Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/125051
|
Title: | 淨灘活動之社會投資報酬—以龍門海灘淨灘活動為例 Social Return on Investment for beach cleanup activities : Take the beach cleanup event at Longmen Beach as an example |
Authors: | 高于翔 Kao, Yu-Hsiang |
Contributors: | 別蓮蒂 Bei, Lien-Ti 高于翔 Kao, Yu-Hsiang |
Keywords: | 社會投資報酬 公益活動 社會影響力評估 淨灘 海灘垃圾 Social Return on Investment (SROI) Public welfare activities Social impact assessment Beach cleanup Marine debris |
Date: | 2019 |
Issue Date: | 2019-08-07 17:10:29 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 企業社會責任是現今企業經營中備受矚目的一環,企業不再僅是成立基金會做慈善捐款就能完成其企業社會責任,而是需要將其融入營運模式之中,打造成可以永續發展的商業模式。而為了要更好的將企業社會責任融入企業營運之中,社會及環境影響力的評估便相當重要,社會投資報酬 (Social Return on Investment, SROI) 即是當今主流的社會影響力評估方法。 本次淨灘活動的SROI為2.56元,代表在此次的淨灘活動中每投入1元的成本可為社會帶來2.56元的效益。本研究為國內少數針對公益活動採用SROI計算的研究,而本次研究的活動─淨灘,也是目前國內從政府、企業到各種團體組織皆相當熱衷從事之公益活動,也因此未來欲舉辦淨灘活動之相關團體則能夠以本研究為借鏡,掌握淨灘活動中關鍵的影響與價值產生處。 而本研究分析上百位的淨灘利害關係人,透過本研究能夠瞭解到淨灘活動所涵蓋的重要利害關係人種類,同時也能知道他們的改變發生路徑以及最終所獲得的價值,也包含過往在討論公益專案效益時容易被忽略的志工效益。 Corporate social responsibility is a very important part of today`s business operations. Enterprises are no longer just setting up foundations to do their charitable donations to complete their corporate social responsibility. Instead, they need to integrate them into the business model and make them sustainable. In order to better integrate corporate social responsibility into corporate operations, social and environmental impact assessment is very important and Social Return on Investment (SROI) is the current mainstream social impact assessment method. This beach cleanup SROI is 2.56 NTD, which means that investing 1 NTD in this beach cleanup activity can generate 2.56 NTD benefits for the society. This study is a rare study of SROI calculations for public welfare activities in Taiwan. The research object-beach cleanup activity is also a charity activity that Taiwan`s government, enterprises and organizations are very keen on.As a result, groups that want to host a beach cleanup activity in the future can use this research as a reference to understand the key impact and value generation in beach cleanup activity. This study analyzes hundreds of beach cleanup activity`s stakeholders. Through this study, we can understand the types of important stakeholders covered by the beach cleanup activity, as well as the path of their changes and the value they ultimately get. It also includes the benefits of volunteers that were easily overlooked in the past when discussing the benefits of public interest projects. |
Reference: | 台北市政府體育局 (2018) 。2018台北馬拉松賽事資訊-競賽規程。 http://www.taipeicitymarathon.com/rules.php,擷取日期:2019年5月9日。 李明機 (2009)。簡析企業社會責任 (CSR) 之發展趨勢。證券櫃檯,頁14-21。 李宜樺、吳佳餘、朱恩言 (2017)。公共服務影響評估工具─「社會投資報酬率 (SROI) 」介紹。國土及公共治理專刊,頁30-41。 李美珍 (2017)。全國志願服務推動成效與展望。 https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/448DE008087A1971/e9283886-af1d-4256-96f0- 6a49b998cf9d,擷取日期:2019年5月16日。 林育朱 (2013)。臺灣海岸調查藍皮書。 http://163.20.87.3/ocean/html/oceanweb/resource/blue.pdf,擷取日期:2019 年5月25日。 徐鈞庭 (2015)。社會效益如何存在?弱勢婦女創業之投資社會效益 (SROI) 個案研究。天主教輔仁大學非營利組織管理碩士學位學程未出版碩士論文。 荒野保護協會 (2018)。【新聞稿】2018荒野保護協會淨灘數據發表記者 會。 https://www.sow.org.tw/info/news/20181219/6432,擷取日期:2019年4月20日。 張舒凡 (2013)。如何評估社會企業的績效?社會創新方案的SROI評估。天主教輔仁大學社會學系碩士班未出版碩士論文。 黃映慈 (2010)。海灘劣化之評估研究—以宜蘭蘇澳頂寮里海灘為例。國立台灣師範大學地理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 黃天如 (2017)。臺灣志工才不只105萬人呢!為什麼志工參與率比起美日卻差了一大截。 https://www.storm.mg/article/363921?srcid=7777772e73746f726d2e6d675f6630 6565613034383563663137623038_1558612660,擷取日期:2019年6月9日。 楊雅智 (2015)。淺談企業社會責任之國際發展趨勢與國內推動現況。證券暨期貨月刊,第三十三卷,第一期,頁5-15。 楊宗諭 (2009)。基隆市長灘里海灘垃圾豐度、組成與來源之研究。國立臺灣海洋大學環境生物與漁業科學研究所未出版碩士論文。 劉彥杰 (2012)。企業社會責任之績效分析:以富邦臺灣企業社會責任基金為研究對象。國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。 蘭方璟 (2011)。員工參與企業志工後職能轉變的歷程。天主教輔仁大學心理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 Islam, Md. Shahidul and Masaru Tanaka (2004). Impacts of pollution on coastal and marine ecosystems including coastal and marine fisheries and approach for management: a review and synthesis Marine Pollution Bulletin, 48, 624-649. Kuo, Fan-Jun and Hsiang-Wen Huang (2014). Strategy for mitigation of marine debris: Analysis of sources and composition of marine debris in northern Taiwan. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 83, 70-80. Leggett, Christopher G., Nora Scherer, Timothy C. Haab, Ryan Bailey, Jason P. Landrum, and Adam Domanski (2018). Assessing the economic benefits of reductions in marine debris at southern California beaches: A random utility travel cost model. Marine Resource Economics, volume 33, number 2, 133-153. Mcilgorm, Alistair and Michael J Rule, (2009). Understanding the economic benefits and costs of controlling marine debris in the APEC region. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264159354_Understanding_the_economic_benefits_and_costs_of_controlling_marine_debris_in_the_APEC_region_MRC_022007 on April 18, 2019 Nicholls, Jeremy, Eilis Lawlor, Eva Neitzert, and Tim Goodspeed (2009). A guide to Social on Investment. Retrieved from: http://www.socialvalueuk.org/app/uploads/2016/03/The%20Guide%20to%20Social%20Return%20on%20Investment%202015.pdf on May 5, 2019 Tuan, Melinda T. (2008). Measuring and/or Estimating Social Value Creation: Insights into Eight Integrated Cost Approaches. Retrieved from: https://docs.gatesfoundation.org/documents/wwl-report-measuring-estimating-social-value-creation.pdf on May 26, 2019 Walther, Bruno A., Alexander Kunz, and Chieh-Shen Hu (2018). Type and quantity of coastal debris pollution in Taiwan: A 12-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 135, 862-872. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程) 106363002 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106363002 |
Data Type: | thesis |
DOI: | 10.6814/NCCU201900203 |
Appears in Collections: | [企業管理研究所(MBA學位學程)] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
300201.pdf | 8798Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 812 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|