政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130505
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113656/144643 (79%)
造访人次 : 51741320      在线人数 : 315
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/130505


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130505


    题名: 審計委員會之組成成員及其特性與關鍵查核事項可讀性之關聯
    The Association between the Characteristics of Audit Committees and the Readability of Key Audit Matters
    作者: 謝易辰
    Hsieh, Yi-Chen
    贡献者: 張祐慈
    Chang, Yu-Tzu
    謝易辰
    Hsieh, Yi-Chen
    关键词: 審計委員會
    關鍵查核事項
    可讀性
    Audit committee
    Key audit matters
    Readability
    日期: 2020
    上传时间: 2020-07-01 13:34:00 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本研究旨在探討審計委員會之特性，如會計專家背景成員、審計委員會開會次數、以及審計委員會成員兼職情形與查核報告中關鍵查核事項之可讀性是否有所關聯。舊式查核報告不足之處在於其無法提供報告使用者專屬於受查者的特定資訊，而依據審計準則第五十八號公報「查核報告中關鍵查核事項之溝通」，會計師必須從與治理單位的溝通事項中決定高度關注事項，並進而再自高度關注事項中決定關鍵查核事項，換言之，對本期查核最為重要之事項，我國亦於2016年起陸續發布及適用新式查核報告相關公報之規定。本研究以2016及2017兩年度台灣上市(櫃)公司為研究樣本，實證結果顯示審計委員會具有會計專家背景成員將降低關鍵查核事項可讀性，審計委員會成員兼職情形將增加關鍵查核事項可讀性。然而，審計委員會開會次數並未對關鍵查核事項可讀性有顯著影響。
    This study investigates whether the characteristics of audit committees such as accounting experts, number of meetings, and multiple directorships affect the readability of key audit matters (KAMs). The auditor shall determine KAMs from those matters that required significant auditor attention in performing audits. The regulator in Taiwan incorporates the International Standards on Auditing to establish similar auditing standards including the KAMs so that CPA firms can provide a tailor-made audit report to their auditees. This study uses Taiwanese data to examine and find that accounting expert in audit committee has a significantly negative effect on the readability of KAMs. Multiple-directorships has a significantly positive effect on the readability of KAMs. However, the number of meetings of the audit committee does not have a significant effect on the readability of KAMs.
    參考文獻: 馬秀如，2017，關鍵查核事項！？以T公司員工收賄為例，會計研究月刊，第375期，94-100。
    劉若蘭、劉政淮與游博凱，2016，審計委員會對公司績效與資訊揭露品質之影響，評價學報，第10期，1-30。
    Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. 2000. Fraudulent financial reporting: Consideration of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4): 441-454.
    Bonsall, S., Miller, B. 2017. The impact of narrative financial disclosure readability on bond ratings and the cost of debt capital. Review of Accounting. Studies. 22(4): 608-643.
    Brick, I.E., Chidambaran, N.K., 2010. Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance 16(4): 533-553.
    Christensen, B. E., S. M. Glover, and C. J. Wolfe. 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors` decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 33 (4): 71-93.
    Church, B. K., S. M. Davis, and S. A. McCracken. 2008. The auditor`s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons 22 (1): 69-90.
    Cohen, J. R., Gaynor, L. M., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. 2007.Auditor Communications with the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors: Policy Recommendations and Opportunities for Future Research. Accounting Horizons 21(2): 165-187.
    DeFond, M. L., R. N. Hann, and X. Hu. 2005. Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research 43(2) : 153-193.
    Dhaliwal, D. S., V. Naiker, and F. Navissi. 2007. Audit committee financial expertise, corporate governance and accruals quality: An empirical analysis. University of Auckland.
    DuBay, W. 2004. The principles of readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information.
    Fakhfakh, M. 2013. The Readability of Standardised Reports by the International Federation of Accountants Journal of Commerce and Accounting Research, 2(1): 10-28.
    Fakhfakh, M. 2015. The readability of international illustration of auditor`s report: An advanced reflection on the compromise between normative principles and linguistic requirements. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, 20(38): 21-29.
    Gunning, R., 1952. The Technique of Clear Writing. McGraw-Hill International Book Co., New York, NY.
    Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K.W., Vulcheva, M. 2018. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies 23(9): 1543–1587.
    Hargis, G., Hernandez, A. K., Hughes, P., Ramaker, J.,Rouiller, S. & Wilde, E. 1998. Developing Quality Technical Information: A Handbook for Writers and Editors. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Harris, I. C., and K. Shimizu. 2004. Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of management studies 41 (July): 775-798.
    Henry, E., Leone, A.J. 2016. Measuring qualitative information in capital markets research: comparison of alternative methodologies to measure disclosure tone. The Accounting Revenue 91(1): 153-178.
    Hossain, M., M. H. B. Perera, and A. R. Rahman. 1995. Voluntary disclosure in the annual reports of New Zealand companies. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 6 (March): 69-87.
    Klare, G. R. 1963. The Measurement of Readability. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
    Köhler, A., Ratzinger-Sakel, N.V., & Theis, J.C. 2016. The Effects of Key Audit Matters on the Auditor`s Report`s Communicative Value: Experimental Evidence from Investment Professionals and Non-Professional Investors. Accounting in Europe, forthcoming.
    Loughran, T. McDonald, B., 2014a. Measuring readability in financial disclosures. Journal of. Finance. 69(4): 1643-1671.
    Loughran, T. McDonald, B. 2014b. Regulation and financial disclosure: the impact of plain English. Journal of Regulatory Economics. 45(1): 94-113.
    Hargis, G. H. 1969. SMOG Grading - A New Readability Formula. Journal of Reading, 22: 639-646.
    Miller, B.P, 2010. The effects of disclosure complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review. 85(6): 2107-2143.
    Velte, P. 2018. Does gender diversity in the audit committee influence key audit matters’ readability in the audit report? UK evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25: 748-755.
    Patton, J., and I. Zelenka. 1997. An empirical analysis of the determinants of the extent of disclosure in annual reports of joint stock companies in the Czech Republic. European Accounting Review 6 (December): 605-626.
    Reid, L C., J. V. Carcello, C. Li, and T. L. Neal. 2019. Impact of Auditor Report Changes on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3): 1501-1539.
    Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998a. Staff Legal Bulletin No. 7. (https://www.sec.gov/interps /legal/slbci7.htm).
    Securities and Exchange Commission, 1998b. A Plain English Handbook: How to Create Clear SEC Disclosure. SEC Office of Investor Education and Assistance Washington, District of Columbia (http://www.sec.gov/pdf/handbook.pdf).
    Sharma, V. D., and E. R. Iselin. 2012. The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure, and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 31 (August): 149-175.
    Sirois, L. P., J. Bédard, and P. Bera. 2018. The Informational Value of Key Audit Matters in the Auditor`s Report: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study. Accounting Horizons. 32(2):141-162
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    107353017
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107353017
    数据类型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU202000567
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    301701.pdf1763KbAdobe PDF20检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈