政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125598
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50803053      Online Users : 759
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125598


    Title: 從規約與意圖談言語行為理論
    On the theory of Speech Acts from Intention and Convention
    Authors: 余思潔
    Yu, Si-Jie
    Contributors: 鄭光明
    Zheng, Guang-Ming
    余思潔
    Yu, Si-Jie
    Keywords: 施行話語
    話語施事行為
    規約
    說話者意圖
    聽者理解
    Date: 2019
    Issue Date: 2019-09-05 15:59:10 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一般意義上,說話這一行為是人類在日常生活中的主要溝通方式。奧斯汀打破語言學界及哲學界對說話行為的傳統認知,對言語和行為之間的關係展開探討,在『說話即做事』的理論基礎上提出言語行為理論,即一個言語行為總是有三個層次,即話語行為、話語施事行為及話語施效行為。奧斯汀著重於對話語施事行為的討論,將之視為言語和行為的關係的直接體現,認為話語施事行為應是一種受制於規約的行為。對於奧斯汀的觀點,斯特勞森有著不同的看法,其指出話語施事行為能否被展現在更多時候應是受到說話者意圖地影響,而非規約。本文就兩人的觀點分歧出發展開對言語行為與規約及說話者意圖之間關係地探討,提出筆者對之見解,指出斯特勞森與奧斯汀產生分歧的主要原因在於其對奧斯汀的觀點的理解存在偏差,而出現理解偏差的問題很大程度上是因為奧斯汀未給規約一個明確的定義。在此種意義下,筆者對規約中約定俗成的定義進行了延展,試圖通過對約定俗成定義地延展完成對規約定義之明確性地加強,以此回應斯特勞森對奧斯汀觀點的質疑,並在一定程度上對於規約及說話者意圖與話語施事行為之關係的問題給出了一個回答。
    Reference: ⚫ 奧斯汀,2016。《如何以言行事》。楊玉成、趙京超,趙京超譯,商務印書館。
    ⚫ Austin, J. L., 1962. How To Do Things With Words , 2nd Edition, ed. J.O. Urmson and M. Sbisá. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    ⚫ Grice, H. Paul, 1969. Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions. The Philosophical Review , 78 (2):147-177
    ⚫ Searle, J., 1989. How Performatives Work. Linguistics and Philosophy , 12: 535–558.
    ⚫ Strawson, P., 1964. Intention and Convention in Speech Acts. The Philosophical Review , 73: 439–60.
    ⚫ Warnock, G. J. 1973. Some Types of Performative Utterance. In Essays on J. L. Austin, G. J. Warnock, ed. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 69-89
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    哲學系
    106154017
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106154017
    Data Type: thesis
    DOI: 10.6814/NCCU201900734
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Philosophy] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    401701.pdf1252KbAdobe PDF2356View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback