政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124913

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/124913

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51684315 在线人数 : 515

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 社會科學學院 > 公共行政學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/124913

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/124913

题名:	書院教學成果評估研究-以政大書院為例 Liberal arts college teaching outcome evaluation: A case study for Chengchi Liberal Arts College
作者:	熊可揚 Hsiung, Ko-Yang
贡献者:	蕭乃沂熊可揚 Hsiung, Ko-Yang
关键词:	書院學習成效博雅教育成果評估
日期:	2019
上传时间:	2019-08-07 16:43:29 (UTC+8)
摘要:	書院是近年來台灣高等教育的新風潮，但是目前的評估研究對其仍所知有限，因此本文以政大書院為研究個案，結合國際上與書院相似概念之評估研究，測量參與書院是否會影響學生學習社群的接觸以及書院和學習社群對於學習成果之影響，並觀察教育實踐和學習社群指標是否影響學生對於參與書院的學習成果。研究結果發現參與書院的學生確實在學習社群氛圍以及教育實踐兩個變項上比起未參與書院的學生表現較佳，並且會透過此二面向影響到學生最終的博雅核心能力成果。本研究數據顯示，學生參與書院的投入程度越高，感受到教學實踐和學習社群氛圍程度越高、學生感受到的教學實踐和學習社群氛圍越高，博雅學習成果越良好、學習社群和教育實踐本身的高低程度並不影響學生參與投入所產生的學習效果。 Recently, “Liberal Arts College” in the western higher education system has become a buzzword in Taiwan. However, the relevant research remains limited knowledge concerning its evaluation. Therefore, the thesis takes the liberal arts colleges at National Chengchi University as the case and measure whether and how the participating colleges affect students. The empirical data indicate that the students participating in the liberal arts colleges performed better than those who did not. Particularly, their sense of learning community and good educational practice mediate the effects of the student’s engagement on liberal arts core competence acquired, measured by their cognitive growth and learning outcome. The results also shows that higher students engagement lead to higher sense of learning community and good educational practices perceive by students. In addition, the students perform better due to the liberal arts learning outcome.
參考文獻:	參考書目 Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874. JOUR. Cruce, T. M., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A., & Pascarella, E. T. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 47(4), 365–383. JOUR. Fink, J. E., & Inkelas, K. K. (2015). A History of Learning Communities Within American Higher Education. New Directions for Student Services, 2015(149), 5–15. JOUR. Hu, Y.-L., Ching, G. S., & Hung, C.-H. (2015). Comparison of concepts within the residential colleges in Taiwan. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(12), 936–940. JOUR. Inkelas, K. (2008). National study of living-learning programs: 2007 report of findings. JOUR. Inkelas, K. K., Drechsler, M., Szelényi, K., Kim, Y. C., McCarron, G. P., Soldner, M., … Mainieri, T. (2007). National study of living-learning programs. UW-Madison Customized Report. JOUR. Inkelas, K. K., Soldner, M., Longerbeam, S. D., & Leonard, J. B. (2008). Differences in student outcomes by types of living–learning programs: The development of an empirical typology. Research in Higher Education, 49(6), 495–512. JOUR. Inkelas, K. K., Vogt, K. E., Longerbeam, S. D., Owen, J., & Johnson, D. (2006). Measuring outcomes of living-learning programs: Examining college environments and student learning and development. The Journal of General Education, 40–76. JOUR. Inkelas, K. K., & Weisman, J. L. (2003). Different by design: An examination of student outcomes among participants in three types of living-learning programs. Journal of College Student Development, 44(3), 335–368. JOUR. Kuh, G. D. (2008). Excerpt from High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. BOOK, Association of American Colleges and Universities. Kurotsuchi Inkelas, K., Johnson, D., Lee, Z., Daver, Z., Longerbeam, S. D., Vogt, K., & Brown Leonard, J. (2006). The role of living-learning programs in students’ perceptions of intellectual growth at three large universities. NASPA Journal, 43(1), 115–143. JOUR. Laufgraben, J. L., & Shapiro, N. S. (2004). Sustaining and improving learning communities. BOOK, John Wiley & Sons. Lenning, O. T., & Ebbers, L. H. (1999). The Powerful Potential of Learning Communities: Improving Education for the Future. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 26, No. 6. BOOK, ERIC. Pascarella, E. T., Cruce, T. M., Wolniak, G. C., & Blaich, C. F. (2004). Do liberal arts colleges really foster good practices in undergraduate education? Journal of College Student Development, 45(1), 57–74. JOUR. Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T., & Feldman, K. A. (2005). How college affects students (Vol. 2). BOOK, Jossey-Bass San Francisco. Pascarella, E. T., Wang, J.-S., Trolian, T. L., & Blaich, C. (2013). How the instructional and learning environments of liberal arts colleges enhance cognitive development. Higher Education, 66(5), 569–583. JOUR. Pascarella, E. T., Wolniak, G. C., Seifert, T. A. D., Cruce, T. M., & Blaich, C. F. (2005). Liberal Arts Colleges and Liberal Arts Education: New Evidence on Impacts. ASHE Higher Education Report, Volume 31, Number 3. ASHE Higher Education Report, 31(3), 1–148. JOUR. Pike, G., Kuh, G., & McCormick, A. (2008). Learning community participation and educational outcomes: Direct, indirect and contingent relationships. In annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL. CONF. Seifert, T. a., Goodman, K. M., Lindsay, N., Jorgensen, J. D., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., & Blaich, C. (2008). The Effects of Liberal Arts Experiences on Liberal Arts Outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 49(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-007-9070-7 Seifert, T. A., Pascarella, E. T., Goodman, K. M., Salisbury, M. H., & Blaich, C. F. (2010). Liberal arts colleges and good practices in undergraduate education: Additional evidence. Journal of College Student Development, 51(1), 1–22. JOUR. Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. H. (1999). Creating Learning Communities: A Practical Guide to Winning Support, Organizing for Change, and Implementing Programs. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. BOOK, ERIC. Smith, C., & Bath, D. (2006). The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. Higher Education, 51(2), 259–286. JOUR. Tinto, V. (1997). Enhancing Learning Via Community. Thought & Action, 13(1), 53–58. JOUR. Wawrzynski, M. R., & Jessup-Anger, J. E. (2010). From expectations to experiences: Using a structural typology to understand first-year student outcomes in academically based living-learning communities. Journal of College Student Development, 51(2), 201–217. JOUR. 江宜樺（2005）。從博雅到通識：大學教育理念的發展與現況。政治與社會哲學評論（14），頁 37-64。吳明錡（2014a）。大學推動住宿書院的意義與挑戰－以政大經驗為探究焦點。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系，台北市。吳明錡（2014b）。卻顧所來徑，蒼蒼橫翠微－政大書院計畫的實踐經驗及其啟示[Residential College at Chengchi University (2007-2014) and Its Implications]。通識教育學刊（13），頁 27-28。李曼麗、哈佛委員會（2010）。哈佛通識教育紅皮書。：北京大學出版社。沈文欽（2010）。西方博雅教育思想緣起、發展和轉型－概念史的考察[The Origin Development and Transformation of the Idea of Western Liberal Education: An Investigation of Conceptual History]。通識教育學刊（5），頁 75-91。季淳（2010）。美國文理大學的書院教育及其在臺灣發展的可能與限制。通識在線（26期），頁頁29-32。季淳、劉育成、黃信洋、吳明錡（2014）。國際發展書院的理念與實踐。載於劉育成、林淑禎（主編），在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 77-93）。台北市：政大出版社。林從一（2014）。政大書院與台灣高等教育發展。載於在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 197-222）。台北市：政大出版社。政大書院計畫辦公室（2013）。國立政治大學邁向頂尖大學計畫 102 年度計畫期中成果書院教育發展計畫。取自 http://topu.nccu.edu.tw/files/archive/26_bf839afa.pdf 洪玉珊（2013）。我國大學生參與書院教育滿意度研究。國立政治大學教育行政與政策研究所，台北市。許恆嘉（2014）。東海大學博雅書院學生參與博雅學習歷程後的增能結果之探究：觀點轉化學習理論的應用。國立中正大學成人及繼續教育研究所，嘉義縣。許恆嘉、王崇名（2013）。博雅教育與住宿學習：以東海大學的創校傳統為例。載於通識教育最前線：博雅與書院教育人才培育圖像。（頁 249-270）。台北市：政大出版社。陳幼慧、莊祐端（2013）。大學精神與通識教育的辯證發展。載於通識教育最前線：博雅與書院教育人才培育圖像。（頁 3-30）。台北市：政大出版社。陳幼慧、陳玉樺（2014）。書院與博雅教育學生學習成效之探討。載於劉育成、林淑禎（主編），在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 123-150）。國立政治大學：政大出版社。陳彰儀、林月雲、朱美麗、劉育成（2014）。學務系統與書院教育。載於在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 151-164）。台北市：政大出版社。陳柏熹、黃馨瑩、陳郁欣、葉泰廷、蘇少祖（2015）。大學生基本素養測驗的發展及信度效度分析。教育科學研究期刊，60(3)，95-126。doi:10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(3).04 游麗嘉（2014）。延續政大人的風骨與氣節，由共同生活中學習─回顧政治大學近年的教學創新。載於在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 251-264）。台北市：政大出版社。甄曉蘭、吳明錡（2014）。大學發展住宿學院的模式─國際經驗與臺灣現況的比較。載於劉育成、林淑禎（主編），在虛實之間學習：以政大書院為核心的高教實驗。（頁 223-248）。台北市：政大出版社。薛雅慈、張雅雯（2012）。大學書院通識教育中的課程制度: 兩岸四地書院與西方住宿學院的比較研究。簡伯宏（2015）。「充實」的大學生活：博雅書院教育的學生參與及挑戰。東海大學社會學系，台中市。藍美華（2014）。新生書院的理念與實踐。「政大書院教育的回顧與展望」發表之論文，台北市。羅清俊（2010）。社會科學研究方法：打開天窗說量化。：威仕曼文化。
描述:	碩士國立政治大學公共行政學系 102256003
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1022560031
数据类型:	thesis
DOI:	10.6814/NCCU201900657
显示于类别:	[公共行政學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
003101.pdf	1551Kb	Adobe PDF2	131	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈