政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130530
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113451/144438 (79%)
Visitors : 51298069      Online Users : 863
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Finance > Theses >  Item 140.119/130530


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130530


    Title: 恐慌情緒下的基金報酬決定因子- 以台灣境內股票型基金為例
    The Determinants of Fund Performance in Fear Sentiment – Evidence from Taiwan Onshore Equity Fund
    Authors: 謝順博
    Sie, Shun-Bo
    Contributors: 周冠男
    Chou, Robin K.
    謝順博
    Sie, Shun-Bo
    Keywords: 基金績效
    恐慌情緒
    Fund Performance
    Fear Sentiment
    Date: 2020
    Issue Date: 2020-07-01 13:38:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我們使用從2000年1月至2020年3月的最新數據，來研究在恐慌情緒下，台灣市場境內股票型基金報酬的決定因子。我們發現，共同基金經理人在市場恐慌的情況下戰勝了市場，尤其是對投資標的於國內的基金經理人而言。但是，隨著市場情緒的上升，基金的報酬表現也隨之下降。此外，我們運用一元固定效果模型發現對基金報酬具顯著負面影響的因子有基金成立年期、基金周轉率、基金家族規模和恐慌指數Vix；而對基金報酬具顯著正面影響的因子有基金規模、資金流量和銷售費用。隨著人們的情緒變得越來越恐慌，我們發現基金報酬與周轉率以及基金報酬與Vix之間的關係從負變為正。這表明基金經理更加技巧熟練，並且表現出了保護投資組合的能力。隨著市場情緒變得更加恐慌，他們將利用偏誤並採取行動因應，最後，他們贏過了市場。
    We use the latest data period from 2000.01 to 2020.03 to study the determinants of onshore equity funds in the Taiwan market in fear sentiment. We find that mutual fund managers beat the market while the market is fearful, especially for domestic fund managers. However, the fund performance decreases as sentiment increases. Moreover, we use one-way fixed effect model and we find significantly negative influence on fund performance with fund age, turnover rate, fund family size, and Vix, whereas we display significantly positive influence on the fund performance with fund size, fund flow, and sales fee. As the sentiment becomes more fearful, we find that the relationship between fund performance with turnover rate and Vix turns from negative to positive. It indicates that fund managers are more skillful and they exhibit their ability to protect the portfolio. They will take action and take advantage of the bias as the market sentiment goes deeper fear. In the end, they outperform the market.
    Reference: Bailey, W., Kumar, A., & Ng, D. (2011). Behavioral Biases of Mutual Fund Investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 1-27.
    Baltagi, B. H. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley and Chichester.
    Bates, D. S. (2000). Post-`87 crash fears in the S&P 500 futures option market. Journal of Econometrics, 94(2), 181-238.
    Berk, J., & Green, R. (2004). Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets. Journal of Political Economy, 112(6), 1269-1295.
    Bhojraj, S., Cho, Y. J. & Yehuda, N. (2012). Mutual Fund Family Size and Mutual Fund Performance: The Role of Regulatory Changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 647-684.
    Bilson, C., Frino, A., & Heaney, R. (2005). Australian Retail Fund Performance Persistence. Accounting and Finance, 45(1), 25-42.
    Carhart, M. (1997). On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57-82.
    Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. (2004). Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? Liquidity, Organizational Diseconomies, and Active Money Management. American Economic Review, 94(5), 1276-1302.
    Choonara, Y. M. (2018). The Effect of Market Distress on Mutual Fund Performance: International Evidence. Working Paper, ISCTE - Lisbon University Institute.
    Chordia, T. (1996). The Structure of Mutual Fund Charges. Journal of Financial Economics, 41(1), 3-39.
    Dechow, P. M., & Sloan, R. G. (1991). Executive incentives and the horizon problem: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14(1), 51-89.
    Dennis, P., Mayhew, S. & Stivers, C. (2006). Stock Returns, Implied Volatility Innovations, and the Asymmetric Volatility Phenomenon. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 41(2), 381-406.
    Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Blake, C. R. (2012). Does Mutual Fund Size Matter? The Relationship Between Size and Performance. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 2(1), 31-55.
    Elton, E.J., Gruber, M. J., Das, S., & Matthew, H. (1993). Efficiency with Costly Information: A Reinterpretation of Evidence from Managed Portfolios. The Review of Financial Studies, 6(1), 1-22.
    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.
    Ferreira, M., Keswani, A., Miguel, A., & Ramos, S. (2013). The Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance: A Cross-Country Study. Review of Finance, 17(2), 483-525.
    Fleming, J., Ostdiek, B., & Whaley, R. E. (1995). Predicting stock market volatility: A new measure. Journal of Futures Markets, 15(3), 265-302.
    Golec, J. H. (1996). The Effects of Mutual Fund Managers’ Characteristics on Their Portfolio Performance, Risk and Fees. Financial Services Review, 5(2), 133-147.
    Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989). Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings. The Journal of Business, 62(3), 393-416.
    Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1992). The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Finance, 47(5), 1977-1984.
    Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1994). A Study of Monthly Mutual Fund Returns and Performance Evaluation Techniques. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29(3), 419-444.
    Gruber, M. (1996). Another Puzzle: The Growth in Activity Managed Mutual Funds. The Journal of Finance, 51(3), 783-810.
    Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
    Hendricks, D., Patel, J., & Zeckhauser, R. (1993). Hot Hands in Mutual Funds: Short‐Run Persistence of Relative Performance, 1974–1988. The Journal of Finance, 48(1), 93-130.
    Huij, J., & Verbeek, M. (2007). Cross-Sectional Learning and Short-Run Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(3), 973-997.
    Ippolito, R. (1989). Efficiency with Costly Information: A Study of Mutual Fund Performance, 1965–1984. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(1), 1-23.
    Jensen, M. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389-416.
    Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
    Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., & Ramos, S. B. (2017). Mutual Fund Size Versus Fees: When Big Boys Become Bad Boys. Working paper, Cass Business School - London.
    Khorana, A., Servaes, H., & Tufano, P. (2009). Mutual Fund Fees Around the World. Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 1279-1310.
    Li, C. A., & Wang, J. C. (2013). The Influences of Greed and Fear on Fund Performance. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 7(5), 47-57.
    Lo, A. W., Repin, D. V., & Steenbarger, B. N. (2005). Fear and Greed in Financial Markets: A Clinical Study of Day-Traders. American Economic Review, 95(2), 352-359.
    Lynch, A., & Musto, D. (2003). How Investors Interpret Past Fund Returns, The Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2033-2058.
    Malkiel, B. (1995). Returns from Investing in Equity Mutual Funds 1971 to 1991. The Journal of Finance, 50(2), 549-572.
    Pan, J. (2002). The jump-risk premia implicit in options: evidence from an integrated time-series study. Journal of Financial Economics, 63(3), 3-50.
    Pollet, J. M., & Wilson, M. I. (2008). How Does Size Affect Mutual Fund Behavior? The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 2941-2969.
    Poteshman, A. M. (2001). Underreaction, Overreaction, and Increasing Misreaction to Information in the Options Market. The Journal of Finance, 56(3), 851-876.
    Sapp, T., & Tiwari, A. (2004). Does Stock Return Momentum Explain the `Smart Money` Effect? The Journal of Finance, 59(6), 2605-2622.
    Sharpe, W. F. (1966). Mutual Fund Performance. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 119-138.
    Sirri, E. R., & Tufano, P. (1998). Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows. The Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1589-1622.
    Treynor, J. L. (1965). How to Rate Management of Investment Funds. Harvard Business Review, 43(1), 63-75.
    Webster, D. (2002). Mutual Fund Performance and Fund Age. Working paper, University of Oxford.
    Wermers, R. (2000). Mutual Fund Performance: An Empirical Decomposition into Stock-Picking Talent, Style, Transactions Costs, and Expenses. The Journal of Finance, 55(4), 1655-1703.
    Whaley, R. E. (2000). The Investor Fear Gauge. Journal of Portfolio Management. 59(1), 12-17.
    Wooldridge, J. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, 152.
    Yan, X. (2008). Liquidity, Investment Style, and the Relation between Fund Size and Fund Performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(3), 741-767.
    Zheng, L. (1999). Is Money Smart? A Study of Mutual Fund Investors` Fund Selection Ability. The Journal of Finance, 54(3), 901-933.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理學系
    107357018
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107357018
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000625
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Finance] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    701801.pdf890KbAdobe PDF20View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback