政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/127336
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51016685      線上人數 : 894
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/127336


    題名: 西漢初期知識分子對「秦」的言論
    The Intellectual`s Discourses on the Qin Dynasty in the Early Former Han
    作者: 工藤卓司
    貢獻者: 東亞觀念史集刊
    關鍵詞: 秦;西漢初期;知識分子;政治思想;禮學
    日期: 2016-12
    上傳時間: 2019-11-20 15:52:44 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 公元前二二一年，秦滅六國建立中國歷史上第一個集權帝國。然而，秦政權卻僅僅維持十五年便滅亡了。到了漢代，不少知識分子對秦朝興亡之故多所討論。他們在秦朝興亡史中觀察到何種道理？「秦」這一歷史經驗帶給他們何種思考？本文以陸賈、賈誼、賈山、韓嬰、鼂錯及張釋之的言論為主，整理了漢初知識分子對「秦」的論述，並探討這些論述與他們的思想以及社會背景之關係。本文結論主要指出以下三點：一、漢初知識分子雖同樣批評秦朝，但他們的切入點各有不同：陸賈偏重「仁義道德」的觀點；賈誼訴求「禮義」與政治制度改革的需要；賈山促使漢文帝反省自己行為與君臣的關係；韓嬰借秦事使諸侯王了解「民之人情」與「禮義」的重要；鼂錯與張釋之所批評的鋒芒則指向「吏」。以上論點，乃是基於他們一方面受所處時間與空間的約束，另一方面則受「秦」的歷史經驗所限制。二、漢初知識分子批判秦朝時，在文字上雖看似在「評判歷史」，但他們的重點尚多在「評判現實政治」；而他們以「秦」為「漢」鑑時則採取以下兩種視角：（一）以「秦」與「漢」對置；（二）以「秦」與「漢」重合。三、先進研究嘗指出《荀子》對漢代諸子思想頗有影響，然而，本文認為賈誼與韓嬰亦受到《管子》影響，此點在漢代禮學史上亦非常值得注意。
    In B.C.221, the Qin Lord destroyed the other six Influential Lords of the Zhanguo period, and founded the first dominate empire in Chinse history; although the Qin dynasty fell into ruin only 15 years later. In the Han period, many intellectuals argued the reasons for the Qin dynasty to rise and fall in these short years. This article offers Lu Jia, Jia Yi, Jia Shan, Han Ying, Chao Cuo, and Zhan Shizhi as examples, sorts the discourses regarding the Qin dynasty in the early Former Han period, and discusses the relationship between these discourses, their thoughts and social backgrounds. In conclusion, this article points out three issues: 1. The intellectuals in the early Former Han period similarly criticized the Qin dynasty, although their points of view were not similar. 2. When the intellectuals in the early Former Han criticized the Qin dynasty, their discourse focused on ＂historical judgement;＂ however, most placed emphasis on ＂political judgement.＂ Then, when they took the warnings of the Qin dynasty for the Han dynasty, they had two visual angles: (1) Contrasted Qin and Han; (2) Overlapped Qin and Han. 3. Most previous researches only emphasized Xun zi`s effect on the intellectuals of the Former Han period; however, this paper thinks that Jia Yi and Han Ying were also influenced by Guan zi. In studies on Li of the Han period, we cannot minimize this point.
    關聯: 東亞觀念史集刊, 11, 137-185
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[東亞觀念史集刊] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    index.html0KbHTML2294檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋