政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125983
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51010737      線上人數 : 918
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125983


    題名: 社會運動的媒介化：一個行動者網絡理論的觀點與取徑
    Mediatization of the movement of the social: an actor network approach
    作者: 陳品丞
    Chen, Pin-Cheng
    貢獻者: 方念萱
    Fang, Nien-Hsuan
    陳品丞
    Chen, Pin-Cheng
    關鍵詞: 媒介化
    社會運動
    行動者網絡理論
    同志運動
    同婚公投
    mediatization
    social movement
    actor network
    mediated activism
    same sex marriage
    日期: 2019
    上傳時間: 2019-09-05 17:41:24 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　媒介長期以來總被視為社會運動達成目標的「工具」或「手段」，相關研究的問題意識一直圍繞在「媒介是助力還是阻力」的二元性思考框架，因而陷入媒介決定論的泥淖，更過度簡化了媒介與社會運動之間複雜的關係。此外，社會運動研究的理論發展陷入停滯，如今媒介已然滲透至日常生活各處，社會文化各方各面皆為媒介所中介，但我們卻缺乏一個得以適切地描繪、分析社會運動與媒介之交織關係的理論概念。

    　　為了幫助我們在「無處不媒介」的社會之中，掌握社會運動與媒介之間整體而動態的共變關係，並為漸趨僵化的社會運動研究注入活水，本研究援引近年歐陸傳播界興起的「媒介化」（mediatization）以及Bruno Latour為主的行動者網絡理論（actor network theory, ANT）與傳統社會運動理論對話，並且嘗試發展一個以「媒介為關懷」的新媒介化ANT取徑，做為邁向社會運動與媒介研究之新典範的起點。本研究以2018年台灣的同性婚姻合法化公投為例，說明何以此新取徑得以幫助我們從不同的角度思考、分析社會運動與媒介的複雜關係。

    　　本研究主要目標有三：（一）藉由社會運動理論、媒介化理論與行動者網絡理論的對話，發展一個得以在當今無處不媒介的社會脈絡之中，適切地描繪社會運動與媒介交織關係的新理論取徑。（二）以台灣2018年的同性婚姻合法化公投爭議為例，實際示範此新取徑如何用於實際的經驗研究之上。（三）檢驗、修正與反思此新取徑的優、劣勢，並提供理論與方法上可能的發展方向，以供有興趣的研究者進一步拓展。

    關鍵字：媒介化、社會運動、行動者網絡理論、同志運動、同婚公投
    Media has long been regarded as a "tool" or "means" for social movements to achieve the goals. However, as media nowadays has penetrated into everyday life, it apparently oversimplifies the complex relationship between media and social movements. What’s worse, the discussion has always been centered on the dualistic framework of techno-utopian and dystopian thinking, suffering from what Mattoni and Treré (2014) called "the one medium bias" and "the technological-fascination bias". We lack a proper conceptual framework to describe and analyze the interweaving relationship of social movements and media.

    Accordingly, this study uses "mediatization" and "actor network theory (ANT) " as a starting point to develop a new approach to help us grasp the overall and dynamic interrelation between changes in social movements and media in the "on the mediation of everything" society (Livingstone, 2009) . This new approach regards "mediatization of the movement of the social" as the interrelated changes in a controversy during the assembling process of all the human and non-human actors, especially media. It should be media-decentralized but media-concerned to avoid determinism or reductionism.

    In order to illustrate how this new approach applies empirically, I take the controversy over the 2018 Taiwanese referendum for marriage equality as the illustrative case, showing how mediatization process takes place in propelling Taiwan to be the first Asian country in legalizing same-sex marriage. This study also reflects on the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach, and provides directions for further theoretical and methodological discussion.
    參考文獻: 中文部分
    方念萱（2016）。〈媒介化、行動化：媒介化理論與行動者網絡理論的對話〉，《傳播文化與政治》，4：55-83。
    王　彥（2015）。〈沉默的框架：框架理論六十年的時間脈絡與空間想象〉，「2015中華傳播學會年會」，高雄義守大學。
    王玉燕（2008）。《環境議題紀錄片的敘事策略研究：一個集體行動框架的觀點》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文
    王劭文（2018）。《網路「同溫層」現象初探：以婚姻平權臉書社群為例》。政治大學傳播碩士學位學程論文。
    王維邦、張仁瑋、陳美華（2018）。〈「反同」逆襲：政黨傾向與婚姻平權態度的關聯〉。取自「巷仔口社會學」https://twstreetcorner.org/2018/12/18/wangweipangjhangrenweichenmeihua/
    瓦　礫（2018年4月25日）。〈如果沒人反對「神聖婚姻法」的話〉。取自「鳴人堂」，https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/6697/3106415
    伍啟鴻、陳榮泰譯（2016）。《巴斯德的實驗室：細菌的戰爭與和平》。新北：群學。（原書：Latour B. [1984]. Pasteur: guerre et paix des microbes. Frence: La Découverte.）
    朱家安（2018年4月23日）。〈【朱家安不要偷懶了】「神聖婚姻法」可以不是笑話〉。取自https://news.readmoo.com/2018/04/23/kris-180423-covenant-marriage/
    何明修（2005）。《社會運動概論》。台北：三民。
    何明修（2016年6月）。〈社會運動的研究有用嗎？〉，「巷仔口社會學」，取自https://twstreetcorner.org/2016/06/21/ming-sho-ho/
    吳翠松、吳季昕（2014）。〈地方文化資產保存運動的共識動員分析：以苗栗護窯運動為借鏡〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，97：63-110。
    李立峯（2016）。〈網絡媒體和連結型行動的力量與挑戰：以2014香港雨傘運動為例〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，6(1)：11-44。
    林文源（2007）。〈論行動者網絡的行動本體論〉，《科技、醫療與社會》，4：65-108。
    林文源（2014）。《看不見的行動能力：從行動者網絡到位移理論》。台北：中研院社會學研究所。
    林怡廷（2017年11月）。〈罷免黃國昌的三股力量：教會、家長、國民黨〉，《天下雜誌》。取自https://www.cw.com.tw/article/article.action?id=5086072
    林常富（2010）。《電視新聞框架研究：以電視新聞報導集會遊行事件為例》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。
    林慧羚（2014）。〈乾隆潮，潮什麼？：從媒介化觀點試論新媒體體感互動〉，《輔仁大學藝術學報》，3：118-136。
    林鶴玲、鄭陸霖（2001）。〈台灣社會運動網路經驗：一個探索性的分析〉，《台灣社會學刊》，25：111-156。
    苗博雅（2018年4月21日）。〈【平權公投記事】--戰略思維與戰術嘗試〉。取自https://miaopoyasdp.wordpress.com/2018/04/21/【平權公投記事】--戰略思維與戰術嘗試/
    唐士哲（2014a）。〈重構媒介？「中介」與「媒介化」概念爬梳〉，《新聞學研究》，121：1-39。
    唐士哲（2014b）。〈從政治化媒介到媒介化政治：電視政論節目作為制度化的政治實踐〉，《中華傳播學刊》，25：3-41。
    唐樂水（2018）。《嘻哈中國：媒介化視野下的次文化研究》。世新大學傳播博士學位學程論文。
    夏春祥（2015）。〈傳播的想像：論媒介生態學〉，《新聞學研究》，125：143-174。
    孫維三（2010）。〈尼可拉斯•盧曼的系統傳播概念與應用：旺旺中時集團 vs. NCC風波的案例分析〉，《新聞學研究》，104：31-65。
    格瓦推（2018年4月26日）。〈荒謬的平權手段――增訂神聖婚姻專法〉。取自https://www.facebook.com/notes/singhuan-wang/10156538027658159/
    曹琬凌（2015）。〈院線記錄片再媒介化之媒介化分析：以【看見台灣】經驗為例〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，5(2)：121-153。
    曹琬凌（2017）。《守住泰雅的聲音：司馬庫斯的媒介化故事》。世新大學傳播博士學位學程論文。
    郭小安（2017）。〈新聞框架與社會運動框架：兩種研究視角的整合與對話〉。文章取自「傳媒圈」http://www.mediacircle.cn/?p=41116。
    陳玉箴譯（2003）。《媒介概念十六講》，台北：韋伯文化。（原書：Silverstone R. [1999]. Why Study the Media? London: Sage.）
    陳美華（2018年11月25日）。〈同婚公投：違憲、不公平戰役、公領域的陷落〉，《報導者》。取自https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-2018-election-referendum-same-sex-marriage-2
    陳婉琪、張恒豪、黃樹仁（2016）。〈網絡社會運動時代的來臨？太陽花運動參與者的人際連帶與社群媒體因素初探〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，28(4)：467-501。
    陳順孝（2017）。〈解讀新聞的方法〉。取自「阿孝札記」部落格https://tinyurl.com/y8ocsdgm
    陶振超（2017）。〈社交媒體的動員力量：網絡機會模式之觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，131：49-86。
    喀　飛（2017）。〈台北同志文化地景的歷史意涵〉，邱怡瑄（編），《以進大同――台北同志生活誌》，頁4-9。台北：財團法人台灣文學發展基金會。
    馮仕政（2013）。《西方社會運動理論研究》。北京：中國人民大學出版社。
    黃淑鈴（2015）。〈從族群正義到環境論述：達悟反核廢運動者的框架移轉〉，《思與言》，53(2)：7-48。
    溫朗東（2018年4月25日）。〈回應各方對神聖婚姻專法公投提案的質疑〉。取自「立場新聞」，https://thestandnews.com/台灣/回應各方對神聖婚姻專法公投提案的質疑/
    臧國仁（1999）。《新聞媒體與消息來源—媒介框架與真實建構之論述》。台北：三民。
    趙鼎新（2007）。《社會運動與革命：理論更新和中國經驗》。台北：巨流。
    劉北成等譯（1992）。《規訓與懲罰：監獄的誕生》，台北：桂冠。（原書：Foucault, M. [1995]. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison. New York: Panthéon.）
    劉育豪（2018年5月11日）。〈「神聖婚姻專法」公投提案到底有什麼意義？〉。取自「公民行動影音記錄資料庫」https://www.civilmedia.tw/archives/76375
    劉時君（2015）。《政治抗議事件的媒體創新使用與實踐：以太陽花運動為例》。政治大學傳播學院新聞所論文。
    蔡怡臻（2017）。《政治選舉中競選歌曲的媒介化：以2016年《台灣美樂地》專輯為例》。中正大學電訊傳播所碩士論文。
    鄭明萱譯（2006）。《認識媒體：人的延伸》，台北：貓頭鷹出版。（原書：McLuhan M. [1964]. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge: MIT Press.）
    鄭陸霖、林鶴玲（2001）。〈社運在網際網路上的展現：台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉，《台灣社會學》，2：55-96。
    鄭義愷譯（2008）。《什麼是社會學》，台北：群學。（原書：Elias N. [1970]. What is Sociology? NY: Columbia University Press.）
    盧安邦、鄭宇君（2017）。〈用方法說故事：探析電腦輔助文本分析工具在框架研究之應用〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，7(2)：145-178。
    蕭　遠（2011）。〈網際網路如何影響社會運動中的動員結構與組織型態？－以台北野草莓學運爲個案研究〉，《台灣民主季刊》，8(3)：45-85。
    簡至潔（2012）。〈從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」――朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動〉，《台灣人權學刊》，1(3)：187-201。
    簡家欣（1998）。〈九○年代台灣女同志的認同建構與運動集結：在刊物網絡上形成的女同志新社群〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，30：63-115。

    英文部分
    Adolf, M. T. (2017). The identity of mediatization: theorizing a dynamic field. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of Mediatizaiton: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Aelst, P. V., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the Internet in shaping the anti-globalization movement. Information, Communiation & Society, 5(4), 465-493.
    Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). The Media Logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    Andrews, K. T., & Biggs, M. (2006). The dynamics of protest diffusion: movement organizations, social networks, and new media in the 1960 Sit-Ins. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 752-777.
    Anduiza, E., Cristancho, C., & Sabucedo, J. M. (2014). Mobiliztion through online social networks: the political protest of the indignados in Spain. Information, Communiation & Society, 17(6), 750-764.
    Barker-Plurnmer, B. (2002). Producing public voice: resource mobilization and media access in the National Organization for Women Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(1), 188-205.
    Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider`s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409-430.
    Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing process and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(77), 611-639.
    Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action. Information, Communiation & Society, 14(6), 770-799.
    Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communiation & Society, 15(5), 739-768.
    Bimber, B. (2016). Three Prompts for Collective Action in the Context of Digital Media. Political Communication, 34(1), 6-20.
    Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge Kegan & Paul.
    Caraway, B. (2016). OUR Walmart: a case study of connective action. Information, Communiation & Society, 19(7), 907-920.
    Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. UK: Polity Press.
    Chadwick, A. (2007). Digital network repertoires and organizational hybridity. Political Communication, 24(3), 283-301.
    Cooper, A. H. (2002). Media framing and social movement mobilization: German peace protest against INF missiles, the Gulf War, and NATO peace enforcement in Bosnia. European Journal of Political Research, 41(1), 37-80.
    Couldry, N. (2008). Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media & Society, 10(3), 373-391.
    Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptulizing mediatization: contexts, traditions, arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191-202.
    D`heer, E. (2018). Media logic revisited: the concept of social media logics as alternative framework to study politicians` usage of socail media during election times. In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pflock (Eds.), Media Logic(s) Revisited. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Davey, L. (1991). The application of case study evaluations. Practical Asseseement, Research & Evaluation, 2(9).
    Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: key concept or conceptual bandwagon. Media, Culture & Society, 36(7), 1032-1044.
    Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2015). `Mediatizaiton and` or `mediatization of` ? A reponse to Hepp et al. Media, Culture & Society, 37(3), 655-657.
    Diani, M. (2000). Social movement networks: virtual and real. Information, Communiation & Society, 3(3), 386-401.
    Dijck, J. v., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2-14.
    Dolwick, J. S. (2009). ‘The social’ and beyond: introducing actor-network theory. Journal of Maritime Archaeology, 4(1), 21-49.
    Donk, W. v. d., Loader, B. D., Nixon, P. G., & Rucht, D. (2004). Introduction: social movements and ICTs. In W. v. d. Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movement. NY: Routledge.
    Downing, J. (2008). Social movement theories and alternative media: an evaluation and critique. Communication, Culture & Critique, 1(1), 40-50.
    Durkheim, É. (1895/1982). The Rules of the Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.
    Edelman, M. (2001). Social movements: changing paradigms and forms of politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30(1), 285-317.
    Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. MA: Blackwell Publishing.
    Eisenlohr, P. (2017). Reconsidering mediatization of religion: Islamic televangelism in India. Media, Culture & Society, 39(6), 869-884.
    Eltantawy, N., & Wiest, J. B. (2011). The Arab spring social media in the Egyptian revolution: reconsidering resource mobilization theory. International Journal of Communication, 5(18), 1208-1224.
    Erofeeva, M. (2019). On multiple agencies: when do things matter? Information, Communiation & Society, 22(5), 590-604.
    Eskjær, M. F. (2018). Mediatization as Structural Couplings: Adapting to Media Logic(s). In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pflock (Eds.), Media Logic(s) Revisited. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Eslen-Ziya, H. (2013). Social media and Turkish feminism: new resources for social activism. Feminist Media Studies, 13(5), 860-870.
    Esser, F., & Matthes, J. (2013). Mediatization effects on political news, political actors, political decisions, and political audiences Democracy In the Age of Globalization and Mediatization (pp. 177-201). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Falasca, K. (2014). Political news journalism: mediatization across three news reporting contexts. European Journal of Communication, 29(5), 583-597.
    Fisher, D. R., & Boekkooi, M. (2010). Mobilizing friends and strangers: understanding the role of the Internet in the Step It Up day of action. Information, Communiation & Society, 13(2), 193-208.
    Fominaya, C. F., & Gillan, K. (2017). Navigating the technology-media-movements complex. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 383-402.
    Foust, C. R., & Hoyt, K. D. (2018). Social movement 2.0: intergrating and assessing scholarship on social media and movement. Review of Communication, 18(1), 37-55.
    Freeman, J. (1979). Resource mobilization and strategy. In J. D. McCarthy & M. N. Zald (Eds.), The Dynamics of Social Movements: Resource Mobilization, Social Control and Tactics Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
    Gamson, W. A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982) Encounters With Unjust Authority: Chicago: Dorsey.
    Garrett, R. K. (2006). Protest in an information society: a review of literature on social movements and new ICTs. Information, Communiation & Society, 9(2), 202-224.
    Giltin, T. (1980). The Whole World Is Watching. CA: University of California Press.
    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
    Haßler, J., Maurer, M., & Oschatz, C. (2014). Media logic and political logic online and offline: the case of climate change communication. Journalism Practice, 8(3), 326-341.
    Hara, N., & Estrada, Z. (2005). Analyzing the mobilization of grassroots activities via the internet: a case study. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 503-514.
    Hepp, A. (2013a). Cultures of Mediatization. Cambridge UK: Polity Press.
    Hepp, A. (2013b). The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: mediatization research in times of the `mediation of everything`. European Journal of Communication, 28(6), 615-629.
    Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2014). Human interaction and communicative figurations: the transformation of mediatized cultures and societies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 249-272). Boston, MA: De Gruyter.
    Hepp, A., & Hasebrink, U. (2018). Researching transforming communicaitons in times of deep mediatization: a figurational approach. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communicaitons in Times of Deep Mediatization. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hepp, A., Hjarvard, S., & Lundby, K. (2015). Mediatization: theorizing the interplay between media, culture, and society. Media, Culture & Society, 37(2), 314-324.
    Hepp, A., Simon, P., & Sowinska, M. (2018). Living together in the mediatizad city: the figurations of young people`s urban communities. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization: The Palgrave Macmillan.
    Hjarvard, S. (2016). Mediatization and the changing authority of religion. Media, Culture & Society, 38(1), 8-17.
    Hoop, E. D., & Jehlička, P. (2017). Reluctant pioneers in the European periphery? Environmental activism, food consumption and “growing your own”. Local Environment, 22(7), 809-824.
    Jansson, A. (2013). Mediatization and social space: reconstructing mediatization for the transmedia age. Communication Theory, 23(3), 279-276.
    Jansson, A. (2015). Using Bourdieu in critical mediatization research: communicational doxa and osmotic pressures in the field of UN organizations. Journal of Media and Communication Research, 31(58), 13-29.
    Jansson, A. (2018). Mediatization and Mobile Lives: A Critical Approach. UK: Routledge.
    Jenkins, J. C. (1983). Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 91(1), 527-553.
    Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203-222.
    Jerne, C. (2018). The syntax of social movements: jam, boxes and other anti-mafia assemblages. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 282-298.
    Kavada, A. (2016). Social movements and political agency in the digital age: a communication approach. Media and Communication, 4(4), 8-12.
    Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583-600.
    Klein, J., Walter, M., & Schimank, U. (2018). Researching individuals` media repertoires: challenges of qualitative interviews on cross-media practices. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization (pp. 363-386): The Palgrave Macmillan.
    Klinger, U., & Svensson, J. (2014). The emergence of network media logic in political communication: a theoretical approach. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1-17.
    Kristensen, N. N., & Christensen, C. L. (2017). The mediatization of fashion: the case of fashion blogs. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of Mediatizaiton: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Krotz, F. (2008). Media connectivity: concepts, conditions, and consequences. In A. Hepp, F. Krotz, S. Moores, & C. Winter (Eds.), Connectivity, Networks and Flows: Conceptualizing Contemporary. NY: Hampton Press.
    Krotz, F. (2018). Media logic and the mediatization approach: a good partnership, a mésalliance, or a misunderstanding? In C. Thimm, M. Anastasiadis, & J. Einspänner-Pflock (Eds.), Media Logic(s) Revisited. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Laer, J. V., & Aelst, P. V. (2010). Internet and social movement action repertoires: opportunities and limitations. Information, Communiation & Society, 13(8), 1146-1171.
    Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. USA: Oxford.
    Latour, B., Milstein, D., Marrero-Guillamón, I., & Rodríguez-Giralt, I. (2018). Down to earth social movements: an interview with Bruno Latour. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 353-361.
    Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the actor- network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393.
    Lee, F. L. F. (2015). Internet, citizen self-mobilization, and social movement organizations in environmental collective action campaigns: two Hong Kong cases. Environment Politics, 24(2), 308-325.
    Li, J., & Li, X. (2017). Media as a core political resource: the young feminist movements in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10(1), 54-71.
    Livingstone, S. (2009). On the mediation of everything: ICA presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 1-18.
    Lockie, S. (2004). Collective agency, non-human causality and environmental social movements: a case study of the Australian `landcare movement`. Journal of Sociology, 40(1), 41-58.
    Lundby, K. (2009). Media logic: looking for social interaction. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
    Lunt, P., & Livingstone, S. (2016). Is `mediatization` the new paradigm for our field? A commentary on Deacon and Stanyer (2014,2015) and Hepp, Hjarvard and Lundby (2015). Media, Culture & Society, 38(3), 462-470.
    Magin, M. (2015). Shades of mediatization components of media logic in German and Austrian elite newspapers (1949–2009). The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(4), 415-437.
    Malinick, T. E., Tindall, D. B., & Diani, M. (2013). Network centrality and social movement media coverage: a two-mode network analytic approach. Social Networks, 35(2), 148-158.
    Marrero-Guillamón, I. (2013). Actor-network theory, Gabriel Tarde and the study of an urban social movement: the case of can ricart, Barcelona. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 403-421.
    Martín Sainz de los Terreros, J. (2018). Welcoming sound: the case of a noise complaint in the weekly assembly of el Campo de Cebada. Social Movement Studies, 17(3), 269-281.
    Mattoni, A. (2017). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements. Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 494-505.
    Mattoni, A., & Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Studies, 24(3), 252-271.
    McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Pace of Insurgency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and socail movements: a partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.
    Meyen, M., Thieroff, M., & Strenger, S. (2014). Mass media logic and the mediatization of politics: a theoretical framework. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 271-288.
    Milan, S. (2015a). From social movements to cloud protesting: the evolution of collective identity. Information, Communiation & Society, 18(8), 887-900.
    Milan, S. (2015b). When algorithms shape collective action: social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1-10.
    Moats, D. (2019). From media technologies to mediated events: a different settlement between media studies and science and technology studies. Information, Communiation & Society, 22(8), 1165-1180.
    Morley, D. (2007). Media, Modernity and Technology: The Geography of the New. Landon and New York: Routledge.
    Myers, D. J. (1994). Communication technology and social movements: contributions of computer networks to activism. Social Science Computer Review, 12(2), 250-260.
    Obregón, R., & Tufte, T. (2017). Communication, social movements and collective action: toward a new research agenda in communication for development and social change. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 635-645.
    Ortiz, D. G., & Ostertag, S. F. (2014). Katrina bloggers and the developement of collective civic action: the web as a virtual mobilizing structure. Sociological Perspectives, 57(1), 52-78.
    Parsloe, S. M., & Holton, A. E. (2018). #Boycottautismspeaks: communicating a counternarrative through cyberactivism and connective action. Information, Communiation & Society, 21(8), 1116-1133.
    Passy, F. (2001). Socialization, connection, and the structure/agency gap: a specification of the impact of networks on participatoin in social movements. Mobilization: An International Journal, 6(2), 173-192.
    Rocamora, A. (2016). Mediatization and digital media in the field of fashion. Fashion Theory, 21(5), 505-522.
    Rodriguez-Giralt, I. (2011). Social movements as actor-networks: prospects for a symmetrical approach to Doñana`s environmentalist protests. Convergencia: Revista de ciencias sociales, 56, 13-35.
    Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Framing the abortion debate: organizational resources, media strategies, and movement-countermovement dynamics. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 479-507.
    Routledge, P. (2008). Acting in the network: ANT and the politics of generating associations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26, 199-217.
    Rucht, D. (2004). The quadruple `A`: media strategies of protest movements since the 1960s. In W. V. D. Donk, B. D. Loader, P. G. Nixon, & D. Rucht (Eds.), Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens, and Social Movement. London: Routledge.
    Ruming, K. (2009). Following the actors: mobilising an actor-network theory methodology in geography. Australian Geographer, 40(4), 451-469.
    Ryan, C., Carragee, K. M., & Meinhofer, W. (2010). Theory into practice: framing, the news media, and collective action. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(1), 175-182.
    Ryan, C., Carragee, K. M., & Schwerner, C. (2009). Media, movements, and the quest for social justice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(2), 165-181.
    Savič, I. (2016). Mediatization of companies as a factor of their communication power and the new role of public relations. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 607-615.
    Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–network theory and methodology: just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134-149.
    Schrøder, K. C. (2017). Towards the "audiencization" of meditization research? Audience dynamics as co-constitutive of mediatization processes. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, & S. Hjarvard (Eds.), Dynamics of Mediatizaiton: Institutional Change and Everyday Transformations in a Digital Age. Berlin: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87-101.
    Seguin, C. (2016). Cascades of coverage: dynamics of media attention to social movement organizations. Social Forces, 94(3), 997-1020.
    Skey, M., Stone, C., Jenzen, O., & Mangan, A. (2017). Mediatization and sport: a bottom-up perspective. Communication & Sports, 6(5), 1-17.
    Smith, J., McCarthy, J. D., McPhail, C., & Augustyn, B. (2001). From protest to agenda building: description bias in media coverage of protest events in Washington, D.C. Social Forces, 79(4), 1397-1423.
    Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1, 197-217.
    Snow, D. A., JR., E. B. R., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464-481.
    Sommerfeldt, E. J. (2013). Online power resource management: activist resource mobilization, communication strategy, and organizational structure. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(4), 347-367.
    Steger, I. (2018). How Taiwan battled fake anti-LGBT news before its vote on same-sex marriage. Quartz.
    Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228-246.
    Tarrow, S. G. (1998). Power in movement : social movements and contentious politics (2 ed.). Cambridge ; NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Tilly, C. (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. NY: Newbery Award Records.
    Trott, V. (2018). Connected feminists: foregrounding the interpersonal in connective action. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 116-129.
    Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273.
    Vicari, S., & Cappai, F. (2016). Health activism and the logic of connective action. A case study of rare disease patient organisations. Information, Communiation & Society, 19(11), 1653-1671.
    Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361-385.
    Waisbord, S. (2018). Revisiting mediated activism. Sociology Compass, 12(6). doi:10.1111/soc4.12584
    Wang, G. (2018). Media communication research in the digital era: moving beyond ontological dualism. Communication Theory, 28(3), 235-253.
    Wang, K. J. Y. (2017). Mobilizing resources to the square: Hong Kong`s anti-moral and national education movement as precursor to the Umbrella Movement. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 20(2), 127-145.
    Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Wissenbach, K. R. (2019). Accounting for power in transnational civic tech activism: a communication-based analytical framework for media practice. The International Communication Gazette, 1-19.
    Wojtkowski, Ł. (2017). The present tense of mediatization studies. Mediatization Studies, 1(1), 9-23.
    Wolf, K. D., & Wudarski, U. (2018). Communicative figurations of expertization: DIY_Maker and multi-player online gaming (MOG) as cultures of amateur learning. In A. Hepp, A. Breiter, & U. Hasebrink (Eds.), Communicative Figurations: Transforming Communications in Times of Deep Mediatization: The Palgrave Macmillan.
    Yan, G., Pegoraro, A., & Watanabe, N. M. (2018). Student-athletes`s organization of activism at the University of Missouri: resource mobilization on Twitter. Journal of Sport Management, 32(1), 24-37.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
    1054640091
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1054640091
    資料類型: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900844
    顯示於類別:[傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    009101.pdf14789KbAdobe PDF21259檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋