| Reference: | 一、中文文獻
王貞懿（2011）。《從新聞中的偽科學報導看大學生的科學素養與媒體識讀能力》。政治大學廣告學研究所碩士論文。
吳文龍（2008）。〈科學新聞傳播的發展與困難〉，《科學教育研究與發展季刊》，50: 21-34。
李松濤（2017）。〈大學生對於科學研究資訊的閱讀表現探究：以網路科學新聞為例〉，《中華傳播學刊》，32: 91-128。
周樹華、閻岩（2015）。〈媒體可信度研究：起源，發展，機會和挑戰〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，33: 255–297。
林基興（2000）。〈科學家的認知與責任──《難以置信──科學家探索神秘信息場》〉，《科學月刊》，31(8): 722-723。
林淑梤、林煥祥（2019）。〈偽科學信念與科學素養的共存與抗衡─民眾參與科學和偽科學活動之探究〉，《教育科學研究期刊》，64(2): 69-97。
林慶順（2018）。《餐桌上的偽科學：加州大學醫學院教授破解上百種健康謠言和深入人心的醫學迷思》。台北：一心文化。
林慶順（2019）。《餐桌上的偽科學2：頂尖醫學期刊評審用科學證據解答50個最流行的健康迷思》。台北：一心文化。
夏淑怡譯（2009）。《黑白假說──看穿偽科學的19個思考實驗》。台北：城邦文化。（原書：竹內薰 [2009].《白い仮説・黒い仮説：ニセカガクを見破る思考実験》。日本東京都：日本実業出版社）
徐美苓（2015）。〈新興環境議題的媒體建構：以台灣替代能源新聞報導為例〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，32: 19-57。
張松林、安寶明譯（1991）。《科學與偽科學》。台北市：久大。（原書：Radner, Daisie & Radner, Michael [1982]. Science and Unreason. California, CA: Wadsworth）
莫季雍（2014）。〈科普、科傳與科學傳播的人才培育〉，《科學月刊》，45(3): 206。
陳明聰、陳思涵（2016）。〈從參加促進者訓練談促進性溝通的爭議〉，《特殊教育季刊》，141: 1-10。
陳筱宛譯（2010）。《別掉入思考的陷阱！》。台北市：商周出版。（原書：Kida, T. [2009]. Don`t believe everything you think. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.）
陳憶寧（2011）。〈當科學家與記者相遇：探討兩種專業對於科學新聞的看法差異〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19: 147-187。
曾元珏（2014）。《台灣成年國民從事運勢與健康之偽科學行為模式的研究》。高雄師範大學科學教育暨環境教育研究所博士論文。
黃俊儒（2006）。〈構思科技社會中的即時學習：以學生及專家對於科學新聞文本之理解差異為例〉，《科學教育學刊》，16(1): 105-124。
黃俊儒（2014）。《別輕易相信！你必須知道的科學偽新聞》。台北：時報出版。
黃俊儒（2016）。《新時代判讀力：教你一眼看穿科學新聞的真偽》。台北市：方寸文創。
黃俊儒（2018）。《新生活判讀力：別讓科學偽新聞誤導你的人生》。台北市：方寸文創。
黃俊儒、簡妙如（2006）。〈科學新聞文本的論述層次及結構分佈：構思另個科學傳播的起點〉，《新聞學研究》，86: 135-170。
黃俊儒、簡妙如（2010）。〈以通識教育型塑公民社會：科學新聞識讀課程為例〉，《課程與教學》，20(1): 45-72。
劉時君、蘇蘅（2017）。〈政治抗議事件中媒體的創新使用與實踐：以太陽花運動為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，33: 147-188。
鄭宇君（2003）。〈從社會脈絡解析科學新聞的產製〉，《新聞學研究》，74: 121-146。
鄭怡卉（2013）。〈新聞中的「偽科學」內容分析研究〉，《新聞學研究》，116: 47-90。
謝瀛春（1992）。〈全國科技會議新聞之分析〉，《新聞學研究》，46: 131-147。
鍾起惠（1997）。〈台灣記者在想什麼？1997台灣記者工作處境與價值觀調查〉，《目擊者雜誌》，1: 15-19。
羅文輝、林文琪、牛隆光、蔡卓芬（2003）。〈媒介依賴與媒介使用對選擇新聞可信度的影響：五種媒介的比較〉，《新聞學研究》，74: 19-44。
關尚仁（2014）。〈臺灣科學傳播的現況與挑戰〉，《科學月刊》，45(3): 186-193。
二、英文文獻
Allen, M., Bruflat, R., Fucilla, R., Kramer, M., McKellips, S., Ryan, D. J., & Spiegelhoff, M. (2000). Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms. Communication Research Reports, 17(4), 331-336.
Allum, N. (2010). What Makes Some People Think Astrology Is Scientific?. Science Communication, 33(3), 341-366.
Barnett, M., Wagner, H., Gatling, A., Anderson, J., Houle, M., & Kafka, A. (2006). The Impact of Science Fiction Film on Student Understanding of Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15(2), 179-191.
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1970). Dimensions for evaluating the acceptability of message sources. Public Opinion Quarterly, 33(4), 563-576.
Bilandzic, H., & Busselle, R. (2008). Transportation and Transportability in the Cultivation of Genre-Consistent Attitudes and Estimates. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 508-529.
Boster, F., Cameron, K., Campo, S., Liu, W., Lillie, J., Baker, E., & Yun, K. (2000). The persuasive effects of statistical evidence in the presence of exemplars. Communication Studies, 51(3), 296-306.
Braverman, J. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: The moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35(5), 666-694.
Brem, S., & Rips, L. (2000). Explanation and Evidence in Informal Argument. Cognitive Science, 24(4), 573-604.
Brewer, P. R. (2012). The Trappings of Science. Science Communication, 35(3), 311-333.
Brosius, H.-B., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in persuasive communications. Communication Research, 21(1), 48-78.
Bucchi, M., & Mazzolini, R. (2003). Big science, little news: science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946-1997. Public Understanding of Science, 12(1), 7-24.
Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media Credibility Reconsidered: Synergy Effects between On-Air and Online News. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 247-264.
Burns, T. W., O`Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2016). Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183-202.
Chang, L., & Lemert, J. (1968). The Invisible Newsman and Other Factors in Media Competition. Journalism Quarterly, 45(3), 436-444.
Chapman, S., Holding, S., McLeod, K., & Wakefield, M. (2005). Impact of news of celebrity illness on breast cancer screening: Kylie Minogue`s breast cancer diagnosis. Medical Journal of Australia, 183(5), 247-250.
Dahlstrom, M. (2010). The Role of Causality in Information Acceptance in Narratives: An Example From Science Communication. Communication Research, 37(6), 857-875.
Dahlstrom, M. (2014). Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proceedings of The National Academy of Sciences, 111(4), 13614-13620.
Dennis, E., & McCartney, J. (1979). Science Journalists on Metropolitan Dailies: Methods, Values and Perceptions of Their Work. The Journal of Environmental Education, 10(3), 9-15.
Etling, L., & Young, R. (2007). Sexism and the Authoritativeness of Female Sportscasters. Communication Research Reports, 24(2), 121-130.
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E.-R. (2002). Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: A systematic review. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 287(20), 2691-2700.
Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 515-540.
Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
Friedman, S. (1986). The journalist’s world. In Scientists and journalists: Reporting science as news. New York, NY: Free Press.
Garrett, B. M., & Cutting, R. L. (2017). Magical beliefs and discriminating science from pseudoscience in undergraduate professional students. Heliyon, 3(11), e00433.
Glaser, M., Garsoffky, B., & Schwan, S. (2009). Narrative-based learning: Possible benefits and problems. Communications, 34(4). 429-447.
Goodell, R. (1977). The Visible Scientists. The Sciences, 17(1), 6-9.
Gordin, M. (2017). The problem with pseudoscience. EMBO Reports, 18(9), 1482-1485.
Greenberg, B., & Roloff, M. (1974). Mass media credibility. Washington: American Newspaper Publishers Association.
Greene, K., Campo, S., & Banerjee, S. (2010). Comparing Normative, Anecdotal, and Statistical Risk Evidence to Discourage Tanning Bed Use. Communication Quarterly, 58(2), 111-132.
Grove, J. (1985). Rationality at risk: Science against pseudoscience. Minerva, 23(2), 216-240.
Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., & Beyleveld, D. (1999). The Media and Public Understanding of Biotechnology. Science Communication, 20(4), 373-394.
Gunther, A. (1988). Attitude Extremity and Trust in Media. Journalism Quarterly, 65(2), 279-287.
Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism. Journalism Practice, 4(3), 297-308.
Hinnant, A., Len-Rios, M. E., & Young, R. (2013). Journalistic Use of Exemplars to Humanize Health News. Journalism Studies, 14(4), 539-554.
Hovland, C., & Weiss, W. (1951). The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635-650.
Ismach, A., & Dennis, E. (1978). A Profile of Newspaper and Television Reporters in a Metropolitan Setting. Journalism Quarterly, 55(4), 739-898.
Jahng, M. R., & Littau, J. (2016). Interacting Is Believing: Interactivity, Social Cue, and Perceptions of Journalistic Credibility on Twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 38-58.
Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2017). Use of Alternative Medicine for Cancer and Its Impact on Survival. JNCI: Journal of The National Cancer Institute, 110(1), 121-124.
Johnson, S. B., Park, H. S., Gross, C. P., & Yu, J. B. (2018). Complementary Medicine, Refusal of Conventional Cancer Therapy, and Survival Among Patients With Curable Cancers. JAMA Oncol, 4(10), 1375-1381.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is Believing?: Comparing Internet and Traditional Sources on Media Credibility Measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(2), 325-340.
Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2004). Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(3), 622-642.
Kim, H., Bigman, C., Leader, A., Lerman, C., & Cappella, J. (2012). Narrative Health Communication and Behavior Change: The Influence of Exemplars in the News on Intention to Quit Smoking. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 473-492.
Kim, S., Weaver, D., & Willnat, L. (2000). Media Reporting and Perceived Credibility of Online Polls. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 846-864.
Kiousis, S. (2001). Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age. Mass Communication and Society, 4(4), 381-403.
Kumkale, G., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The Sleeper Effect in Persuasion: A Meta-Analytic Review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 143-172.
Ley, B. L., Jankowski, N., & Brewer, P. R. (2012). Investigating CSI: portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 51-67.
Losh, S. C., & Nzekwe, B. (2011). The Influence of Education Major: How Diverse Preservice Teachers View Pseudoscience Topics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 579-591.
Martin, F. (1990). News and Comment-science teachers confront pseudoscience. The Skeptical Inquirer, 15, 19-20.
Martin, M. (1994). Pseudoscience, the paranormal, and science education. Science & Education, 3(4), 357-371.
McKinley, C., Limbu, Y., & Jayachandran, C. (2016). The Influence of Statistical versus Exemplar Appeals on Indian Adults’ Health Intentions: An Investigation of Direct Effects and Intervening Persuasion Processes. Health Communication, 32(4), 427-437.
Mehrabi, D., Muhamad, S. S. A., & Hassan, M. A. (2013). Components of news media credibility among professional administrative staff in Malaysia. China Media Research, 9(1), 34-40.
Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus, D., & Mccann, R. (2003). Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment. Communication Yearbook, 27(1), 293-335.
Metzger, M., Flanagin, A., Eyal, K., Lemus, D., & Mccann, R. (2003). Credibility for the 21st Century: Integrating Perspectives on Source, Message, and Media Credibility in the Contemporary Media Environment. Annals Of The International Communication Association, 27(1), 293-335.
Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and Measuring Credibility of Newspapers: Developing an Index. Journalism Quarterly, 65(3), 567-574.
Millar, R. (1997). Science education for democracy: What can the school curriculum achieve?. London, UK: Routledge.
Moore, K. (1999). Influence of text genre on adults` monitoring of understanding and recall. Educational Gerontology, 25(8), 691-710.
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008). Toward a Theory of Entertainment Persuasion: Explaining the Persuasive Effects of Entertainment-Education Messages. Communication Theory, 18(3), 407-425.
Nelkin, D. (1995). Selling science. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. (1989). Differential Criteria for Evaluating Credibility of Newspapers and TV News. Journalism Quarterly, 66(2), 277-284.
Plantin, J.-C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2018). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. New Media & Society, 20(1), 293-310.
Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research, 15, 3-59.
Schoijet, M. (2009). On Pseudoscience. Critique, 37(3), 425-439.
Schweiger, W. (2000). Media Credibility — Experience or Image?. European Journal of Communication, 15(1), 37-59.
Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Shermer, M. (2002). The Skeptic encyclopedia of pseudoscience. Santa Barbara, Calif.: ABC-CLIO.
Shermer, M. (2003). Why smart people believe weird things. Skeptic, 10(2), 62-75.
Shermer, M. (2011). What is pseudoscience?. Scientific American, 116(10), 122.
Shermer, M. (2016). The Quack of the Gaps Problem. Scientific American, 315(2), 75.
Slater, M., & Rouner, D. (1996). How Message Evaluation and Source Attributes May Influence Credibility Assessment and Belief Change. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974-991.
Slater, M., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment? Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173-191.
Sparks, G., Nelson, C., & Campbell, R. (1997). The relationship between exposure to televised messages about paranormal phenomena and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41(3), 345-359.
Sundar, S. (1998). Effect of Source Attribution on Perception of Online News Stories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(1), 55-68.
Thagard, P. (1978). Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience. PSA: Proceedings of The Biennial Meeting of The Philosophy of Science Association, 1978(1), 223-234.
Thomm, E., & Bromme, R. (2012). “It should at least seem scientific!” Textual features of “scientificness” and their impact on lay assessments of online information. Science Education, 96(2), 187-211.
Tobacyk, J. (2004). A Revised Paranormal Belief Scale. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 23(1), 94-98.
Tobacyk, J., & Milford, G. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1029-1037.
Treise, D., & Weigold, M. (2002). Advancing Science Communication. Science Communication, 23(3), 310-322.
Tsai, C., Lin, C., Shih, W., & Wu, P. (2015). The effect of online argumentation upon students` pseudoscientific beliefs. Computers & Education, 80, 187-197.
Tseng, Y.-C., Tsai, C.-Y., Hsieh, P.-Y., Hung, J.-F., & Huang, T.-C. (2013). The Relationship Between Exposure to Pseudoscientific Television Programmes and Pseudoscientific Beliefs among Taiwanese University Students. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 4(2), 107-122.
Wallington, S., Blake, K., Taylor-Clark, K., & Viswanath, K. (2010). Antecedents to Agenda Setting and Framing in Health News: An Examination of Priority, Angle, Source, and Resource Usage from a National Survey of U.S. Health Reporters and Editors. Journal of Health Communication, 15(1), 76-94.
Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (1994). Time-lag Differences In The Agenda-setting Process: An Examination Of Five News Media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6(3), 225-240.
Wellington, J. (1991). Newspaper science, school science: friends or enemies? International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 363-372.
Whitehead, J. (1968). Factors of source credibility. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 54(1), 59-63.
Worchel, S., Andreoli, V., & Eason, J. (1975). Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5(2), 157-172.
Yarden, A. (2009). Reading Scientific Texts: Adapting Primary Literature for Promoting Scientific Literacy. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 307-311.
Zillmann, D., & Brosius, H.-B. (2000). LEA`s communication series. Exemplification in communication: The influence of case reports on the perception of issues. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
三、網路文獻
孔德廉、柯皓翔、劉致昕、許家瑜（2019年12月26日）。〈打不死的內容農場──揭開「密訊」背後操盤手和中國因素〉，《報導者》。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/information-warfare-business-content-farm-mission
余弦妙（2018年11月27日）。〈全球臉書使用者超過22億 台灣已逾1900萬人〉，《蘋果新聞網》。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20181127/1474251/
邱宜君、楊惠君（2017年10月25日）。〈【許達夫案追蹤2-2】另類療法成為醫療三不管地帶〉，《報導者》。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/complementary-alternative-medicine-regulation
國家通訊傳播委員會（2019年3月27日）。〈新聞稿〉。台北市：國家通訊傳播委員會。取自 https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=8&cate=0&keyword=&is_history=0&pages=0&sn_f=41223
國家通訊傳播委員會（2019年3月28日）。〈新聞稿〉。台北市：國家通訊傳播委員會。取自 https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=8&cate=0&keyword=&is_history=0&pages=0&sn_f=41228
國家通訊傳播委員會（2019年7月10日）。〈新聞稿〉。台北市：國家通訊傳播委員會。取自 https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=8&cate=0&keyword=&is_history=0&pages=0&sn_f=41651
陳潔（2019年03月18日）。〈你的體質，不可能是酸的！戳破鹼性水、蚊子愛叮酸性人的五大迷思〉，《天下雜誌》。取自 https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5094367
資策會（2016年12月15日）。〈2017年19歲以下網友潛藏巨大消費力量〉。取自 https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=449&List=1
劉昌德、林麗雲、胡元輝、劉慧雯（2019）。〈網路新聞專業表現評鑑 每日新聞媒體臉書粉絲專頁評比之初探研究〉。取自台灣媒體觀察教育基金會網頁 http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/news/9826
蔣曜宇（2019）。〈「LINE訊息查證」平台正式上線，聯手4大查核機構打擊假消息〉，《數位時代》。取自https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/54068/line-disinformation-examination
顏正芳（2018年4月3日）。〈偽科學資訊流竄 侵蝕台人健康〉，《蘋果新聞網》。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20180403/1327474/
蘇蘅（2015）。〈台灣新聞媒體公信力研究〉。取自台灣媒體觀察教育基金會網頁 http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/news/9282
Callahan, A. (2018). Is Alkaline Water Really Better for You?. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/27/well/eat/alkaline-water-health-benefits.html
Federal Trade Commission. (2016, November 15). FTC Issues Enforcement Policy Statement Regarding Marketing Claims for Over-the-Counter Homeopathic Drugs. Washington, DC: Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2016/11/ftc-issues-enforcement-policy-statement-regarding-marketing
Figueroa, T. (2018, November 2). Jury awards $105 million to terminal cancer patient in suit against `pH Miracle` author. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/la-me-ln-san-diego-ph-miracle-lawsuit-20181102-story.html
French, C. (2019, March 11). Why Do People Believe in Pseudoscience?. Gizmodo. Retrieved from https://gizmodo.com/why-do-people-believe-in-pseudoscience-1833193811
Funk, C., Gottfried, J., & Mitchell, A. (2017). Science News and Information Today. Retrieved 28 August 2019 from Pew Research Center web site: https://www.journalism.org/2017/09/20/science-news-and-information-today/
Hitlin, P., & Olmstead, K. (2018). The Science People See on Social Media. Retrieved 28 August 2019, from Pew Research Center web site: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2018/03/21/the-science-people-see-on-social-media/
Lower, Stephen（2002）Pesudoscience-What is it? How can I recongize it? Retrieved from http://www.chem1.com/acad/sci/pseudosci.html
Mahdawi, A. (2018, October 29). Is alkaline water a miracle cure – or BS? The science is in. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/global/2018/oct/29/alkaline-water-cure-bs-science-beyonce-tom-brady
Moore, D. (2005, JUNE 16). Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal. Gallup. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/16915/three-four-americans-believe-paranormal.aspx
National Health and Medical Research Council (2015). NHMRC Statement on Homeopathy (NHMRC ref #CAM02). Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/homeopathy
National Science Foundation. (2006). Science and engineering indicators 2006 (NSB 06-01). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind/
Ngak, C. (2019, October 30). Social media a news source and tool during Superstorm Sandy. CBS NEWS. Retrieved from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/social-media-a-news-source-and-tool-during-superstorm-sandy/
Ritschel, C. (2019, February 5). Health Articles Shared On Facebook Include False Information, Researchers Say. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/fake-news-health-facebook-study-medicine-nutrition-fact-credibility-a8764436.html |
