English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113325/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51190540      Online Users : 907
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/127708


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127708


    Title: 論我國企業併購法中規範之特別委員會制度
    The Special Committee under Taiwan Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act
    Authors: 周振鋒
    Chou, Cheng-Fong
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 企業併購法;特別委員會;受任人義務;合併;公開收購;獨立專家;獨立董事;控制股東;董事會
    Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act;Special Committee;Fiduciary Duty;Merger;Tender Offer;Independent Advisor;Independent Director;Controlling Shareholder;Board of Directors
    Date: 2017-01
    Issue Date: 2019-12-04 14:50:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 依2015年通過之企業併購法第六條，公開發行股票之公司於召開董事會決議併購事項前，除設有審計委員會者，否則即應設置特別委員會。特別委員會應聘請獨立專家協助就併購條件之合理性提供意見，審議本次併購計畫與交易之公平性與合理性，再將審議結果提報董事會及股東會。特別委員會應由與併購案不具利害關係之人組成，經特別委員會審議後，即能沖淡潛在之利益衝突，間接維護股東權益。特別委員會制度主要係參考美國判例法而來，強調沖淡利害衝突功能，但此功能發揮前提需確保特別委員會具有實質審查權與獨立性，但觀我國目前法規設計仍對此二者有諸多不合之處，令人質疑其是否能發揮預期功能。故本文擬以特別委員會新制為題，以比較法之角度探討我國之特別委員會制度設計缺陷與未來施行可能面臨之問題，供我國法規未來改進之參考。
    According to Article 6 of Taiwan Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act (＂M&A Act＂) which was amended in 2015, to establish a special committee is required for a public company in M&A transactions. The committee should hire independent advisors offering opinions with respect to fairness and reasonableness of the proposed transaction and then should determine whether the transaction is fair and reasonable to the company and its shareholders. The committee should submit its opinion to the board of directors and shareholders` meeting for reference. As the committee is consisted of independent and disinterested persons, the problem of potential conflict of interest can be avoided so as to protect shareholders` interests. This type of institution is derived from U.S. law, but current setting under M&A Act cannot fully reflect the U.S. counterpart. This article will analyze the problems and drawbacks, theoretically and practically, from U.S. law`s perspective.
    Relation: 國立中正大學法學集刊, No.54, pp.115-157
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2393View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback