English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51569764      Online Users : 991
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130671


    Title: 選對媒體才是王道:從區位理論分析Facebook、Instagram和YouTube作為不同購買決策階段之競爭優勢
    Choosing the right social media platform at different decision stages: Comparing the competitive advantage of Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube through the Niche Theory
    Authors: 程于晏
    Cheng, Yu-Yen
    Contributors: 張郁敏
    Chang, Yuh-Miin
    程于晏
    Cheng, Yu-Yen
    Keywords: 顧客決策旅程
    預期需求滿足
    區位理論
    社群媒體
    競爭關係
    Customer decision journey
    Needs
    Niche Theory
    Social media
    Competitive relationships
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 14:06:53 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:    過去已知消費者使用不同社群媒體的動機,但不了解消費者在每個購買決策過程使用不同社群媒體的需求與動機,也不清楚在不同決策階段何種社群媒體最適用。因此本研究針對18 – 34歲的消費者在評估階段與分享階段使用Facebook、Instagram和YouTube的預期需求滿足進行研究,並透過區位理論比較兩購買決策階段中,三種社群媒體在不同預期需求滿足的滿足程度(區位寬度)、媒體間的競爭狀況(區位重疊度)、媒體優勢性(區位優勢)以及整體競爭狀態。
       本研究利用調查法蒐集了430份有效樣本,研究結果發現消費者在評估階段有「獲得評論需求」、「休閒娛樂需求」和「資訊分享需求」,在分享階段有「評論娛樂需求」和「習慣分享需求」。比較評估階段媒體競爭狀況,YouTube在「獲得評論需求」和「休閒娛樂需求」皆有可能取代Facebook和Instagram,而Instagram則有可能取代Facebook,但三者在「資訊分享需求」為互相競爭關係;比較分享階段,YouTube在「評論娛樂需求」中有可能取代Facebook和Instagram,但Facebook與Instagram則互相競爭狀態,但在「習慣分享需求」中,Facebook有可能取代Instagram,Instagram則有可能取代YouTube,但Facebook與YouTube呈現互相競爭的狀態。
       The motivations of consumers to use different social media has been researched in the past, but the needs and motivations of consumers to use different social media in each stage of customer decision journey are not been found, and it is not clear which social media is the most appropriate at different stages. This study focuses on considering the needs of consumers aged 18 to 34 who use Facebook, Instagram and YouTube in the evaluation stage and sharing stage, and compares the consumer`s satisfaction (Niche Breadth), the competition between media (Niche Overlap), the media superiority (Niche Superiority) and the overall competition through the Niche Theory.
       Collected 430 web questionnaires, the finding of this study shows that consumers have the needs for "obtaining comments", "leisure entertainment" and "information sharing" in the evaluation stage, while in the sharing stage, they have the needs for "comment entertainment" and "habitual sharing". Comparing the competitive states of evaluation stage, YouTube may replace Facebook and Instagram in "obtaining comments needs" and "obtaining comments needs", while Instagram is likely to replace Facebook, but the three are competing in "information sharing needs" comparing the sharing stage, YouTube may also replace Facebook and Instagram in "comment entertainment needs", but Facebook and Instagram compete with each other. However, in "habitual sharing needs", Facebook may replace Instagram and Instagram may replace YouTube, but Facebook and YouTube may compete with each other.
    Reference: 中文部分
    〈2019台灣網路報告〉(2019)。《財團法人台灣網路資訊中心》。取自
    https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_20
    19_CH.pdf。
    王嵩音(2007)。〈網路使用之態度、動機與影響〉。《資訊社會研究》,
    12,57–85。取自http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/jccic/12/fu/12-03.pdf。汪志堅、陳翔、江義平、江維彬(2013)。〈Facebook社交網站使用因素之量表發展與驗證〉。《電子商務學報》,15,319–351。https://doi.org/10.6188/JEB.2013.15(3).01。
    李岳昇、王嵩音(2015)。〈印刷雜誌、數位雜誌與行動數位雜誌之市場區位
    理論分析〉。《資訊社會學研究》,28,35–65。
    https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201501_(28).0002。
    邱皓政(2010)。《量化硏究與統計分析 : SPSS(PASW)資料分析範例(五版)》。臺
    北市:五南圖書。
    〈品牌影響力調查 Most Influential Brands〉(2018)。《Ipsos、商業周刊》。
    取自https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2018-01/n042_mkt_millennials_and_the_impact_of_social_brand_perception.pdf。
    〈消費歷程中不容小覷的影響力 YouTube造就成效行銷新勢力 (上) 〉(2019)。
    《台北數位集團》。取自https://index.taipeiads.com/NewsData.php?oid=4。
    區谷怡(2016)。O2O消費的使用與滿足和科技接受整合模式——以線上買票,
    線下觀影為例。國立政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程碩士論文,台北市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2666b5
    郭貞、黃振家(2002)。〈以區位分析比較網路、型錄、與商店做為購物管道
    之競爭優勢:一個跨年比較〉。《新聞學研究》,72,1–26。取自http://www.airitilibrary.com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=10161007-200207-201305130013-201305130013-1-26。
    黃品慈、李秀珠(2013)。〈不同類型 IPTV 之市場競爭:從區位理論檢視
    PPStream、土豆網與 Youtube 之競爭〉。《中華傳播學刊》,207–241。
    https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2013.24.06。
    楊安琪(2018年9月14日)。〈YouTube 影音勢力全面啟動!國際年度盛會
    YouTube FanFest 蓄勢待發〉。《TechNews科技新報》。取自
    https://technews.tw/2018/09/14/youtube-pulse-and-youtube-fanfest/。
    詹子君(2015)。《從「區位理論」探討線上新聞平台─ Yahoo! 奇摩、Facebook 與
    LINE─ 之間的情形》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。取自「全國博碩士論
    文資訊網」https://hdl.handle.net/11296/f9tue2。
    萬文隆、林淑芬(2004)。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉。《生活科技教
    育》,37,17–23。https://doi.org/10.6232/LTE.2004.37(4).4。
    《維基百科》區位論。取自
    https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8C%BA%E4%BD%8D%E8%AE%BA。
    〈線上影片廣告:觀看情境對廣告的影響〉(2017)。《Ipsos》。取自
    https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2017-
    10/P065_CNT_YouTube-Video-Ad-Viewability.pdf。
    謝宗霖、羅新興(2009)。〈網頁訊息對瀏覽者回憶與消費意願的影響-以探討
    涉入的干擾效果〉。《中華管理評論國際學報》,12(4)。取自
    http://cmr.ba.ouhk.edu.hk/cmr/webjournal/v12n4/CMR251C09.pdf。
    英文部分
    Alhabash, S., & Ma, M. (2017). A tale of four platforms: Motivations and uses of
    Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat among college students?. Social Media+Society,3(1),2056305117691544. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117691544
    Barclays (2018). Gen Z: Step aside Millennials. Retrieved from
    https://www.investmentbank.barclays.com/our-insights/generation-z.html
    Coelho, R., Oliveira, D., & Almeida, M. (2016). Does social media matter for post
    typology? Impact of post content on Facebook and Instagram metrics. Online Information Review, 40, 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2015-0176
    Chiang, H., & Hsiao, K. (2015). YouTube stickiness: the needs, personal, and
    environmental perspective. Internet Research, 25, 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2013-0236
    Cheung, T. T. (2014). A study on motives, usage, self-presentation and number of
    followers on Instagram [Master’s thesis]. Retrieved from
    http://lbms03.cityu.edu.hk/oaps/ss2014-4595-ctt656.pdf
    Court, D., Elzinga, D., Mulder, S., & Vetvik, O. (2009). The consumer decision
    journey. The McKinsey Quarterly, (3). Retrieved from
    http://search.proquest.com/docview/224538362/
    DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Chapter 6: Factor Analysis. Scale development: Theory and
    applications, 26.
    Duncan (2002): Evaluating the IMC processes (pp. 726-732).
    Dimmick, J., Chen, Y., & Li, Z. (2004). Competition Between the Internet and
    Traditional News Media: The Gratification-Opportunities Niche Dimension. Journal of Media Economics, 17, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327736me1701_2
    Edelman, D. C. (2010). Branding in the Digital Age. Harvard Business Review,
    88, 14-18. Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1108/eb040166
    Dimmick, J., Kline, S., & Stafford, L. (2000). The Gratification Niches of Personal E-
    mail and the Telephone: Competition, Displacement, and Complementarity.
    Communication Research, 27, 227–248.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365000027002005
    Dimmick, J. (1993). Ecology, economics, and gratification utilities, media
    economics:Theory and practice, 135-156. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
    Associates, Inc.
    THE TRENDS TO KNOW FOR 2019 (2019). GlobalWebIndex. Retrieved from
    https://www.globalwebindex.com/2019-consumer-trends.
    Gao, Q., & Feng, C. (2016). Branding with social media: User gratifications, usage
    patterns, and brand message content strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 868–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.022
    Godey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., & Singh,
    R. (2016). Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand
    equity and consumer behavior. Journal of business research, 69, 5833-5841.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.181
    Gu, B., & Ye, Q. (2014). First step in social media: Measuring the influence of online
    management responses on customer satisfaction. Production and Operations
    Management, 23, 570-582. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12043
    Gatautis, R., & Kazakevičiūtė, A. (2012). Consumer behavior in online social
    networks: review and future research directions. Economics and management,
    17, 1457-1463. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.em.17.4.3014
    Gülnar, B., Balcı, Ş., & Çakır, V. (2010). Motivations of Facebook, You Tube and
    similar web sites users. Bilig, 54(Summer 2010), 161-184. Retrieved from
    http://bilig.yesevi.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/2656-published.pdf
    Gulati, R., & Oldroyd, J. B. (2005). The quest for customer focus. Harvard Business
    Review, 83, 92-101.
    Huang, Y. T., & Su, S. F. (2018). Motives for instagram use and topics of interest
    among young adults. Future Internet, 10, 77.
    https://doi.org/10.3390/fi10080077
    Haridakis, P., & Hanson, G. (2009). Social interaction and co-viewing with YouTube:
    Blending mass communication reception and social connection. Journal of
    Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 317-335.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908270
    IBM (2017). Uniquely Generation Z. Retrieved from
    https://www.generationy20.com/retail-generation-z.PDF
    Klobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2019).
    Problematic and extensive YouTube use: first hand reports. Online Information
    Review, 43, 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2018-0032
    Klobas, J. E., McGill, T. J., Moghavvemi, S., & Paramanathan, T. (2018).
    Compulsive YouTube usage: A comparison of use motivation and personality
    effects. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 129-139.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.038
    Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and
    consumption on YouTube?. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236-247.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
    Koroleva, K., & Kane, G. (2017). Relational affordances of information processing on
    Facebook. Information & Management, 54, 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2016.11.007
    Kim, J., Kim, S., & Nam, C. (2016). Competitive dynamics in the Korean video
    platform market: Traditional pay TV platforms vs. OTT platforms. Telematics
    and Informatics, 33, 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.014
    Keller, K. L. (2016). Unlocking the power of integrated marketing communications:
    how integrated is your IMC program?. Journal of Advertising, 45, 286-301.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1204967
    Kim, J., Kim, S., & Nam, C. (2016). Competitive dynamics in the Korean video
    platform market: Traditional pay TV platforms vs. OTT platforms. Telematics
    and Informatics, 33, 711–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.014
    Krause, A. E., North, A. C., & Heritage, B. (2014). The Uses and Gratifications of
    using Facebook music listening applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 39,
    71e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.001
    Ko, H., Cho, C. H., & Roberts, M. S. (2005). Internet uses and gratifications: A
    structural equation model of interactive advertising. Journal of advertising, 34, 57-
    70. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/236570329/
    Kaye, B., & Johnson, T. (2004). A Web for all reasons: uses and gratifications of
    Internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics, 21,
    197–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00037-6
    Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-36.
    Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor
    analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.
    Larsson, A. O. (2018). The news user on social media: A comparative study of
    interacting with media organizations on Facebook and Instagram. Journalism
    studies, 19, 2225-2242. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2017.1332957
    Lu, W., & Hampton, K. (2017). Beyond the power of networks: Differentiating
    network structure from social media affordances for perceived social support.
    New Media & Society, 19, 861–879. 
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815621514
    Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience
    throughout the customer journey. Journal of marketing, 80, 69-96. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0420
    Lai, C. Y., & Yang, H. L. (2016). Determinants and consequences of Facebook
    feature use. New Media & Society, 18, 1310-1330.
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814555959
    Lee, E., Lee, J. A., Moon, J. H., & Sung, Y. (2015). Pictures speak louder than words:
    Motivations for using Instagram. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social
    Networking, 18, 552-556. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0157
    Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and Gratifications of digital photo
    sharing on Facebook. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 129e138.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.009
    Meyer, C., & Schwager, A. (2007). Understanding customer experience. Harvard
    business review, 85(2), 116. Retrieved from
    http://search.proquest.com/docview/70260209/
    Mierzjewska, B. I., & Hollifield, C. A. (2006). Theoretical approaches in media
    management research. In Handbook of media management and economics (pp.
    49-78). Routledge.
    de Oliveira, R., Pentoney, C., & Pritchard-Berman, M. (2018). YouTube needs:
    understanding user’s motivations to watch videos on mobile devices.Proceedings
    of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with
    Mobile Devices and Services, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3229434.3229448
    Prasad, S., Gupta, I., & Totala, N. (2017). Social media usage, electronic word of mouth
    and purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9, 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2016-0063
    Park, N., & Lee, S. (2014). College students` motivations for Facebook use and
    psychological outcomes. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58, 601-
    620. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2014.966355
    Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students` social
    networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of applied developmental psychology, 30, 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.12.010
    Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (Eds.). (2013). Qualitative
    research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. sage.
    Roy, S. K. (2009). Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context.
    Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 878-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.03.002
    Sheldon, P., & Newman, M. (2019). Instagram and American Teens: Understanding
    Motives for Its Use and Relationship to Excessive Reassurance-Seeking and
    Interpersonal Rejection. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 8, 1-16.
    Shane-Simpson, C., Manago, A., Gaggi, N., & Gillespie-Lynch, K. (2018). Why do
    college students prefer Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram? Site affordances, tensions between privacy and self-expression, and implications for social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 276-288. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/2093196713/
    Sheldon, P., Rauschnabel, P. A., Antony, M. G., & Car, S. (2017). A cross-cultural
    comparison of Croatian and American social network sites: Exploring cultural differences in motives for Instagram use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 643-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.009
    Sheldon, P., & Bryant, K. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to
    narcissism and contextual age. Computers in human Behavior, 58, 89-97.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059
    Stein, A., & Ramaseshan, B. (2016). Towards the identification of customer
    experience touch point elements. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services,
    30, 8-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.12.001
    Sundar, S., & Limperos, A. (2013). Uses and Grats 2.0: New Gratifications for New 
    Media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 504–525.
    https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2013.845827
    Smock, A. D., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Wohn, D. Y. (2011). Facebook as a
    toolkit: A uses and gratifications approach to unbundling feature use. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2322e2329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.011
    Shao, G. (2009). Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: a uses and
    gratification perspective. Internet research, 19, 7-25.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240910927795
    Varkaris, E., & Neuhofer, B. (2017). The influence of social media on the consumers’
    hotel decision journey. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 8, 101-118. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2016-0058
    We Are Social & Hootsuite, Task Force. (2019). Digital 2019 Global Digital
    Overview (January 2019) v01. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/DataReportal/digital-2019-global-digital-overview-january-2019-v01?from_action=save
    We Are Social & Hootsuite, Task Force. (2018). Digital in 2018 Global Overview.
    Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/wearesocial/digital-in-2018-global-
    overview-86860338?ref=https://digitalreport.wearesocial.com/
    Whiting, A., & Williams, D. (2013). Why people use social media: a uses and
    gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16, 362–369. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-06-2013-0041
    Yi, K., & Sung, Y. (2007). What to read in the morning? A niche analysis of free
    daily papers and paid papers in Korea. The International Journal on Media Management, 9, 164-174. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/220296974/
    Zolkepli, I. A., & Kamarulzaman, Y. (2015). Social media adoption: The role of
    media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior, 43,
    189-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.050
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    107464020
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464020
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000490
    Appears in Collections:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    402001.pdf4678KbAdobe PDF2281View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback