政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/130142
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51079962      線上人數 : 974
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/130142


    題名: 論法律與道德的關係：霍布斯之「自然法與實證法相互包含」論題(The Mutual-containment-thesis)
    作者: 周家瑜
    Chou, Chia-yu
    貢獻者: 政治系
    關鍵詞: 霍布斯;哈特;自然法;法實證主義;道德
    Hobbes;H.L.A. Hart;Laws of Nature;Legal Positivism;Morality
    日期: 2019-03
    上傳時間: 2020-06-22
    摘要: 雖然霍布斯的政治思想以其國家學說著名，然而法律卻始終是他理論體系中的重要主題。我們應如何理解霍布斯的法理論，以及對霍布斯而言，（實證）法律與道德的關聯為何？便是這篇文章致力探討的主題。本文首先指出，在法實證主義者與自然法思想家這樣的二分法中，霍布斯的論述似乎踩在一個模稜兩可的位置，一方面霍布斯主張法律即為主權者命令，因此霍布斯式法理論與後來奧斯丁的命令論連結起來，也導致後來哈特的批判，但另一方面，霍布斯似乎又主張主權者命令應當受到自然法的規約與限制，因此似乎傾向自然法傳統，而本篇文章藉由霍布斯對自然法與實證法之間關係之探討要指出的是：這兩種理論與傳統均無法涵蓋霍布斯的法理論。
    This essay explores Hobbes`s account of the mutual-containment thesis, which has been a puzzle for Hobbes scholars. Specifically, it investigates Hobbes`s account of the relationship between positive and natural law, i.e., law and morality. While the core purpose of Hobbes`s political thought appears to justify an absolute power, and hence Hobbes was often seen as a legal positivist (akin to John Austin`s command theory), his account of laws of nature (supposed to impose restrictions upon political authority) has been gaining attention in recent years. Additionally, I argue that Hobbes`s account of laws of nature is neither ＂self-effacing＂, as some have argued, nor a ＂façade of absolutism＂. While Hobbes`s conception of laws of nature as equity does not impose limits upon sovereign power as traditional natural laws did, it has function through rulings of the subordinate Judge. I indicate that Hobbes`s accounts of the role and importance of the Judge`s interpretation, and how the law is verified by the subordinate Judge, show that his legal theory has been oversimplified by both the legal positivist and natural law interpretations. I conclude that neither of these contrasting theories is able to tell the whole story of Hobbes`s legal theory.
    關聯: A Journal for Philosophical Study of Public Affairs 政治與社會哲學評論, No.68期, pp.107-142
    資料類型: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6523/SOCIETAS.201903_(68).003
    DOI: 10.6523/SOCIETAS.201903_(68).003
    顯示於類別:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    43.pdf1788KbAdobe PDF2253檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋