Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/126590
|
| Title: | 有別於西歐的東亞經驗：臺灣移工政策設計的考察（1980-2016）
A Distinct East Asian Experience From Western Europe’s: A Study of Migrant Labor Policy Design in Taiwan (1980-2016) |
| Authors: | 劉濬誠
Liu, Jun-Cheng |
| Contributors: | 蘇偉業
So, Wai-Yip
劉濬誠
Liu, Jun-Cheng |
| Keywords: | 移工政策
政策設計
標的團體的身分
東亞經驗
Migrant labor policy
Policy design
Target population of identity
East Asian experience |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-10-03 17:19:41 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 1950年代的西歐與1980年代後的東亞國家，皆因應勞力短缺問題而採用移工政策，但西歐的移工政策終結後，許多移工滯留在國內，發展出保障移工權利與歸化成國民的移民面向，東亞國家則是長期維持在強調暫時性、補充性的移工政策上，兩個地區呈現了不同的政策軌跡。
本文嘗試透過臺灣經驗個案的考察，回答「是否存在一個有別於西歐的東亞經驗」的提問。在學術上回顧了東西方政策經驗的相關論辯，我們指出，過往以自由國家、全球化制度主義、發展型國家以及族裔同質性的理論觀點，並不足以解釋東亞移工政策的發展邏輯。本文採中層的分析取徑，引入Schneider與Ingram提出的政策設計與社會建構理論，並整合移工政策的相關研究，發展商品、人、國民的標的團體身分概念，建構移工政策設計的分析架構。
本文藉由歷史分析法與論述分析法，蒐集臺灣移工政策的媒體與歷史資料，提出商品化與去商品化的移工政策設計兩個不同的歷史階段。前者強調移工商品與資本家利益主導了政策設計，促使移工政策合法化，並延續至今；後者則指仲介與移工（人）主導政策設計，解釋2007年的直聘制度與2016年的《就業服務法》第五十二條的修法歷程，以及近年來保障移工權利政策興起的原因。
最後，本文討論了臺灣移工政策的未來方向，保守地推論，臺灣受到政策設計的僵固性與移工定居的動機影響，很難出現類似西歐移民面向的結果。同時，本文亦論證日韓兩國與台灣在未來發展的相似性。本文認為，有別於西歐的東亞經驗基本上是存在的。
Facing labor shortage, West Europe and East Asia adopted a migrant labor policy (MLP) in the 1950s and the 1980s respectively. However, the MLP was terminated in West Europe in the 1970s, but a considerable number of the migrant labor did not go back to their home countries and further secured citizenship after the 1990s in host countries. By contrast, the East Asian counterparts still sustain the status of the migrant labor as temporary workers, not allowing them to acquire citizenship. It seems to be a distinct policy trajectory from Europe’s.
This study makes use of Taiwan as a case to answer a question: “Is there a distinct East Asian experience from Western Europe’s?” This study argues that the existing literature focuses more on macro-level than meso-level variables. For example, some scholars test whether the theories developed from the migrant labor policy in Europe since the 1950s can apply to East Asia, including liberal state and global institutionalism. Others use the “developmental state theory” to examine the East Asian experience, emphasizing effectiveness of “ideology of economic supremacy”.
This study proposes the “migrant labor policy design framework” as an alternative perspective. In addition, it also argues that existing policy design literature overlooks the multi-dimensional identity of migrant labor. This study tries to build up the concept of “target population of identity” to illustrate this point.
By adopting a historical analysis and a discourse analysis, this study proposes two different identity development stages for the MLP in Taiwan. The first is the “migrant labor as commodity” from 1980 to 1992. The second is the “migrant labor as human” after the 1993 to the present.
Finally, this study assesses the future policy direction for Taiwan, arguing for policy similarity among Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. It conjectures that it is not much possible for East Asia to repeat the West Europe’s experience in the future. |
| Reference: | 王力行（1993）。無愧：郝柏村的政治之旅，台北：天下文化出版公司。
王宏仁、白朗潔（2007）。移工、跨國仲介與制度設計：誰從台越國際勞動力流動獲利? 。臺灣社會研究季刊，65，35-66。
王振寰（1989）。臺灣的政治轉型與反對運動，臺灣社會研究季刊，2（1），71-116。
王振寰（1993）。臺灣新政商關係的形成與政治轉型。臺灣社會研究季刊，14，123-163。
王振寰（1996）。誰統治臺灣？ 轉型中的國家機器與權力結構。臺北：巨流。
王振寰（1997）。跨國界區域經濟形成的統理機制：以臺灣資本外移南中國為例，臺灣社會研究季刊，27，1-36。
王振寰（2003）。全球化與後進國家: 兼論東亞的發展路徑與轉型。臺灣社會學刊，31，1-45.
王振寰、方孝鼎（1992）。國家機器、勞工政策與勞工運動。臺灣社會研究季刊，13，1-29。
王朝枝（2000）。臺灣工業團體特質與演變之探討。國立政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北。
王潔媛、楊培珊（2018）。「客工」？臺灣小型長期照顧機構外籍看護工之照顧勞動。社會政策與社會工作學刊，22（2），95-134。
丘延亮（2009）。移工運動形成與工運中的民族主義論述。世新大學社會發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
出井康博（2018）。絕望工廠 日本：外國留學生與實習生的「現代奴工」實錄，陳令嫻（譯），台北：光現出版。譯自ルポ ニッポン絶望工場，2016。
行政院新聞局（1991)。行政院郝院長言論集。臺北：行政院新聞局。
何明修（2008）。沒有階級認同的勞工運動：臺灣的自主工會與兄弟義氣的極限。臺灣社會研究季刊，72，49-91
何明修、蕭新煌（2006）。臺灣全志．卷九，社會志，社會運動篇。南投：臺灣文獻館。
吳介民（1997）。經貿躍進，政治僵持？後冷戰時代初期兩岸關係的基調與變奏。臺灣政治學刊，1，211-255。
吳永毅（2007）。無HOME可歸：公私反轉與外籍家勞所受之時空排斥的個案研究。臺灣社會研究季刊，66，1-74。
吳佳玫（2000）。臺灣中小企業政商關係現狀與影響。國立成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南。
吳惠林、張清溪（1991）。臺灣地區的勞力短缺與外籍勞工問題，臺北：中華經濟研究所
吳靜如（2005）。新奴工制度。臺灣外勞政策研討會，臺北。
宋家瑜（2016）。臺灣移工文學場域的生成：以文學獎為例。國立清華大學臺灣文學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹。
李允傑（1999）。臺灣工會政策的政治經濟分析。台北：商鼎文化。
李誠（1975）。臺灣現階段勞動短缺之研究。載於李誠（編）。臺灣人力資源論文集（153-192頁），臺北：聯經。
李誠（2007）。外勞在臺灣經濟發展過程中所扮演的角色。載於羅紀琼（編），臺灣外籍勞工研究（9-43頁）。臺北：中央經濟研究院
汪鑑雄（2000）。牧童‧博士‧火車頭─趙守博的成長、苦學與耕耘。新北：正中書局。
周平（2015）。論述分析。載於 瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（編），社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法（93-130頁）。臺北：東華書局。
周素卿、陳東升（2001）。後進者的全球化：東南亞臺灣企業地域生產網絡的建構與對外投資經驗。都市與計劃，28（4），421-459。
周添城（1992）。權力邊陲的中小企業。載於蕭新煌等人（編），解剖臺灣經濟—威權體制下的壟斷與剝削。臺北：前衛出版社。
林如昕（2009）。政黨輪替後的外勞政策，2000-2006。國立臺灣大學政治研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
林忠正（1991）。臺灣勞動市場的最近發展。載於賴澤涵、黃俊傑（編），光復後臺灣地區發展經驗（頁239-260）。臺北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
林祖嘉、黃啟宏（2006）。對外投資與勞動結構調整：臺灣的實證分析。人文及社會科學集刊，18（1），171-214。
林國明（2015）。歷史研究法。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（編），社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法（173-218頁）。臺北：東華書局。
林萬億（2012）。臺灣的社會福利：歷史與制度的分析（二版）。臺北：五南
武黎全科（2017）。東藏西躲的漂泊生活：越南籍勞工在臺灣的「逃逸機制」。東亞研究，48（2），91-126。
范雅鈞（2008）。戰後臺灣勞工運動史料彙編(三) ─ 工運組織與工運事件。臺北：國史館
倪炎元（2005）。再現的政治：臺灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析。臺北：韋伯。
倪炎元（2012）。批判論述分析的定位爭議及其應用問題：以 Norman Fairclough 分析途徑為例的探討。新聞學研究，110，1-42。
夏曉鵑（2014）。跨國草根移工運動的形成：香港「亞洲移工協調會」案例研究。臺灣社會研究季刊，96，1-47。
徐正光(1989)。從異化到自主：臺灣勞工運動的基本性格。載於徐正光、宋文里（編），臺灣新興社會運動（103-126頁）。臺北：巨流。
張威儀（2012）。臺灣勞動體制的剝削本質-歷史制度主義的觀點。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。
張書銘（2019）。越南移工：國家勞動輸出政策及其社會發展意涵。臺北：五南。
張清溪（1995）。八○年代後期勞工短缺與相關的勞動市場問題，載於于宗先（編）。臺灣人力資源論文集（續）。臺北：聯經。
張筵儀、王俊元、吳政峰（2011）。政策設計，公部門網絡治理與標的人口社會建構之移轉-毒品危害防制政策之分析。競爭力評論，14，73-100。
梁莉芳（2019)。結構性脆弱的悲歌：外籍漁工的日常工作與健康經驗。人文及社會科學集刊，31（2），263-300。
莊文忠（1997）。政策設計理論的建構：全面性（Holistic）觀點初探。國立臺灣大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
陳宗韓（1999）。臺灣外籍勞工政策的政治經濟分析。國立臺灣大學三民主義研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北。
陳菊（2001）。植基於勞動人權與勞動競爭力之臺灣外籍勞工政策。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文，未出版，高雄。.
曾嬿芬（2004）。引進外籍勞工的國族政治。臺灣社會學刊，32，1-58。
曾嬿芬（2006）。誰可以打開國界的門? 移民政策的階級主義。臺灣社會研究季刊，61，73-107。
曾嬿芬（2007）。研究移住/居臺灣：社會學研究現況。臺灣社會研究季刊，66，75-103。
游美惠（2000）。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究，8，5-42。
焦興鎧（2004）。從國際勞動基準論歐洲聯盟對外籍勞工人權之保障。歐美研究，34（1），95-141。
黃文志（2016）。我國非法人口移動之現況與犯罪偵查。載於林盈君等（編），國土安全與移民政策—人權與安全的多元議題探析（87-139頁）。臺北：威秀資訊。
黃秀端、林政楠（2014）。移民權利、移民管制與整合─入出國及移民法在立法院修法過程的分析。臺灣民主季刊，11（3），83-133.
黃宗昊（2004）。臺灣政商關係的演變：歷史制度論分析。問題與研究，43（4），35-72
葉秋紅（2009）。在台外籍移工的匯款、消費行為以及對臺灣品牌產品接受度之分析。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
董安琪（2015）。全球化下臺灣產業的轉型－空洞化抑或升級？。載於李誠、蕭代基、吳中書、王健全（編），于宗先院士及臺灣經濟發展政策（頁227-269）。臺北：中央研究院經濟研究所、中華經濟研究院。
趙剛（1995）。1987年的臺灣工會、國家與工運：以遠化工會的個案為例。載於徐正光、蕭新煌（編），臺灣的國家與社會（頁 115-150）。臺北：東大出版社。
劉宜君、辛炳隆（2009）。我國外籍勞工引進與名額配置因素之探討：政策德菲法之應用。政大勞動學報，24，133-177。
劉梅君（2000）。「廉價外勞」論述的政治經濟學批判。臺灣社會研究季刊，38，59-90。
劉梅君（2009）。兩公約國際審查後，移工人權保障的下一步在哪兒?，2019年8月10日，取自https://hre.pro.edu.tw/article/3896。
潘淑雯（2003）。我國外籍勞工政策制定過程-政策綱絡的分析。國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。
蔡宏進（1990）。我國外籍勞工可能引發的社會問題及因應對策。臺北：行政院研究考核委員會。
蔡明璋、陳嘉慧（1997）。國家、外勞政策與市場實踐：經濟社會學的分析。臺灣社會研究季刊，27，69-93。
鄭津津（2008）。從國際勞工組織相關公約與建議書看我國外籍勞工人權保障問題。臺灣國際法季刊，5（3），131-153。
賴建寰（2016）。臺灣 1980 年代政治反對運動與勞工運動：以勞支會為中心 （1982-1989）。國立政治大學臺灣史研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北。
謝國興（1999）。台南幫：一個臺灣本土企業集團的興起。臺北：遠流出版公司。
瞿宛文（2017）。臺灣戰後經濟發展的源起：後進發展的為何與如何。臺北：聯經。
簡曉娟（2011）。暴動? 抗暴? 論移工團體與新聞媒體對高捷泰勞事件的意義建構與互動分析。臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文，未出版，臺北。
藍佩嘉（2008）。跨國灰姑娘：當東南亞幫傭遇上臺灣新富家庭。臺北：行人文化實驗室。
藍於琛（2004）。荷蘭與德國統合主義式改革的政治經濟分析。國立政治大學政治學研究所博士論文，未出版，臺北。
蘇瑞祥（1998）。公共政策設計-理論與經驗分析。臺北：龍騰出版社。
顧玉玲（2009）。移工運動的主體形塑：以「家事服務法」推動過程為例。臺灣社會研究季刊，74，343-365。
龔尤倩（2002）。外勞政策的利益結構與翻轉的行政實驗初探－以台北市的外勞行政、文化實踐為例。臺灣社會研究季刊，48，235-285。
龔尤倩（2008）。客工制度安魂曲？－由臺灣與德國客工政策的比較談起，載於夏曉鵑、陳信行、黃德北（編），跨界流離―全球化下的移民與移工（上冊）（頁243-273）。臺北：臺灣社會研究雜誌社。
Abella, M. I. (1995). Asian labour migration: Past, present, and future. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 12(2), 125-135.
Amsden, A. H. (1989). Asia`s next giant: South Korea and late industrialization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Athukorala, P. C. (2006). International labour migration in East Asia: Trends, patterns and policy issues. Asian‐Pacific Economic Literature, 20(1), 18-39.
Bartram, D. (2000). Japan and labor migration: Theoretical and methodological implications of negative cases. International Migration Review, 34(1), 5-32.
Bartram, D. (2005). International labor migration: Foreign workers and public policy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Battistella, G. (2014). Migration in Asia: In search of a theoretical framework. In G. Battistella(Ed.), Global and Asian perspectives on international migration (pp. 1-25). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
Berger, P. L., & T. Luckmann (1966). The Social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
Bonjour, S. (2011). The power and morals of policy makers: Reassessing the control gap debate. International Migration Review, 45(1), 89-122.
Bonjour, S. (2016). Speaking of rights: The influence of law and courts on the making of family migration policies in Germany. Law & Policy, 38(4), 328-348.
Borjas, G. J. (1989). Economic theory and international migration. International Migration Review, 23, 457-485.
Borjas, G. J. (2016). We wanted workers: Unraveling the immigration narrative. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
Boswell, C. (2003). European migration policies in flux: Changing patterns of inclusion and exclusion. London, UK: Blackwell Publishing
Boswell, C. (2007). Theorizing migration policy: Is there a third way? International Migration Review, 41(1),75-100.
Brubaker, R. (1995). Comments on “modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states”. International Migration Review, 29(4), 903-908.
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. New York, NY: Routledge.
Campbell, A. L.(2012) Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351.
Castells, M. (1998). End of Millennium. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Castle, S. (1986). The guest-worker in Western Europe - An obituary. The International Migration Review, 20(4), 761-778.
Castle, S. (2001). International migration and the nation-state in Asia. In Siddique, M. A. B.(Ed.), International migration in the 21st century(pp. 178-201). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Castle, S., H. Booth, & T. Wallace (1984). Here for good: Western Europe’s new ethnic miniority. London, UK: Pluto Press.
Castles, S., & A. Davidson (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalization and the politics of belonging. London, UK: Psychology Press.
Castles, S., & G. Kosack (1973). Immigrant workers and class structure in Western Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Chang, C. H. (1988). A economic analysis of guest workers in Taiwan. Conference on Labor and Economic Development. Taipei: Chunghua Institution for Economic Research.
Chiavacci, D. (2007). External autonomous, but internally deadlocked: The gap between foreign worker policy and real development in Japan. Retrieve August, 10, 2019, from https://www.jil.go.jp/profile/documents/Chiavacci2007.pdf.
Chin, R. (2007). The guest worker question in postwar Germany. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cholewinski, R. (1994). The Protection of the right of economic migrants to family reunion in Europe. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 43(3), 568–598.
Chung, E, A. (2014). Japan and South Korea: Immigration control and immigrant incorporation, In J. F. Hollifield, P. H. Martin, P. M. Orrenius(Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective(3 rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Standard University Press.
Cornelius, W. A, & T. Tsuda (2004).Controlling immigration: The limits of government intervention. In W. A., Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L., Martin & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective (2nd ed.). (pp.3-50). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Cornelius, W. A., P. L. Martin & J. F Hollifield (1994). Introduction: The ambivalent quest for immigration control. In W. A. Cornelius, P. L. Martin & J. E. Hollifield(Eds.), Controlling immigration: A global perspective(pp.3-43). CA: Standford University Press.
deLeon, P. (2005) Social construction for public policy. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 635-37.
DiAlto, S. J.（2005）From ‘problem minority’to ‘model minority’: The changing social construction of Japanese Americans. In A. L. Schneider & H. M. Ingram(Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy(pp. 81-103). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Donvan, M. C. (1993). Social constructions of people with AIDS: Target populations and United States policy, 1981–1990. Review of Policy Research, 12(3‐4), 3-29.
Dryzek, J. S., & B. Ripley.(1988). The ambitions of policy design. Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 705-719.
Edelman M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ellermann, A. (2013). When can liberal states avoid unwanted immigration? Self-limited sovereignty and guest worker recruitment in Switzerland and Germany. World Politics, 65(3), 491-538.
Ellermann, A. (2015). Do policy legacies matter? Past and present guest worker recruitment in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(8), 1235-1253.
Evans, P. B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Franzosi, R. (1987). The press as a source of socio-historical data: Issues in the methodology of data collection from newspapers. Historical methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 20, 5-16.
Freeman, G. P, & J. Mo (1996). Japan and the Asian NICs as new countries of destination. In P. J Lloyd & L. S Williams (Ed.), International trade and migration in the APEC Region (pp. 156–173). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, G. P. (1979). Immigrant labor and racial conflict in industrial societies: The French and British experience, 1945–1975. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Freeman, G. P. (1995). Modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states. International Migration Review, 29(4), 881-902.
Garon, G. (2015). Policy-making for immigration and integration in Québec: Degenerative politics or business as usual? Policy studies, 36(5), 487-506.
Goss, J. & B. Lindquist (2000). Placing movers: An overview of the Asian-Pacific migration system. The Contemporary Pacific, 12(2), 385-414.
Griffin, L. J. (1993). Narrative, event-structure analysis, and causal interpretation in historical sociology. American journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1094-1133.
Guiraudon, V. (2000). European Courts and foreigners’ rights: A comparative study of norms diffusion. International Migration Review, 34, 1088–1125.
Guiraudon, V., & G. Lahav (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative political studies, 33(2), 163-195.
Gurowitz, A. (1999). Mobilizing international norms: Domestic actors, migrants, and the Japanese state. World Politics, 51(3), 413–445.
Hammar, T. (Ed.). (1985). European immigration policy: A comparative study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heinmiller, B. T., M. A. Hennigar., & S. Kopec (2017). Degenerative politics and youth criminal justice policy in Canada. Politics & Policy, 45(3), 405-431
Herbert, U. (1990). A history of foreign labor in Germany, 1880-1980: Seasonal workers, forced laborers, guest workers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Translated form Geschichte der Ausländerbeschäftigung in Deutschland, 1880 bis 1980.
Hoffmann-Nowotny, H. J. (1985). Switzerland. In T. Hammar (Ed.), European immigration policy: A comparative study(pp. 206-236). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political studies, 48(4), 706-723.
Hollifield, J. F. (1986). Immigration policy in France and Germany: Outputs versus outcomes. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 485(1), 113-128.
Hollifield, J. F. (1992). Immigrants, markets, and states: The political economy of postwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Hollifield, J. F. (2004). The emerging migration state. International Migration Review, 38(3), 885-912.
Hollifield, J. F., & T. K. Wong (2014).The Politics of international migration: How can We ‘bring the state back in? In C. B. Brettell & J. F. Hollifield (Eds.), Migration Theory: Talking across disciplines(pp. 227-88).New York, NY: Routledge.
Hollifield, J., P. L. Martin, & P. Orrenius (Eds.) (2014). Controlling immigration: A global perspective(3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hsiao, H. H. M. (1988). An East Asian development model: Empirical explorations, In P. L. Berger & H. H. M. Hsiao (Eds.). In Search of an East Asian development model(pp. 12-23). New Brunswick, NJ: Transction Books.
Hugo, G. (1998). Theory and reality in Asia and the Pacific. In D. Massey (Ed.), Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium (pp. 160–195). New York, NY: Clarendon press
ILO (2015). ILO Global estimates on migrant workers: Results and methodology - Special focus on migrant domestic workers Retrieved July 22, 2018, from http://www.refworld.org/docid/5672bc6f4.html
Ingram, H., deLeon, P., & Schneider, A. (2016). Conclusion: Public policy theory and democracy: The elephant in the corner. In B. G. Peters & Z. Philippe (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy (pp. 175-200). London: Palgrave Macmillan
Iwabuchi, K., H. M. Kim, & H. C. Hsia (2016). Rethinking multiculturalism from a trans-East-Asian perspective. In K. Iwabuchi, H. M. Kim, & H. C. Hsia (Eds.), Multiculturalism in East Asia: A transnational exploration of Japan, South Korea and Taiwan (pp. 1-17). London, NY: Rowman & Littlefield International Press.
Jacobson, D. (1996). Rights across borders: Immigration and the decline of citizenship. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jensen, L. S. (2005). Constructing and entitling America’s original veterans. In. A. L. Schneider., & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 35-62). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Johannesson, L. (2018). Exploring the “liberal paradox” from the inside: Evidence from the Swedish Migration Courts. International Migration Review, 52(4), 1162-1185.
Johnson, C. (1982). MITI and the Japanese miracle: the growth of industrial policy: 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jones, G. (2005). Multinationals from the 1930s to the 1980s. In A. D. Chandler & B. Mazlish (Eds.), Leviathans: Multinational corporations and the new global history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Joppke, C. (1998). Why liberal accept unwanted immigrantion. World Politics, 50(2), 266-293.
Joppke, C. (2003). Citizenship between de-and re-ethnicization. European Journal of Sociology, 44(3), 429-458.
Jørgensen, M. B. (2012). Legitimizing policies: How policy approaches to irregular migrants are formulated and legitimized in Scandinavia. Etikk i Praksis, 6 (2),46-63.
Jørgensen, M. B., & T. L., Thomsen (2013). Crises now and then: Comparing integration policy frameworks and immigrant target groups in Denmark in the 1970s and 2000s. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 14(2), 245-262.
Kim, C. H. (2018). Temporary labour migration, social movements and neoliberal transformation in South Korea. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
Kim, D. (2011). Promoting migrants` rights in South Korea: NGOs and the enactment of the Employment Permit System. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 20(1), 55-78.
Kim, N. H. J. (2008). Korean immigration policy changes and the political liberals’ Dilemma. International Migration Review, 42(3), 576-596.
Kreitzer, R. J., & C. W. Smith (2018). Reproducible and replicable: An empirical assessment of the social construction of politically relevant target groups. Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 768-774.
Kühne, P. (2000). The Federal Republic of Germany: Ambivalent promotion of immigrants’ interests. In R. Penninx & J. Roosbald (eds.), Trade unions, immigration and immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. New York, N.Y.: Berghahnn.
Lee, B. (2010). Comparing immigration policies in Japan and Korea: A historical-institutionalist approach. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.
Lee, B. H., & H. G. Yoo (2013). The rise and fall of independent immigrant worker unionism: A case study of the Migrants Trade Union in South Korea. Journal of Industrial Relations, 55(2), 227-242.
Lee, H. Y. & Y. W, Park(2005). The politics of foreign labor policy in Korea and Japan. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 35(2), 143-65
Lee, J. J. G. (2018) Why developmental states accept guest workers: Bureaucratic policy-making and the politics of labour migration in Singapore, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1463845.
Lenard, P. T. & C. Straehle (2010) Temporary labour migration: Exploitation, tool of development, or both?. Policy and Society 29(4), 283-294.
Linder, S. H., & B. G. Peters (1984) From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 237-259.
Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 33, 677-310.
Lowi, T. J., & N. K. Nicholson (2009). Arenas of power: Reflections on politics and policy. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Lu, M. C. W. (2016). Examining labour migration regimes in East Asia: appearance and technique of control in Taiwan. In E. Guild & S. Mantu(Eds.). Constructing and imagining labour migration: Perspectives of control from five continents (pp. 105-126). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
Ma, T. C. (2011). Challenging the governance structure: The investigation of foreign labor policy-making in Taiwan, East Asia, 28(4), 351-367.
Marier, P., S. Paterson., & M. Angus (2014). From quacks to professionals: The importance of changing social constructions in the policy-making process. Policy Studies, 35(4), 413-433.
Martin, P. (1996). Labor contractors: A conceptual overview. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 5(2-3), 201-218.
Messina, A. M. (2007). The logics and politics of post-WWII migration to Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, J. A. (2008). Postwar negotiations: The first generation of Turkish" guest workers"in West Germany, 1961-1973. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.
Mondou, M., & E. Montpetit. (2010). Policy styles and degenerative politics: Poverty policy designs in Newfoundland and Quebec. Policy Studies Journal, 38(4), 703-722.
Montpetit, É., C. Rothmayr, F. Varone (2005). Institutional vulnerability to social construction: Federalism, target populations, and policy design for assisted reproductive technology in six democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 38(2), 119-142.
Moon, C. I. & R. Peasad (1994). Beyond the developmental state: Networks, politics, and institutions. Governance, 7(4), 360-386.
Neshkova, M. I., & H. Guo (2016). Policy target populations and public participation in agency decision making. International Public Management Journal, 21(2), 297-325.
Newton, L. (2008). Illegal, alien, or immigrant: The politics of immigration reform. New York, NY: New York University Press.
Nicholson-Crotty, S., & K. J. Meier (2005). From perception to public policy: Translating social constructions into policy designs. In A. L. Schneider & H. M. Ingram(Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 223-242). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Nowlin, M. C. (2016). Policy change, policy feedback, and interest mobilization: The politics of nuclear waste management. Review of Policy Research, 33(1), 51-70.
Park, C., & M. Wilding (2013). Social enterprise policy design: Constructing social enterprise in the UK and Korea. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(3), 236-247.
Parker, I. (1992) Discourse Dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
Pempel, T. J. (1999). The developmental regime in a changing world economy. In M. Woo-Cumings(Ed.), The Developmental State(pp. 137-181). New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
Pierce, J. J. et al. (2014). Social construction and policy design: A review of past applications. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 1-29.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American political science review, 94(2), 251-267.
Pior, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage: Migrant labor and industrial societies. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rahman, M. (2012). Understanding Asian migration policy. In M. M. Rahman., & A. A. Ullah (Eds)., Asian migration policy: South, Southeast and East Asia. (pp.19-40) Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Rainwater, K., & L. B. Williams (2018). Thai guestworker export in decline: The rise and fall of the Thailand-Taiwan migration system. International Migration Review, doi: 0197918318769315.
Reich, G., & J. Barth (2010). Educating citizens or defying federal authority? A comparative study of in‐state tuition for undocumented students. Policy Studies Journal, 38(3), 419-445.
Rodriguez, R. M. (2010). Migrants for export: How the Philippine state brokers labor to the world location. MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (1999). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (2007). Theories of the Policy Process(2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sasaki, K. (2014). To return or not to return: The changing meaning of mobility among Japanese Brazilians, 1908–2010. In B. Xiang, B. S. A. Yeoh, & M. Toyota (Eds.), Return: Nationalizing transnational mobility in Asia (pp. 39-62). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Schain, M. (2008). The politics of immigration in France, Britain, and the United States: A comparative study. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schneider, A. L. (2012). Punishment policy in the American States from 1890 to 2008: Convergence, divergence, synchronous change, and feed‐forward effects. Policy Studies Journal, 40(2), 193-210.
Schneider, A. L., & H. M. Ingram (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American political science review, 87(2), 334-347.
Schneider, A. L., & H. M., Ingram (1997). Policy design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
Schneider, A. L., & H. M. Ingram (2005a). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Schneider, A. L., &. H. M. Ingram (2005b). A response to Peter deLeon. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 638-640.
Schneider, A. L ., & H. M. Ingram (2008). Social constructions in the study of public policy. In J. A. Holstein, J. F. Gubrium(Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research(pp. 189-211). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Schneider, A. L ., & H. M. Ingram (2017). Framing the target in policy formulation: The importance of social constuctions. In Howlett, M., & I. Mukherjee (Eds.), Handbook of policy formulation. (pp.320-336). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing
Schneider, A. L., & H. M. Ingram (2019). Social constructions, anticipatory feedback strategies, and deceptive public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 206-236.
Schneider, A. L., & M. Sidney (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103-119.
Schönwälder, K. (2006). The difficult task of managing migration: The 1973 recruitment stop. In N. Gregor, N. Roemer, & M. Roseman(Eds.), German history from the Margins(pp. 252-67). IN: Indiana University Press.
Schriner, K. (2005). Constructiong and democratic citizen: Idiocy and insanity. In. A. L. Schneider., & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 63-80). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Seol, D. H & J. D. Skrentny (2004). South Korea: Importing undocumented workers. In W. A. Cornelius, T. Tsuda, P. L. Martin, and J. F. Hollified (Eds.). Controlling immigration: A global perspective (2nd ed.) (pp. 475–513). CA: Stanford University Press.
Seol, D. H. (2000). Past and present of foreign workers in Korea 1987-2000. Asia Solidarity Quarterly, 2, 6-31.
Seol, D. H. (2012). The citizenship of foreign workers in South Korea. Citizenship studies, 16(1), 119-133.
Seol, D. H., & J. D. Skrentny (2009). Why is there so little migrant settlement in East Asia? International Migration Review, 43(3), 578-620.
Shipper, A. W. (2002). The political construction of foreign workers in Japan. Critical Asian Studies, 34(1), 41-68.
Sidney, M. S. (2005). Contested image of race and place: The politic of housing discrimination. In. A. L. Schneider., & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 111-138). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Simon, H. (1981).The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Preee.
Skrentny, J, D., S. Chan, J. Fox, & D. Kim (2007). Defining nations in Asia and Europe: A comparative analysis of ethnic return migrantion policy. International Migration Review, 41(4), 793-825.
Skrentny, J. D., & Lee, J. J. G. (2014). Immigration, nationhood, and transnationalization in industrialized East Asia. In Y. N. Soysal(ed.), Transnational Trajectories in East Asia (pp. 148-172). New York, NY: Routledge Routledge.
Smith, K. B., C. W. Larimer (2009). The public policy theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Soss, J. (2005). Making clients and citizens: Welfare policy as a source of status, belief, and action. In. A. L. Schneider., & H. M. Ingram (Eds.), Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy (pp. 291-328). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Soysal, Y. M. (1994). Limits of citizenship: Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Steinberger, P.(1980). Typologies of public policy: Meaning construction and their policy process. Social Science Quarterly, 61, 185-197.
Steinert, J. D. (2014). Migration and migration policy: West Germany and the recruitment of foreign labour, 1945–61. Journal of Contemporary History, 49(1), 9-27.
Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (2nd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
Surak, K. (2008). Convergence in foreigners` rights and citizenship policies? A look at Japan. International Migration Review, 42(3), 550-575.
Surak, K.(2017). Migration industries and the state: Guestwork programs in East Asia. International Migration Review. doi.org/10.1111/imre.12308.
Thomann, E., & C. Rapp (2017). Who deserves solidarity? Unequal treatment of immigrants in Swiss welfare policy delivery. Policy Studies Journal. doi: 10.1111/psj.12225.
Tian, Y. (2019). Workers by any other name: comparing co-ethnics and ‘interns’ as labour migrants to Japan. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(9), 1496-1514.
Tilly, C. (2011). Why and how history matters. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Science(pp. 417-437). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Todaro, M. P. & L. Maruszko (1987). Economic development in third world. N.Y: Lonman
UN. (2017). Handbook on measuring international migration through Population Censuses. Retrieved August 20, 2019, from: https://ppt.cc/fPtvox.
Verbunt, G. (1985). France. In T. Hammar (Ed.). European immigration law: A comparative studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Wade, R. H. (2018). The developmental state: Dead or alive?. Development and Change, 49(2), 518-546.
Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
Walzer, M.(1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Wilson, J. Q.(1980). Politics of regulation. New York, NY: Harper
Wong, J. (2004). The adaptive developmental state in East Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(3), 345-362.
Xiang, B. (2014a). Return and the reordering of transnational mobility in Asia. In B. Xiang, B. S. A. Yeoh, M. Toyota (Eds.). Return: Nationalizing transnational mobility in Asia. NC: Duke University Press.
Xiang, B. (2014b). Transnational encapsulation: Compulsory return as a labor-migration control in East asia. In B. Xiang, B. S. A. Yeoh, M. Toyota (Eds.). Return: Nationalizing transnational mobility in Asia (pp. 83-99). NC: Duke University Press.
Yamanaka, K. (1993). New immigration policy and unskilled foreign workers in Japan. Pacific Affairs, 66(1),72-90.
Yamanaka, K. (2010). Civil society and social movements for immigrant rights in Japan and South Korea: Convergence and divergence in unskilled immigration policy. Korean Ovserver, 41(4), 615-647.
Yoo, G. J. (2008). Immigrants and Welfare: Policy constructions of deservingness. Journal of Immigration and Refugee Studies, 6 (4), 490-507.
You, S. Y., & Y. F. Wong (2015). Explaining occupational injury rates between migrant and native workers in Taiwan, 1998-2011. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal. 24(4), 1-28.
Yurdakul, G. (2009). From guest workers into Muslims: The transformation of Turkish immigrant associations in Germany. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
公共行政學系
1052560111 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1052560111 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU201901193 |
| Appears in Collections: | [公共行政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 011101.pdf | 2437Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 281 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
