Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125602
|
| Title: | 隨機對照試驗2001-2017醫學文獻之書目計量學研究
A Bibliometric Study in Randomized Controlled Trials of Medical Literature, 2001-2017 |
| Authors: | 周錦昀
Chou, Chin-Yun |
| Contributors: | 蔡明月
Tsay, Ming-Yueh
周錦昀
Chou, Chin-Yun |
| Keywords: | 隨機對照試驗
實證醫學
書目計量學
文獻成長
布萊德福定律
洛卡定律
普萊斯平方根定律
80/20法則
Randomized Controlled Trials
Evidence-Based Mediceine
Bibliomatric
Literature Growth
Bradford’s Law
Lotka’s Law
Price’s Law
80/20 Rule |
| Date: | 2019 |
| Issue Date: | 2019-09-05 16:00:02 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 本研究利用書目計量學進行隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之特性。蒐集MEDLINE資料庫中資料類型為隨機對照試驗的醫學文獻進行分析研究。為延續楊彥緒自1965年至2001年之書目研究，並瞭解文獻成長模式，本研究蒐集2001年至2017年共計316,432筆書目進行分析，並針對資料類型、語言、出版國以及主題分佈進行分析，利用布萊德福定律以及布萊德福—齊夫定律進行期刊生產力的相關研究，洛卡定律、80/20法則以及普萊斯平方根定律進行第一作者生產力之相關分析。
本研究結果如下所述：隨機對照試驗醫學文獻自2001年至2017年文獻逐漸成長，累積成長分佈曲線為線性成長。99%的文獻資料屬於期刊文獻，其餘文獻類型分別為讀者來函、編輯意見、報導型文章、新聞、會議文章與其他，並將期刊文獻類型細分後以臨床試驗類型為最多，共計229,940筆書目。文獻資料共計31種語言，其中英語為總文獻的95.5%，為主要的使用語言，其次為中文共計2.17%的文獻，而出版國以美國為最多共計144,953篇為總文獻的45.8%，其次為英國90,735篇為總文獻的28.7%。所有文獻中研究主題以膳食補充劑為最多。針對313,594篇期刊文獻進行布萊德福定律分析，將隨機對照試驗醫學文獻進行分區，研究結果可將文獻分為四區，其中前三區與布萊德福定律相符，而第一區的核心期刊共計83種，整體文獻與布萊德福—齊夫定律相符。在作者生產力部分，本研究僅針對第一作者進行分析，合著者最高可達518位，並以3到7人為最常見，在第一作者中以Giuseppe Derosa為發表最多文獻之第一作者共計102篇。以洛卡定律最小平方法計算可得n值-3.2412，c值為86.179%，並利用K-S檢定法進行檢驗，證明本研究不適用且不符合洛卡定律，第一作者生產力亦不符合普萊斯平方根定律及80/20法則。
本研究針對研究結果進行以下建議：在文獻資料部分，資料庫應針對文獻之完整性進行維護，並完整刊登作者姓名與聯絡地址，以確實反映作者之生產力。在圖書資訊服務部分，提供各大圖書資訊單位，利用布萊德福定律分區所界定之核心期刊建立館藏發展與採購清單。在臨床人員與未來研究部分，若未來欲進行此領域之相關研究，應提升自身之外語能力，並針對核心期刊進行研讀。
This study used the bibliometrics to characterize the medical literature of randomized controlled trials. Analyze the medical literature of randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE database. In order to continue Yen-Hsu Yang’s research from 1965to 2001and understand the growth model of literature, this study collected 316,432 RCT’s bibliographies from 2001 to 2017 for analysis and analysis of data types, languages, publishing countries and research subjects. The study uses Bradford’s Law and Bradford-Zif’s Law to examine the productivity of journal, and uses Loka’s Law, 80/20 Rule and Price’s Law for the correlation analysis of the first author’s productivity.
The results of this study are as follows: The literature of the medical literature of randomized controlled trial has gradually grown from 2001 to 2017, and the cumulative growth distribution curve is linear growth. There are 99% of the literature types belong to the journal literature. The rest of the literature types are letters, editorial, report articles, news, conference articles and others. Subdivided the journal types into 7 types, most of the journal types literature are clinical trial, with a total of 229,940 data. The literature consists of 31 languages, most of literature is written by English (95.5%), which is the main language, Chinese is the second most widely used. The United States is the country which published maximum literature of 144,953 as 45.8% of the total literature, United Kingdom ranked number two (28.7%). The most research subject is dietary supplement. Analysis 313,594 journal articles with Bradford’s law, the medical literature of randomized controlled trial was inapplicable. According to the Bradford’s law the literature could be divided into four regions. There are 83 core journals, and the overall literature is consistent with Bradford-Zif’s law. In the author productivity section, this study only analyzes the first author, the most co-authors up to 518, and 3 to 7 people are the most common co-authors. Giuseppe Derosa is the most published first author, which published 102 Article. Loka’s law is found to be inapplicable to the distribution of first author productivity (n=-3.2412, c=86.179%). K-S test proves that this study is inapplicable to Loka’s law. The productivity of the first author is also inconsistent with Price’s law and the 80/20 rule.
This study makes the following recommendations for the results of the study: In the literature section, the database should be maintained for the integrity of the literature, the author’s name and contact address should be fully published to reflect the author’s productivity. In the book information service section, provide the major book information units, use the core journals defined by the Bradford’s Law to establish a collection development and procurement list. In the clinical staff and future research sections, if you want to conduct related research in this field in the future, should improve your language skills and conduct research on core journals. |
| Reference: | 一、 中文
尤慧敏（2002）。台灣地區生命科學生產力之國際指標研究。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系，新北。
方瑀紳（2016）。1955~2013年科技教育研究文獻：回顧與前瞻[Technology Education Literature Analysis in 1955~2013: Review and Prospect]。科技博物，20（1），頁5-31。
方鶯珍、璩大成（2004）。實證醫學簡介。北市醫學雜誌，1（2），113-117。
朱姮音、吳啟瑞（民98）。實證醫學入門。繼續教育，25（2），頁120-124。
何光國（1994）。文獻計量學導論。臺北：三民書局。
吳志隆、趙佩君、林隆堯、余祐慈、林珊如（2014）。實證醫學教育之文獻搜尋焦慮：中部某醫學大學醫學研究所學生之實證研究。教育資料與圖書館學，51（2），225-266。
周復之（2015）。中國大陸危機管理學術研究現狀與發展趨勢-2006~2015。國防大學政治作戰學院政治學系博士論文，台北。
林白芬（2015）。無線射頻辨識文獻之書目計量分析。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士論文，新北
林怡甄（2008）。「輸送現象」之文獻特性分析。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所，台北。
林玟娟、黃志富、盧相如、張家禎（2012）。基層醫師對實證醫學的態度與應用之初探分析。醫療品質雜誌， 6（5），59-65。doi: 10.30160/jhq.201209.0012
邱信一（2011）。臺灣公共衛生系所文獻作者生產力與影響力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士論文，台北。
邵婉卿（2013）。洛特卡定律及其應用。國家教育研究院電子報，39。取自http://fm.naer.edu.tw/index.php?edm_no=39&content_no=1063
洪世芳（2003）。OPAC文獻之書目計量學研究。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士論文，新北。
洪銘禪（2010）。Wiki網站作者生產力與其引用關係之研究：以台灣棒球維基館為例。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士論文，新北。
張永賢、余建宏、陳瑞明（2012）。日本345個漢方治療之隨機對照臨床試驗（RCT）的實證醫學（EBM）報告。北市中醫會刊，18（2），36-39。
莊筱婷（無年代）。臨床試驗。取自http://ntcrc.ntu.edu.tw/files/literature/Chapter_2_Clinical_Trials.pdf
郭斐然、梁繼權（2006）。實證醫學簡介及臨床應用。臺灣家庭醫學研究，4（2），91-103。doi: 10.29475/tfmr.200604.0005
陳杰峰、王慈蜂（譯）（2014）。實證醫學—臨床實務與教學指引，第四版。台北市：台灣愛思唯爾。(Straus, Glasziou, Richardson, Haynes., 2012)
陳杰峰、蔡宛真、邱文達（2004）。實證醫學於健康照護之應用[The Application of Evidence Base Medicine on Health Care]。台灣醫學，8（2），235-240。doi: 10.6320/fjm.2004.8(2).12
陳銀鈴（2010）。大陸地區網路犯罪文獻之資訊計量研究。華梵大學資訊管理學系碩士論文，新北。
陳寶華（2010）。燃料電池文獻與專利之科學計量研究。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士論文，新北。
游忠諺、謝建成（2017）。電子資源資料之書目計量研究—以癌症研究為例。技術學刊，32（1），61-89。
楊彥緒（2003）。隨機對照試驗醫學文獻之書目計量學研究。淡江大學資訊與圖書館學系碩士班碩士論文。
董蕙茹（2008）。臺灣地區的世界文學翻譯作品：書目計量分析。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學碩士論文，台北。
實證醫學中心（無年代）。實證醫學中心科室簡介—定義。取自http://www2.kmuh.org.tw/web/kmuhdept/7180/DeptIntro/%E5%AE%9A%E7%BE%A9.aspx
蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北：華泰總經銷。
蔡明月、古育詩（2005）。光觸媒文獻之書目計量學研究。教育資料與圖書館學，43（2），153-172。
蔡明月、劉瓊芳（2007）。1992-2005資訊計量學研究及其發展演變[A Study of Informetric Research and Its Development, 1992-2005]。圖書與資訊學刊，（61），42-56。Doi：10.6575/JoLIS.2007.61.04
蔡明月、鄭琚媛（2005）。台灣地區生命科學國際會議文獻生產力研究[A Productivity Study of International Conference Literature on Life Science in Taiwan]。圖書與資訊學刊（53），1-17。doi: 10.6575/JoLIS.2005.53.01
蔡明月、賴芊卉（2007）。資訊科學引用與被引用文獻分散現象與主題變化研究：1985-2005。圖書資訊學研究，1（2），1-31。
蔡緒浩（2013）。從SSCI資料庫探討全球文創產業之研究方向。致理學報，（33），265-292。
謝綺蓉（譯）（2006）。80/20法則。台北市：大塊文化。(Koch, R., 1997)
盧美秀（2001）。實證醫學、實證護理與實證管理[Evidence-Based Medicine, Nursing and Management]。新臺北護理期刊， 3（1）， 1-6。 doi: 10.6540/ntjn.2001.1.001
二、 英文
Alvarado, R. U. (2016). Growth of Literature on Bradford`s Law. Investigación Bibliotecológica: Archivonomía, Bibliotecología e Información, 30(68, Supplement), 51-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibbai.2016.06.003
Baker, J., Robertson-Wilson, J., & Sedgwick, W. (2003). Publishing Productivity in Sport Psychology 1970-2000: An Exploratory Examination of the Lotka-Price Law. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 25, 477-483. 轉引自邱信一（2011）。臺灣公共衛生系所文獻作者生產力與影響力之研究。國立臺灣師範大學圖書資訊學研究所碩士學位論文研究。
Blashfield, Roger K, & Intoccia, Vincent. (2000). Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(3), 472-473.
Brownson, R. C., Gurney, J. G., & Land, G. H. (1999). Evidence-based decision making in public health. Journal Of Public Health Management And Practice: JPHMP, 5(5), 86-97.
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. (2011). OCEBM Levels of Evidence. Retrieved from https://www.cebm.net/2016/05/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/
Çiftçi, Ş. K., Danişman, Ş., Yalçın, M., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Ay, Y., Sölpük, N., & Karadağ, E. (2016). Map of Scientific Publication in the field of Educational Sciences and Teacher Education in Turkey: A Bibliometric Study*. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(4), 1097-1123. doi:10.12738/estp.2016.4.0009
Cochrane Library. About the Cochrane Library. Retrieved from http://www.cochranelibrary.com/about/about-the-cochrane-library.html#Overview
Cochrane. Our name. Retrieved from http://www.cochrane.org/about-us/our-name
Doll, R., Peto, R., & Clarke, M. (1999). First Publication of an Individually Randomized Trial. Controlled Clinical Trials, 20, 367-368.
Efthimiadis, E.N. (1990). The Growth of the OPAC Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(5), 342-347.
Guilera, G., Barrios, M., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2013). Meta-analysis in psychology: a bibliometric study. Scientometrics, 94(3), 943-954. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0761-2
Gupta, B. M., & Karisiddappa, C. R. (1996). Author Productivity Patterns in the Theoretical Population Genetics. Scientometrics, 36(1), 19-41.
Gupta, B. M., Kumar, Suresh., Syed, Shaheen., & Singh, K. V. (1996). Distribution of productivity among authors in potato research 1900-1980. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies, 33(3), 127-134.
Gupta, B. M., Sharma, Lalita., & Kumar, Suresh. (1998). Literature Growth and Author Productivity Patterns in Indian Physics. Information Processing and Management, 34(1), 121-131.
Guyatt, G. H. (1991, March/April). Editorial: Evidence-based medicine. ACP Journal Club, 114, A-16.
Kaska, S. C., & Weinstein, J. N. (1998). Historical perspective. Ernest Amory Codman, 1869-1940. A pioneer of evidence-based medicine: the end result idea. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 23(5), 629-633.
MacRoberts, Michael H. and MacRoberts, Barbara R. (1982). A Re-evalution of Lotka’s Law of Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science, 12(3), 443-450.
Mahapatra, G. (1994). Correlation Between Growth of Publications and Citations: A Study Based on Growth Curves. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, 41(1), 8-12.
Microsoft Corporation (2018). Microsoft Office Excel 2016. Retrieved from http://office.microsoft.com/zh-tw/excel/HA101656321028.aspx
Mongin, P. (2016) Spurious Unanimity and The Pareto Principle. Economics and Philosophy, 32(2016), 511–532.
Newby, G. B., Greenberg, J., & Jones, P. (2003). Open Source Software Development and Lotka`s Law: Bibliometric Patterns in Programming. Journal Of The American Society For Information Science & Technology, 54(2), 169-178.
NLM Customer Support. (n.d.). What is the Cochrane Collaboration? Retrieved from https://support.nlm.nih.gov/ics/support/kbanswer.asp?deptID=28054&task=knowledge&questionID=1731
NTU Library（2011）。MEDLINE與PubMed差異比較。取自http://tul.blog.ntu.edu.tw/archives/2923?cv=1（2018年1月1日）。
Nwagwu, W. (2006). A bibliometric analysis of productivity patterns of biomedical authors of Nigeria during 1967-2002. Scientometrics, 69(2), 259-269. doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0152-7
Pak, C., Yu, G., & Wang, W. (2018). A study on the citation situation within the citing paper: citation distribution of references according to mention frequency. Scientometrics, 114(3), 905-918. doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2627-0
Pratt, G.F. (1992). A Decade of AIDS Literature. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 80, 380-381.
Price DDS. (1963). Big Science, Little Science. New Haven, Conn, Yale University Press.
Price, Derde de Solla. (1976). A general theory of bibliometrics and other cumulative advantage process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27, 292-306.
Price, Derek J. de Solla. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New Yourk: Columbia University Press, 46.
Rajani, S., and Ravi, B. (2016). Applicability of lotka`s law and authorship pattern in the field of mathematical science research: A scientometric study. International Research : Journal of Library and Information Science, 6(3).
Sackett D.L. (2000). Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 3-4.
Stephens, J., Hubbard, D. E., Pickett, C., & Kimball, R. (2013). Citation Behavior of Aerospace Engineering Faculty. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(6), 451-457. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.09.007
Sutter, M., & Kochner, M. G. (2001). Power laws of research output. Evidence for journals of economics. Scientometrics, 51(2), 405-414. doi:10.1023/a:1012757802706
Trueswell, R. L. (1969). Some behavorial patterns of library users: the 80/20 rule. Wilson Library Bulletin, 43(5), 459-461.
Tsay, M. Y. (1989). A bibliometric Study of Indexing and Abstracting, 1876-1976. The Index, 16(4), 234-238.
Tsay, M. Y., & Yang, Y. H. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of the literature of randomized controlled trials. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 93(4), 450–458.
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2017). MEDLINE, PubMed, and PMC (PubMed Central): How are they different? Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/dif_med_pub.html
U.S. National Library of Medicine. (2018). MEDLINE®. Retrieved from https://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/factsheets/medline.html
Ya-Ting Yang, Usman Iqbal, Jack Horn-Yu Ching, Jonathan Bee-Shen Ting, Hsien-Tsai Chiu, Hiko Tamashiro, Yi-Hsin Elsa Hsu. (2015). Trends in the growth of literature of telemedicine: A bibliometric analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 122(3), 471-479. |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
105155017 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105155017 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU201900794 |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 501701.pdf | 3036Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 605 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
