” Journal of Accounting Research 38(1):171-202. CFA Institute. 2008. “Short-termism survey: Practices and preferences of investment professionals”. Available at https://www.cfainstitute.org/en/research/survey-reports/short-termism-survey Chen, Shuping, Dawn Matsumoto, and Shiva Rajgopal. 2011. “Is Silence Golden? An Empirical Analysis of Firms That Stop Giving Quarterly Earnings Guidance.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 51(1):134-150. Chen, Xia, Jarrad Harford, and Kai Li. 2007. “Monitoring: Which Institutions Matter?” Journal of Financial Economics 86(2):279-305. Houston, Joel F., Baruch Lev, and Jennifer Wu Tucker. 2010. “To Guide or Not to Guide? Causes and Consequences of Stopping Quarterly Earnings Guidance*: Causes and Consequences of Stopping Quarterly Earnings Guidance.” Contemporary Accounting Research 27(1):143-185. Hsieh, P., T. Koller, and D. R. Rajan. 2006. The misguided practice of earnings guidance. The McKinsey Quarterly. Available at http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/The_misguided_practice_of_earnings_guidance_1759. Janjigian, V. 2003. In defense of earnings guidance. Forbes.com. February 20. Available at http://www.forbes.com/2003/02/20/cz_vj_0220soapbox.html Jensen, M., Murphy, K., Wruck, E., 2004. Remuneration: where we’ve been, how we got to here, what are the problems, and how to fix them. Working paper, Harvard Business School. U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2007. Commission on the regulation of U.S. capital markets in the 21st century: Report and recommendations. Available at http://www.uschamber.com/publications/reports/0703capmarketscomm.htm. Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of accounting and economics, 32(1-3), 97-180.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學金融學系 107352047
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107352047
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000742
顯示於類別:	[金融學系] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
204701.pdf		785Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋