政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130565

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Executive Master of Business Administration > Theses > Item 140.119/130565

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130565

Title:	醫療器材代理商產品選擇策略之研究–以C公司為例 Research on the strategy of Products Portfolio Selection for Medical Equipment Agent – Taking C Company as an Example
Authors:	洪禎改 Hung, Jen-Kai
Contributors:	詹文男 Chan, Wen-Nan 洪禎改 Hung, Jen-Kai
Keywords:	醫療器材原廠代理商去中間化產品組合 Medical Device Original Manufacturer Agents Disintermediation Product Portfolio
Date:	2020
Issue Date:	2020-07-01 13:45:28 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	醫療器材產業是整合型的學科，國家產業創新能力不夠或市場規模不夠大的地區，很難發展高端醫療器材產業，全球高端醫療器材的研發與生產，由美國、歐洲、日本等國所主導，其他國家對高端醫療器材產品的需求，主要靠進口來滿足需求。醫療器材研發製造廠商進入新市場時，初期會與當地代理商合作，當市場達到經濟規模後，原廠將跨足進入當地市場，原廠想直接銷售給醫療機構，醫療機構想直接從原廠購買，當醫療器材代理商的上下游在共同利益結合下，代理商就面臨「去中間化」的危機，這是代理商常見不利的問題。中國醫療產業市場實施的「兩票制」，更是用政府監管部門直接介入「去中間化」的手段。醫療器材代理商似乎在打一場打不贏的仗。本研究的課題主要是藉由個案研究法，分析個案公司自1986年成立至2019年期間與原廠合作的代理過程、產品組合模式等，對個案公司做深入研究，藉由總體環境分析理論、產業競爭分析理論、顧客需求理論分析、企業SWOT優劣分析理論、產品組合理論等方面，對個案在選擇合作原廠與產品組合策略上的研究與分析，希望找到代理商對選擇原廠與選擇產品組合的最佳策略。研究結果指出: 婚姻雙方講究門當戶對，在代理商業模式下，選擇合作原廠上，也要考慮雙方資源與企業規模的適配性，醫療器材代理商應該考慮選擇與企業規模相當的原廠合作。在產品選擇上，適當的產品組合，做好市場差異化，可產生代理制衡的綜效。在顧客經營上，衍伸領域內採購需求，可產生顧客綜效，讓顧客專屬陷入。利用以上三個構面的選擇，找出對代理商最有利的代理原廠與產品組合的選擇方案。 Medical devices industry is an integrated discipline. It is difficult to develop the high-end medical device in an area where the country’s industrial innovation is not good enough or the market size is not large enough. Global high-end medical devices are dominated by the United States, Europe, and Japan those developed countries. The demand for high-end medical devices in other countries mainly depends on import. When medical device manufacturers enter new markets, they initially adopt the business model of agents. Once the market has reached economic scale, the original manufacturer may step into the local market. The original manufacturer hopes to sell products directly to hospitals, and hospital wants to directly purchase from the original manufacturer. When the suppliers and buyers of medical device has a common interest, the agent will face the crisis of "Disintermediation", which is a common problem for agents. "Two-invoice policy" implemented in China medical field is a means of direct intervention by government in "Disintermediation". Medical device agents seem to be fighting an unwinnable battle. The subject of this research is mainly to analyze the company C from its establishment of 1986 to 2019 about its agent process and product portfolio. Through the case study by overall environmental analysis theory, industrial competition analysis theory, customer demand theory, enterprise SWOT advantages and dis-advantages analysis theory, product portfolio theory… etc., to research and analyze the case on the selection of cooperative original manufacturer and product portfolio strategy. I hope to find the best strategy for medical device agent to select the original manufacturer and product portfolio. The results of the study pointed out: Marriage parties should be in fair conditions. Under the agency business model, the selection of the original manufacturer for cooperation should consider the adaptability of the two parties` resources to the scale of the enterprise. In terms of product selection, proper product portfolio and market differentiation can create a comprehensive effect in agent’s checks and balances. In terms of customer management, customer exclusiveness to develop demand in the field can generate customer synergy. Use the selection of the above three facets to find out the most favorable original manufacturer and product portfolio for agents.
Reference:	一、中文部分 1.王冠東(2003)，國際醫療器材廠商在台行銷通路決策之研究，未出版碩士論文，淡江大學，台北。 2.司徒達賢(2011)，策略管理新論-觀念架構與分析方法，智勝出版社，台北。 3.邱志聖(2018)，策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用(第四版)，智勝出版社，台北。 4.吳建穎(2003)，製造商權力對通路合作與衝突影響之研究--以進口醫療器材業為例，未出版碩士論文，銘傳大學，台北。 5.食品藥物管理署(2004)，醫療器材管理辦法，衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。 6.食品藥物管理署(2020)，醫療器材管理法，衛生福利部食品藥物管理署。 7.郭大維(2019)，全球眼科醫材市場概況分析(2019.6)，工研院產科國際所，新竹。 8.陳玉美(2006)，國內醫療器材進口代理商選擇產品決策過程之研究，未出版碩士論文，淡江大學，台北。 9.陳柏憲(2010)，顧客關係、品牌知名度、企業形象、服務品質、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度間關係之研究，未出版碩士論文。 10.衛生福利部(2004)，醫療法，衛生福利部。 11.衛生福利部(2004)，藥事法，衛生福利部。二、英文部分 1.Anderson, E. W. & M. W. Sullivan (1993), “ The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms,” Marketing Science, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 125-143. 2.Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative Research in Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods: United States Edition. 3.Cardozo, R.N., “An Experimental Study of Customer Effect, Expectation and Satisfaction, “Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.2, 1965, pp.244-249. 4.Coase, R. H.（1937）, “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, Vol.4, pp.386-405. 5.Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. 6.Engel, J.F., r.d. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard (2000), Consumer Behavior , 8th ed., Rinehart and Winston, NEW YORK. 7.Griffin, G., 2002, “Image: It’s all in the Mind (That’s Why It Drives Sales),” Instant and Small Commercial Printer, 21(8), 12-15. 8.Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. 9.Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. 10.Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching(2nd ed.) London: Sage. 11.Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative research in business and management, Sage. 12.Park, C. Whan, Bernard J. Jaworski, and Deborah J. MacInnis (1986). Strategic Brand Concept-Image Management.Journal of Marketing, 50. 135-145 13.Philip Kotler, Swee Hoon Ang, Siew Meng Leong & Tan Chin Tiong (1996) Marketing Management: An Asia Perspective, Prentice Hall 14.Porter, M. E (1990).The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press. New York 15.Porter, M. E (1980) , Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York. 16.Robertson, T. S., & Gatignon, H., 1986, Competitive effects on technology diffusion, Journal of Marketing, 20(3), 1-12. 17.Sauerhaft, S., Atkins, C. (1989) "Image Wars`, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 18.Smith, J. K. (1983). Quantitative versus Qualitative Research: An Attempt to Clarify the Issue. Educational Researcher, 12(3), 6-13. 19.The Wall Street Journal (2014) Where (in the Human Body) Venture Capital Is Going Eyes and Ears Draw Biggest Increases in Investments，New York 20.Van Maanen, J. (1979). Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 520-526. 21.Williamson, O. E. (1975), “Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications” New York: Free Press. 22.Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd edn. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5: Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. 23.Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods(4th ed.) Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) 107932162
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107932162
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU202000544
Appears in Collections:	[Executive Master of Business Administration] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
216201.pdf		2266Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...