Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/128633
|
Title: | 私立幼兒園家長之認知價值對其持續選擇意願之影響:以期望確認理論為基礎 The impact of perceived value of private pre-school parents on the intention of continuous select: expectation confirmation model |
Authors: | 羅國誠 Lo, Kuo-Cheng |
Contributors: | 吳政達 郭昭佑 Wu, Cheng-Ta Kuo, Chao-Yu 羅國誠 Lo, Kuo-Cheng |
Keywords: | 私立幼兒園 家長 期望確認 認知價值 滿意度 持續選擇意願 Private Preschool Parent Expectation confirmation Perceived value Satisfaction Repurchasing intention |
Date: | 2019 |
Issue Date: | 2020-02-05 18:08:48 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 本研究以期望確認理論(ECT)為基礎,旨在建構一個私立幼兒園家長的認知價值對其持續選擇意願影響的模型,期能完整解釋家長在選擇私立幼兒園時的期望與認知,而影響其對私立幼兒園的滿意度與持續選擇意願。探究重點包括私立幼兒園家長之期望確認、認知價值、滿意度對其持續選擇意願之間的關係,以及了解不同家長背景之差異。 本研究工具依照理論發展,經專家問卷審查與預試分析後,編制成「私立幼兒園家長之期望確認、認知價值、滿意度對其持續選擇意願之影響」問卷。研究對象為新北市私立幼兒園家長,採立意抽樣,回收有效樣本411份。統計分析方法為描述性統計分析,驗證式因素分析(包括:一階測量模型、組成信度、收斂效度與區別效度),以及結構方程模型(SEM),以得到整合模型的路徑結構與預測能力;完成問卷分析統計後,邀請資深私立幼兒園園長進行質性訪談。透過量化統計與質化訪談,歸結研究結果與建議如下: 一、期望確認理論模型之驗證結果成立。 二、本研究模型之整體模型配適度指標,均達標準,顯示認知價值理論及期望確認理論適合作為私立幼兒園家長持續選擇私立幼兒園意願模型之理論基礎。 三、認知價值在期望確認理論模型中之驗證結果成立,即私立幼兒園家長的期望確認與認知價值對其持續選擇意願有顯著正向影響 四、透過各變項的中介效果分析,發現提升幼生家長對於私立幼兒園之滿意度,始能提高其持續選擇就讀該幼兒園之意願。 五、私立幼兒園家長背景之差異分析: (一)有經過抽籤或面試等程序入園就讀的幼生家長,對於私立幼兒園的期望確認與認知價值程度較高。 (二)不考慮轉讀公立幼兒園的家長對於私立幼兒園在期望確認、認知價值、滿意度與持續選擇意願的程度較高。 (三)幼生母親相較其他親屬對於私立幼兒園有較高的認知價值。 (四)家庭年所得越高者對於私立幼兒園有較高的期望確認。 (五)幼生與雙親同住的家庭對於私立幼兒園有較高的期望確認。 (六)透過親友介紹或網路搜尋幼兒園口碑的家長對於私立幼兒園在期望確認、認知價值、滿意度與持續選擇意願的程度較高。 六、對實務層面之建議 (一)對教育主管機關之建議:多元參與政策修訂過程、落實支持輔導服務系統、在準公共化幼兒園政策中請將私立幼兒園列為實質夥伴關係。 (二)對私立幼兒園經營者之建議:宏觀掌握政策趨勢與市場變動、重視家長滿意度、優化親師互動關係、強化園所經營特色、掌握家長初始期望、持續滿足家長需求、同理家長教養限制、導入專業協助。 (三)對幼生家長之建議:檢視自我盲點、確認教育價值、提升親職能力、多元期望確認、慎思幼兒認知、清楚幼教補助。 七、對未來研究之建議 (一)在幼生家長持續選擇幼兒園的決策過程中,不論是期望確認或認知價值,皆須透過滿意度進而影響家長的持續選擇意願,此實證結果可作為後續相關研究之重要參考。 (二)幼生家長滿意度實為其持續選擇幼兒園就讀之關鍵因素,而滿意度是來自於家長對園所的信任度以及穩定的親師關係。 (三)幼生家長滿意度之歸因,若家長認為是幼兒本身因素造成,即不會對園所的滿意度產生影響,但若是由園所造成,家長對園所的滿意度就會有所影響。 (四)延伸研究時間軸線,建議收集幼生剛入園時與入園一年左右的家長考量因素與想法轉折,以清楚掌握幼生家長在選擇前後的變化情形。 (五)建構衡量滿意度量表,由於滿意度對幼生家長的持續選擇幼兒園意願上具有極高的預測效果,以完整預測家長對於私立幼兒園的持續選擇意願。 This study is based on the expectation confirmation theory (ECT), and aims to construct a model of the influence of the cognitive value of parents in private preschools on their willingness to continue to choose. This study hopes to thoroughly explain how the cognitive value and expectations of parents in private preschools influence their continuous choices and satisfaction toward private preschools. The focus of inquiry includes the relationship between the expectations of parents of private preschools, their cognitive value, and their willingness to continue to choose, as well as understanding the differences of different parents` backgrounds. This research tool was developed in accordance with theory. After the review of expert questionnaires and pre-test analysis, a questionnaire entitled “The Impact of Expectation Confirmation, Cognitive Value, and Satisfaction of Private preschool Parents on Their Consistent Choice Will” was compiled. The research object was the parents of private preschools in New Taipei City. The sample was taken intentionally and 411 valid samples were recovered. Statistical analysis methods are descriptive statistical analysis, validated factor analysis (including: first-order measurement models, composition reliability, convergence validity and discriminant validity), and structural equation model (SEM) to obtain the path structure of the integrated model and Prediction ability; after completing the questionnaire analysis and statistics, senior private preschool principals are invited to conduct qualitative interviews. Through quantitative statistics and qualitative interviews, the research results and recommendations are summarized as follows: 1. Expect to verify the establishment of the expectation confirmation theoretical model. 2. The overall model of this research model is equipped with suitable indicators, which all meet the standards, showing that the cognitive value theory and expectation confirmation theory are suitable as the theoretical basis for the private preschool parents` continuous choice of private preschool willingness model. 3. The verification result of the cognitive value in the expectation confirmation theory model is valid, that is, the expectation confirmation and cognitive value of parents in private preschools have a significant positive impact on their willingness to continue to choose. 4. Through the analysis of the intermediary effects of various variables, it was found that increasing the satisfaction of children’s parents with private preschools can only increase their willingness to continue to choose to attend the preschool. 5. Analysis of differences in parents` backgrounds in private preschools: (1) Parents of young children who have entered the park through lottery or interviews have higher expectations and recognition of private preschools. (2) Parents who do not consider transferring to a public preschool have a higher degree of expectation confirmation, cognitive value, satisfaction, and willingness to continue to choose the private preschool. (3) Compared with other relatives, children’s mothers have higher cognitive value for private preschools. (4) Those with higher family incomes have higher expectations for private preschools. (5) Families with young children and parents have higher expectations for private preschools. (6) Parents who searched for preschools word of mouth through introductions from relatives and friends or online have a higher degree of expectation confirmation, cognitive value, satisfaction, and willingness to continue to choose for private preschools. 6. Suggestions on practical aspect (1) Suggestions for the education authorities: Diversified participation in the policy revision process, implementation of a support counselling service system, and the inclusion of private preschools as a substantive partnership in the quasi-public preschool policy. (2) Suggestions for private preschool operators: macro-control of policy trends and market changes, attention to parental satisfaction, optimization of parent-teacher interactions, strengthening of the characteristics of the school`s operation, mastering of parents` initial expectations, continued satisfaction of parental needs, and sympathize with the limitation on parental education and introduce professional assistance. (3) Suggestions for parents of young children: review self-blind spots, confirm educational value, improve parenting ability, confirm multiple expectations, carefully consider children`s cognition, and understand early childhood education subsidies. 7.Suggestions for future research (1) In the decision-making process of children’s parents` continuous choice of preschool, whether it is expectation confirmation or cognitive value, it is necessary to influence parents` continuous choice willingness through satisfaction, and this empirical result can be used as an important reference for subsequent related research. (2) The satisfaction of children’s parents is the key factor for their continued choice of preschool, and the satisfaction comes from the trust of parents in the preschool and the stable parent-teacher relationship. (3) The attribution of parental satisfaction of young children. If the parents believe that it is caused by children`s own factors, it will not affect the satisfaction of the preschool, but if it is caused by the preschool, parent`s satisfaction with the preschool will be somewhat different. influences. (4) Extending the research timeline, it is recommended to collect the parents` considerations and turning points when the young children enter the preschool and about one year after entering the preschool, in order to clearly understand the changes of the young parents before and after the choice. (5) Construct a scale for measuring satisfaction, because satisfaction has a very high predictive effect on the willingness of young children`s parents to choose a preschool, so as to fully predict the parents` willingness to choose a private preschool. |
Reference: | 壹、中文部分 內政部(2018)。內政部統計處嬰兒出生人數。檢索日期:2018年12月28日,取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/chart.aspx. 王淑英、孫嫚薇(2003)。托育照顧政策中的國家角色。國家政策季刊,4,147-174。 王淑娟、李元恕、黃怡仁、方國定(2008)。建構資訊系統持續使用意圖模式:以中部某大學為實證對象。科技管理學刊,13(4),1-30。 王舒芸、鄭清霞(2014)。我國托育服務供給模式與收費機制之研究。衛生福利部社會及家庭署委託研究期末報告(編號:103006),未出版。 白華枝、張麗君(2013)。以生態理論觀點探討幼兒語言能力發展之因素。南臺學報,38(4),207-228。 全國教保資訊網(2019)。107學年度執行須知。檢索日期:2019年6月10日,取自https://www.ece.moe.edu.tw/?p=7712。 行政院(2018)。我國少子女化對策計畫(107年至111年)(核定本)。臺北市:作者。 行政院主計總處(2017a)。婦女婚育與就業調查報告(資料時期:105 年10 月)。臺北市:作者。 行政院主計總處(2017b)。105年家庭收支調查報告。臺北市:作者。 何昶鴛、李冠緯、李素箱(2012)。使用者對Wii Fit 持續使用意願之探討:期望確認理論之應用。真理大學運動知識學報,9,46-63。 何瑞乾(2017)。臺中市私立幼兒園教師幸福感、組織公民行為與教學效能之相關研究。國立嘉義大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文,嘉義市。 余民寧、李昭鋆(2018)。補救教學中個別化教學對學生學習成效之影響分析。教育科學研究期刊,63(1),247-271。 吳金香、張茂源(2012)。少子女化趨勢下幼兒園經營之探討。學校行政,80,120-137。 李家瑩、方郁惠、吳柏勳(2013)。以期望理論及公平理論探討線上服務失誤補救。電子商務學報,15(3),367-388。 李新民、鄭博真(2014),私立幼兒園教師知覺條件過優、工作滿足感與離職傾向之相關研究。華醫學報,41,33-61。 李宏珍(2016)。幼兒園家長選擇因素與滿意度之研究:以某企業幼兒園研究為例。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,新北市。 汪慧玲、沈佳生(2012),幼兒園教師教導特殊幼兒產生的困擾及因應策略之研究。新竹教育大學教育學報, 29 (1),37-66。 沈龍安(2016)。從《幼兒教育及照顧法》論述幼托整合政策之實施現況。學校行政,101,185-200。 兒童福利聯盟(2013)。2013 年媽媽壓力與育兒政策使用情形調查。檢索日期:2018年12月27日,取自https://www.children.org.tw/news/advocacy_detail/1009 林言同(2011)。私立幼兒園家長滿意度、轉換障礙與轉學意願之關係研究。南台人文社會學報,6,29-57。 林佳芬、李子建(2014)。私立幼兒園課程領導困境及其解決策略之探究:質性研究分析取徑。課程與教學,17(2), 67-92。 林俊瑩、吳百祿(2009)。影響臺灣地區大學生對學校滿意度與忠誠度之因果機制。教育學刊,33,75-114。 林彥汝(2013)。從「圖書館印象」「認知價值」及「讀者體驗」、探討讀者行為意圖之影響因素。國立中興大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文,台中市。 林婉婷(2015)。系統動態觀點下家長選擇幼兒園之意願探討。中華大學科技管理學系碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。 林葙葙、林娟如(2014)。幼兒數學認知診斷評量工具初探。教育學誌,32,1-44。 林彰璿(2013)。高雄市私立幼兒園品牌形象與顧客忠誠度關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所-組織發展與領導班碩士論文,高雄市。 洪淑芬、楊崇宏、周照偉、林建宏、蔡賢亮(2013)。國民小學高年級學生對互動式電子白板教學之學習動機與滿意度研究。數位學習科技期刊,5(1),29-50。 邱嘉玲、魏美惠(2014)。幼托整合對公私立幼兒園影響之初探。幼兒教育年刊,25,163-183。 段慧瑩、馬祖琳(2013)。社會變遷中私立幼兒園未來發展議題與策略探究。幼兒教保研究期刊,10,1-17。 孫扶志(2015)。翻轉幼兒園新世代父母親職教育成效之策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(12),47-51。 翁世航(2017)。你抽中了嗎?四張圖瞭解公私立幼兒園學費對家庭支出的影響。關鍵評論。檢索日期:2018年12月28日。擷取自: https://www.thenewslens.com/article/69621 張育瑋、許秉瑜、蕭文龍、鄭雲珊(2011)。資訊系統的認知價值對使用者滿意度之影響:以期望確認模式為基礎。科技管理學刊,16(2),1-24。 教育部(2011)。孩子的學習樂園。如何選擇幼托園所?臺北市:作者。 教育部(2016)。中華民國教育年報105年。臺北市:作者。 教育部(2018a)。教育部統計處各級學校校數(101-106學年度)。檢索日期:2018年12月28日。擷取自:https://stats.moe.gov.tw/result.aspx?qno=MQAxAA2 教育部(2018b)。106學年原住民族教育概況分析。臺北市:作者。 教育部(2018c)。新住民子女就讀國中小人數分布概況統計-106學年度。臺北市:作者。 教育部(2018d)。「準公共化幼兒園」107學年啟動,增加平價教保服務的多元選擇!檢索日期:2019年6月8日。擷取自:https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=C48AA891713FF810 梁佳蓁(2016)。我國幼兒教保人員專業發展的困境與因應。學校行政,102,99-119。 許麗玲、陳至柔、陳澔輝(2013)。雲端ERP系統服務品質與持續使用意圖之研究。電子商務學報,15(2),195-233 陳志泓(2013)。雲嘉地區幼兒園服務品質,知覺價值,滿意度及家長忠誠度之研究。南華大學幼兒教育學系碩士論文,嘉義縣。 陳煇煌、李宗翰、陳世智、黃維信(2012)。擴充資訊系統後續使用模型:以公路防救災資訊系統為例之實證研究。電子商務研究,10(4),409-426。 陳建文、陳美文(2006)。圖書館服務品質對使用者滿意度與再使用意願之研究:以某大學為例。教育資料與圖書館學,44(1),61-82。 陳建興(2018)。私立幼兒園以食農教育作為招生行銷策略之分析。國立臺灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文,台北市。 陳英豪、何韻儀(2016)。父母參與親子數學活動與其幼兒邏輯數學智能之相關研究。南亞學報,36,369-398。 陳淑珍(2018)。新竹縣六家高鐵地區私立幼兒園園長知識領導與創新經營效能之研究。國立清華大學教育與學習科技學系碩士論文,新竹市。 曾智豐(2012)。知覺價值、學業成就、期望不一致對學校滿意度之研究-以國小學童為例。教育理論與實踐學刊,25,29-56。 湯梓辰、周靜羚、許淑英、許淑裕(2012)。落實幼小銜接之基本能力評量融入園本課程研究。臺灣教師專業發展學會學刊,1,117-156。 馮燕(1997)。托育服務:生態觀點的分析。臺北:巨流。 馮燕(2009)。從生態觀點看幼兒托育發展。幼兒教保研究期刊,3,1-13。 黃侑華(2013)。家長對幼兒的學習期望與期望確認之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育所碩士論文,台北市。 黃娟娟、楊淑朱(2015)。雲嘉南地區不同年代私立幼兒園存在意義與經營之挑戰。幼兒教保研究期刊,15,33-60。 黃惠芳(2015)。幼兒園實施親職教育十個困境。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(12),58-59。 黃若飴(2007)。探討性別和不同性質體育課程下教導方式、學習動機及學習策略與大學生桌球課學習滿意度之間的關係。台灣運動心理學報,10,15-36。 楊于萱、周淑惠(2010)。臺灣幼兒園園長課程領導之個案研究。教育資料集刊,45,27-57。 楊素婷、陳殷哲(2018)。建構私立幼兒園服務品質指標之研究。經營管理學刊,15,1-23。 詹孟潔(2015)。Parents Education or Educate Parents?。臺灣教育評論月刊,4(12),12-13。 詹俊成(2011)。臺北市高中職學生體育課班級氣氛與學習動機對學習滿意度之影響。體育學報,44(3),437-457。 維基百科(2018)。總和生育率。檢索日期:2018年12月28日,取自https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E6%80%BB%E5%92%8C% E7%94%9F%E8%82%B2%E7%8E%87 蔡育佑(2003)。聽覺障礙學生體育課學習滿意度調查研究。特殊教育學報, 17, 177-192。 劉乙儀、張瑞村、范雨潔(2015)。臺灣幼兒園教師專業發展之困境與展望。學校行政,96,196-215。 劉宗哲、郭嶷、李沃慶(2000)。知覺價值與轉換障礙如何影響再購意願:以行動電話服務之整合模型與實證研究為例。管理與系統,17(4),559-583。 劉秀枝(2011)。私立幼兒園教師職場幸福感與工作滿意度之關係研究。幼兒教保研究期刊,6,頁87-115。 劉慈惠(2006)。學前幼兒被期待學些什麼?以兩所幼稚園家長為例。師大學報:教育類,51(1),131-158。 劉寧(2016)。影響幼兒家長使用M-learning意願之研究:以微信公眾號為例。國立政治大學幼兒教育所碩士論文,台北市。 歐宇峰(2018)。幼兒園、安親班經營FACEBOOK粉絲團的消費者知覺價值與對於忠誠度的影響。育達科技大學兒童教育暨事業經營產業系碩士論文,苗栗縣。 廖則竣、郭溥淵、陶蓓麗、鍾儀君(2012)。健康資訊網站持續使用意向之研究。電子商務研究,10(2),145-168。 蔡俊傑、吳進堆(2013)。精熟動機氣候方案在幼兒體能教學設計之研究。國立臺灣體育運動大學學報,4,31-51。 蕭文龍、郭庭伊(2010)。部落客持續使用部落格之研究:以整合期望確認、科技接受模式和個人因素觀點探討。電子商務學報,12(2),221-249 。 謝亞恆、林俊瑩(2007)。社會網絡、學校教學品質與學校滿意度之關聯性:以臺灣地區大學生為例。臺東大學教育學報,18(1),107-139。 謝亞恆、林俊瑩(2011)。學校永續經營的關鍵—家長對學前幼兒就讀園所忠誠度的影響因素分析。教育與社會研究, 23, 1-40。 簡楚瑛(2002)。一個台北市私立幼兒園的改變-生態系統理論的應用。教育與心理研究,25(2),279-306。 顏嘉辰(2016)。幼兒園教注音的迷思。通識在線,63,28-29。 蘇瑞蓮、金喆(2009)。知覺價格、服務品質、知覺價值、滿意度與忠誠度關係之探討-以安親班為例。聯大學報,6(2),283-306。 顧宜錚、李家瑩、黃相翎(2013)。有服務品質就足夠嗎?顧客體驗對網站滿意度之影響。中山管理評論,21(3),479-509。 貳、英文部分 Aaker, D. A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1979). Unobservable variables in structural equation models with an application in industrial selling. Journal of Marketing Research, 147-158. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural Equation Modeling in practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. Bagozzi, R., & Edwards, J. (1998). A General Approach for Representing Constructs in Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1). 45-87. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 2(3), 351-370. Bolton, R. N., & Drew, J. H. (1999). A multistage model of customers` assessments of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 375-384. Briggs, N. (2006). Estimation of the standard error and confidence interval of the indirect effect in multiple mediator models. The Ohio State University, Columbus. Chen, C. P., Lai, H. M., & Ho, C. Y. (2015). Why do teachers continue to use teaching blogs? The roles of perceived voluntariness and habit. Computers & Education, 82, 236-249. Chen, F. C., & Tsai, M. H. (2008). Perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty of TV travel product shopping: Involvement as a moderator. Tourism Management, 29, 1166–1171. Chen, N. S., Wei, C. W., Kinshuk, & Chen, Y. R. (2008). Classroom climate and learning effectiveness in holistic blended learning environments. International Journal on Digital Learning Technology, 1(1), 72-92. Chin, W. W. (1998). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 22(1), 7-16. Churchill, G. A. Jr,(1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64-73. Frederick, F. R., & Sasser, W. E. (1996). Zero defections: Quality comes to services. Harvard Business Review, 72(2), 57-69. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50. Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18, 233-239. Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46-59. Hair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R, L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hair, Jr. J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R, L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420. Hilton, A. & Armstrong, R. A. (2006). Is one set of data more variable than another? Microbiologist, 7(2), 34-36. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. Huang, Y. W., & Wang, Y. S. (2015). Factors Affecting Students` Continued Usage Intention Toward Business Simulation Games: An Empirical Study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 260-283. Jones, T. O., & Sasser, W. E. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review, 73(6), 88-99. Katz, R.W. (1993). Dynamic cost–loss ratio decision-making model with an auto correlated climate variable. Journal of Climate, 6, 151–160. Kenny, D. A. (2006). Series editor’s note. In T. A. Brown (Ed.), Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (pp. ix–x). New York: Guilford. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. Kotler, P. (1972). A generic concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 36(2), 46-54. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Lehman, A., O`Rourke, N., Hatcher, L., & Stepanski, E. J. (2005). JMP for Basic Univariate And Multivariate Statistics: A Step-by-step Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Press. Lin, H. H., & Wang, Y. S. (2006). An Examination of the Determinants of Customer Loyalty in Mobile Commerce Contexts”. Information & Management, 43(3), 271-282 Lin, J., Wang, B., Wang, N., & Lu, Y. (2014).Understanding the evolution of consumer trust in mobile commerce: a longitudinal study. Information Technology Management, 15(1), 37-49. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99-128. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83-104. Melone, N. P. (1990). A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research. Management Science, 36(1), 76-91. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469. Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of marketing, 63, 33-44. Hussain, R., Nasser, A. A., & Hussain, Y. K. (2014). Service quality and customer satisfaction of a UAE-based airline: An empirical investigation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15, 1-9. Segars, A. H. (1997). Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement: A paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research. Omega, 25(1), 107-121. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422-445. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why We Buy What We Buy: A Theory of Consumption Values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Aysmptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290-212). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss. Sobel, M. E. (1986). Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 159-186). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association. Sukwadi, R., & Yang, C. C. (2012). The Critical Service Attributes in Higher Education: How to Prioritize Them? International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 23(4), 449-470. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer Perceived Value: the Development of A Multiple Item Scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203-220. Tam, L. M. (2004). Customer Satisfaction, Service Quality and Perceived Value: An Integrative Model. Journal of Marketing Management, 20, 897-917. Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Thomas, A. S. (1995). After all you’ve done for your customers, why are they still not happy? Fortune, 139(12), 178-182. Williams, J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Resampling and distribution of the product methods for testing indirect effects in complex models. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 23-51. Zabell, S. L. (2008). The probable error of a mean. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481), 1-7. Zeithaml, V. A. (1981). How consumer evaluation processes differ between goods and services (2thed.). New Jersey: Prenyice Hall. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence, Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22. |
Description: | 博士 國立政治大學 教育學系 104152504 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104152504 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU202000032 |
Appears in Collections: | [教育學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
250401.pdf | 2822Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 0 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|