政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/129766
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51155541      線上人數 : 904
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129766


    題名: 論南海仲裁庭對UNCLOS 第121（3）條相關法律解釋與適用之影響
    The Impact of the South China Sea Arbitral Tribunal’s Interpretation and Application of UNLCOS Article 121(3)
    作者: 蕭琇安
    Hsiao, Anne Hsiu-An
    貢獻者: 國關中心
    關鍵詞: 南海爭端;菲中仲裁;島嶼制度;UNCLOS第121(3)條;岩礁
    South China Sea Dispute;Philippines v. China Arbitration;Regime of Islands;UNCLOS Article 121(3);Rocks
    日期: 2016-12
    上傳時間: 2020-05-25 15:39:08 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 2013年設立的南海（菲律賓v.中國）仲裁庭是第一個決定對UNCLOS第121條第3項關於島嶼制度中的「岩礁」（rock）規定進行解釋的國際法律裁判機構。仲裁庭對第3項以地物本身能否「維持人類定居或經濟生活」的概念來區別享有200海浬EEZ及大陸礁層的「島」和不具有這些權利的「礁」，採取了非常嚴格的解釋，並用以檢視黃岩島及南沙群島中較大的地物。最後，仲裁庭宣判黃岩島為岩礁，且南沙群島中沒有一座島。仲裁庭對第121(3)條的解釋以及對太平島法律屬性的判定已受到部分學者的批評。本文首先討論第121(3)條在南海仲裁案中的重要性，並進一步分析為何仲裁庭對該條文相關法律見解，不論對解決菲、中雙邊爭端或整個南海爭端，抑或是第121條第3項習慣法規則之發展，其影響力在近期的未來或恐不如預期。
    The South China Sea (Philippines v. China) Arbitral Tribunal established in 2013 was the first international judiciary that decided to take on the interpretation of UNCLOS Article 121(3) concerning the classification of ＂rock＂ under the concept of Regime of Islands. The Tribunal adopted very strict and nuanced interpretations for a feature`s own capacity to ＂sustain human habitation or economic life＂, so as to differentiate between an ＂island＂ entitled to a 200-nautical-mile EEZ and continental shelf and a ＂rock＂ that is not. It then applied them to the Scarborough Shoal and the largest Sprtaly islets, including Taiping Island (Itu Aba), and declared that Scarborough Shoal to be a rock, whereas none of the Spratly features were islands. Some scholars have criticized the Tribunal`s interpretation of Article 121(3) and its determination of the legal status Aba. This article began by discussing the significance of Article 121(3) in the South China Sea arbitration. It concludes that despite the Tribunal`s painstaking effort in resolving the ambiguities contained in Article 121(3), its effects on how Philippines and China settle their relevant disputes, or its contributions to the South China Sea dispute settlement more broadly as well as to the development of more generally acceptable customary rules in relation to Article 121(3), may be more limited than hoped for in the foreseeable future.
    關聯: 台灣國際法季刊, Vol.13, No.4, pp.85-106
    資料類型: 期刊論文
    顯示於類別:[國際關係研究中心] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2414檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋