政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125827

政大典藏 > College of Social Science > Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work > Theses > Item 140.119/125827

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125827

Title:	發展優點評量之操作方法：以心智障礙者為例 Developing a strength assessment guideline : the application for individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disability
Authors:	黃佳惠 Huang, Chia-Hui
Contributors:	宋麗玉 Song, Li-Yu 黃佳惠 Huang, Chia-Hui
Keywords:	優勢觀點優點評量心智障礙者溝通輔具 Strengths perspective Strength assessment Intellectual and Developmental Disability Communication aid
Date:	2019
Issue Date:	2019-09-05 17:12:59 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究旨在於建構喜憨兒社會福利基金會北區社福部優勢個管模式之優點評量工作方法，使專業工作人員間有共同的語言與信念，並以正向角度看待每位服務對象。藉由發展適用於心智障礙者優點評量的工作手冊，包含問句和題項，有助於探索心智障礙者的想望，心智障礙者可理解自身的優點評量表，以及專業工作人員能更有方法與技巧地運用這些工具在工作中，提升其服務能量。本研究透過焦點團體蒐集適用於操作優點評量表於心智障礙者之問句、題項與圖卡等方法以及個別深度訪談5名曾使用優勢觀點服務於心智障礙者的實務工作者，建構執行優點評量表於心智障礙者時，可運用的工作技巧與方法，進而優化優點評量表、發展操作手冊。提供專業工作人員操作手冊後，專業工作人員依據手冊再次針對心智障礙者進行優點評量表，並且再次進行焦點團體了解專業工作人員使用操作手冊之情形，以及比較分析12份優點評量表內涵之前後差異，進而發展適用於心智障礙者之優點評量表暨操作方法。研究結果如下： 1. 具體聚焦的問句有助於心智障礙者理解 2. 更貼近心智障礙者的生活事件有助於引起心智障礙者回應 3. 多元溝通輔具的使用有助於操作心智障礙者優點評量。依據研究結果，筆者提出三項討論與建議： 1. 開放性與引導性問題的適用時機。 2. 將操作手冊內容列於員工訓練課程。 3. 各據點可發展適用於心智障礙者的溝通圖卡。 The purpose of this study is to develop a strength assessment guideline for the Children Are Us Foundation, which promotes strength perspective case management model in the North District Social Welfare Department, so that workers may have a common language and belief, seeing cases from a positive perspective.The newly developed strength assessment guideline for individuals with intellectual and developmental disability (IDD) involves various questions and hints,which assist workers to discover dreams and personal hopes of the cases. IDD individuals are able to understand the strength assessment scales by themselves, and workers are given useful techniques to use tools to improve their serving power at work. In this study, through focus group activities, questions, communication hints, and drawing cards for IDD individuals had been gathered.Five workers were interviewed in-depth about their experiences on using the strengths perspective to serve IDD individuals.The collected working skills and experiences were used to renew the strength assessment scale and develop a guideline for assessing IDD individuals. Following the instruction of the guideline, workers re-visited IDD individuals to perform the strength assessment again, 12 sets of assessment outcomes were compared and analyzed. Another focus group activity was also held to find out any difference workers discovered with the new assessment method, so that a final version of the strength assessment guideline for individuals with IDD may be finalized. The research results are as follows: 1. Substantial focusing questions help IDD individuals understand significantly. 2. Being closer to life events of IDD individuals helps them respond. 3. Using multiple communication aids helps the practical operation of the IDD strength assessment. Based on the research outcomes, the following three suggestions are made: 1. The timing of using open and guided questions is critical. 2. The strength assessment guideline should be an essential course included in the new employee training program. 3. Drawing cards used for communicating with IDD individuals may be developed by each service center, according to the local unique features.
Reference:	參考文獻中文文獻宋麗玉譯（2003）。基礎優點個案管理訓練手冊。台北：內政部。宋麗玉（2009）。優勢觀點社會工作概論。載於宋麗玉、施教裕，優勢觀點：社會工作理論與實務（42-68頁）。台北市：洪葉文化事業有限公司。宋麗玉（2009）。優點評量。載於宋麗玉、施教裕，優勢觀點：社會工作理論與實務（423-450頁）。台北市：洪葉文化事業有限公司。施教裕(2009)。復元的理想和模型。載於宋麗玉、施教裕，優勢觀點：社會工作理論與實務（71-134頁）。台北市：洪葉文化事業有限公司。財團法人育成社會福利基金會(2018)。心智障礙者常見類型。取自https://ycswf.org.tw/recognize-mr/common-types/。鈕文英（2010）。美國智能和發展障礙協會2010年定義的內容與意涵。國小特殊教育，49，21-32。瑪麗亞社會福利基金會(2018)。認識心智障礙。取自https://www.maria.org.tw/index.php?incfn=inc_service01.htm。衛生福利部主統計處（2018）。2.3.1身心障礙者人數按季。取自https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/DOS/cp-2976-13815-113.html。簡秀玲(2018)。從看到問題到看到優勢—社工員視野的改變。取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/index.html 曾月娥、李婉萍(2018)。優勢之路：我們一起成長。社團法人台灣復元優勢觀點社會學會、宋麗玉(主編)，優勢觀點與社會工作實務─邁向復元之路(263-284頁)。台北市：洪葉文化事業有限公司。曾月娥(2019)。案例十九：跨越生命重圍~~一小步的人生。取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/index.html。張淑娟（譯）（2013）。以個人為中心計畫輕鬆上手PICTURE模式（原作者：Steven Holbum、Anne Gordon、Peter M.Vietze）。臺北市：財團法人心路社會福利基金會。（原著出版年：2007）。陸莉、黃玉枝、林秀錦、朱慧娟(2000)。智能障礙學生輔導手冊。教育部特殊教育小組主編。國立台南師範學院。周月清、尤珮蓉(2014)。支持需求量表(SIS)作為智障者支持需求評估工具；文獻探討與案例分析。身心障礙研究，2(12)，77-93。黃如玉(2019)。案例二十三：「優勢觀點」與「PCP」的結合與運用-以台北市金龍發展中心為例。取自復元與優勢觀點發展中心http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/s/index.html。復元與優勢觀點發展中心(2018)。常見問題-何以引進優點個案管理模式？。取自http://socialwork2009.nccu.edu.tw/crsp/a/q02.pdf。陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。潘淑滿(2006)。質性研究：理論與應用。台北：心理。洪志成、廖梅花譯(2003)。焦點團體訪談。嘉義：濤石。胡幼慧(2010)。質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例。台北：巨流。王文科、王智弘 (2010)。質的研究信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，17，20-50。財團法人心路社會福利基金會(2019)。台灣智能障礙者生活品質評量表文字介紹。取自https://web.syinlu.org.tw/eshop/product/detail/publications/180。英文文獻 Anthony, W.A. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 16,11-24. Deegan, P, (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 11(4), 11-19. Miller,W.R.,&Rollnick,S.(2002). Motivational interviewing：Preparing people for change.(2nd ed.).New York：The Guildford Press. Modrcin, M., Rapp, C., & Chamberlain, R. (1985). Case management with psychiatrically disabled individuals: Curriculum & training program. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas School of Social Welfare. Rapp, C.(1997). Forward. In D. Saleebey(ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice.(2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman Publisher. Rapp, C. A. & Goscha, R. J. (2006). The strengths model: Case management with people with psychiatric disabilities.(2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press,Inc. Russo, R. (1999). Applying a strengths-based practice approach in working with people with developmental disabilities and their families. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Service, 80(1), 25-33. Saleebey, D. (2009). The strengths approach to practice: Beginnings. In D. Saleebey(ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice.(pp.93-107)(5th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley,V. J., Buntinx, W. H. E., Coulter, D. L.,Craig, E. M., Gomez, S. C., Lachapelle, Y.,Reeve, A., Shogren, K. A., Snell, M. E.,Spreat, S., Tassé, M. J., Thompson, J. R.,Verdugo-Alonso, M. A., Wehmeyer, M. L., &Yeager, M. H. (2010).Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports. Washington, DC: American Association on Intellectual and Develop-mental Disabilities. Tice, C.& Perkins, K. (1996).Mental health issues & aging: Building on the strengths of older persons. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學社會工作研究所 106264006
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106264006
Data Type:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900831
Appears in Collections:	[Graduate Institute of Social Administration and Social Work] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
400601.pdf	1960Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...