English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 111300/142217 (78%)
Visitors : 48264807      Online Users : 277
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/129097


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/129097


    Title: 對情緒行為障礙障生觀察評量之評分者間信度研究
    The inter-rater reliability of observation assessment in students with emotional and behavioral disorders
    Authors: 陳智修
    Chen, Chih-Hsiu
    Contributors: 教育博七
    Keywords: 情緒行為障礙學生 ; 評分者間信度 ; 觀察評量 
    students with emotional and behavioral disorders ; inter-rater reliability ; observation assessment
    Date: 2018-12
    Issue Date: 2020-03-04 15:30:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 觀察評量廣泛地被家長與教師使用於情障生的鑑定與介入成效評估，故評分者間信度對其格外重要。但過去研究所用的信度指標過於單一，且也較少探討影響評分者間信度的相關因素。因此，本研究旨在分析家長、導師、資源教師在特質定義與評分標準的一致性，並探討影響這些信度指標的因素。本研究以七年級資源班情障生的家長、導師與資源教師為樣本，共計312人。經Kappa一致性係數、McNemar考驗與相關係數分析後，本研究發現：就特質定義而言，導師與資源教師在各評量面向皆有一致性，但家長與導師對行為問題的定義並不一致，且家長與資源教師對認知學習、注意力與過動問題的定義也不一致。從評分標準來說，導師與資源教師在各評量面向也皆有一致性，但家長與兩類教師對人際關係、注意力的評分標準皆不相同。在影響信度的因素部分，「評量情境與評分者配對」可解釋為何家長與教師在特質定義與評分標準的一致性較低；「評量方法或内容」可說明本研究特質定義一致性相對較低的原因；溝通類評分者因素能改善親師在特定評量面向的特質定義或評分標準歧異；知能類評分者因素則近乎無法改善親師間的不一致性。最後，本研究亦提出評量實務與後續研究的相關建議。
    Inter-rater reliability is an important issue as observation assessments are widely utilized to identify the students with emotional and behavioral disorders and evaluate their progress by parents and teachers. However, previous studies often tend to adopt constricted reliability index and seldom explore the factors that may affect the reliability. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trait and category definition consistency among parents, tutors and resource teachers, and to explore the factors affecting the reliability indexes. Subjects were 312 parents, tutors and resource teachers whose child or pupil was the seventh grade resource classroom student with emotional and behavioral disorders. Kappa coefficient, McNemar test and correlational research were conducted. The results revealed that: In the trait definitions, though tutors agreed with resource teachers on every assessment dimension, parents and tutors were not in agreement on behavior problem. And parents and resource teachers were not in agreement on cognitive learning, attention and hyperactivity problems. In the category definitions, tutors still agreed with resource teachers on every assessment dimension. But parents disagreed with the two kinds of teachers on interpersonal relationship and attention problems. As for the factors affecting reliability indexes, assessment situation and rater pair could explain why there was less consistency between parents and teachers. The lower trait definition agreement in this study might be due to assessment method and item content. On specific assessment dimensions, raters` communication could improve the trait or category definition discrepancy between parents and teachers. But rater`s knowledge could hardly improve the discrepancy. Finally, some suggestions about assessment practice and further research were offered.
    Relation: 特教論壇, No.25, pp.46-62
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: https://doi.org/10.6502/SEF.201812_(25).0003
    DOI: 10.6502/SEF.201812_(25).0003
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2350View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback