政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/129845

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50934781 Online Users : 1014

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

政大典藏 > College of Foreign Languages and Literature > Department of English > Periodical Articles > Item 140.119/129845

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129845

Title:	Direct (Dis)agreement Verbs - Agree/Disagree in Native Speaker and Learner Data
Authors:	鍾曉芳 Chung, Siaw-Fong
Contributors:	英文系
Keywords:	agree;discourse;corpus;disagree;native;learner
Date:	2020-04
Issue Date:	2020-05-26 13:37:02 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	“I am not agree with you” is an incorrect use of agree frequently seen in the writing of Taiwanese learners. Yet, not many studies have discussed the use of agree and disagree in the literature. Many studies are concerned more about the politeness of (dis)agreement, especially in detailing the relationship between speaker and hearer. We took a lexical semantic approach to compare the use of agree and disagree in essays written by native English speakers and Taiwanese learners in the ICNALE (International Corpus Network of Asian Learners of English). The essays were based on two topics concerning societal issues collected in the corpus – (a) whether smoking should be completely banned in restaurants and (b) whether college students should take a part-time job or not – the writers were asked to respond to each issue by agreeing or disagreeing. Our results showed that when given clear instructions to agree or disagree, both native and learners tended to state (dis)agreement in the very first sentence in their essays, but Taiwanese learners relied more on the uses of agree and disagree more often than the native speakers did. The errors committed by learners on the use of agree (not for disagree) were between 25–35% in our data. The results will bring significant comparisons of the lexical semantics of related verbs (verbs of social interaction) in future studies.
Relation:	Journal of Second Language Studies, Vol.3, No.1, pp.111-140
Data Type:	article
DOI link:	https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.17006.chu
DOI:	10.1075/jsls.17006.chu
Appears in Collections:	[Department of English] Periodical Articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML2	495	View/Open

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

Loading...