政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125494

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/125494

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文筆數/總筆數 : 113325/144300 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51160300 線上人數 : 931

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜尋範圍

查詢小技巧：

您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果

若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料

進階搜尋

主頁 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上傳 ‧ 說明 ‧ 關於政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手機版

政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播學院碩士在職專班 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/125494

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125494

題名:	電視新聞自律研究－以中天新聞為例 A Study on the Self-regulation of Television News Media - The Case of CTI TV News
作者:	謝建文 Hsieh, Chien-Wen
貢獻者:	關尚仁黃新生謝建文 Hsieh, Chien-Wen
關鍵詞:	電視新聞問責自律編審公評人新聞室 TV News Accountable Self-regulation News auditor News ombudsman Newsroom
日期:	2019
上傳時間:	2019-09-05 15:38:05 (UTC+8)
摘要:	為改善國內電視新聞品質，電視事業主管機關《中華民國國家通訊傳播委員會》(NCC)近年來以「審照」與「評鑑」等行政監管機制，要求電視新聞媒體增設「新聞編審」、「獨立審查人」、「公評人」等專屬職務，作為新聞室內部品質管控作業流程的守門人角色，來落實新聞「自律」(self-regulation)機制，降低因外界他律問責可能損及新聞自由的疑慮，試圖改善國內新聞媒體因高度競爭而逐漸劣化的媒介生態環境。制度實施以來確有國內業者創下評鑑期間連續三年無裁罰違規優良紀錄。本研究檢視NCC近年要求衛星電視新聞台增設「編審」職務執行自律工作，發現編審制度強化新聞室內部守門控管機制，的確有其成效。但是，編審制度不代表新聞室自律被完全實踐。研究發現，傳播學者Shoemaker所提「層級理論」中的新聞室高層級(總監)決策影響，仍然扮演了關鍵角色。然而階層較低的編審人員，仍可善用一些溝通技巧和方法，來形塑場域內有利執行守門業務的環境，在新聞室內部自律執行上，順利落實新聞守門人的工作。另外，研究也發現，隱藏於場域內的新聞專業意理，是真正落實新聞自律的成功基因。因此，在新聞場域內從下到上，自第一線工作人員，到新聞室最高主管都能具備新聞倫理相關訓練與素養，建立起共同專業意理價值，發揮人人都是守門人的角色，更有助於新聞自律的實踐。建議未來在建置編審自律機制的規範上，應該以更全面思維，建構具備新聞專業倫理的新聞工作場域來做考量規畫，並在保障新聞自由與自主的基準原則上，來有效落實新聞自律與問責機制。 For enhancing the so-called television news quality in Taiwan, National Communications Commission (NCC), the authority of telecommunications and broadcasting services, in recent years through its administrative supervision mechanism such as license-reviewing as well as appraisal and evaluation, has mandated TV news channels to further implement certain functions, including but not limited to those roles as “news auditor”, “independent reviewer” and “news ombudsman”. Those characters are positioned as gatekeepers for better the internal quality control and the operating procedures within the newsroom. NCC has anticipated that the news outlets “self-regulation ” mechanism can be therefore carrying out; the misgivings on the freedom of the press possibly damaged by the external questioning on news credibility and accountability can be thus reducing; and, the highly competitive and gradually degenerative domestic news media environment can be thence improving. And indeed, ever since the implementation of the system, there is a TV news outlet has set a record of penalty-free for 3 years in a row during the evaluation periods of time. This study takes a close look into the newly added position as the “news auditor” at those cable TV news channels for delivering those self-regulated works, which required by NCC in recent years. And, the research finds that the “news audit system” does strengthen the newsroom internal gatekeeping and controlling mechanism; yet, the findings also reflect that the effectiveness of the “news audit system” can neither represent nor guarantee the journalistic self-discipline is thoroughly fulfilled. The findings also indicate that on one hand the senior decision-maker, such as news department director, as the key player within the “Hierarchy of Influences” – theory introduced by Pamela J. Shoemaker, still plays a vital role. On the other hand, the lower-level editing reviewer can still shape up a favorable working environment for gatekeeping by leveraging the different communications skills and modus; so that he/ she can thus smoothly practice the duty as a gatekeeper with self-regulation and within the newsroom. In addition, this study finds that what truly leads to the implementation of journalistic self-discipline is the professional ideology ‘hidden’ within the newsroom. In the news territory, no matter it’s top-down or it’s bottom-up, from the frontline reporters to the top executives, that everyone equipped with journalistic ethics, attained with professional competencies, and cultivated with righteousness and values, can therefore be endued and demonstrate the role & responsibility as a gatekeeper that will ensure and contribute to the realization of journalistic self-regulation. In conclusion, for implementing the regulations related to the editing reviewing & self-disciplined mechanism in the future, more comprehensive perspectives should be taken into consideration in order to construct the workplace with professional journalistic ethics, to safeguard the freedom of the press as well as to ensure the independence of the news media. With these fundamental principles, the television news outlets’ self-regulation and the media accountability can be continuously executive and thereafter effectively fulfilled.
參考文獻:	一. 中文文獻王心武 (2010)。《媒介生態視域下的新聞公評人制度探析》。王亞維、陳百齡 (2011)。《電視媒體製播新聞問責機制研究》。王亞維 (2012)。《電視媒體問責起源與發展—論國內外制度理論與實踐》。王洪鈞 (1967)。〈發展中的中國新聞自律〉，《新聞學研究》第一期，頁150-156。王建雄 (2008)。《新聞自律機制－台灣電視媒體建立公評人制度之可行性分析》。王偊菁 (2016)。《網路即時新聞對電視新聞工作者之影響》。王泰俐、周慧儀、羅文輝 (2010)。〈台灣國際電視新聞的小報化〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，（總）第13期，頁75–108。石麗東 (1991)。《當代新聞報導》。台北:正中書局。朱晶晶 (2007)。《加拿大媒介自律研究》。李月華 (1984)。〈加拿大的廣播電視〉，《新聞學研究》第三十三期，頁417-436。李彬 (2009)。《全球新聞傳播史-公元1500-2000年》，北京: 清華大學出版社李瞻 (1983)。《世界新聞史》，台北:三民書局。何吉森 (2013)。《參考各國機制實踐三律共管之「民主參與式」共同管制政策的落實》。谷玲玲、林維國 (2017)。《電視使用行為及滿意度調查報告》。林庭瑤 (2007年09月12日)。〈媒體訂自主公約設公評人〉，《中國時報》，第A5版。林照真 (2011)。《收視率的宰制：台灣媒體代理商與電視頻道業者權力競逐之研究》。林照真 (2007)。《收視率新聞學：台灣電視新聞商品化》。林維國、鄭宗記、吳永乾 (2014)。《電視使用行為及滿意度調查報告》。洪貞玲 (2006)。〈廣電管制與言論自由─從衛星電視換照爭議談起〉，《廣播電視》，第26期，頁51-75。胡元輝 (2013)。〈追求真實與公眾信賴─新傳播科技所沒有改變的命題〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，3卷1期：頁1-12 。胡元輝 (2008.12.12)。《創設公評人　誰願跑第一？》，上網日期：2018年6月25日，取自:https://www.feja.org.tw/40386 胡元輝 (2008.12.12)。《新聞公評人不死，只是凋零？》，上網日期：2018年6月25日，取自:https://www.feja.org.tw/40387 胡元輝 (2013)。〈追求真實與公眾信賴--新傳播科技所沒有改變的命題〉。《傳播研究與實踐》，頁1-12。上網日期：2018年5月08日，取自:http://www.mediawatch.org.tw/sites/default/files/Pursuing%20Truth%20and%20Public%20Trust.pdf 胡文棟 (2017.03)。《立法院法制局議題研究》，上網日期：2018年8月05日，取自: https://goo.gl/v3zzyF_ 徐志明 (2004)。《我國新聞自律制度之研究》。涂智翔 (2010)。《公民參與傳播負面內容監理機制之研究》。唐士哲 (2005)。《在速度的廢墟中挺進：電子媒介新聞的唯物批判觀點》。張可婷譯 (2010)。《質性研究的設計》，台北 : 韋柏文化。(原書: Uwe Flick [2007]. Deisining Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, California:SAGE)。張詠華譯 (2009)。《大眾傳播通論》，上海:復旦大學。( 原書: Jay Black ;Jennings Bryant ; Susan Thompson [1998]. Introduction to Media Communication. New York , NY : McGraw-Hill ) 張錦華等人 (2009)。《電視新聞收視質指標建構及量測計畫》。張耀仁 (2009)。《新聞自律，抑或落井下石：從TVBS「黑道嗆聲光碟事件」析論媒體批評在台灣》。許文宜 (2008)。《從新聞產製「階層模式」再探自律困境與機會》。許倩 (2004.10)。〈美國新聞公評人制度的歷史和現狀〉，《新聞記者》，上網日期：2018年1月17日，取自:http://xwjz.eastday.com/eastday/xwjz/node33668/node33670/userobject1ai547793.html 翁秀琪 (2008)。《公共媒體如何問責：以台灣的公廣集團為例》。袁衷 (2004)。〈新聞公評人的譯法〉，《新聞記者》2004年第12期，頁 45 陳依玫 (2009.06.26)《媒體享新聞自由　需負自律責任》，上網日期：2017年12月25日，取自:https://www.feja.org.tw/36489 陳炳宏 (2005.09.03)。〈不要再訂自律公約吧〉，上網日期：2019年1月28日，取自:https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20050903/2023673/ 黃能揚 (2009年7月)。〈人人都該是公評人，正如人人都該是記者... 〉，《公共電視策發部研究》。馮建三等譯 (1998)。《傳播政治經濟學－再思考與再更新》，台北 : 五南(原書: Vincent Mosco [1996]. The Political Economy of Communication. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE ) 。彭武順 (1984)。〈日本的廣播電視〉，《新聞學研究》第三十三期，頁437-460。蔡文書 (2006.06.20)。〈日本政府不同時期新聞政策的分析〉，上網日期：2018年2月02日，取自:http://media.people.com.cn/BIG5/22114/52789/66887/4509993.html 賴子歆 (2015)。〈簡析《衛報》信託所有權之治理模式〉，《傳播文化與政治》第一期，2015年6月，頁 143-166 。賴祥蔚 (2006)。〈新聞自由的臨摹與反思〉，《新聞學研究》第八十七期，頁97-129。劉昌德 (2007)。《民主參與式的共管自律─新聞自律機制之回顧與再思考》。劉旭峰 (2006)。《收視率萬歲─誰在看電視？》。台北：印刻出版社。劉幼琍 (2012)。《自律、共管與公評人：媒體問責制度的建構與實踐》。簡旭徵 (2010)。《公民社會夥伴關係運用─NCC傳播內容監理策略個案研究》。羅世宏、管中祥、洪貞玲、鄭國威 (2006)。〈監督傳播管制機關 NCC：傳播政策公民監督與審議機制的能與不能〉，《中華傳播學刊》。第十期，頁55-85。蘇蘅 (2015)。《台灣新聞媒體公信力研究》。蘇衡 (2018)。〈新聞專業的新視野：媒體實踐與台灣的問題〉，《Journal of Communication & Culture》 No.17，頁16-51。萬文隆 (2004)。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉，《生活教育月刊》，2004年05月，三十七卷第四期，頁17-23。臧國仁 (1998)。《新聞報導與真實建構:新聞框架理論的觀點》。羅苑韶 (2016.11.16)。〈後真相概念〉，《中央社》，上網日期：2017年11月17日，取自:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/ahel/201611160411.aspx 二、外文文獻 Alison Flood (2016.Nov 15). Post-truth` named word of the year by Oxford Dictionaries Post-Truth, The Guardian, Retrieved from https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/post-truth Bill Orme (2015).〈United States: Media self-regulation: A questionable case of American exceptionalism?〉,Ethical Journalism Network , Retrieved from https://ethicaljournalismnetwork.org/resources/publications/trust-factor/united-states Claude-Jean Bertrand (2000). MAS Media accountability systems. David Shedden (2015, MAR. 27). Today in media history: in 1947, the press reported on the Hutchins Commission report. Retrieved from https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2015/today-in-media-history-in-1947-the-press-reported-on-the-hutchins-commission-report/ Denis McQuail (1997). Accountability of media to society-principles and means. Denis McQuail (2005). Publication in a free society: the problem of accountability. Comunicação e Sociedade, vol. 7, pp. 235-255. Dentsu Inc. (2019.Feb.28).〈Advertising Expenditures in Japan Totaled 6,530.0 Billion Yen in 2018,Up 2.2% Compared with 2017〉Retrieved From:http://www.dentsu.com/news/release/pdf-cms/2019023- 0228en.pdf Denis McQuail (2010) . McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory (6th edition) Donald T. Mogavero (1982).The American Press Ombudsman. Journalism Quarterly, v59 n4 p548-53,580 Win 1982 Evan Ruth (2000) , Media regulation in the United Kingdom, Retrieved From https://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/uk-media-regulation.pdf Hilligoss, Wade B. (2014). The Diminishing Role of the Ombudsman in American Journalism." Huub Evers (2012). The news ombudsman: Lightning rod or watchdog? Jeffrey A. Dvorkin (2004.December 07). Is the Ombudsman going soft on NPR? , Retrieved form https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2004/12/07/4207221/is-the-ombudsman-going-soft-on-npr JEFFREY A. DVORKIN (2006.January 31). Does-an-ombudsman-do-any-good? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2006/01/31/5180984/does-an-ombudsman-do-any-good Jonh H. McManus (1994). Market-Driven journalism：let the citizen beware?. California, Thousand Oaks:Sage.86，79，P.108. Jonh H. McManus (1992). Serving the Public and Serving the Market: A Conflict of Interest? December 1992,Journa accountability John W. Dimmick (1978). Levels of Analysis in Mass Media Decision Making: A Taxonomy, Research Strategy, and Illustrative Data Analysis. Karine Barzilai-Nahon (2008). Gatekeeping: A critical review Kimiko Akita, Rick Kenney ( 2016 ). “What`s a newspaper ombudsman? Notes on a cross-cultural debate” Leveson Inquiry Team (2012.03.27). ”The Case for a Media Ombudsman “ Margaret Sullivan (2018.11.29). When Fox News staffers break ethics rules, discipline follows — or does it?), Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/when-fox-news-staffers-break-ethics-rules-discipline-follows--or-does-it/2018/11/28/02a11b98-f32a-11e8-80d0-f7e1948d55f4_story.html?utm_term=.c7ec85727011N Masami Ito (2011). Broadcasting in Japan: Case-studies on Broadcasting Systems Mike Feintuck & Mike Varney (2006). Media Regulation, Public Interest and the Law MURAKAMI Seiichi (2009). NHK Broadcasting Studies-Stipulations on Programming In The Broadcast Law:The Intersection of Japanese and GHQ Agendas Neil Nemeth (2003). News Ombudsmen in North America: Assessing an Experiment in Social Responsibility Nicholas Russell (2006). Morals and the Media, 2nd edition: Ethics in Canadian Journalism, p.231 Pamela J. Shoemaker, Martin Eichholz, Eunyi Kim, and Brenda Wrigley (2001).Indiviual And Routine Forces In Gatekeepng, AEJMC Quarterly, VoI.78,No.2 VoI. 78,No.2 Patrick Ferrucci & Chad Painter (2016). Market Matters: How Market-Driven is `The newsroom`? PBS Ombudsman (March 27, 2017).The Mailbag: When Interview Subjects Can Be Seen as Stereotypes Michael Getler) ,Retrieved from:http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/home/ Ralph S. Brown Jr. (1948). Book Review: The Commission on Freedom of the Press, Yale Law School，Abstract retrieved from :https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3748&context= fss_papers Ralph Negrine (2013). Cable Television and the Future of Broadcasting Robert M. Hutchins (1947). A Free and Responsible Press Shoemaker & Reese (1996). Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content Siobhain Butterworth (2008.Mar 31). The readers` editor on ... self-regulation and reputation management, The Guardian, Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/mar/31/pressandpublishingSiobhain Butterworth ( 2009. July 27) .Beyond right to reply: how we set the record straight, The Guardian, Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainability/readers-editor-reply Takeshi Maezawa (2000). The Controversy Over The Origins And Functions Of Ombudsmanship "Communication Science" No. 11, Vol. 5, Jan. 2000 Wade B. Hilligoss (2014). The Diminishing Role of the Ombudsman in American Journalism. Warren Breed (1955) . Social Control in the Newsroom: A Functional Analysis, Social Forces, Vol. 33, No. 4 (May, 1955), pp. 326-335 William Babcock (2012). Media Accountability: Who Will Watch the Watchdog in the Twitter Age 三、線上資料: 新聞公評人(ONO)組織（Organization of News Ombudsmen）,上網日期：2018年2月11日，取自:www.newsombudsmen.org/ 國家通訊傳播委員會(2019)。《NCC傳播內容申訴分析報告》，NCC，上網日期：2018年9月20日，取自:https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news.aspx?site_content_sn=2606&is_history=0 房業涵 (2018.05.06)，臉書，上網日期：2019年1月03日，取自: https://www.facebook.com/menafangofficial/?ref=br_rs 讀賣新聞官網，上網日期：2018年10月09日，取自: https://info.yomiuri.co.jp/group NBC and CBS Reduce Role of Self-Censors (1988.AUG 20). Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/1988/08/20/business/nbc-and-cbs- reduce-role-of-self-censors.html PBS Ombudsman ,History of the role at PBS, PBS Org. ,Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/mission.html The Scott Trust: values and history ( 2015.JUL 26). The Scott Trust \| The Guardian, Retrieved from https://www.thegu ardian.com/the-scott- trust/2015/jul/26/the-scott-trust
描述:	碩士國立政治大學傳播學院碩士在職專班 105941002
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105941002
資料類型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900773
顯示於類別:	[傳播學院碩士在職專班] 學位論文

文件中的檔案:

檔案	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
100201.pdf	2399Kb	Adobe PDF2	0	檢視/開啟

在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回饋