政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130933
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113324/144300 (79%)
造访人次 : 51129182      在线人数 : 910
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130933


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130933


    题名: 薪酬差異與權益資金成本-代理問題之探討
    The Relation between Pay Ratio and Cost of Equity Capital-The Impact of Agency Problem
    作者: 周仲薇
    Chou, Chung-Wei
    贡献者: 李佳玲
    Lee, Chia-Ling
    周仲薇
    Chou, Chung-Wei
    关键词: 薪酬差異
    權益資金成本
    代理問題
    Pay Disparity
    Cost of Equity Capital
    Agency Problem
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-08-03 17:27:41 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 近年針對高階管理階層與員工薪酬支付不公平的議題,受到各界廣泛重視,許多國家以強制揭露總經理與員工薪酬中位數比率作為因應方法。有鑒於此,本文針對新興市場-臺灣,以高階管理者對員工每人平均薪酬的比率衡量薪酬差異,研究薪酬差異與權益資金成本間的關聯性,探討薪酬差異是否會影響投資者的要求報酬,為增加薪酬資訊透明度的政策是否具意義提供證據。本研究以臺灣2008年至2018年上市公司為研究對象,實證結果發現,薪酬差異與權益資金成本呈顯著正相關,支持管理者權力理論,反映投資人在面對越高的薪酬差異時,越會認為公司有管理據守的問題,而要求公司提供越高的報酬。此外,外資法人持股比例會降低薪酬差異與權益資金成本間的正向關係,表示當外部監督越強、代理問題越不嚴重時,能夠使兩者間的正向相關顯著降低。
    Recently, the income inequality between top managers pay and employees pay has become a growing public concern. Many countries have adopted mandatory disclosure of pay ratio as a response. Our research focuses on the association between pay disparity, measured as top managers’ average pay divided by employees’ average pay, and cost of equity capital in Taiwan, an emerging market economy. To investigate whether the pay disparity will affect investors’ required rate of return, providing further evidence if the pay disclosure policies are meaningful or not. Using observations of firms listed in Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation from 2008 to 2018, this paper finds a significantly positive relation between pay disparity and cost of equity capital. The result supports the hypothesis developed by managerial power theory that investors regard larger pay disparity as management entrenchment associated with severe agency problem, and thus ask for higher returns on investments. Further analysis shows that the significantly positive association between pay disparity and cost of equity capital is weaker when foreign institutional investors hold more shares. This result suggests that corporate governance which is used to curb agency problem can reduce the positive association.
    參考文獻: 李貴富、陳韻珊、韓沂璉、杜昀容(民106)。財務報表可比性、無形資產與權益資金成本。管理與系統,24(1),103-134。
    林美鳳、梁嘉紋、金成隆(民99)。公司股權結構與外資持股關係之研究。中山管理評論,18(1),101-142。
    陳明園、張家萍(民95)。高階經理人酬勞變動之決定因子。經濟論文叢刊,3(3), 285-316。
    蔡柳卿、楊朝旭、許慧雯(民101)。高階管理團隊薪酬對資產減損敏感度之實證研究。中華會計學刊,8(2),165-216。
    Albuquerue, R., and Wang, N. (2008). Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. The Journal of Finance, 63(1), 1-40.
    Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1), 3-18.
    Bebchuk, L. A., Cremers, K. M., and Peyer, U. C. (2011). The CEO pay slice. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 199-221.
    Bebchuk, L. A., and Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 71-92.
    Bognanno, M. L. (2001). Corporate tournaments. Journal of Labor Economics, 19(2), 290-315.
    Botosan, C. A. (1997). Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Accounting Review, 323-349.
    Bowen, R. M., Rajgopal, S., and Venkatachalam, M. (2008). Accounting discretion, corporate governance, and firm performance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(2), 351-405.
    Brennan, M. J., and Cao, H. H. (1997). International portfolio investment flows. The Journal of Finance, 52(5), 1851-1880.
    Chen, Z., Huang, Y., and Wei, K. J. (2013). Executive pay disparity and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48(3), 849-885.
    Choe, H., Kho, B.-C., and Stulz, R. M. (2005). Do domestic investors have an edge? The trading experience of foreign investors in Korea. The Review of Financial Studies, 18(3), 795-829.
    Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P., and Lang, L. H. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741-2771.
    Claus, J., and Thomas, J. (2001). Equity premia as low as three percent? Evidence from analysts` earnings forecasts for domestic and international stock markets. The Journal of Finance, 56(5), 1629-1666.
    Conyon, M. J., Peck, S. I., and Sadler, G. V. (2001). Corporate tournaments and executive compensation: Evidence from the UK. Strategic Management Journal, 22(8), 805-815.
    Core, J. E., Guay, W. R., and Larcker, D. F. (2003). Executive equity compensation and incentives: A survey. Economic Policy Review, 9, 27-50.
    Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., and Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-406.
    Crawford, S., Nelson, K. K., and Rountree, B. (2018). Mind the Gap: CEO-Employee Pay Ratios and Shareholder Say-on-Pay Votes. Available at SSRN 3088052.
    Dahlquist, M., and Robertsson, G. (2001). Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. Journal of Financial Economics, 59(3), 413-440.
    Diamond, D. W., and Verrecchia, R. E. (1991). Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital. The Journal of Finance, 46(4), 1325-1359.
    Easton, P. D. (2004). PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 73-95.
    Easton, P. D., and Sommers, G. A. (2007). Effect of analysts` optimism on estimates of the expected rate of return implied by earnings forecasts. Journal of Accounting Research, 45(5), 983-1015.
    Elton, E. J. (1999). Presidential address: expected return, realized return, and asset pricing tests. The Journal of Finance, 54(4), 1199-1220.
    Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1992). The cross‐section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 47(2), 427-465.
    Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1993). Common Risk-Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), 3-56.
    Fama, E. F., and French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 153-193.
    Fan, J. P., and Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401-425.
    Francis, J., and Philbrick, D. (1993). Analysts` decisions as products of a multi-task environment. Journal of Accounting Research, 31(2), 216-230.
    Gebhardt, W. R., Lee, C. M., and Swaminathan, B. (2001). Toward an implied cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(1), 135-176.
    Gordon, J. R., and Gordon, M. J. (1997). The finite horizon expected return model. Financial Analysts Journal, 53(3), 52-61.
    Grinblatt, M., and Keloharju, M. (2001). How distance, language, and culture influence stockholdings and trades. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 1053-1073.
    Hail, L., and Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 485-531.
    Hou, K., Van Dijk, M. A., and Zhang, Y. (2012). The implied cost of capital: A new approach. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), 504-526.
    Jensen, M. C., and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    Kang, J.-K. (1997). Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46(1), 3-28.
    Kelly, K., and Seow, J. L. (2016). Investor reactions to company disclosure of high CEO pay and high CEO-to-employee pay ratio: An experimental investigation. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(1), 107-125.
    Khanna, T., and Palepu, K. (2000). Emerging market business groups, foreign intermediaries, and corporate governance. In Concentrated Corporate Ownership, Morck, R (ed). University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL:, 265–292.
    La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-517.
    Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1994). Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. The Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1541-1578.
    Lazear, E. P., and Rosen, S. (1981). Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 841-864.
    Lin, H.-w., and McNichols, M. F. (1998). Underwriting relationships, analysts` earnings forecasts and investment recommendations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 25(1), 101-127.
    Main, B. G., O`REILLY, C. A., and Wade, J. (1995). The CEO, the board of directors and executive compensation: Economic and psychological perspectives. Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 293-332.
    Main, B. G., O`Reilly III, C. A., and Wade, J. (1993). Top executive pay: Tournament or teamwork? Journal of Labor Economics, 11(4), 606-628.
    Masulis, R. W., and Mobbs, S. (2011). Are all inside directors the same? Evidence from the external directorship market. The Journal of Finance, 66(3), 823-872.
    McNichols, M., and O`Brien, P. C. (1997). Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research, 35, 167-199.
    Merton, R. C. (1987). A Simple-Model of Capital-Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information. The Journal of Finance, 42(3), 483-510.
    Mishel, L., and Wolfe, J. (2019). CEO compensation has grown 940% since 1978. Economic Policy Institute, 14.
    Modigliani, F., and Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-297.
    Ohlson, J. A., and Juettner-Nauroth, B. E. (2005). Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinantsof value. Review of Accounting Studies, 10(2-3), 349-365.
    Raheja, C. G. (2005). Determinants of board size and composition: A theory of corporate boards. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 283-306.
    Rosen, S. (1986). Prizes and Incentives in Elimination Tournaments. American Economic Review, 76(4), 701-715.
    Rouen, E. (2020). Rethinking measurement of pay disparity and its relation to firm performance. The Accounting Review, 95(1), 343-378.
    Ruback, R. S., and Jensen, M. C. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5-50.
    Schwarz, M., and Severinov, S. (2010). Investment tournaments: when should a rational agent put all eggs in one basket? Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 893-922.
    Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3, Part 1), 461-488.
    Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737-783.
    Shyu, Y. W., and Lee, C. I. (2009). Excess control rights and debt maturity structure in family‐controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(5), 611-628.
    Stulz, R. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-54.
    Taylor, C. R. (1995). Digging for golden carrots: An analysis of research tournaments. American Economic Review, 872-890.
    Van Essen, M., Otten, J., and Carberry, E. J. (2015). Assessing managerial power theory: A meta-analytic approach to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation. Journal of Management, 41(1), 164-202.
    Weston, J. F. (1979). The tender takeover. Mergers and Acquisitions, 14, 74-82.
    Yeh, Y. h., Lee, T. s., and Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    107353027
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107353027
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000934
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    302701.pdf1661KbAdobe PDF279检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈